
I Converted My Photos Into Short Videos With AI on Honor's Latest Phones. It's Weird
The photo gallery app in Honor's latest midrange phones has an image-to-video generative AI feature powered by Google. It'll probably come to your phone soon.
All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links.
As midrange phones designed to plug the gap between flagships, the Honor 400 and 400 Pro might not ordinarily attract much attention. But these devices—unavailable in the US—are among the first to feature Google's image-to-video AI generator, based on its Veo 2 model (now available to Gemini subscribers). Built into Honor's Gallery app, you can select a still photo from your camera roll to bring it to life as a five-second video.
After much experimentation with different photos, from landscapes to family and pets, I'm impressed and weirded out. Like any AI tool, it has the potential to be good or bad, depending on how you wield it, and the results veer from flawless to freaky. It's a neat trick, and it's coming to the phone in your hand soon. Fake Photography
Faking photography is nothing new—the medium is always evolving. Artificial intelligence has been smoothing wrinkles and enhancing skies for years. None of your photos are real, especially those you shot with your phone and edited to post on social media. But we're pushing beyond creating a fake bokeh background blur or dialing up colors of the sunset. Creating entirely fake videos from still images feels like a new high and a new low.
The process is easy. Open the Gallery app on the Honor 400 or 400 Pro, choose the Create tab, tap Image to video, and select one of your photos. Choose a 9:16 or 16:9 aspect ratio for portrait or landscape, then hit start. You need to be connected to the internet. Each five-second video took around 30 seconds to create, but a pop-up message warns me they can take up to two minutes. There's no room to enter a prompt, so you are left at the mercy of whatever the AI decides to do.
I began with photos of my wife and kids. The first few videos have a major uncanny valley feel. In one photo, my wife is covering her mouth, and the AI animates her moving her hand and talking, but the mouth it pastes in is entirely wrong. Much to her horror, it gives my daughter a series of facial tics. The video of my selfie comes out well and would surely fool anyone who doesn't know me, but my wife says she can tell it's not me because I never make facial expressions like that.
We tried the cats next, and despite some odd expressions (my eldest cat, Bodhi, never looks as deferential as this), the results were pretty solid. Photos of landscapes, such as a boat on the waves or trees in a forest, are brought to life with believable rippling effects. Things got weirder with inanimate objects. With a pair of Star Wars Funko Pops, Anakin Skywalker's lightsaber glowed to life, but Darth Maul on a speeder weirdly rotated on the spot. For a few photos of ornaments, it did a disappointing pan or zoom.
As the debate about AI-generated art rages on, I can't help but wonder at the implications of uploading personal photos to be analyzed and animated by ever more powerful AI. Social media is already awash with carefully edited photos and videos, but AI processing is improving fast, generating more believable results with every passing day, and it's quickly becoming accessible to everyone. Camera Cold War
Photography is the battleground for phone manufacturers trying to outdo one another. While most phone makers focused on hardware, Google dived deeper into computational photography, doing more with less. Google pioneered and popularized AI features in its Pixel phones. Options like AI Eraser to remove unwanted items or people from photos and AI-enhanced zoom to create more detailed zoomed shots from afar with underpowered hardware are fast becoming ubiquitous, and both work well on Honor's latest phones.
Google has already moved on with Pixel 9 features like Best Take, enabling you to pick smiling faces where everyone has their eyes open from different shots, and Add Me, allowing you to take group photos and then add yourself to them. Securing buy-in for this brave new world of AI photography is clearly important, as Google aims to pull big Android phone manufacturers aboard, carefully balancing exclusive Pixel features with debuts for companies like Honor.
Honor is creeping closer to marrying hardware and software in the 400 Pro. It has a triple-lens main camera comprising a 200-megapixel main shooter with a large 1/1.4-inch sensor, a 50-megapixel telephoto lens, and a 12-megapixel ultrawide, not to mention a 50-MP selfie camera. Honor has also bet big on AI in recent years, pushing more AI into its phones, working closely with Google, and showing off its own new AI features. The Chinese phone maker has come a long way from beauty filters that smooth out your wrinkles, though those are still available.
The generate button has a label that says 'Limited-time free trial.' Honor 400 buyers get two free months and can generate up to 10 videos a day. Presumably, this will eventually be a paid feature of Google's Gemini Pro subscription and will roll out on many more phones (there's no firm timeline or pricing yet). It's a win-win for Google when it owns the underlying AI, enticing you to subscribe down the line. It's fun to play with—we exhausted our daily allowance fast—but seriously creepy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
AI Talent Pipeline: How Nations Compete In The Global AI Race
The artificial intelligence revolution is often framed as a clash of algorithms and infrastructure, but its true battleground lies in the minds shaping it – the AI talent. While nations vie for technological supremacy, the real contest revolves around human capital-who educates, retains, and ethically deploys the brightest minds. This deeper struggle, unfolding across universities, immigration offices, and corporate labs, beneath the surface of flashy model releases and geopolitical posturing, will determine whether AI becomes a force for equitable progress or a catalyst for deeper global divides. China's educational machinery is producing graduates at an unprecedented scale. In 2024, approximately 11.79 million students graduated from Chinese universities, an increase of 210,000 from the previous year, with around 1.6 million specializing in engineering and technology in 2022. By comparison, the United States produces far fewer graduates (around 4.1 million overall in 2022), with only 112,000 graduating with computer and information science degrees. This numerical advantage is reshaping the global talent landscape. According to MacroPolo's Global AI Talent Tracker, China has expanded its domestic AI talent pool significantly, with the percentage of the world's top AI researchers originating from China (based on undergraduate degrees) rising from 29% in 2019 to 47% in 2022. However, the United States remains "the top destination for top-tier AI talent to work," hosting approximately 60% of top AI institutions. Despite this, America's approach to talent faces structural challenges. The H-1B visa cap, which limits skilled foreign workers, is 'set at 65,000 per fiscal year, with an additional 20,000 visas for those with advanced U.S. degrees'. This constraint affects the tech industry's ability to recruit globally. This self-imposed constraint forces companies like Google and Microsoft to establish research centers in Toronto and London – a technological offshoring driven not by cost but by talent access. Europe's predicament completes this global triangle of talent misallocation. The continent invests heavily in AI education – ETH Zurich and Oxford produce world-class specialists-only to watch a significant number board one-way flights to California, lured by higher salaries and cutting-edge projects. This exodus potentially creates a vicious cycle: fewer AI experts means fewer competitive startups, which means fewer reasons for graduates to stay – a continental brain drain that undermines Europe's digital sovereignty. As AI permeates daily life, a quieter conflict emerges: balancing innovation with ethical guardrails. Europe's GDPR has levied huge fines since 2018 for data misuse, such as the $1.3 billion imposed on Meta for transferring EU citizens' data to the US without adequate safeguards, while China's surveillance networks track citizens through 626 million CCTV cameras. U.S. giant Apple was recently fined $95 million amid claims they were spying on users over a decade-long period. These divergent approaches reflect fundamentally different visions for AI's role in society. 'AI is a tool, and its values are human values. That means we need to be responsible developers as well as governors of this technology-which requires a framework,' argues Fei-Fei Li, Stanford AI pioneer. Her call for ethical ecosystems contrasts sharply with China's state-driven model, where AI development aligns with national objectives like social stability and economic planning. The growing capabilities of AI raise significant questions about the future of work. Andrew Ng, co-founder of Google Brain, observes: 'AI software will be in direct competition with a lot of people for a lot of jobs.' McKinsey estimates that 30% of U.S. jobs could be automated by 2030, but impacts will vary wildly. According to the WEF Future of Jobs Report 2025, 'on average, workers can expect that two-fifths (39%) of their existing skill sets will be transformed or become outdated over the 2025-2030 period.' The report goes on to state that, 'the fastest declining roles include various clerical roles, such as cashiers and ticket clerks, alongside administrative assistants and executive secretaries, printing workers, and accountants and auditors.' These changes are accelerated by AI and information processing technologies, as well as an increase in digital access for businesses. The panic that could be caused by these figures is palpable, but some are arguing that the real challenge isn't job loss – it's ensuring that displaced workers can transition to new roles. Countries investing in vocational AI training, like Germany's Industry 4.0 initiative, could potentially achieve smoother workforce transitions. By 2030, China could reverse its brain drain through initiatives like the Thousand Talents Plan, which has already repatriated over 8,000 scientists since 2008. If successful, this repatriation could supercharge domestic innovation while depriving Western labs of critical expertise. Europe's stringent AI Act may inadvertently cede ground to less regulated regions. Businesses could potentially start self-censoring AI projects to avoid EU compliance costs, with complexity, risk governance, data governance and talent listed as the 4 major challenges facing EU organisations in light of this Act, according to McKinsey. They went further to state that only 4% of their survey respondents thought that the requirements of the EU AI Act were even clear. This could create an innovation vacuum, pushing experimental AI development to jurisdictions with less stringent oversight. Breakthroughs in quantum computing could reshape talent flows. IBM's Condor and China's Jiuzhang 3.0 are vying to crack quantum supremacy, with the winner likely attracting a new wave of specialists. 'We need to make the world quantum-ready today by focusing on education and workforce development,' according to Alessandro Curioni, vice-president at IBM Research Europe. A recent WEF report on quantum technologies warns that, 'demand for experts is outpacing available talent and companies are struggling to recruit people in this increasingly competitive and strategic industry.' An IBM quantum data center dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images The focus on human talent suggests a more nuanced understanding of AI development – one that values creative problem-solving and ethical considerations alongside technical progress. "I think the future of global competition is, unambiguously, about creative talent," explains Vivienne Ming, executive chair and co-founder of Socos Labs. 'Everyone will have access to amazing AI. Your vendor on that will not be a huge differentiator. Your creative talent though-that will be who you are.' Similarly, Silvio Savarese, executive vice president and chief scientist at Salesforce AI Research, believes: 'AI is placing tools of unprecedented power, flexibility and even personalisation into everyone's hands, requiring little more than natural language to operate. They'll assist us in many parts of our lives, taking on the role of superpowered collaborators.' The employment landscape for AI talent faces complex challenges. In China, the record graduating class of 11.8 million students in 2024 confronts a difficult job market, with youth unemployment in urban areas at 18.8% in August, the highest for the year. These economic realities are forcing both countries to reconsider how they develop, attract, and retain AI talent. The competition isn't just about who can produce or attract the most talent – it's about who can create environments where that talent can thrive and innovate responsibly. The AI race transcends technical capabilities and infrastructure. While computing power, algorithms, and data remain important, human creativity, ethics, and talent ultimately determine how AI will shape our future. As nations compete for AI dominance, they must recognize that sustainable success requires nurturing not just technical expertise but also creative problem-solving and ethical judgment – skills that remain distinctly human even as AI capabilities expand. In this regard success isn't about which nation develops the smartest algorithms, but which creates environments where human AI talent can flourish alongside increasingly powerful AI systems. This human element may well be the deciding factor in who leads the next phase of the AI revolution.

Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta plans to automate many of its product risk assessments
An AI-powered system could soon take responsibility for evaluating the potential harms and privacy risks of up to 90% of updates made to Meta apps like Instagram and WhatsApp, according to internal documents reportedly viewed by NPR. NPR says a 2012 agreement between Facebook (now Meta) and the Federal Trade Commission requires the company to conduct privacy reviews of its products, evaluating the risks of any potential updates. Until now, those reviews have been largely conducted by human evaluators. Under the new system, Meta reportedly said product teams will be asked to fill out a questionaire about their work, then will usually receive an "instant decision" with AI-identified risks, along with requirements that an update or feature must meet before it launches. This AI-centric approach would allow Meta to update its products more quickly, but one former executive told NPR it also creates 'higher risks,' as 'negative externalities of product changes are less likely to be prevented before they start causing problems in the world.' In a statement, Meta seemed to confirm that it's changing its review system, but it insisted that only 'low-risk decisions' will be automated, while 'human expertise' will still be used to examine 'novel and complex issues.' This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Karate Kid: Legends' Director Jonathan Entwistle on Navigating ‘Cobra Kai' and the Test Screening-Inspired Epilogue
On the heels of Cobra Kai's 65-episode run, Karate Kid: Legends director Jonathan Entwistle strived to restore the cinematic identity of the beloved franchise. The British filmmaker — who's most known for helming idiosyncratic streaming series such as End of the F***ing World and I Am Not Okay With This — designed his feature directorial debut to unite Karate Kid and Cobra Kai fans from every generation. That included those viewers who were raised on Jackie Chan's 2010 standalone remake of The Karate Kid. To pull off this creative merger, Entwistle and screenwriter Rob Lieber realized that they could utilize the Miyagi family dojo scene from John G. Avildsen's The Karate Kid Part II (1986) to connect Chan's story with the Ralph Macchio and Pat Morita-led mothership franchise. More from The Hollywood Reporter Ralph Macchio Insisted That 'Karate Kid: Legends' Delay Its Release Until After 'Cobra Kai' Ralph Macchio on Decision to Return to 'Karate Kid' Films and Future of the Franchise 40 Years In Sony Is Using Roblox to Market 'Karate Kid: Legends' to the Next Gen (Exclusive) The Part II scene established that 400 years earlier, Mr. Miyagi's (Morita) ancestor, Shimpo Miyagi, spent some time in China before returning home to Okinawa, Japan. The Karate Kid: Legends brain trust then used animation to flesh out how Shimpo was taken in by Mr. Han's (Chan) forebears and taught kung fu. He then founded Miyagi-Do Karate to combine both families' unique martial arts, creating a familial friendship that endured all the way through Mr. Han and Mr. Miyagi. Entwistle unearthed a great deal of Karate Kid Part II footage to make sure he left no stone unturned in uniting and retconning the franchise. '[The Part II] piece had been the inspiration for the entirely different team back in 2010. They crafted that movie's concept using this beat or this notion of the Hans and the Miyagis,' Entwistle tells The Hollywood Reporter in support of Karate Kid: Legends' May 30 theatrical release. 'So we went back into the vault and into the archives to find all the scraps of film from that [Karate Kid Part II] sequence.' Entwistle's film is set three years after the events of the franchise's hit Netflix series, Cobra Kai, as Chan's Mr. Han asks Macchio's original 'Karate Kid,' Daniel LaRusso, to help train his great-nephew, Li Fong (Ben Wang), for a New York City-set karate tournament. However, the film was originally going to hit theaters before the show's February 2025 series finale. Thus, Macchio soon became adamant that the film should delay itself for the sake of the Cobra Kai audience, and Entwistle is ultimately glad that the studio didn't risk any confusion. 'We are not a Cobra Kai movie in any way, shape, or form, and that was never the intention. Cobra Kai is so important within the overall gamut that it was only right to let it have its absolute air to breathe,' Entwistle says. 'I saw no point in confusing [the audience] with a Karate Kid movie that sits right next to the end of Cobra Kai. So it was really, really good, certainly as a Cobra Kai fan, that it had its moment and was allowed to finish. And now it's like, 'Hey guys, we've got a different story over here. Let's just keep going.'' One of the franchise's many hallmarks is that most of the films conclude on a triumphant freeze frame. Entwistle's film does in fact have one as well, but test screenings prompted him to add an epilogue, one that includes a surprise cameo that is discussed later on in this interview's brief spoiler section. 'The movie ended, solidly ended, on a freeze frame for such a long time until we started to preview it and realized that people wanted a flavor of, 'Well, where's Jackie? Where is everybody?'' Entwistle shares. 'But we still wanted to maintain the ending with the freeze frame. And it indeed remains in the movie, albeit with the logo that plays afterwards [until the coda].' Below, during a recent conversation with THR, Entwistle also discusses the tall order of casting a Peter Parker or Miles Morales-like Li Fong. *** How did the guy behind pitch black comedy series like and end up making a movie? It was me following a dream to make a real theatrical motion picture. That should really be every director's end goal. I was enticed by the idea of being able to make a big theatrical movie and bringing my tone, my craft and my team. I had my cinematographer [Justin Brown] and production designer [Maya Sigel] from all of my shows, and I was actually very excited to bring the martial arts element back to the big screen. I saw this as a really fun opportunity to do some fights and do some action in a different way than you normally see delivered in this type of movie. When you signed on, were Ralph Macchio and Jackie Chan on board already? Or were there still some details to hammer out? Yeah, at the time when I came on board, it was the how. We knew that we really wanted to try and find a way to turn the spotlight back to the theatrical versions of what this story was, specifically with Columbia Pictures. So it was a case of, 'Well, what's a cool way to be able to do this? How can we play with that and actually still tell a new chapter in the story or a new graphic novel in the sequence?' And when was it realized that 's Miyagi family dojo scene could be retconned in order to fold Jackie Chan's 2010 standalone reboot into the mothership? It was when we realized that [the Part II] piece had been the inspiration for the entirely different team back in 2010. They crafted that movie's concept using this beat or this notion of the Hans and the Miyagis. So we went back into the vault and into the archives to find all the scraps of film from that [The Karate Kid Part II] sequence. There were so many different iterations. There were pieces of a Blu-ray and some television versions that had been scanned at some point. So there were all these different kinds of pieces of how the movie was made, and it was fun to be able to put all that together. takes place three years after 's series finale, but was anything off limits with regard to ? For example, if your movie wanted to use Cobra Kai for the villain's dojo, would that have caused all sorts of problems? We could use anything that's in the movies. We could have used and touched on any concept that was in the original movies. So we could always use Daniel and Miyagi, but any elements that are Cobra Kai-specific are not a Columbia Pictures property. So you could've gone with Cobra Kai for the villain's dojo, but would that East Coast expansion have required too much exposition? Yeah, I think so, for sure. Cobra Kai had also ended its run, and we knew very much that we were in tandem with the end of that piece. Cobra Kai is Johnny Lawrence's story, which is one of the things that makes it so fun and so good. And that having wrapped up, I was just like, 'Well, that exists. I have that show. It's there. I can always watch it.' And then I was like, 'Let's just keep going with another novel in the long sequence.' That allowed us to connect back to the big screen after living on television for a very, very long time. I was like, 'What's a 90-minute version of this story that we can do on the big screen for all the audiences?' There's really three audiences: the Karate Kid audience, the Cobra Kai audience and the moviegoing audience, which is actually a huge, huge piece. So it was very important for me to be audience-first and make this a great experience in the theater. I enjoyed the show, don't get me wrong, but I definitely missed the cinematic flourishes of the films. That cliffside helicopter shot in is one of the most beautiful shots ever put to screen, and then there's the indelible Bill Conti score. So it sounds like you were glad to bring some of those qualities back. A hundred percent. I wanted all the elements to not just feel theatrical, but also cinematic, and we got that opportunity to do that. We built lots of sets. The large pieces of New York are set builds, such as the pizza shop and the neighboring alleyway. We had a classical approach to the filmmaking, and I wanted New York to feel like a cozy movie New York. That's very much a filmic approach where you don't need to bother with the specifics. We're not running around on location just shooting things; we're crafting everything. The same goes for the music. We wanted to make sure that the music was score-based and bespoke. I firmly believe that television should consist of tracks, and movies should be score. A lot of the things that feel like tracks in this movie are actually score, and it was really key to me to blend themes with the original Conti orchestral approach. We recorded in Burbank with a full orchestra, which is a filmic approach to finishing the movie. So there was an overall analog approach to the fight sequences, the set builds, the cinematography and the color palette. It was all crafted with an eye toward revitalizing the franchise cinematically. 's final season and filmed at roughly the same time, so I figured that you killed two birds with one stone and shot the Miyagi house scenes on the show's Atlanta set. But you actually built your own set in Montreal? Yeah, we rebuilt the Miyagi house in Montreal. [Cobra Kai] was shooting at the same time, and their [Miyagi house] is a Cobra Kai set. For the motion picture, we went back to the original version of Miyagi's house [in The Karate Kid] and where it would be today. Sadly, the original house [in Canoga Park] is now gone. It was lost in a fire. [The next question contains spoilers for ' mid-credit scene.] The Miyagi house-set coda featuring Daniel LaRusso (Ralph Macchio) and Johnny Lawrence (William 'Billy' Zabka) is why I initially assumed you utilized 's infrastructure. How did that cameo come together? It was just the perfect way to round everything out. It became quite clear that we were putting all of the pieces together and that Cobra Kai would have ended by the time audiences see this. And like I said, that's Johnny's story. So to bring the two of them together to round that out just felt really perfect. Billy came [to set], and a lot of it was improv. A lot of that was just Ralph and Billy. After so many years of working together, they could just do their thing together. So we just wanted to capture that, and we wanted to put that at the end of the movie. This is by no means the end of Daniel LaRusso's story at all. But this movie was an opportunity to round out that piece and to physically hand over something from Daniel to Li Fong, but also Ralph to Ben [Wang]. They had a real relationship that I think was very, very sweet. So shooting those guys in the original Miyagi house, albeit the rebuilt version, was really quite special. [Spoiler talk for ' has now concluded.] The original plan was to release in 2024 for the 40th anniversary of , but the strikes got in the way. Ralph then felt passionately about it releasing after 's February 2025 finale, especially since takes place three years later. Do you like where you ultimately ended up, release date-wise? I think it's very important to piece out the stories in the correct way. We are not a Cobra Kai movie in any way, shape, or form, and that was never the intention. Cobra Kai is so important within the overall gamut that it was only right to let it have its absolute air to breathe. So I saw no point in confusing [the audience] with a Karate Kid movie that sits right next to the end of Cobra Kai. So it was really, really good, certainly as a Cobra Kai fan, that it had its moment and was allowed to finish. And now it's like, 'Hey guys, we've got a different story over here. Let's just keep going.' It's nothing but a positive addition to the overall world. Ben Wang's casting feels like a needle in a haystack, and as one of your producers said, he really does have a Michael J. Fox quality about him. You apparently auditioned 10,000 candidates for the role of Li Fong. Were you looking more for actors who you could teach kung fu? Or martial artists who you could train to act? I was looking for the person who could do it all. We needed a native Mandarin speaker and someone who understood what it was to live in America, but also someone who was a fantastic actor and could do the martial arts. For me, the Li character was very much a Peter Parker or Miles Morales-like character. So that was really important for me, both in terms of the martial arts and the tone of the performance. And when I first saw Ben, I was like, 'Well, there's a Marty McFly.' I joke that I wanted Morty from Rick and Morty in the way that he is like Michael J. Fox. So Ben had what I was looking for in an actor, but the martial arts element of the movie was so important that I just wanted to make sure that we were actually able to do real in-camera stuff. So the guy had to be able to do it himself, and there was no question about that. Much to the studio's annoyance, I was forever saying, 'The guy's got to be able to fight.' And so when I saw Ben, I was like, 'Please be able to do the martial arts.' He'd been in Destin's [Daniel Cretton] show, American Born Chinese, and once I saw the tapes, I was like, 'Okay, this is great.' He then got trained 24/7. We started to work with the stunt team and with Jackie's team, and it was next level. Ben does a huge percentage of the stunts himself, and you can see that in the movie The dragon kick is the crane kick of this movie. Who decides what that signature move of the movie is going to be? Weirdly, it was led by the approach to the fights. I wanted to make sure that they felt real and in your face with as much physical contact as possible. So our wonderful stunt coordinator, Peng Zhang, went out and found this fantastic kid, A.J., who could do the move he was looking for without any wires or VFX. He wanted someone who could do it from scratch so that we could shoot it and choreograph around it. We were like, 'For a kid who knows kung fu, what would that move look like when blended with karate?' So we worked backwards to where it became the dragon kick that Li's brother could do [but he couldn't]. Mr. Han and Daniel LaRusso aren't the only legends in this movie. ' Charlie Conway is also in the mix. That said, seeing Joshua Jackson play a dad to a teenage daughter (Sadie Stanley) and be described as 'old' caused me to have an existential crisis. Can you believe that this much time has passed to where Josh is now playing an 'old' dad? (Laughs.) No, I grew up with Dawson's Creek, and I'm a huge, huge fan. [Writer's Note: Entwistle also has a Mighty Ducks jersey hanging in his office.] Josh was probably most annoyed by the number of times I quoted Dawson's Creek to him whilst we were shooting. So he's very well-versed in that, and he's absolutely wonderful in the movie. He really committed to the fight sequences and the boxing. That is Josh. There's no stunt double in that entire sequence. He takes every single punch. He really committed because he saw how hard the kids were working in martial arts, and when Jackie Chan shows up, you take every punch you can. So the millennial in me is enjoying the Josh renaissance, and it's been an absolute pleasure working with him on this movie. He brought a wonderful softness and a little glint in the eye to his character. He plays the man being taught by the kid [Ben Wang's Li Fong]. So he's got to be able to handle that, but he's not being taught kicks and punches. He's being taught that as a former boxer who now makes pizzas, he can still get back in the ring, and that's quite a nice sentiment. Knowing you were making a movie, was the concluding freeze frame a prerequisite for you? Oh, a thousand percent. The movie ended, solidly ended, on a freeze frame for such a long time until we started to preview it and realized that people wanted a flavor of, 'Well, where's Jackie? Where is everybody?' But we still wanted to maintain the ending with the freeze frame. We shot that moment knowing it would be the freeze frame, and we did all of these different versions of how the freeze frame could be. Was it a still photograph that [Wyatt Oleff's] Alan takes at the end? There were all these different versions, but the freeze frame was always going to be the final moment from the get-go. And it indeed remains in the movie, albeit with the logo that plays afterwards [until the coda]. ***Karate Kid: Legends is now playing in movie theaters nationwide. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 13 of Tom Cruise's Most Jaw-Dropping Stunts Hollywood Stars Who Are One Award Away From an EGOT 'The Goonies' Cast, Then and Now