logo
Centre questions maintainability of PFI's plea against ban in Delhi HC

Centre questions maintainability of PFI's plea against ban in Delhi HC

India Gazette14-07-2025
New Delhi [India], July 14 (ANI): The Central government on Monday objected to the legal validity of a petition on maintainability ground filed by the Popular Front of India (PFI) in the Delhi High Court, challenging the confirmation of a five-year ban imposed on the organization under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
During the hearing, the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S V Raju, representing the Centre, argued that the petition was not maintainable under Articles 226 or 227 of the Constitution. He submitted that the tribunal upholding the ban was led by a sitting High Court judge, and therefore, any challenge to its order should be made under Article 136 in the Supreme Court, not in the High Court.
The ASG also stated that the authority of a High Court judge presiding over a tribunal does not fall under the purview of subordinate courts.
PFI's counsel countered by referencing a previous ruling by a division bench of the High Court, which, according to them, allows the petition to be heard.
However, the bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela decided to re-list the matter for further arguments, listing the next hearing on August 7. The court has not yet issued a formal notice on the petition.
PFI's petition contests the tribunal's order from March 2024, which affirmed the Centre's September 2022 decision to ban the organisation and its affiliates for allegedly engaging in terrorist activities and promoting communal hatred. The Ministry of Home Affairs declared PFI and its linked groups--including the Campus Front of India, Rehab India Foundation, and National Women's Front--as 'unlawful associations' under UAPA.
The government cited extensive evidence, including video materials and testimony from over 100 witnesses, to justify the ban. It claimed connections between PFI and other proscribed groups such as ISIS, SIMI, and Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB), along with involvement in financing terrorism, executing targeted killings, and destabilising public order. Following the crackdown in September 2022, more than 150 individuals reportedly linked to PFI were detained across India. (ANI)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parliament LIVE updates: Govt to table bills for removal of PM, CM, minister held on serious charges
Parliament LIVE updates: Govt to table bills for removal of PM, CM, minister held on serious charges

Business Standard

time29 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Parliament LIVE updates: Govt to table bills for removal of PM, CM, minister held on serious charges

Parliament session 2025 Live updates: The Centre is set to table 3 bills in Parliament on removal of PM, CMs, ministers held on serious criminal charges. Catch all the latest updates here The government is preparing to introduce three bills in Parliament on Wednesday that provide for the removal of a prime minister, a Union minister, a chief minister or a minister of a state or union territory if arrested or detained on serious criminal charges for 30 consecutive days. Under the proposed provisions, if any of these officeholders are arrested and kept in custody for 30 days in a row for offences carrying a minimum sentence of five years, they will automatically lose their position on the 31st day. The three draft legislations are the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025; the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025; and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025. Home Minister Amit Shah is scheduled to introduce the three bills in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. He will also move a motion to refer the bills to a joint committee of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, with a requirement to submit its report on the first day of the last week of the next session of Parliament. Online gaming bill to be introduced Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw is also expected to introduce the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The proposed law aims to ban online money gaming and its advertisements, prescribing imprisonment, fines, or both for those engaged in offering or promoting such activities. The bill also seeks to draw a clear distinction between money gaming and eSports or online social games. The Lok Sabha is further scheduled to continue its discussion on astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla's space mission on Wednesday. 10:48 AM Parliament Session Live: Manickam Tagore seeks Adjournment Motion in LS over voter revision in Bihar Congress MP Manickam Tagore on Wednesday moved an Adjournment Motion in the Lok Sabha, alleging that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar was a 'targeted move' to benefit the ruling party. He cited a Congress investigation that found fake and duplicate voters during the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. 10:25 AM Owaisi moves notice in Lok Sabha against Union Territories Amendment Bill AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi has given notice in the Lok Sabha opposing the introduction of the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025. 10:09 AM Lok Sabha to resume debate on astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla's space mission The Lok Sabha is also scheduled to resume the discussion on astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla's space mission on Wednesday. 10:07 AM Online gaming bill to be introducted in Lok Sabha; ban on online money gaming sought Electronics and IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw will introduce the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The bill proposes a ban on online money gaming and related advertisements, with provisions for imprisonment, fines, or both for violators. It also aims to distinguish such games from eSports and online social games.

PM, chief ministers removed on 31st day of arrest: New bills set to rock Parliament
PM, chief ministers removed on 31st day of arrest: New bills set to rock Parliament

India Today

time29 minutes ago

  • India Today

PM, chief ministers removed on 31st day of arrest: New bills set to rock Parliament

A stormy session is expected in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday as the government is set to introduce three contentious bills that mandate the removal of a Prime Minister, Union Minister, Chief Minister or Minister of State or Union Territory if they remain in jail for 30 consecutive proposed laws -- the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025, the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025 -- will be tabled by the Union Home Ministry. Home Minister Amit Shah is also slated to move a motion to send the bills to a joint parliamentary committee.- Ends advertisement

Delhi court staffer cleared in viral video case, inquiry cites lack of evidence
Delhi court staffer cleared in viral video case, inquiry cites lack of evidence

News18

time36 minutes ago

  • News18

Delhi court staffer cleared in viral video case, inquiry cites lack of evidence

New Delhi [India], August 20 (ANI): A Delhi court staffer accused of appearing in a compromising video with a judge has been exonerated after an inquiry found no evidence of misconduct or immoral acts. A District Judge of Tis Hazari Court, who acted as the Inquiry Officer, submitted his report to the Principal District & Sessions Judge (HQs), Tis Hazari, holding that the department had 'failed to establish any article of charge" against the female official, identified as Ms A. 'The Department has failed to establish that the delinquent official committed any immoral act or entered into any sexual activity with her Presiding Officer or anyone else during office duty timings. No misconduct or immoral act subversive to discipline is established," the report stated. During the proceedings, Ms A was represented by Advocate Ashish Dixit, who appeared as her Defence Assistant. The inquiry report records that she was able to effectively contest the charges with his assistance. The report raised serious concerns about the authenticity of the video evidence. It noted discrepancies in the pen drives examined, with the one available on record differing in make, model and capacity from those referenced in the fact-finding report. It also highlighted that the expert who analysed the material was neither accredited under Section 79A of the IT Act nor certified in digital forensics. Even during cross-examination, the expert admitted he lacked the requisite qualifications. Several departmental witnesses admitted they had merely seen the alleged video on WhatsApp or social media and could not confirm whether it was genuine. None produced a copy of the clip during the inquiry. The inquiry stressed that imputations on a woman's character required heightened scrutiny, and vague testimonies could not justify disciplinary action. Even the department's main witness, the judge's orderly, conceded he had seen a clip online but was unsure of its authenticity. In light of these findings, the inquiry concluded that Ms. A was not guilty of any misconduct. She has been fully cleared of all charges, stated the report. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store