
Black and white thinking takes us closer to fascism
We do not, for example, live in a world where the people of Israel are wholly good or wholly bad. Likewise, we do not live in a world where the same could be said of Palestinians, or the US government, or even – and perhaps this is the most difficult to admit these days – the Parliamentary Labour Party.
READ MORE: Trust selling Highland clan's land for £6.8m under investigation
There are good and bad people in every one of the groups I have mentioned. The numbers of those who are good and those who are bad might vary within them but to pretend everything is a simple question of groups being good or evil, or right and wrong, is mistaken.
The reality of human life is that such simplistic claims can never be justified. In every group, every society, among people of every ethnicity or race, and in every state, and every organisation, we have to recognise good and bad can coexist, and sometimes simultaneously even in the same people.
I know this makes life much harder. But, if we succumb to the temptation to subscribe to generalisms about any group, anywhere, at any time, and believe blanket descriptions can apply to them without taking into account the diverse nature of humanity, then we succumb to something that is best called fascism.
Fascists have one political goal, which is all too easily seen among some politicians in both the UK and the United States at present. They seek to describe some group in society as the 'other'.
They then ascribe to that group a range of characteristics which can, in truth, be found in any group in any society, anywhere, but which they claim are commonplace or universal within the group they deem to be the 'other'.
They then blame all the ills in a society upon that 'other'. The extermination of that group becomes their political focus, all the while disguising the fact that what they are really doing is pursuing an agenda that, almost without exception in the case of fascism, is intended to advance the interest of some (but not all) among the wealthiest in their society, at cost to everyone else.
This is most easily seen in the US, where the support of some (but I stress, not all) within the tech community for the agenda pursued by Donald Trump and far-right think tanks is resulting in the 'othering' of those they describe as illegal immigrants.
US president Donald Trump They are then indifferent to the suffering of all those who might share ethnicity with those they 'other'. All of this is being done to advance the interests of a white, male, evangelical Christian anti-feminist elite within that society over the interests of all others.
In the UK, we see a similar exploitation of so-called illegal immigrants, even though no-one is an illegal immigrant in the UK until their application to be resident here has been formally declined.
It is easy to identify far-right politicians from Reform UK and the Conservative Party who are undertaking this activity but, as Keir Starmer has reminded us, not least with his 'island of strangers' speech, this is something Labour are also all too keen to do.
Division is now a political strategy when not so long ago our whole focus was upon the creation of integrated communities so that people might live in harmony.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon says she should have paused gender reform legislation
The change has been dramatic and appears to have been quite sudden but in practice it can be fairly easily traced as having begun in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis.
Then, it became apparent to many that our economy was being systemically structured to ensure some got all the advantages of the actions the state undertook as a consequence of the banking collapse.
The majority, and most definitely those on median incomes or less, enjoyed no gain at all, and quite probably suffered losses.
People were told there was growth, that there was no such thing as austerity, and that government services were being maintained by additional government spending. But what they experienced was something entirely different. They were not better off. Services were worse. The society in which they lived was very definitely suffering, and they were angry about that.
Then, despite the fact that this was actually because of the exploitation created by some bankers and others in a wealthy elite (and again, I stress, this was not universal), some politicians, acting with the outright support of those who were benefiting the most, chose to blame those they call illegal migrants for the situation the majority of people found themselves in.
The anger and disillusion people quite reasonably felt as a consequence of the deliberate failure of the Tories to meet need was redirected for the political advantage of the elite that was actually exploiting people and, in the process, something once described by the German historian and philosopher Hannah Arendt occurred.
As she explained, the constant lying of our politicians is not intended to make people believe the lies that they are told. Instead, its goal is to ensure no-one believes anything any more. The intention is to ensure no-one can, with any degree of certainty, distinguish between truth and lies, and so between right and wrong.
People deprived of that power are, in Arendt's opinion, also deprived of the power to think and judge and, as a consequence, are then unwittingly subject to the rule of lies. This then means politicians who wish to manipulate a population for their own advantage are free to do so.
That is what happens when we give up on nuance. That is what happens when we give up on believing we have more in common with others than that which divides us. That is what happens when we forget there is right and wrong, but that there is no-one, or any group, that is at all times and in all places possessed of either quality on every occasion.
That is, in effect, what happens when we give up on judgment. We become exposed to manipulation and so to abuse.
And this is where we are. This is why politicians think they can lie to us, on Gaza, on the state of the UK, on Scottish independence, and on almost anything else. It's because they believe we have forgotten how to determine the truth in among the noise that those who wish to distract us deliberately create.
It is our job to work out what is really happening and to form a judgment upon it. That is what politics and political economy demand of us.
It's hard and it sometimes leaves us confused and feeling alienated, but that is the price we have to pay if we are to continue to believe in humanity and decency, and to believe there are things we must do because they are simply right.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Newsom warns Trump he's 'playing with fire' on redistricting
By Gavin Newsom sent a stern warning to President Donald Trump that he is 'playing with fire' over efforts to rewrite the congressional map in Texas. In a letter penned to the president on Monday, Newsom vowed to not 'stand idly by' as Texas along with other GOP-dominated states attempt to add more Republican seats to protect and enlarge their majority in the U.S. House. Democrats only need to flip three House seats to regain control of the chamber in the upcoming 2026 midterms . 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' Newsom wrote. The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment. Newsom goes on to address Trump directly by claiming the president is 'playing with fire' that will lead to the 'destabilization of our democracy.' 'You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make,' Newsom added. 'This attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy.' Newsom, who many believe has aspirations for a presidential run in 2028, made similar comments last week after claiming he will 'fight fire with fire' against Gov. Greg Abbott's redistricting plan. 'The proposal that we're advancing with the legislature has a trigger only if they move forward, to dismantling the protocols that are well-established,' Newsom told the press. 'Would the state of California move forward in kind? Fighting? Yes, fire with fire.' Newsom's new letter to Trump is the most outspoken example of Democrats planning to counter the GOP redistricting in Texas. Democratic state lawmakers fled from Texas to deny the GOP the quorum necessary to vote on legislation in the state capital.


Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump signs order extending China tariff truce by 90 days, White House says
WASHINGTON, Aug 11 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order extending a tariff truce with China by another 90 days, a White House official said on Monday with only hours to go before U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods were due to snap back to triple-digit rates. The order followed a noncommittal answer by Trump to reporters as to whether he would extend the lower tariff rates a day after he urged Beijing to quadruple its purchases of U.S. soybeans. A tariff truce between Beijing and Washington was set to expire on Tuesday at 00:01 ET (04:01 GMT). The order prevents U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods from shooting up to 145%, with Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods set to hit 125%, rates that would have resulted in a virtual trade embargo. "We'll see what happens," Trump told a press conference, when asked how he planned to extend the deadline. "They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi (Jinping) and myself." Imports from China are currently subject to 30% tariffs, including a 10% base rate and 20% in fentanyl-related tariffs imposed by Washington in February and March. China had matched the de-escalation, lowering its rate on U.S. imports to 10%. The two sides in May announced a truce in their trade dispute after talks in Geneva, Switzerland, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Stockholm, Sweden in late July, but did not announce an agreement to further extend the deadline. Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump's first term and now with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said she expected Trump to extend the 90-day "tariff détente" for another 90 days later on Monday. "It wouldn't be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn't go right down to the wire," she said, adding Trump could also announce progress in other aspects of the economic relationship as a backdrop for granting the extension. "The whole reason for the 90-day pause in the first place was to lay the groundwork for broader negotiations and there's been a lot of noise about everything from soybeans to export controls to excess capacity over the weekend," she said. Ryan Majerus, a former U.S. trade official now with the King & Spalding law firm, welcomed the news. 'This will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the U.S. and China work toward a framework deal in the fall. I'm certain investment commitments will factor into any potential deal, and the extension gives them more time to try and work through some of the longstanding trade concerns," he said. The White House declined to comment beyond Trump's remarks. The Treasury Department and U.S. Trade Representative's Office did not respond to requests for comment. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said Washington has the makings of a deal with China and he was "optimistic" about the path forward. Trump pushed for additional concessions on Sunday, urging China to quadruple its soybean purchases, although analysts questioned the feasibility of any such deal. Trump did not repeat the demand on Monday. But Washington has also been pressing Beijing to stop buying Russian oil, with Trump threatening to impose secondary tariffs on China.


Channel 4
12 minutes ago
- Channel 4
Trump says he will tell Putin to end Ukraine war at Alaska summit
He's not inviting Ukraine's president to his Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin – but Donald Trump said he would tell the Russian leader to 'end the war' – while warning Ukraine that there would be 'some swapping, some changes to land.' Ukraine's foreign minister said Mr Putin wanted to 'occupy all of Ukraine and blackmail Europe and the whole world'.