logo
A 900-year-old typo may solve Chaucer mystery

A 900-year-old typo may solve Chaucer mystery

Telegraph17-07-2025
A mystery surrounding a lost poem or story referenced by Geoffrey Chaucer may have been solved after scientists corrected a 900-year-old typo.
The Tale of Wade, referred to by the 'Father of English Poetry' in two of his works, was popular in the medieval period but has been almost entirely lost.
Chaucer inserted references from the Wade story into tales of romance in his own work, including passages of Troilus and Cressida and The Canterbury Tales, but nobody knew why.
The one surviving fragment of the tale was discovered by scholars in 1896, but this only added to the confusion with the story seemingly dealing with the subject of 'elves'.
But now Cambridge experts claim to have solved the mystery by correcting a typo made by a medieval scribe.
It has been revealed the word 'elves' in the Wade fragment was an error, and should have read 'wolves'.
The alteration has changed the scholarly view of the Wade story, which now appears to have been a straightforward romantic tale, and therefore more fitting for Chaucer to have referenced in his own work.
The breakthrough, detailed today in The Review of English Studies, was made by Dr James Wade and Dr Seb Falk at the University of Cambridge 's Girton College.
Dr Falk said: 'Changing elves to wolves makes a massive difference. It shifts this legend away from monsters and giants into the human battles of chivalric rivals.'
Dr Wade added: 'It wasn't clear why Chaucer mentioned Wade in the context of courtly intrigue. Our discovery makes much more sense of this.'
The breakthrough was made by looking again at the fragment found in a Cambridge library in the 19th century.
This scrap of material, which dates back to the the 12th century, was a sermon that appeared to quote a line from the tale, saying: 'Some are elves and some are adders; some are sprites that dwell by waters: there is no man, but Hildebrand only.'
Dr Wade and Dr Falk found that certain letters were poorly written by a medieval scribe, who confused a runic letter that was still found in Middle English, and pronounced 'w' with the letter 'y'.
That, they said, turned 'wlves' into 'ylves.'
By correcting the medieval spelling, they arrived at a new version, which read: 'Some are wolves and some are adders; some are sea-snakes that dwell by the water. There is no man at all but Hildebrand.'
The tale appears to be a more down-to-earth medieval romance about human characters rather than supernatural ones. Its inclusion in a sermon may also have been intended to reach as wide an audience as possible.
Dr Falk added: 'Here we have a late-12th-century sermon deploying a meme from the hit romantic story of the day.
'This is very early evidence of a preacher weaving pop culture into a sermon to keep his audience hooked.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Monty Don claims a garden 'doesn't need a single plant in it'
Monty Don claims a garden 'doesn't need a single plant in it'

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Monty Don claims a garden 'doesn't need a single plant in it'

Monty Don has ruffled feathers by claiming that a garden doesn't need to have plants in. The gardening guru, 70, said that some of the most famous gardens in the world don't contain a single plant. Writing in his column for Gardeners' World, he said: 'A garden can be anything you want it to be, even if - and I know that this is heresy to many people - it does not include a single plant.' The beloved presenter pointed to the famous Stowe garden created by Lancelot 'Capability' Brown, who is widely considered Britain's greatest gardener, in the late 18th century. Filled with monuments, Brown's gardens 'did not involve any particular interest in the specific plants used,' Monty explained. He also evoked the home roof garden of lauded Mexican architect Luis Barragán, which Monty visited, adding: 'It consisted of pink-painted walls, terracotta walls and nothing else save the sky - which Barragan insisted was an essential part of the garden.' While Monty himself appears to cherish plants of all varieties - his own garden is filled with numerous different species - Monty appears not to favour one type of gardening over any other. He said: 'We in Britain tend to have such a fixed idea of what a 'good' garden might look like. 'I have a garden happily filled to overflowing with plants. I love the physical process of raising and tending plants, but I also love visiting gardens that explore all the subconscious and spiritual possibilities that gardens can evoke and enrich.' On the subject of plants, the horticulturalist has previously urged dog owners to be 'sensible' about the varieties which could harm their pets. He made the comments earlier this year, as he prepared to unveil his dog-friendly garden at the Chelsea Flower Show. Monty teamed up with the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) for his first - and 'I hope my last' - garden at Chelsea filled with features for dogs including a lawn, water to wallow in and trees to cast shade. Don defended the inclusion of plants that can be toxic to dogs in the garden, such as alliums and foxgloves, saying they were blooms he had alongside his pets without problems in his own garden. The RHS and Radio 2 dog garden, which was not be judged, was to be relocated to nearby Battersea Dogs & Cats Home after the world-famous event at the Chelsea Hospital, west London. Monty said they would remove any plants the charity did not want to have as part of the planting. The horticulturalist, who has presented on Chelsea since 1990 and has covered the show for the BBC without a break for more than a decade, also said creating the garden had been a 'humbling' process that made him 'hugely' respect designers and makers of gardens at RHS Chelsea. Speaking onsite, he said: 'It doesn't matter what kind of garden or how good or bad it is, it's an almost unimaginable amount of work because of the detail you have to attend to.' He added that he was looking forward to getting back to presenting coverage after his stint as a designer, which he described as 'moonlighting'. 'I now have real insight into the whole process. I didn't know I needed that and I do, it's humbling.' Don, who was originally approached by the RHS to design a dog-friendly garden, said he did not want the project, created with horticulturalist Jamie Butterworth, to have any message except for being about dogs. 'I wanted to see a garden at Chelsea that didn't have a message, that didn't set itself in an exotic situation, was absolutely set fair and square in 2025 in England and that was full of plants that either I did have or everybody could buy from their local garden centre, and with trees or shrubs that were native or long adapted to this country.' The lawn was central to the plot, surrounded by planting which can create shifting paths for dogs to take around the garden, and a large open-fronted 'dog house' with an old sofa for the animals to retreat to. The garden also featured long meadow grass for dogs to lie in, while Radio 2 presenter Jo Wiley suggested an area of water for dogs to wallow in, based on experience with her pets, Don said. There was a playfulness to the garden, with use of dogwood, round-headed alliums evoking balls dogs love to play with, and terracotta pots have been created with pawprints of Don's dog Ned who is regularly be seen following him around his garden on Gardeners' World. But while the lawn was created to look like it had been used by dogs and people, the team have stopped short of having holes dug in it or 'pee rings'. And Don said: 'There are plants in the garden that are technically poisonous to dogs. 'However, there are no plants that I don't have in my own garden and I've always had dogs. 'My view on this is actually the main plant I worry about is yew and we don't have that in the garden. 'In my experience dogs are sensible and owners are sensible.' Don added: 'We have a brief to make a beautiful garden for Chelsea. The only dogs that are going to be allowed on here are mine or others specifically invited and on a lead and under control. 'When it goes to Battersea it will not have any plants Battersea doesn't want to be there, we will remove any that they feel has any toxicity to their dogs,' he said. 'We're not saying these are plants that are perfectly safe, what are you making a fuss about? What I am saying is in my experience I've not had any problems with these plants, and I've had dogs for the last 65 years.' Many everyday activities from cutting with knives in the kitchen to driving a car or crossing the road were more dangerous than these plants were to dogs, he said. And he added: 'Just be sensible, don't get hysterical, but at the same time don't dismiss it.' He also said dog owners who are keen gardeners should not expect a perfect lawn because 'that's not compatible with dogs', and encouraged those who did not want their animals to be crashing through the flower beds to create low fences or hedging on borders or corners to stop them. An RHS spokesperson said the dog garden was 'primarily designed to bring joy and delight'. 'However, as RHS Chelsea is also a great place to inspire and educate, with some people perhaps not realising that a number of common garden plants could be harmful to dogs if eaten, the RHS and Monty are encouraging people to be aware, but also to be sensible, about dogs in their gardens at home. 'The garden raises awareness to keep an eye on pets amongst plants. Don't let them eat or dig up plants in borders and, as with anything, if you see them eating something in the garden and you see changes in behaviours or are worried or have doubts, call the vets.' They added: 'The garden will live on at Battersea, where experts from the charity will carefully select dog-friendly, non-toxic plants to live on where rescue dogs can enjoy them for years to come.'

Kate Middleton has worn these earrings TEN times - snap up a pair while you can
Kate Middleton has worn these earrings TEN times - snap up a pair while you can

Daily Mail​

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Kate Middleton has worn these earrings TEN times - snap up a pair while you can

Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Few brands have caught the eye of the Royal Family quite like sustainable jewellery label Monica Vinader. The Princess of Wales has been a devoted fan of the brand's understated and affordable pieces since 2014, and is often seen wearing the gorgeous Siren Wire earrings. Crafted from 18-carat gold vermeil and hand-cut green onyx, these earrings perfectly balance refined simplicity with a touch of statement-making charm. Versatile and timeless, they work just as well for everyday wear as they do for more formal occasions. The rich green gemstone adds a subtle pop of colour, while the sleek silhouette transitions effortlessly from day to night. Lightweight and easy to wear, they're the kind of piece you'll reach for time and again - whether teamed with a T-shirt and jeans or a little black dress. £130 Shop In addition to Kate's gold vermeil pair, these elegant earrings are also available in sterling silver and rose gold vermeil. You can also choose from a range of centre stones to suit your style - from striking black onyx and soft rose quartz to calming aquamarine and deep kyanite. Kate's admiration for the brand may well be rooted in its strong sustainability ethos. Monica Vinader uses 100% recycled gold and sterling silver in all its pieces, aligning with the Princess' support for eco-conscious fashion. Even the packaging reflects that commitment, with each item shipped in recyclable boxes and reusable pouches. Stylish, sustainable and royally approved - what's not to love? Snap up a pair before they're gone.

The toll Charles and Diana's 'wedding of the century' took on the ailing princess: 44 years on, this is the troubling truth about why Diana felt like a 'lamb to the slaughter' - and her saddening bulimia fit just before
The toll Charles and Diana's 'wedding of the century' took on the ailing princess: 44 years on, this is the troubling truth about why Diana felt like a 'lamb to the slaughter' - and her saddening bulimia fit just before

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

The toll Charles and Diana's 'wedding of the century' took on the ailing princess: 44 years on, this is the troubling truth about why Diana felt like a 'lamb to the slaughter' - and her saddening bulimia fit just before

The night before the 'wedding of the century', Princess Diana spent a quiet evening with her sisters and bridal party at Clarence House. The young bride-to-be had only recently turned 20 and admitted to journalist Andrew Morton ten years later that she 'had a very bad fit of bulimia the night before'. Between 1991 and 1992, Diana recorded tapes for Morton, which were the main source of his best-selling authorised biography, Diana: Her True Story. In the tapes, Diana tells how her public persona was often very different to her real personality. 'I ate everything I could possibly find, which amused my sister, and nobody understood what was going on there,' said Diana. 'It was very hush-hush. I was as sick as a parrot that night. It was such an indication of what was going on.' In another room, the Queen Mother and Lady Fermoy, Diana's grandmother, watched Dad's Army on TV. Diana found it hard to sleep and went downstairs, where 'Backstairs Billy', the Queen Mother's Steward, William Tallon, gave her a glass of orange juice. Then she spotted his bicycle, leapt on it and cycled around in circles, ringing the bell and singing: 'I'm going to marry the Prince of Wales tomorrow! And then came the morning. 'I was very, very calm, deathly calm,' said Diana. 'I felt I was a lamb to the slaughter. I knew it and couldn't do anything about it. My last night of freedom was with Jane at Clarence House.' On July 29, 1981, 44 years ago to this day, Diana married Charles at St Paul's Cathedral in front of 3,500 guests. A record-breaking 750million people in 74 countries across the globe tuned in to watch the event on television. 'I remember being so in love with my husband that I couldn't take my eyes off him,' Diana said. 'He was going to look after me. Well, was I wrong on that assumption? 'I realised I had taken on an enormous role but had no idea what I was going into - but no idea.' Charles and Diana had announced their engagement five months prior to the wedding, on February 24, 1981, with an exclusive interview. The Prince told the BBC that he was 'delighted and frankly amazed' that Diana was 'prepared' to take him on. However, he upset his future wife when he was asked if they were in love. Diana replied, 'Of course,' while Charles quipped, 'Whatever in love means' - a comment she was believed to find 'traumatising'. During the discussion, Diana debuted her £47,000 engagement ring from luxury jeweller Garrard. It was a 12-carat oval blue Ceylon sapphire, surrounded by 14 diamonds, set in 18-carat white gold. Diana's dress featured a substantial skirt complete with a record-breaking 25ft-train and frothy folds of silk taffeta fit for a fairytale. To make sure it would fit down the aisle, wedding dress designers Elizabeth and David Emanuel secretly measured St Paul's Cathedral with a tape measure. Diana's wedding dress, and it's 25-foot train, has gone down as one of the most famous wedding dresses in history During the couple's five-month engagement, Diana's waist has shrunk from 29in to 23½in and her dress has been taken in five times. She attended around 15 fittings and required five bodices to accommodate her rapid weight loss. In addition to being sewn into the gown after losing more weight ahead of her wedding, Diana accidentally spilt perfume on her dress just hours before walking down the aisle, which she hid by holding that part of the gown. 'That dress!' BBC presenter Tom Fleming exclaimed as the soon-to-be princess smoothed the dress around her. 'What a dream she looks,' commentator Angela Rippon added while noting Diana's tiny waist. According to journalist Penny Junor's book, The Duchess: The Untold Story, Charles sent Diana a signet ring that bore his Prince of Wales feathers, accompanied by a note that read: 'I am so proud of you and when you come up, I'll be there at the altar for you tomorrow. Just look 'em in the eye and knock them dead.' However, Diana's personal astrologer, Penny Thornton, claimed in an ITV documentary that the royal also had a devastating confession for his bride. 'One of the most shocking things that Diana told me was that the night before the wedding, Charles told her that he didn't love her,' Thornton claimed. 'I think Charles didn't want to go into the wedding on a false premise. He wanted to square it with her and it was devastating for Diana.' In 2020, speaking in Channel 5's documentary, Charles & Camilla: King and Queen in Waiting, former BBC royal reporter Jennie Bond said Diana confided to her about her doubts on her big day. Bond, who grew close to Princess Diana while working as a royal correspondent from 1989 to 2003, revealed the fairytale appearance of the 1981 royal wedding was very different behind closed doors. She said: 'Diana told me much later in one of our private conversations that she had felt like a lamb to the slaughter as she walked up the aisle, which is very sad, but I think she knew that things weren't quite right. 'When she saw Camilla in the congregation, she was immediately uneasy about it.' Bond added that Diana found a bracelet that Prince Charles had given Camilla during their engagement, which he had engraved with her initials. 'She was enraged by it, and she wanted to know why he had gifted this to Camilla'. Charles even wore a set of personalised cufflinks, which read C & C, for Charles and Camilla, on the couple's honeymoon. By 1986, both were having extramarital affairs. While Charles was seeing Camilla, the love of his life, Diana was having a dalliance with Army officer Captain James Hewitt. In 1992, Prime Minister John Major announced the couple were to separate, but continue living together at Kensington Palace. Two years after their separation, Charles would admit to his infidelity on national TV, on the same night that Diana wore the outfit later dubbed the 'Revenge Dress '. In August 1996, their divorce was finalised, and they continued to co-parent their sons until Diana's tragic death in a car crash in Paris one year later. It was not until 1999 that Charles and Camilla felt able to 'come out' as a couple. They did so by allowing a photo to be taken of them as they left the Ritz hotel in London, having attended a 50th birthday party. It would take a further six years before they could marry, and that ceremony was nowhere near as lavish or high-profile as Charles and Diana's nuptials. In 2005, Charles married Camilla Parker Bowles at Windsor Guildhall. Charles and Camilla - who had both been divorced - opted for a civil ceremony which was followed by a religious blessing. The couple's wedding ceremony was attended by their children from their previous marriages - Prince William, Prince Harry, Laura Lopes and Tom Parker Bowles. Unlike Charles' first wedding, the couple's civil ceremony was kept private. Buckingham Palace announced that there would be no music or readings featured in the order of service. After the ceremony, the royal newlyweds took the time to greet royal fans who had gathered on the streets of Windsor to celebrate their marriage. Charles and Diana relationship timeline November 1977: Prince Charles and Diana Spencer are introduced when Diana was just 16, and working as a nanny July 1980: The pair was thought to start courting at this time. Charles taught Diana how to fish and Diana was spotted at the Royal Family's Balmoral estate February 1981: The royal engagement is officially announced July 29, 1981: Charles and Diana tie the knot October 1981: Princess Diana makes first official royal engagement in Wales June 21, 1982: Prince William is born 1983: The couple tour Australia and New Zealand September 15, 1984: Prince Harry is born 1986: Both Charles and Diana reportedly start having affairs 1989: Diana reportedly confronts Camilla Parker Bowles July 29, 1991: The pair celebrate a muted 10 years of marriage June 7, 1992: Diana: Her True Story, a biography written by Andrew Morton, is published December 9, 1992: Charles and Diana announce their split June - October 1994: Prince Charles confesses to his affair November 20, 1995: The infamous Panorama interview is broadcast December 19, 1995: Prince Charles files for divorce August 31, 1997: Princess Diana dies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store