logo
Explainer: Why men are having teen rape charges 'downgraded'

Explainer: Why men are having teen rape charges 'downgraded'

In her 2025 audit of group-based child sexual exploitation and abuse, Casey noted that while the legal age of consent is 16, prosecutions involving this age group are often dropped or downgraded—especially when a victim is said to have consented or been 'in love' with an adult perpetrator.
READ MORE: Scots legal 'grey area' may let men avoid teen rape charges
'Open to interpretation'
'Although any sexual activity with 13–15-year-olds is unlawful, the decision on whether to charge, and which offence to charge with, is left more open to interpretation,' said Baroness Casey.
The peer argues this flexibility is well-intentioned—designed to avoid criminalising young people close in age or those who mistakenly believe someone is older—but warns it is being exploited by adult men who groom children.
Her recommendation: make all penetrative sexual activity between adults and under-16s automatically rape, as is the case in countries like France.
What the law says in Scotland
Age of consent
Under the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009, the age of consent is 16. Any sexual activity involving a child under 16 is a criminal offence, even when both parties are underage.
Children under 13
The law is unequivocal: sexual activity involving a child under 13 is automatically treated as rape or sexual assault. Consent is not a defence. Scottish Government guidance requires that any such concerns be escalated via local child protection procedures.
Children aged 13–15
Sexual activity in this age group is illegal, but prosecution is more discretionary. Decisions may consider age gaps, coercion, grooming, and vulnerability. Cases can be referred to the Procurator Fiscal, the Children's Reporter, or managed through safeguarding rather than the criminal courts.
National guidance and crime recording
National Guidance on Under-Age Sexual Activity (2010): Advises that not all underage sexual activity is abuse, but significant age gaps or power imbalances should trigger child protection responses. Mandatory reporting applies to under-13s.
Scottish Crime Recording Standard: Requires prompt recording of sexual crime reports. Categorisation depends on available evidence, including victim statements and corroboration.
Maximum penalties
Under the 2009 Act, the maximum sentence for sexual activity with a child under 16 is 10 years. Rape and assault by penetration can result in life imprisonment.
Home Secretary announces law change in England and Wales
On Monday, Yvette Cooper told MPs she would legislate to tackle this great area:
'We will change the law to ensure that adults who engage in penetrative sex with a child under 16 face the most serious charge of rape, and we will work closely with the Crown Prosecution Service and the police to ensure that there are safeguards for consensual teenage relationships.'
Shadow minister calls for reform in Scotland
Scottish Conservative shadow minister for victims and community safety, Sharon Dowey, said there could be alarming consequences if the law changes in England but not in Scotland:
'The Casey Review revealed some cases which will have deeply troubled the public and parents, given the age of those involved.
'They will be worried that the same grey area in the law could still exist up here where those who have sexually abused teenagers are not properly punished.
'If the rules down south are changed in light of these harrowing cases, then the law must be tightened up in Scotland as well to avoid any possibility of us becoming a safe haven for child abusers.'
Summary
The legal grey area flagged by Baroness Casey lies in how sexual activity with children aged 13–15 is handled: illegal by statute, but often inconsistently prosecuted.
In Scotland, while the law criminalises all under-16 sexual activity and removes the possibility of consent for under-13s, the approach for 13–15-year-olds is more discretionary, which could lead to some cases being dropped or downgraded.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canadian prosecutors win bid to extradite Scots over death of restaurateur
Canadian prosecutors win bid to extradite Scots over death of restaurateur

STV News

time2 hours ago

  • STV News

Canadian prosecutors win bid to extradite Scots over death of restaurateur

Canadian prosecutors have won a battle in their bid to extradite three Scots wanted in Ontario for their alleged involvement in the death of a restaurant owner. Lawyers for Canada had to prove to Sheriff Julius Komorowski that the offences allegedly committed were ones recognised in Scots law. Canadian authorities want Robert Evans, 24, his father, Robert Busby Evans, 47, and his uncle Barry Evans, 54, returned from Scotland to their country. They say the three men were involved in the death of a man called Sharif Rahman in Owen Sound, Ontario in August 2023. Ontario provincial police said the 24-year-old had been charged with manslaughter while his father and uncle were charged with accessory after the fact to commit an indictable offence. In order to be extradited from Scotland, prosecutors have to show that there is an equivalent offence to being an accessory to the fact in Scottish law. Lawyers for the two older Evans argued that there was no equivalent act and that the request made by Canada to have them extradited should be refused. In a written judgement published on Tuesday, Sheriff Komorowski concluded there is. He concluded that if the men had committed their alleged offences in Scotland, both the father and uncle would have been prosecuted under the charge of attempting to defeat the ends of justice. He wrote: 'I hold that, under the law of Scotland, it is the crime of attempting to defeat the ends of justice to assist another in fleeing to avoid apprehension for a crime that the assisted person has committed. 'That is so regardless of whether pursuit of that individual has yet commenced, or indeed regardless of whether any investigation has begun. 'Accordingly, I find that Barry Evans and Robert Busby Evans are wanted for conduct that would be criminal according to the law of Scotland if it had occurred here.' The three men were said to have been on holiday in Canada when a dispute allegedly broke out over an unpaid $150 restaurant bill at The Curry House in Owen Sound on August 17, 2023. It has been claimed that restaurateur Sharif Rahman followed the Evans family into the street outside his restaurant, where a physical altercation is alleged to have ensued. The 44-year-old married father-of-one was found injured by a staff member and died a week later in hospital in London, Ontario. The three men were arrested in Edinburgh and Dalkeith last year in connection with an outstanding international warrant. Canadian media outlets have reported that Robert Evans and his father and brother were in the country on visitors visas and left shortly after the incident involving Mr Rahman. It has been claimed that Barry drove Robert Junior 40 miles away from the scene after the alleged attack. Robert Senior is also alleged to have arranged for his child to return to Scotland the following day. Sheriff Komorowski wrote: 'Also, the next day (August 18, 2023), Barry Evans attended at the hotel in which he had booked rooms the day before for him and the brother of Robert Evans. 'He had made that booking just before attending at the restaurant. On his return there the next day, he retrieved his deposit and driving licence. 'He also removed his guest registration containing his name, signature and car registration. 'This was done as a means of avoiding Barry Evans and Robert Evans' brother being placed close to the scene of the crime, which in turn was to avoid the implication that Robert Evans might have been present at the scene.' Prosecutors in Canada claim the alleged actions by the two men were committed in a bid to frustrate the investigation into Mr Rahman's death and were illegal. Sheriff Komorowski wrote: 'It follows that, with respect to the allegations against Barry Evans concerning items taken by him from the hotel the day after the incident, the dual criminality requirement is met. 'It does not matter whether there was in fact any investigation ongoing or whether Barry Evans knew of any investigation. 'I consider the alleged connection between these items and avoiding the identification of Robert Evans (junior) as a perpetrator quite tenuous. 'But as counsel for the requested persons properly acknowledged, it is not for me to decide what inferences might properly be drawn from the behaviour alleged as to what the purpose was in taking these items. 'That is a question as to guilt or innocence which is solely for the courts of the requesting state to determine after a criminal trial.' The two older men were represented in proceedings by advocate Sarah Loosemore. According to her Faculty of Advocates profile, Ms Loosemore practiced in the superior and appellate courts in Ontario before calling to the bar in Scotland. Sheriff Komorowski also said that his ruling did not mean the three men could be extradited immediately. He added: 'As there are other matters yet to be determined that might preclude the extradition of these two individuals, this decision does not bring these extradition proceedings to a conclusion. 'If ultimately the court refers the extradition of these two individuals to the Scottish Ministers, and the Ministers order extradition, then there is a right of appeal to the High Court of Justiciary. 'As part of such an appeal, this decision on dual criminality can be reviewed.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Rise in sex offenders using 'sleepwalker defence' to deflect rape charges, CPS prosecutor warns
Rise in sex offenders using 'sleepwalker defence' to deflect rape charges, CPS prosecutor warns

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Rise in sex offenders using 'sleepwalker defence' to deflect rape charges, CPS prosecutor warns

There has been a rise in rapists claiming they suffer with sexsomnia to evade conviction, a top Crown Prosecution Service lawyer has told a Daily Mail podcast. Speaking to The Trial, Charlotte Coulton-Smith said the CPS is making sexsomnia a 'key part of training' so case workers can better identify offenders who fraudulently claim to have the condition. The concern comes as courts have increasingly encountered the sleep disorder defence. Sexsomnia is a rare condition that causes people to engage in sexual activity while completely asleep, with sufferers having no memory of their actions. Those with the genuine condition can engage in a range of unconscious sexual behaviours including touching others, masturbation and full intercourse. In the last decade, several high-profile cases across Europe have seen men acquitted of rape after successfully proving to courts they suffer from the condition. But not all attempts succeed. Dean Final, 32, who was jailed for 11 years for rape in August, recently tried and failed to use a sexsomnia defence. 'It's certainly on the increase', Coulton-Smith told Trial host Caroline Cheetham. 'We're seeing more cases where defendants will claim to be suffering from sexsomnia. 'We are going to make sure that we are robustly challenging and dealing with these cases within the CPS. 'I don't expect to see it going away anytime soon. Women and girls need to be aware of it.' Sexsomnia cases present a complex challenge for courts, as there is no standard diagnostic method to verify the condition. Courts are more likely to accept it as a legitimate defence when defendants have a documented history of sleepwalking or display telltale signs during the alleged incident - such as keeping their eyes open throughout the sexual activity. Other key indicators that help distinguish genuine sexsomnia from fabricated claims include complete memory loss of the events and an absence of complex, coordinated movements during the activity. However, there is still debate within the medical community whether the condition actually exists. Coulton-Smith, who helped prosecute Final, described how the CPS worked to easily disprove his sexsomnia claim. 'Final served a claim that he was suffering from sexsomnia. We really wanted to make sure that never got in front of a jury. 'It was clear that there was no proper, expert foundation to say he was suffering with sexsomnia. 'He had no history of sleepwalking. In fact, we asked for a statement from the prison to say, has he been sleepwalking – they told us no. 'We asked his ex-partner: has he ever sleepwalked before? She told he hasn't. 'Effectively, this behaviour started and stopped just for this event. It's a clear demonstration of why we need to tackle this issue head on. 'If it's not properly challenged, this could be a road map for abusers to carry on their abusing. 'We will be looking with laser detail whenever this type of defence is raised.' To listen to full interview about the Dean Final case and the 'sexsomnia' defence, subscribe to The Crime Desk now.

Nicola Sturgeon says she could leave Scotland ‘for a wee while'
Nicola Sturgeon says she could leave Scotland ‘for a wee while'

South Wales Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Nicola Sturgeon says she could leave Scotland ‘for a wee while'

The former Scottish first minister said a focus on her political career meant she had had to 'forego' living elsewhere. Speaking as her memoir is published, she suggested she could have a 'perspective shift' by living elsewhere. Her comments come as she prepares to step down as an MSP at next May's Holyrood elections – by which point she will have served 27 years in the Scottish Parliament, including more than eight years as first minister. She was arrested and questioned by police as part of the investigation into SNP finances, but has now been formally cleared. However, her husband, former SNP chief executive Peter Murrell, who she announced her separation from in January this year, has appeared in court charged with alleged embezzlement. Ms Sturgeon said she was now at a point in her life where she is 'happy, contented, looking forward to the future'. But she told BBC Breakfast that while she might live elsewhere for a period, she said she would 'never leave Scotland for very long'. She stated: 'Scotland is my home, it is where I belong, it is where my family is.' She added: 'One of the things about being so focused on a political career is that you forego certain things. 'I didn't live outside of Scotland or the UK for any period when I was younger, I think it is healthy to shift your perspective, to see life from a different angle. 'So, maybe for a wee while I will take myself outside of Scotland, give myself that perspective shift, but I am never going to be away for very long.' Speaking about her memoir, titled Frankly, she said it had been 'important to me to tell my story in my words'. The former SNP leader said: 'I hope lots of people read it, I hope they enjoy it, but it is out there now and people can make up their own minds, and that is actually a nice feeling and I am enjoying that.' She added: 'What I have done in this book is put my story in my words. 'There will be people who enjoy reading it, there will be people who don't. There will be people who slag it off who never read it at all. 'But I am really comfortable I have put my story in my words.' She insisted she is 'really proud of what I achieved as first minister', but added that there was 'lots I wish I had done different and done better' during her time in power. But she stressed that after going through 'difficult' times, she has now found 'a real sense of happiness and joy in life'. Asked about her arrest by police in June 2023, she said the period had been 'difficult' and 'horrific', adding that in the police station she 'felt probably at the lowest ebb in my life'. Ms Sturgeon said: 'What the book also recounts is a process of going through that really difficult time and coming out the other end of it, so it is also a story of resilience and strength. 'I hope people can take something from that as well, that you can face these really tough times in your life – and I know people have faced much, much tougher things in life than I have – but you find within yourself a strength.' She also made clear she has 'no doubt at all' that Scotland will become independent – vowing to campaign in any future referendum on the issue. Ms Sturgeon had been a key figure in the campaign leading up to the 2014 vote, which saw Scots vote by 55% to 45% to stay part of the UK. The former SNP leader accepted that her goal of independence 'wasn't delivered in my time in office', but she said: 'It will happen, I am absolutely in no doubt at all.' She stated: 'I write in the book about what I predict, in not that long a timespan, will be a kind of rewired UK, a sort of federation of the nations, and an independent Scotland will be part of that.' While she said she may not lead an independent Scotland, she said she would 'at some point in the next few years' be involved in campaigning for independence in another referendum. Speaking about a future vote, she added: 'If there is – when there is – another decision on Scottish independence, it will be a case of hold me back. I'll be there.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store