Kincora: Abuse victim gets settlement after claims MI5 agent protected
The former housemaster William McGrath, who was known as the "Beast of Kincora", was imprisoned in 1981 for abusing boys as part of a paedophile ring which was operated in the home.McGrath held a leading role in the far-right loyalist movement Tara.He died in the early 1990s.Mr Hoy's lawyers claimed authorities enabled McGrath to target vulnerable young victims so more information about the group could be obtained.It was alleged that Royal Ulster Constabulary officers were prevented from investigating McGrath due to his role as an MI5 agent.Claims for negligence and misfeasance in public office were advanced as part of wider actions against the PSNI, Home Office and Department of Health.Defendants have disputed responsibility for any violation in the duty of care to the victims of the Kincora Boys' Home.A three-day trial was due to begin on Monday but counsel for Mr Hoy announced proceedings had been settled on confidential terms.No further details were disclosed.Speaking to the media outside court, Mr Hoy said: "This case was never about the money, it was about holding them to account."The judge, Mr Justice Simpson, commended the parties for reaching the outcome in a difficult case.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
No ticket targets for Liverpool's new litter enforcement team
A new team of litter enforcement officers in Liverpool will not be told how many tickets they should be handing City Councillor Laura Robertson-Collins said newly introduced measures were instead designed to catch those "deliberately messing up our streets" rather than residents who make "an honest mistake".The local authority, working with contractor Waste Investigations Support and Enforcement (WISE), said it was cracking down on littering, fly-tipping and dog fouling in the city. The council said 45 Fixed Penalty Notices (FPNs) were handed out last month for illegally dumping waste. 'Promote positive behaviour' WISE officers will support work being done by the council's internal environmental crime enforcement City Council said it was not setting FPN targets because it preferred to focus on encouraging responsible said: "Our goal is to help promote positive behaviour and show people who don't respect our city that it will not go unseen."Those caught littering face a £150 fine, while dog owners who do not clean up after their pets risk a £100 penalty.A tiered penalty system has been introduced for fly-tipping, which starts at £500 and can rise depending upon the severity and scale of the managing director John Dunne said he wanted to secure "long-term improvements in local environmental quality".He said officers would use body-worn cameras and mobile technology to verify offenders' details. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Bereaved families consider suing over ‘flawed' domestic violence tool
On Aug 19 2019, Ms Fields reported to police that Paul Crowther, her former partner, had threatened to kill her. She gave a statement and an officer completed a Dash form. He ticked 'yes' to only nine questions, grading her at 'medium' risk. A month later, Crowther stabbed her to death in the street. Ms Jones said: 'I am one of the families that's thinking of coming on board. If it's been a scandal like the Post Office scandal and others, it needs to be out in the open. I don't want any other parents or loved ones to go through what her father and I have gone through.' Last week, The Telegraph also reported on the case of Natalie Saunders, 33, who was murdered by Stephen Charlton in 2018 after Cleveland Police repeatedly graded her as 'medium risk', even after members of the public reported incidents of Charlton assaulting her and 'threatening her and saying he's gonna kill her'. She was deemed 'high risk' only once, after escaping her abuser and calling police to say she was 'covered in marks' and feared for her life. But the following month, officers completed a Dash form and again scored her 'medium risk'. Seven weeks later, Charlton strangled her to death in her home. 'A preventable death' On Wednesday, her brother Wayne Saunders told The Telegraph: 'For me, it's just been a quick tick-box exercise, and not looked into in greater depth.' Mr Saunders, 46, from Stockton-on-Tees, added: 'I don't think my parents have had any closure, because she was let down massively by a lot of authorities. Her death could have been prevented. 'But it's not only that, these failings need to be highlighted for the simple fact that it could be someone else's life today, tomorrow, and the day after. More lives will be lost if nothing changes.' Both families sought Article Two inquests into their loved ones' deaths, believing this would be the proper mechanism to examine potential state failings, but were refused. Ms Saunders' family are considering their next steps in the fight for justice. An assessment in February warned the Home Office and advisers to Bridget Phillipson, the minister for women and equalities, that the tool was 'as helpful as flipping a coin'. But despite the findings, the department went on to commission SafeLives, the charity behind Dash, to review how police and social services assessed risk in domestic abuse cases. Flawed grading system SafeLives said victims must answer 'yes' to at least 14 questions – which include whether the perpetrator has ever used a weapon, threatened to kill, or attempted to strangle, choke, suffocate or drown them – to be classed as 'high risk' and guaranteed urgent intervention. Scores of nine to 13 mean 'medium' risk, while fewer than nine is 'standard' – but neither of these lower gradings guarantees women specialist support. Practitioners are told by SafeLives to use 'professional judgment' to override low scores and are instructed to escalate cases after three or more police call-outs in a year. A spokesman for the National Police Chiefs Council told The Telegraph that neither Dash nor its successor tool Dara, which has been adopted by 18 forces, were designed to be used in isolation and 'only provide a snapshot of information available at the time', stressing that officers were expected to apply judgement and training. Cleveland Police said that after a 2021 review into Ms Saunders' death it improved domestic abuse training and has since made further changes. West Yorkshire Police said it had 'fully accepted' the findings of the reviews into Ms Fields' 'appalling death' and implemented all recommendations.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Dozens more Afghan relocation data breaches uncovered by BBC
The Ministry of Defence has admitted there have been 49 separate data breaches in the past four years at the unit handling relocation applications from Afghans seeking safety in the out of the 49 breaches were already publicly known - including the leak in 2022 of a spreadsheet containing details of almost 19,000 people fleeing the mammoth data breach, which led to thousands of Afghans being secretly relocated to the UK, was only revealed last month after the High Court lifted a gagging was described by the UK's information watchdog as a "one-off occurrence following a failure to [follow] usual checks, rather than reflecting a wider culture of non-compliance". However, lawyers representing Afghans affected by data breaches said the new figures, released to the BBC under the Freedom of Information Act, raised concerns about a culture of lax security among those working on the resettlement MoD has refused to provide any details of the nature of each breach but incidents which have previously been made public include officials inadvertently revealing the email addresses or other personal details of applicants to third Malik, Head of Data Protection at Barings Law which represents hundreds of Afghans affected by the biggest of the breaches in February 2022, said: "What began as an isolated incident, which the Ministry of Defence initially sought to keep from public view, has now escalated into a series of catastrophic failings."We urge the Ministry of Defence to be fully transparent with both those affected and the wider public. Victims should not be forced to learn the truth through legal action or news reports."The Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) was set up in April 2021 to help people who feared their lives were at risk because they had worked with British armed forces in Afghanistan and to resettle eligible applicants and their family members in the UK. It was closed in July this scheme has been dogged by revelations about poor data security, potentially putting the lives of Afghans who worked with British forces at risk. In September 2021, BBC News revealed that more than 250 Afghans seeking relocation to the UK were mistakenly copied into an email from the Ministry of Defence, putting them at risk of reprisals.A total of 265 email addresses were shared in this way across three separate incidents that month, which ultimately led to a £350,000 fine from the breaches were "intensely difficult and embarrassing for the government handling publicly", one defence source Wallace, the then-defence secretary, expressed his personal anger at what had occurred, telling MPs: "I am very keen that it is not just the poor person who drafts the email who is held to account, but the chain upwards, to ensure that this does not happen again."Two months after the incidents, in November 2021, the then Conservative government announced "significant remedial actions", including new data handling procedures and training as well as a new "two pairs of eyes rule" requiring any external email to an ARAP-eligible Afghan national be reviewed by a second member of staff before being government said the measures were taken to "prevent such incidents occurring again".Instead, data breaches continued including, in February 2022, a potentially catastrophic leak which saw a soldier at Regent's Park barracks send a spreadsheet with what they believed to be a small number of applicants' names to trusted Afghan did not realise that hidden data in the spreadsheet in fact contained the names, contact details and some information about family members and associates for nearly 19,000 the leak was discovered some 18 months later, in August 2023, the then-Conservative government sought a gagging order to prevent details of the error being made public. The government successfully argued that lives were at risk and the Taliban would be alerted if an injunction wasn't super injunction which was imposed was not lifted until July this Baines, a senior data protection specialist at the law firm Mishcon de Reya, said the new figures uncovered by the BBC show a "remarkable number of data security incidents in relation to the ARAP scheme"."It is difficult to think of any information more sensitive than that which is involved with the scheme, and it baffles me why there were not better security measures in place," he added. Seven of the 49 data breaches were sufficiently serious to require MoD officials to notify data watchdog the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).This includes three breaches - one in 2021, and two in 2022 - that have not been made public ICO said it was limited in the amount of information it still held on those breaches and why it didn't take further action but that its work with the MoD was "ongoing"."We continue to engage with the MoD, so we can be assured that they have made the required improvements," a spokeswoman watchdog has not taken any action against the MoD over the large spreadsheet data breach which was previously subject to court-imposed reporting restrictions, arguing "there was little we could add in this case that would justify the further allocation of resource away from other priorities".Jon Baines said there were "serious questions firstly as to whether the ICO should have conducted more in-depth investigations previously, and secondly, whether there is now an urgent need for more investigation."What assurance can we all have now that the MoD are properly protecting the highly sensitive personal data it is often entrusted with?", he added.A Labour government source blamed previous Conservative administrations for inadequate data protection measures and said new software has been introduced and other changes made since Labour came to power last year."Current ministers repeatedly highlighted the Tory mismanagement of data around the ARAP scheme while in opposition," the source said."Since last July, we've brought in a host of new measures to improve data security and we've made public the largest Afghan data breach which occurred under the previous government, to allow for parliamentary scrutiny and accountability."A Conservative Party spokesman said: "This data leak should never have happened and was an unacceptable breach of data protection secretary of state for defence has issued an apology on behalf of the government, and Conservatives joined in that apology."When this breach came to light, the immediate priority of the then-government was to protect persons in the dataset."An MoD spokesperson said: "We take data security extremely seriously and are committed to ensuring that any incidents are dealt with properly, and that we follow our legal duties."All incidents that meet the threshold under UK data protection laws are referred to the Information Commissioner's Office, and any lesser incidents are examined internally to ensure lessons are learned."If you have any information on stories you would like to share with the BBC Politics Investigations team, please get in touch at politicsinvestigations@ Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
