Pete Hegseth accused of plagiarism by Princeton student newspaper
A report by The Daily Princetonian alleges that his senior thesis, submitted by Hegseth in 2003, contains eight instances of 'uncredited material, sham paraphrasing, and verbatim copying.'
The outlet had the thesis, 'Modern Presidential Rhetoric and the Cold War Context,' reviewed by three plagiarism experts. They were not made aware of the identity of the author before assessing the work.
In one example, Hegseth wrote about President George W. Bush's reaction to being told of the first attack on the World Trade Center in New York on 9/11.
'After Card's whisper, Bush looked distracted and somber but continued to listen to the second-graders, joking that they 'read like sixth-graders,'' wrote the now defense secretary.
An article in The Washington Post, published in 2001 shortly after the attacks, reads: 'After Card's whisper, Bush looked distracted and somber but continued to listen to the second-graders read and soon was smiling again. He joked that they read so well, they must be sixth-graders.'
The Post article is not cited in Hegseth's paper.
Plagiarism detection models flagged 12 passages in the thesis, and the experts consulted by the newspaper found only eight of those were significant, with the remaining four being not significant enough to be concerning alone but 'fit a broader pattern of some form of plagiarism.'
While the three experts all said that the passages violated Princeton's academic honesty regulations, they had differing opinions on whether the instances were serious or too minor to matter.
James M. Lang, author of Cheating Lessons: Learning from Academic Dishonesty, called the case 'borderline.'
He told the Princetonian: 'There's no silver bullet here; there's no smoking gun in terms of a deep example of plagiarism,' and said there was more 'gray than black and white,' with roughly half of the examples constituting serious plagiarism and the other half only being minor.
In one example where the experts differ, Hegseth wrote: 'The Berlin Wall speech represents a rare occurrence in presidential rhetoric; caught up in the emotion of the moment, Kennedy, who had just given a speech about the need for peace, got carried away and just ad-libbed the opposite, saying there was no way to work with the Communists.'
The passage is similar to one from President Kennedy: Profile of Power by Richard Reeves: 'In his enthusiasm, Kennedy, who had just given a peace speech and was trying to work out a test ban treaty with the Soviets, had gotten carried away and just ad-libbed the opposite, saying there was no way to work with Communists.'
Reeves is cited in the paper, even for that sentence, but there are no quotation marks. While Lang sees that incident as serious, Jonathan Bailey, who runs the website Plagiarism Today, didn't see that or any of the other seven as egregious.
'Even the ones that were more direct still typically only involve a sentence or two at a time,' Bailey told the Princetonian.
The third expert consulted, Guy Curtis, a researcher at the University of Western Australia who studies academic integrity, said that the thesis violated rules as set out by the university regarding unattributed copying.
'Once you get 10 to 15 words in a row by 'accident' that happen to correspond with something else — it's probably not accidental,' Curtis said.
There are no set rules at Princeton for addressing such issues after graduation, and they could be explained by sloppiness or oversight.
Bailey told the paper: 'This doesn't fit the pattern of someone who went into this deliberately, maliciously trying to plagiarize their way to finishing it. This seems like it was just poor writing techniques and poor methodology.'
The senior thesis is a graduation requirement for all undergraduate students. Hegseth graduated in 2003.
Following the publication of the The Daily Princetonian's article, Chief Pentagon Spokesperson Sean Parnell provided a statement to Konstantin Toropin, a reporter for military.com.
'Secretary Hegseth has written five books. He's written hundreds of papers and op-eds. During the confirmation process, every word was reviewed by top left-wing law firms working in conjunction with every media outlet in the country. They found no plagiarism because there was no plagiarism,' he said. 'This is a fake story designed to distract from the DoD's historic accomplishments under President Trump and Secretary Hegseth's leadership.'
The defense secretary had a difficult confirmation process on Capitol Hill and has since been plagued by scandals relating to his sharing of sensitive military operational information in Signal group chats.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Ex-Washington Post fact checker hits ‘absentee owner' Bezos, tells him to commit to saving paper or sell it
The Washington Post is a sinking ship with a captain missing in action. And according to its now-former fact-checker, that missing captain is its billionaire owner, Jeff Bezos. "He has to be committed to it. If he's not committed to it, he should find someone else to own it," Glenn Kessler told Fox News Digital. "I feel like he was kind of committed to it. And then he's kind of an absentee owner, and he shouldn't be because it's, you know, one of the prime assets of American journalism." Kessler left the Post in July after more than 27 years at the paper — and his final years there were not the best. "What's so saddening is that five years ago, I would not have imagined The Washington Post would be in this state," Kessler said. Kessler never considered leaving the Post until he was presented with the buyout offer, which he accepted. The Post has been financially bleeding, so much so that it reportedly was on pace to lose at least $77 million in 2024. The buyouts had targeted the most veteran staffers, aiming to cut costs and ward off layoffs for the time being. The famed fact-checker was among several high-profile journalists and columnists who have left the paper in recent months, many of whom took issue with decisions and editorial changes Bezos himself had ordered. Kessler compared the Post to "being on the Titanic after it struck an iceberg — drifting aimlessly as it sank, with not enough lifeboats for everyone" in a piece he wrote on his newly-launched Substack account. "They have to have a vision of where they want to go. And I've not seen that vision yet. Or if there is a vision, it's not been clearly articulated," Kessler said. "It's gonna be a really rocky period in the news business in the next five to ten years. And the Post needs to be prepared for that. And I kind of feel like they've lost a lot of, you know, important sailors and captains to keep the ship going. So they're gonna have to make do with less." Bezos has been the target of intense blowback by liberals, who've accused him of bending the knee to President Donald Trump based on actions that have rocked the paper. First was his decision in October to halt the planned endorsement of then-Vice President Kamala Harris just days before the presidential election. Then, in February, he launched a new mission for the editorial pages to promote "personal liberties and free markets," vowing to not publish any pieces that go against those principles. Both instances sparked rebellion among the paper's liberal readers, leading to the cancellation of hundreds of thousands of subscriptions. Several staffers also resigned in protest. But Kessler wasn't always a Bezos critic. He credited the Amazon founder for saving the Post when he bought it in 2013. "Before Bezos bought the newspaper, it was in really bad shape," he told Fox News Digital. "People forget how, you know, because the Graham family didn't really have the resources to keep it going in the new era. And there had been a bunch of buyouts and people were asked to leave. So it had been a pretty grim period then." Things at the Post were souring so much so that Kessler himself had been interviewing for a different job outside the paper. That was until he was offered The Fact Checker stint in 2011, which he accepted, thinking that if the ship went down, he himself could stay afloat with his own "brand." "But then Bezos bought the paper, and he invested a lot of money in the paper," Kessler said. "So the size of the staff doubled. The number of foreign bureaus probably went up [by] at least a third. The resources devoted to engineering support surged, so the web pages started loading faster, and we could do fantastic graphics. There was investment in video… And you really felt like the Post was going places, and it was actually producing better journalism at any point in the time I had worked at the Post." "And now it is just… it's like it hit an iceberg, and it's kind of drifting there, and I don't think there's a plan to rescue it. Or at least a plan to, you know, turn the ship around and get it moving in the direction it was." Kessler blamed management for being "a little dazzled" by the traffic spike that came during the first Trump administration, reaching levels "almost equal" to the Post's top rival, The New York Times. But then, unlike the Times, the Post failed to capitalize on its new readers by not expanding its portfolio. "I've sat in many meetings and had many discussions and heard lots of speeches. I still have no idea what they're trying to do," Kessler said of his former bosses. "It vaguely seems to say we're gonna appeal [to] the people… who don't really care about the news. And we're gonna provide products that would allow them to read The Washington Post and find out information they need to know," he said. "And the problem, as I wrote in my piece, is that that's what The New York Times has been doing for ten years. They have 10 million subscribers, but a large chunk of that are people that don't get the core news product," Kessler continued. "They get the recipes, they get The Athletic — the sports section, they get product recommendations, they get the games, they play Wordle." He said the Post is stuck with "the Avis problem," citing the car rental company's old ads that claimed "We try harder," alluding to the reality it was always in the shadow of Hertz, a dynamic similar to the Gray Lady. "The Washington Post has always been No. 2. It's never had the same size circulation as the Times. I would argue news coverage was better, but maybe I was biased about that," Kessler conceded to Fox News Digital. "But now in this fragmented marketplace, people have to make a choice. What Substacks am I going to subscribe to? What newsletters am I gonna get? What networks am I going to watch? 'Oh, I need one newspaper. I'll be willing to spend money on one newspaper,' and the default is always going to be, unfortunately, The New York Times." He continued, "It's a broader product. It has better arts coverage, theater coverage. I've never gotten an understanding of how the Post was going to combat that problem. And it sounded like the solution was, 'Oh, we're going to be like a mini-me New York Times with things to appeal to people that don't follow news.' Well, they already get that in The New York Times." The Post has scrapped an initiative launched last year dubbed "WP Ventures," meant to attract social media users. However, the paper appears to already be pivoting with Tuesday's announcement of former Axios executive editor and former Post reporter, Sara Kehaulani Goo, returning as its president of Creator Network — a new position Goo says will be "creating personality-driven content" and help provide advertisers "access" to a new audience driven by creators. The Times and the rise of new media weren't the only obstacles facing the Post. "Midway through my journalism career, I started saying, 'I'm working for a dinosaur.' And AI is quite possibly the meteorite that will kill off the last of the dinosaurs," Kessler said to Fox News Digital. "I'm greatly concerned about what AI is gonna do, because AI is gonna kill search. And search was how people often found our news articles." "The statistics I had seen was that four or five years ago, every 100 searches on Google yielded six clicks on a news site. Now it's about every 100 searches yields two clicks on the news site. When people use AI, a thousand searches result in one click," he continued. "So it's a dramatic difference. And if I were running a news organization, at this point, I don't know quite what I would do about that. So it's a bad time to be running a new organization. I do have sympathy for the situation that [Washington Post publisher and CEO] Will Lewis and [Washington Post executive editor] Matt Murray find themselves in right now. I just question whether or not they really have figured out what to do." Goo said in her announcement that "we're going to be infusing AI with everything that we do to help us maximize efficiency and scale." But the buck ultimately stops with Bezos, according to Kessler. "The Post was really at its high point [after Bezos' purchase]— the amount of stories we're producing, the quality of the stories was really significant. And then, traffic surged when Trump got elected and there was so much hunger and interest in the news we were producing. We kind of lost our way after that," Kessler said. "And not only lost our way, we started losing oodles of money. A hundred million dollars one year, I think the last number I saw [in] 2023 was $77 million… I think even for a person as rich as Jeff Bezos, that counts as real money." "And I have gotten the sense that he's a bit of an absentee owner. He's had other distractions, and he's committed more to some of his other enterprises, such as a space company, than he is to The Washington Post, which is really just a tiny part of his business investments. And maybe, I don't know, I hate to speculate, maybe you thought he gave us his best shot, and we blew it, and now we've got it muddled through," he added. A spokesperson for The Washington Post told Fox News Digital, "The Washington Post is reinventing itself to be a trusted news source for all Americans. That means working hard each day to publish the most accurate news, alongside opinions that resonate across the nation."
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Draft ‘MAHA' plan to improve kids' health leaked. Here's what's in it.
The Trump administration has identified ultra-processed foods and chemical exposure as potential hazards in its plan to improve the health of American children, but does not propose widespread restrictions on such foods or pesticides, according to a draft of the report obtained by The Washington Post. Instead, the 'Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy' - which isn't final and may not be publicly released for weeks - said the government will continue efforts to define ultra-processed food and work to increase public awareness and confidence in how pesticides are regulated. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. That approach is in line with some recent policy proposals but falls far short of the major changes some of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy's supporters have called for. It's unlikely to provoke fury from the food and agriculture industries Kennedy has railed against and that once feared a sweeping crackdown on their products. President Donald Trump formed a 'Make America Healthy Again' commission chaired by Kennedy to address the root causes of chronic disease and childhood illness. The commission released a report in May identifying the causes of childhood chronic diseases that are shortening Americans' lifespans. The latest report is meant to serve as a blueprint to cure those ills. The draft report, first reported by the New York Times, provides new details on how health agencies will try to address broadly recognized dangers to American health, including air and water pollution, exposure to microplastics, and poor nutrition. It also targets long-established public health practices including vaccination and the fluoridation of drinking water. And it calls for new working groups and research into health issues, including a task force focused on chronic disease. It's unclear whether the draft was revised before the Tuesday deadline to submit it to Trump. An HHS spokesman declined to comment and referred questions to the White House. Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, said 'any document purported to be the MAHA report should be treated as speculative literature' unless it has been released by the administration. Here are some of the takeaways: - - - Pesticides The draft report characterizes the Environmental Protection Agency's reviews of pesticides as 'robust' - a far different tone from how Kennedy has previously talked about the chemicals used widely in U.S. agriculture, saying they are contaminating the food supply. It doesn't directly mention the pesticides glyphosate or atrazine referenced in the first MAHA report in May. Instead it just says the EPA 'will work to ensure that the public has awareness and confidence' in the agency's 'robust pesticide review procedures.' The May MAHA report also took a far milder tone than some people associated with the movement expected. That report expressed a commitment to the prosperity of farmers who, along with chemical manufacturers, had pushed back on efforts to more strictly regulate the pesticides they rely on to produce large crops. Kennedy has repeatedly said he would not pursue policies that would put farmers out of business. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, who calls pesticides 'crop protection tools,' recently said Kennedy and his team have met with 130 groups representing the farming and ranching industry. 'I have rarely seen anyone more open to understanding and learning,' she said at a news conference earlier this month. 'I've also heard [Kennedy] say that we can't compromise our farmers and their ability to feed and fuel and clothe the world.' - - - Food and pharmaceuticals The draft raises concerns about reduced-fat food, which became popular decades ago but is now questioned by many nutritionists. It proposes removing restrictions on the sale of whole milk in schools and mandates for reduced-fat foods purchased through the Women, Infants and Children food assistance program. And it calls for better food in hospitals and for veterans. The draft says HHS will explore developing potential 'industry guidelines' to limit the direct marketing of 'certain unhealthy foods to children' and will increase oversight of advertising by drug companies. But it does not propose immediate new restrictions. It points to some efforts already underway, such as pushing food companies to remove synthetic dyes from their products. It also promises transparency around fees paid by pharmaceutical companies to the Food and Drug Administration, which Kennedy supporters have characterized as giving the industry undue influence over drug approvals. - - - Families The report addresses a number of issues around raising families. It promises to update infant formula requirements, encourage breastfeeding and launch an education campaign to boost fertility rates. - - - Vaccines The draft promises to develop a new vaccine framework to ensure 'America has the best Childhood Vaccine Schedule' and address vaccine injuries. Kennedy has long been critical of the childhood immunization schedule, which he has contended has too many shots and could be linked to chronic disease and shortened lifespans. Public health experts have said the array of shots provided to children and their cumulative health effects have been extensively studied and deemed safe. This week, HHS revived a defunct Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines, a move anti-vaccine activists had demanded in an attempt to overhaul the immunization schedule. - - - Fluoride Kennedy and others in the MAHA movement have called for the removal of fluoride from drinking water, a practice widely hailed for improving oral health. But the draft doesn't outright call for removing fluoride from water. Instead, it says the government will 'educate' Americans on appropriate levels of fluoride and raise awareness of getting fluoride through toothpaste. It references the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revisiting its long-standing recommendation to add fluoride to drinking water and the FDA's review of prescription fluoride supplements. Research has found the health benefits of fluoride have diminished in recent years as the mineral became widely available through toothpaste and mouthwash. Studies have also shown fluoride can have harmful health effects at high concentrations that are well above levels considered safe for drinking water. - - - Electromagnetism The draft report said HHS would partner with other agencies to study electromagnetic radiation to identify 'gaps in knowledge, including on new technologies to ensure safety and efficacy.' Some people have been leery of electromagnetic radiation from modern technology such as cellphones, WiFi routers and Bluetooth technology, but there is little research to back up those concerns. Kennedy has previously echoed the conspiracy theory that 5G high-speed wireless network service is being used to 'harvest our data and control our behavior.' The World Health Organization in 2016 said scientific evidence does not confirm health consequences from exposure to low-level electromagnetic fields, but more research is needed. The American Cancer Society in 2022 said most studies have not identified strong links between cancer and exposure to extremely low frequency sources of electromagnetic radiation such as computers and power lines. - - - Psychiatric drugs The report calls for the creation of a government working group to scrutinize the use of psychiatric medication by children. Kennedy has long criticized the use of these drugs, such as antidepressants and Adderall, and has made false claims about them. Medical associations and mental health experts have raised concerns about the Trump administration's scrutiny of the medicines, saying they have been shown to be beneficial when prescribed judiciously. The draft does not mention the use of weight loss drugs by children, which Trump's executive order establishing the MAHA commission characterized as a potential 'threat.' - - - Lauren Weber contributed to this report. Related Content Ukraine scrambles to roll back Russian eastern advance as summit takes place Her dogs kept dying, and she got cancer. Then they tested her water. D.C.'s homeless begin to see the effects of Trump's crackdown Solve the daily Crossword
5 hours ago
Draft of new 'MAHA' report suggests RFK Jr. won't target pesticides
The draft of an upcoming government report suggesting ways to improve the health of American children does not recommend severe restrictions on pesticides and ultra-processed foods, according to a copy of the document obtained by ABC News. The draft's language, if left unchanged, would constitute a win for the agriculture industry and a potential setback for Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) allies, who have railed against the use of chemical additives in America's food supply, arguing that they harm children. A person familiar with the draft cautioned that the language could still change before it's released to the public. "Unless officially released by the administration, any document purporting to be the MAHA report should be dismissed as speculative literature," White House deputy press secretary Kush Desai said in response to ABC News' request for comment. An HHS spokesperson declined to verify the document's authenticity. The New York Times first reported details of the new draft report. The report will be the second "MAHA" report released by the Trump administration following one published in May. Both were composed by officials in the White House and across different federal agencies, including Kennedy's HHS. The May report detailed the factors officials said were worsening the health of American children and called for a second report, within 100 days, to recommend policies to address those factors. The earlier report -- which was dogged by the revelation that some studies it cited were nonexistent -- cited damning statistics about the effect of chemical food additives, tying them to cancer and developmental disorders. The draft of the new report does not signal any intention to eliminate pesticides from America's food. Instead, the draft calls for "more targeted and precise pesticide applications" and research programs that would "help to decrease pesticide volumes." The report also stated the Environmental Protection Agency "will work to ensure that the public has awareness and confidence in EPA's robust pesticide review procedures and how that relates to the limiting of risk for users and the general public." Regarding ultra-processed foods, the new report states only that HHS, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration would work to develop a "government-wide definition for 'ultra-processed food.'" In his January confirmation hearing, Kennedy declared that "something is poisoning the American people, and we know that the primary culprits are changing food supply, a switch to highly chemical intensive processed foods." Meanwhile, some "MAHA" influencers have loudly demanded changes to the country's food supply, putting their faith in Kennedy to leverage his position of power to uproot the agriculture industry. But this summer, agriculture groups lobbied intensely against the inclusion of anti-pesticide recommendations in the new report. They appeared to find an ally in Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, who indicated to reporters this month that the upcoming report would spare pesticides. "There is no chance that our current system of agriculture can survive without those crop protection tools," she said at a press conference in a Washington. "I feel very confident that his, and our, commitment to make sure that farmers are at the table remains paramount, and that the report will reflect that."
