Troops in LA can detain individuals, military official says, as protests spread
Members of law enforcement detain a person as people protest against federal immigration sweeps, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S. June 11, 2025. (Reuters)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Judge temporarily bars Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles
A US judge on Thursday temporarily barred US President Donald Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, finding that the Guard was unlawfully mobilised by Trump. San Francisco-based US District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on Friday. Breyer said the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion'. Trump justified the deployment of troops by qualifying the protests as a rebellion. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote. The Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order. Trump summoned military troops to Los Angeles to support a civilian police operation over the objection of Newsom, an extraordinary and rarely used measure.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
As Trump hits out at critics, damage to America may go far deeper
Four months into his second term, US President Donald Trump has launched a high-stakes campaign against three pillars of American society: mainstream media, elite universities and the nation's most influential law firms. Through lawsuits, executive orders and threats to funding, he has exerted unprecedented pressure on many institutions, sparking debate about whether his actions signify genuine reform or personal vendettas Advertisement Critics argue that these confrontations reflect a desire to settle old scores rather than drive meaningful change. Regardless, it raises urgent questions about the future role of these institutions in upholding democracy. To gauge public sentiment, American broadcaster Michael Smerconish recently polled his audience on which sector – major law firms, academia or the media – is most vital to the nation's interests. The poll suggests the public recognises all three as essential pillars of society, with law firms rated slightly higher. The close division also suggests that, despite acknowledging the flaws in each sector, Americans perceive all of them as vital checks on government power and crucial safeguards for the rule of law. The challenges facing each sector have become increasingly pronounced. The American media, long regarded as a government watchdog, faces a wave of lawsuits and executive actions. These conflicts involve financial and psychological costs, potentially prompting media organisations to exercise greater caution in or even desist from reporting on matters of public interest. Advertisement Elite universities have also come under scrutiny. The administration has threatened to freeze federal grants and is restricting international student enrolment, citing issues such as campus antisemitism. While it is important to address campus challenges, critics warn these actions risk politicising higher education and may be more about exerting leverage than genuine reform.
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs' lawyer complains about trial secrecy as rapper's name goes unmentioned
A lawyer for Sean 'Diddy' Combs protested against the rising tide of secrecy at the hip-hop icon's federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial on Thursday after Combs and the public were excluded from lengthy arguments over whether another famous rapper's name could be disclosed. Advertisement Defence lawyer Marc Agnifilo complained to Judge Arun Subramanian after Combs was left out of an hour-long meeting in a private room outside the courtroom where lawyers and the judge discussed a hotel room 'event' in January 2024. That meeting added a two-hour delay to the start of the sixth and final day of testimony from a woman identified in court only by the pseudonym 'Jane', who dated Combs from 2001 until his arrest last September. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to charges that carry a potential prison sentence of 15 years to life in prison if he is convicted. Prosecutors say he used his fame, fortune, violence and threats to manipulate girlfriends into sex with paid sex workers in multi-day events that they later said they regretted. Defence lawyers say the government is trying to prosecute consensual sex between adults. Advertisement Under cross-examination, Jane testified on Thursday that she flew to Las Vegas in January 2023 with a famous rapper and his girlfriend.
