I Converted My Photos Into Short Videos With AI on Honor's Latest Phones. It's Weird
All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links.
As midrange phones designed to plug the gap between flagships, the Honor 400 and 400 Pro might not ordinarily attract much attention. But these devices—unavailable in the US—are among the first to feature Google's image-to-video AI generator, based on its Veo 2 model (now available to Gemini subscribers). Built into Honor's Gallery app, you can select a still photo from your camera roll to bring it to life as a five-second video.
After much experimentation with different photos, from landscapes to family and pets, I'm impressed and weirded out. Like any AI tool, it has the potential to be good or bad, depending on how you wield it, and the results veer from flawless to freaky. It's a neat trick, and it's coming to the phone in your hand soon. Fake Photography
Faking photography is nothing new—the medium is always evolving. Artificial intelligence has been smoothing wrinkles and enhancing skies for years. None of your photos are real, especially those you shot with your phone and edited to post on social media. But we're pushing beyond creating a fake bokeh background blur or dialing up colors of the sunset. Creating entirely fake videos from still images feels like a new high and a new low.
The process is easy. Open the Gallery app on the Honor 400 or 400 Pro, choose the Create tab, tap Image to video, and select one of your photos. Choose a 9:16 or 16:9 aspect ratio for portrait or landscape, then hit start. You need to be connected to the internet. Each five-second video took around 30 seconds to create, but a pop-up message warns me they can take up to two minutes. There's no room to enter a prompt, so you are left at the mercy of whatever the AI decides to do.
I began with photos of my wife and kids. The first few videos have a major uncanny valley feel. In one photo, my wife is covering her mouth, and the AI animates her moving her hand and talking, but the mouth it pastes in is entirely wrong. Much to her horror, it gives my daughter a series of facial tics. The video of my selfie comes out well and would surely fool anyone who doesn't know me, but my wife says she can tell it's not me because I never make facial expressions like that.
We tried the cats next, and despite some odd expressions (my eldest cat, Bodhi, never looks as deferential as this), the results were pretty solid. Photos of landscapes, such as a boat on the waves or trees in a forest, are brought to life with believable rippling effects. Things got weirder with inanimate objects. With a pair of Star Wars Funko Pops, Anakin Skywalker's lightsaber glowed to life, but Darth Maul on a speeder weirdly rotated on the spot. For a few photos of ornaments, it did a disappointing pan or zoom.
As the debate about AI-generated art rages on, I can't help but wonder at the implications of uploading personal photos to be analyzed and animated by ever more powerful AI. Social media is already awash with carefully edited photos and videos, but AI processing is improving fast, generating more believable results with every passing day, and it's quickly becoming accessible to everyone. Camera Cold War
Photography is the battleground for phone manufacturers trying to outdo one another. While most phone makers focused on hardware, Google dived deeper into computational photography, doing more with less. Google pioneered and popularized AI features in its Pixel phones. Options like AI Eraser to remove unwanted items or people from photos and AI-enhanced zoom to create more detailed zoomed shots from afar with underpowered hardware are fast becoming ubiquitous, and both work well on Honor's latest phones.
Google has already moved on with Pixel 9 features like Best Take, enabling you to pick smiling faces where everyone has their eyes open from different shots, and Add Me, allowing you to take group photos and then add yourself to them. Securing buy-in for this brave new world of AI photography is clearly important, as Google aims to pull big Android phone manufacturers aboard, carefully balancing exclusive Pixel features with debuts for companies like Honor.
Honor is creeping closer to marrying hardware and software in the 400 Pro. It has a triple-lens main camera comprising a 200-megapixel main shooter with a large 1/1.4-inch sensor, a 50-megapixel telephoto lens, and a 12-megapixel ultrawide, not to mention a 50-MP selfie camera. Honor has also bet big on AI in recent years, pushing more AI into its phones, working closely with Google, and showing off its own new AI features. The Chinese phone maker has come a long way from beauty filters that smooth out your wrinkles, though those are still available.
The generate button has a label that says 'Limited-time free trial.' Honor 400 buyers get two free months and can generate up to 10 videos a day. Presumably, this will eventually be a paid feature of Google's Gemini Pro subscription and will roll out on many more phones (there's no firm timeline or pricing yet). It's a win-win for Google when it owns the underlying AI, enticing you to subscribe down the line. It's fun to play with—we exhausted our daily allowance fast—but seriously creepy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Is AI Agent Washing, And Why Is It Everywhere?
AI agents, in case you haven't noticed, are everywhere. Every week, I see new headlines about 'autonomous AI,' 'self-directed agents,' and 'intelligent coworkers.' As someone who's spent years building automation tools, I understand the excitement—some of those headlines are even written by me. The promise of AI agents—tools that can plan, reason, and act independently—is genuinely game-changing. But not everything labeled an 'agent' actually lives up to the name. More and more, I'm noticing a trend that feels uncomfortably familiar from past tech booms: companies rushing to call their simple chatbots or task automations 'agents,' when in reality, they're little more than rebranded scripts. This practice is called 'agent washing,' and while it may help companies ride the current hype cycle, it comes at a cost—it confuses users, disappoints customers, and gums up the process of adopting tools that are genuinely transformative. Here's how to recognize agent washing and why it matters. What Is Agent Washing? A new report from Gartner throws cold water on the agent craze, estimating that only about 130 of the thousands of existing agentic AI vendors are legit. 'Most agentic AI projects right now are early-stage experiments or proof of concepts that are mostly driven by hype and are often misapplied,' said Anushree Verma, a Senior Director Analyst at Gartner. 'This can blind organizations to the real cost and complexity of deploying AI agents at scale, stalling projects from moving into production.' Some companies are compounding the problem through agent washing, which involves rebranding existing products like AI assistants and chatbots without 'substantial agentic capabilities.' When that line is blurred—whether to attract attention, funding, or users—it has the effect of creating confusion and eroding trust. Users expect the intelligence and autonomy that the word 'agent' implies, and when that expectation isn't met, it reflects poorly on the product and the brand. Worse still, it can stall meaningful progress by flooding the market with inflated claims and underwhelming experiences. The Promise Of Real Agents Vs. Hype With so much noise in the market, it can be difficult to tell the difference between a true AI agent and a dressed-up LLM workflow. But with a sharp eye, it's possible. As Yoav Shoham, Stanford professor emeritus and AI21 Labs cofounder, put it in MIT Tech Review, 'We don't necessarily need a rigid standard, but we do need clearer expectations about what these systems are supposed to do, how autonomously they operate, and how reliably they perform.' Asking just a few key questions can go a long way toward cutting through the hype. The most important thing to check for is whether the tool can make autonomous decisions without constant human input. A real agent doesn't just wait for you to tell it what to do. It assesses the situation, weighs options, and chooses a course of action based on context. If it simply reacts to pre-set triggers, it's likely just automation. In banking, for example, agents should be able to not only identify suspicious activity; they should take the appropriate safeguarding actions without being prompted. Additionally, true agents should demonstrate that they're learning and improving over time. They adapt to user behavior, refine their strategies, and adjust based on outcomes. If the system performs the same way no matter how many times it runs, that's your sign you've been snared by a marketing gimmick. Lastly, Shoham makes the important point that even the smartest agent isn't useful in a vacuum. 'Without a shared vocabulary or context, coordination becomes brittle,' he writes. 'Solving it at scale is far from trivial.' Of course, agents can be taught to negotiate and collaborate, but it won't happen automatically. 'The potential here is real,' he argues. 'But we need to match the ambition with thoughtful design, clear definitions, and realistic expectations.' Final Thoughts Agent washing may seem like a harmless bit of marketing. But in reality, it undermines the entire ecosystem by fostering skepticism, slowing adoption, and turning enthusiasm into disappointment. As sobering as Gartner's findings are, there is also reason for optimism. The firm predicts that at least 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be made autonomously through agentic AI by 2028, up from 0% in 2024. Beyond that, 33% of enterprise software applications will include agentic AI by 2028, up from less than 1% in 2024. If we want to build a future powered by truly intelligent tools, we have to start with clarity. That means resisting the urge to chase buzzwords and instead focus on solving real problems with real capabilities.
Business Insider
13 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Even Russia has had enough of some Chinese products
Russia's trade boom with China is losing steam, with a top Moscow official warning that the country's markets are already oversupplied with some Chinese goods. "In the current year, we are recording a certain decline in mutual trade," said Anton Alikhanov, Russia's industry and trade minister, on Tuesday at a business forum. "We also note the gradual saturation of the market with Chinese products in certain market segments, as well as internal economic processes both in Russia and in China," Alikhanov said. Sanctions and volatility in commodity markets have also weighed on flows, he said. From record highs to slowdown Trade between the two countries surged after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, as China filled the gap left by Western brands and Moscow diverted energy exports eastward. Turnover in Russia-China trade rose 29% in 2022 and 26% in 2023, reaching a record $245 billion in 2024. But growth slowed to just 2% last year, and in the first seven months of 2025, trade fell about 8% year-on-year to $125.8 billion. Alikhanov warned that the rapid growth of past years is unlikely to return. "In the medium term, we should expect more moderate growth rates of mutual trade than before," he said. Chinese companies have dominated Russia's consumer markets, especially cars, where they quickly took the majority of new sales after Western firms exited. But the wave of imports has also raised unease in Moscow. This year, the Kremlin increased tariffs on Chinese-made cars — a move mirroring protective trade steps in the US and Europe against Chinese overcapacity. That step has already slowed flows: Exports of all Chinese goods to Russia dropped 8.4% in the first half of 2025. Alikhanov suggested that future cooperation should focus less on consumer imports and more on industrial investment. "I believe that in the long term, the most successful initiatives will be those that involve investment in joint production, technology transfer and the introduction of advanced technologies," he said. Russia's energy lifeline falters But it's not just consumer trade that is under strain — Russia's energy exports to China have also come under pressure due to lower global oil prices and tighter US sanctions on tankers carrying Russian crude. That slowdown is rippling through the wider economy, with GDP growing just 1.1% in the second quarter — down from 1.4% in the first quarter and sharply lower than 4% a year earlier. "Falling Chinese demand for Russian raw materials — particularly crude oil — has intensified fiscal pressure on Moscow by eroding the tax base tied to energy exports, a key pillar of federal revenues," wrote Maciej Kalwasiński, a senior fellow at the China Department at the Centre for Eastern Studies in Poland, last week. He added that the overall contraction in bilateral trade exerts a "tangible negative impact" on the Russian economy. "This further strains Russia's ability to sustain wartime spending, especially since Russia's economic growth rate has slowed sharply since the beginning of 2025," wrote Kalwasiński.
Bloomberg
13 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Xiaomi Plans Europe Entry; Pop Mart Gets Labubu Boost
'Bloomberg: The China Show' is your definitive source for news and analysis on the world's second-biggest economy. From politics and policy to tech and trends, David Ingles and Yvonne Man give global investors unique insight, delivering in-depth discussions with the newsmakers who matter. (Source: Bloomberg)
