Court ruling declaring removal of bike lanes unconstitutional is 'ridiculous': Doug Ford
Article content
Ford has already said his government plans to appeal, even as it works on a compromise with the city to both keep the bike lanes and add extra lanes for vehicle traffic.
Article content
Article content
He said he has faith that the Court of Appeal will overturn the lower-court ruling, but in the event it does not, he did not rule out using the notwithstanding clause to save the law.
Article content
Article content
'Let's see what happens at the Court of Appeals, and then we'll go from there, but I have confidence in the courts,' Ford said at an unrelated transit announcement.
Article content
Ontario Superior Court Justice Paul Schabas ruled the lane removals would put people at an 'increased risk of harm and death' and violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Article content
He noted that the government had received advice from experts, reports from Toronto officials and evidence from the city and elsewhere that removing bike lanes 'will not achieve the asserted goal' of the law, to reduce traffic.
Article content
Ford made the removal of bike lanes on Bloor Street, Yonge Street and University Avenue a campaign issue during the snap election he called and won in February, and he says the judge's ruling tramples on people's democratic rights.
Article content
Article content
'This is the most ridiculous decision I've ever seen,' he said.
Article content
Article content
'I've never seen a decision like this, that a judge overrules the people of Ontario because of ideology — not because of law — ideology, but we knew when they picked this judge where it was going anyway, so it's not a big surprise.'
Article content
It's not the first time Ford has called judges' integrity into question. In April he blasted judges he perceives as being soft on crime, and floated ideas such as electing judges and offering them payouts to retire early.
Article content
Last year, Ford defended his government's appointments of two former staffers to a committee that helps select provincial judges, saying he wants 'like-minded people' in appointments, not Liberals or New Democrats.
Article content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: Solid reasons to lower the voting age to 16
Article content In Scotland, post-referendum research shows that teens enfranchised at 16 continued to vote at higher rates than peers who had to wait until 18, confirming that starting earlier helps build lifelong voting habits (Eichhorn & Huebner, 2025). Article content Canadian students are often introduced to democratic participation early through the Civix Student Vote program, which mirrors real elections and helps prepare future voters. In the most recent federal election, 949,361 students cast a ballot in this mock vote. Article content It would be far more effective to allow these students to vote in real elections while they are still in school, taking social studies courses that keep them informed about current events and the political process. For those in Alberta concerned that schools are indoctrinating students with progressive beliefs or influencing them to vote for the Liberals or NDP, the most recent Student Vote results are revealing. In 2025, students would have elected a Conservative minority government, compared to the adult population, which returned a Liberal minority. Article content Article content That alone casts doubt on fears of ideological bias. Article content Canada lowered the voting age from 21 to 18 in 1970 without disruption. According to Statistics Canada, enfranchising 16- and 17-year-olds would increase the voting population by only about three per cent. And if that three per cent has such a profound effect on election outcomes, then I would argue we have far bigger issues in our democracy than teenage maturity.
Edmonton Journal
a day ago
- Edmonton Journal
Lorne Gunter: Canada still hasn't seen Carney's promised leadership
The chances of Canada convincing Donald Trump's White House to reverse his tariffs on a wide range of Canadian goods seems remote. There's a possibility cases working their way through the U.S. courts will — maybe within the next six to 12 months — find Trump has overstepped his authority to impose tariffs and reverse them. Article content Who knows, the U.S. Senate may even find its spine and take back much of its Constitutional authority over tariffs. Article content Article content Article content Keep in mind that the Americans' much-touted deals with the E.U., the U.K. and Japan aren't really deals at all. There are no documents, the details are sketchy and the two sides in each now disagree over just what each deal contains. Article content Trump just likes the show of being Mr. Tough Guy, of having other countries' leaders appear to bow before him and kiss his ring. Article content It won't be easy for Canada to get the same kind of 'deal' as those other countries. Trump seems to have a special hate on for Canada. And we are being backburnered by the Trump administration. Our concerns are being handled by mid-level officials, not boss-to-boss, despite Prime Minister Mark 'Elbows Up' Carney insistence that he knows Trump, knows who to deal with him and is uniquely qualified to reach an agreement. Article content Article content If we could even just return to Harper-era export levels with the U.S., Canada would be far less vulnerable. Under Stephen Harper's government, about 75 per cent of our foreign trade was with our southern neighbour. Now, thanks to the Liberals' complete indifference to all things economic, Ottawa has taken the easy path for the last 10 years until we are reliant on the Americans for 90 per cent of our trade. Article content Article content They account for around one-quarter of our GDP, while we account for less than three per cent of theirs. That means Canada has a need for a deal, but lacks leverage. So we need to export more to other countries to make us less susceptible to shocks from the U.S.
Edmonton Journal
a day ago
- Edmonton Journal
Michigan auto jobs depend on changing course on tariffs, Whitmer tells Trump
Article content Under his series of executive orders and trade frameworks, U.S. automakers face import taxes of 50% on steel and aluminum, 30% on parts from China and a top rate of 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico not covered under an existing 2020 trade agreement. That puts America's automakers and parts suppliers at a disadvantage against German, Japanese and South Korean vehicles that only face a 15% import tax negotiated by Trump last month. Article content On top of that, Trump this past week threatened a 100% tariff on computer chips, which are an integral part of cars and trucks, though he would exclude companies that produce chips domestically from the tax. Article content Whitmer's two earlier meetings with Trump resulted in gains for Michigan. But the tariffs represent a significantly broader request of a president who has imposed them even more aggressively in the face of criticism. Article content Article content Materials in the presentation brought Whitmer to the meeting and obtained by The Associated Press noted how trade with Canada and Mexico has driven $23.2 billion in investment to Michigan since 2020. Article content General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis operate 50 factories across the state, while more than 4,000 facilities support the auto parts supply chain. Altogether, the sector supports nearly 600,000 manufacturing jobs, forming the backbone of Michigan's economy. Article content Whitmer outlined the main points of the materials to Trump and left copies with his team. Article content To Grossman, the Michigan State professor, a key question is whether voters who expected to be helped by tariffs would react if Trump's import taxes failed to deliver the promised economic growth. Article content 'Everyone's aware that Michigan is a critical swing state and the auto industry has outsized influence, not just directly, but symbolically,' Grossman said. Article content Article content AP VoteCast found that Trump won Michigan in 2024 largely because two-thirds of its voters described the economic conditions as being poor or 'not so good.' Roughly 70% of the voters in the state who felt negatively about the economy backed the Republican. The state was essentially split over whether tariffs were a positive, with Trump getting 76% of those voters who viewed them favorably. Article content The heads of General Motors, Ford and Stellantis have repeatedly warned the administration that the tariffs would cut company profits and undermine their global competitiveness. Their efforts have resulted in little more than a temporary, monthlong pause intended to give companies time to adjust. The reprieve did little to blunt the financial fallout. Article content In the second quarter alone, Ford reported $800 million in tariff-related costs, while GM said the import taxes cost it $1.1 billion. Those expenses could make it harder to reinvest in new domestic factories, a goal Trump has championed. Article content 'We expect tariffs to be a net headwind of about $2 billion this year, and we'll continue to monitor the developments closely and engage with policymakers to ensure U.S. autoworkers and customers are not disadvantaged by policy change,' Ford CEO Jim Farley said on his company's earning call. Article content Since Trump returned to the White House, Michigan has lost 7,500 manufacturing jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Article content Smaller suppliers have felt the strain, too. Article content Detroit Axle, a family-run auto parts distributor, has been one of the more vocal companies in Michigan about the impact of the tariffs. The company initially announced it might have to shut down a warehouse and lay off more than 100 workers, but later said it would be able to keep the facility open, at least for now.
