Putin ally suggests launching 'preventative strikes' against the West for practically waging 'full-scale war' on Russia - as Trump sours on Kremlin
'What is happening today is a proxy war, but in essence it is a full-scale war, sanctions packages, loud statements about the militarisation of Europe,' Medvedev said in his latest tirade, carried by the TASS news agency.
'It's another attempt to destroy the 'historical anomaly' hated by the West - Russia, our country.
'We need to act accordingly, to respond in full. And if necessary, launch pre-emptive strikes.'
He went on to add that many in the West had 'treachery in their blood' and a 'sick, very outdated view of their own superiority'.
Medvedev, now deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, cast himself as a liberal moderniser when he was president from 2008-2012, but has since emerged as an anti-Western Kremlin hawk.
He now routinely spouts virulent anti-Western rhetoric and has accused the US, UK and Western European nations of trying to undermine Moscow for centuries.
His fiery comments come days after US President Donald Trump announced he was 'very unhappy' with his opposite number in the Kremlin and would slap '100 per cent tariffs' on Russia - plus secondary sanctions on its trading partners - if a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine is not reached in 50 days.
Meanwhile, the US and allies in Europe are now hashing out a deal to transfer yet more sophisticated weapons systems, including air defence systems, to Kyiv.
The US-led NATO military alliance casts Russia as a major threat and politicians across Western Europe have said that Russia, which in 2022 sent tens of thousands of troops into Ukraine, could one day attack a member of NATO.
Medvedev has roundly rejected those claims as 'complete rubbish', noting that President Vladimir Putin had repeatedly rejected such assertions too.
'Let me remind you that our president has stated unequivocally: Russia is not going to fight NATO or attack Europe.
'The statements of Western politicians on this topic are complete nonsense. I would add that this nonsense is being deliberately thrown into the information space in order to destabilise an already difficult situation.
'This is another flank of the West's open war against us,' he said.
Diplomats say Medvedev's remarks give an indication of thinking among some of the more hawkish members of Russia's political elite.
Medvedev may be emboldened by news that the Trump administration is running out of patience with Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine.
During a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office this week, the US President's anger at Moscow's escalating attacks on Ukraine boiled over.
'We are very, very unhappy with [Russia], and we're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days, tariffs at about 100 per cent,' he said in the Oval Office.
He also threatened to levy secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian exports to discourage them from keeping funds flowing into the Kremlin's war chest.
Until now, the US and its European allies have declined to impose measures that would restrict Russia from exporting its oil and gas elsewhere.
Such a move would constitute a dramatic ramping up of Western efforts to back Ukraine as it would likely see Washington and the EU target countries such as China, India and NATO member Turkey, all of whom import huge quantities of Russian energy.
'I'm disappointed in President Putin. I thought we would've had a deal two months ago,' he went on, in reference to a US-proposed ceasefire deal that Kyiv accepted but was rejected by Moscow.
In response, leading Russian propagandist Igor Korotchenko said Moscow must use the 50-day period before sanctions are imposed to win the war by destroying Ukraine.
Korotchenko, a former colonel-turned-military analyst and editor-in-chief of National Defence magazine, told state-TV: 'Weakening the potential of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' rear support system will force Ukraine to accept Russia's terms
'It is necessary to intensify Russian strikes… to the maximum extent possible. Scaling up this approach, we can achieve success.'
Trump earlier this week also struck a deal with NATO counterparts in Europe to send sophisticated weaponry, including sorely needed Patriot air defence missiles, to Ukraine - but insisted that the US would not foot the bill.
'We've made a deal today where we are going to be sending [Ukraine] weapons and [Europe] is going to be paying for them,' he stated.
'We - the United States - will not be having any payment made. We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it, and they're going to be paying for it.'
The workings of the deal struck between the White House and European nations to provide and finance the delivery of advanced weapons systems to Ukraine were not immediately clear.
Many European countries appeared to get on board with the announcement, though Trump's move to take credit for the additional weapons headed to Ukraine created some mild friction in Europe.
'If we pay for these weapons, it's our support,' said EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, speaking after the Brussels meeting, adding that she welcomed Trump's decision.
'So it's European support, and we are doing as much as we can to help Ukraine ... If you promise to give the weapons, but say that somebody else is going to pay for it, it's not really given by you, is it?'
Washington also retains some $3.85 billion worth of Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) left over from the Biden administration at its disposal to provide weapons to Ukraine.
The PDA allows the president to draw from US weapons stocks to help allies in an emergency.
Trump has not sent any weapons to Ukraine that were not previously approved under the Biden administration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
What is ‘an authentically conservative position'?
Kemi Badenoch has written to Conservative MPs urging them to 'take an authentically conservative position'. Which is what precisely? Answering the question demands some political context. The Tory governments of the last 15 years had some medium-size successes: Universal Credit, English schools reform, pensions simplification. But the failures were bigger: economic stagnation and uncontrolled immigration – exacerbated by the biggest conflict between two European countries since the Second World War, and the most fatal pandemic since the First. There is a justified sense that the Conservatives, who have exhausted five leaders in under ten years, lost their political compass in government – hence the rise of Reform. Badenoch is scrabbling to recover ground she is losing. What does it look like? National conservatives, libertarians, Thatcher nostalgics, authoritarians, One Nationers, populists – all claim to represent real conservatism. There are no tablets of stone, with a definition carved into them, to give an incontestable verdict. But over time, conservatism has tended to stress three indispensables. First, it's anti-utopian. It says that history shows attempts to build heaven on earth, based on race or class supremacy – Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia – end instead in hell: in holocausts, the slaughter of innocents, Holodomor and injustices worse than they replace. Second, it's local – or, rather, national. A French conservative is likely to be republican, interventionist and have a high view of the state's role. A British one will be monarchist, tend to prefer markets to planning and be increasingly suspicious of two-tier state power. The two may well find each other strangers. That said, there is rough agreement internationally on two fundamentals: social order and economic freedom, and that the two are self-reinforcing. Third – and most controversially, given our times – conservatism in Britain is bound up with institutions: monarchy, Parliament, rule of law, limited government, a free media. If they go wrong, revolutionaries try to smash them. Conservatives work instead to reform them, because institutions are a kind of collective, embodied memory. And without memory, you can't learn. Indeed, you have no identity. So far, so obvious. But how does that world-view translate into policy? I wrestled with the question in a recent essay for Policy Exchange – the Future of the Right – and found quickly that the old conservative classics are the best: boosting enterprise, particularly small business. Controlling immigration. Helping families, which the state treats as a cash cow. Boosting our defence and security in a dangerous world. Getting value for money from our public services. (Plainly, the NHS can't carry on as it is.) This is all very well. But – in a country with an ageing population, low growth, broken border control, balkanised cities and civil discontent – it sounds, and perhaps is, abstracted. Many conservatives are giving up on not just the Conservatives but politics. To opt for Reform is, above all, a cry of protest – and rage. If the question 50 years ago, when Margaret Thatcher led the Opposition, was what – what should conservatives do in government? – the question now is how: how can a government of the Right, however constituted, fulfil a conservative, democratic mandate amidst a broken, social democratic state? How would a Prime Minister Badenoch – or Nigel Farage, for that matter – respond to activist judges, bust procurement, politicised civil servants, mass strikes, Islamist demands for blasphemy laws, out-of-date agreements like the Refugee Convention, lawfare? Some conservatives have given up altogether, retreating to Substack and declaring the Blob unbeatable. It isn't. The body responsible for righting these wrongs is Parliament. Under the terms of our constitution, it makes the law, and all must ultimately bend to its will – judges, securocrats and mandarins alike – because it represents the people. But Parliament in general, and the Commons in particular, is in a very bad way. The latter has three main functions. To debate, consider legislation and provide ministers. It does none of them well. Debate is curtailed. Legislation is poorly drafted and scrutinised. Ministers are all too often not up to the job. Why? The shorthand answer is that the political parties are, increasingly, selecting parliamentary candidates for other purposes. The voter-driven fashion is to select energetic campaigners who will be committed constituency champions. That's great for individual seats. But not for the country as a whole – because sparky local campaigners don't always make efficient ministers or diligent legislators. Fifty years ago, the plan called Stepping Stones helped to pave the way for the Thatcher governments' programme of trade union reform. A Badenoch or Farage administration needs a modernised equivalent – a strategy not so much for what a conservative government would deliver but how it would deliver it. The signs are that the Conservative leader understands this. Hence the leadership campaign document to which she contributed a foreword – Rise of the Bureaucratic Class. Part of the answer to speeding its fall may lie in her own hands. 'I had rather have a plain russet-coated captain that knows what he fights for, and loves what he knows, than that which you call a gentleman and is nothing else,' Oliver Cromwell once wrote. The key to finding effective MPs is less technical ability than belief. They need stars to navigate by – enterprise, a smaller state, border control, defence, and understanding the difference between Islam, a great religion, and Islamism, a politicised and extreme ideology. Badenoch, and Farage for that matter, need the equivalents of Cromwell's captains in the Commons. As the Conservatives select candidates for the next election, the means of improving Parliament lies partly in her hands.
BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
US to impose sanctions on Palestinian organisations
The US says it is going to impose sanctions on the Palestinians' self-governance organisation as well as the body that represents it on the international sanctions affect both the Palestinian Authority (PA) which was established by the Oslo peace accords, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) which was recognised after the same process as the official representative of the Palestinian people in return for it recognising Israel and renouncing State Department said it would deny visas to PLO members and PA officials. The timing and language of the statement suggest it is the Trump administration's response to this week's French-Saudi led conference at the United Nations held to rally support for a future two state meeting came as France, the UK and Canada committed to recognising an independent, demilitarised Palestinian state later this year, in some cases subject to certain conditions. The US castigated these moves, having privately warned of diplomatic consequences if those attending the UN conference made "anti-Israel" its sanctions announcement, the State Department accused the PA and PLO of taking actions to "internationalise its conflict with Israel such as through the International Criminal Court (ICC) and International Court of Justice (ICJ)".It also referred to a series of long-standing complaints by the US and Israel that the PLO and PA had continued "to support terrorism including incitement and glorification of violence (especially in textbooks), and providing payments and benefits in support of terrorism to Palestinian terrorists and their families". The Trump administration earlier this year lifted sanctions on violent Israeli settlers who have killed Palestinians in the occupied West leading Palestinian politician described the sanctions move as "revenge" by the US for the commitments to recognise Palestinian statehood by a growing number of PA appeared to echo that sentiment in a statement released on Thursday."These campaigns have been escalating in response to the significant and successive achievements of Palestinian diplomacy," it said."Particularly the recent recognitions of the State of Palestine by key countries, the successful United Nations conference in New York, and the historic declaration issued therein." Mustafa Barghouti, founder of the Palestinian National Initiative (PNI) which is part of the PLO, said the US was targeting the wrong told the BBC: "Trump's administration, instead of punishing the criminals who are committing war crimes in Gaza and in the West Bank, which is Israel, is instead… punishing the victim, which is the Palestinian people."Israel welcomed the sanctions and thanked US Secretary of State Marco Rubio for imposing them."This important action by [President Trump] and his administration also exposes the moral distortion of certain countries that ran to recognise a virtual Palestinian state while turning a blind eye to its support for terror and incitement," said foreign minister Gideon Sa' PA has always rejected complaints around "salaries" saying the payments are stipends to the families of all Palestinian prisoners held under Israel's military occupation, many of whom are not given any due process and are held in breach of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Palestinians see all those detained by Israel and jailed by its military courts, which have a 99 per cent conviction rate, as political prisoners. French officials said last week the PA had expressed its willingness to end these payments in response to France's commitment to recognise a Palestinian week's UN conference further isolated the US in its support for the way Israel has continued the war in Gaza, which many countries criticised at the meeting. The conference exposed a strategic vacuum being left by Washington that had traditionally led diplomatic efforts towards a viable longer-term peace between Israelis and travel ban on Palestinian officials may be meant as a more limited broadside than a full range of financial sanctions. It is already a complex and lengthy process for PA and PLO officials to obtain visas to travel to the US, requiring special exemptions which are rarely given. It is not yet clear whether the move would affect any officials working for the Palestinian mission to the United Nations in New York. The current Palestinian ambassador to the UN and his deputy are both US citizens.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Russian strikes kill at least 14 people in Kyiv, 6-year-old boy among dead
KYIV, July 31 (Reuters) - Russia launched waves of missiles and drones on Kyiv before dawn on Thursday, killing at least 14 people including a six-year-old boy, and wounding well over 100 others, officials in the Ukrainian capital said. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, speaking in his nightly video address, put the death toll at 14 and said rescue operations were continuing into the evening. The Interior Ministry said more than 1,200 police and rescuers were tackling the aftermath. Ukraine's national rescue service said 15 had been killed and 145 injured. Zelenskiy said dozens remained in hospital. Fourteen of the injured were children, the largest number of children hurt in a single attack on the city since Russia started its full-scale invasion almost 3-1/2 years ago. In an earlier post on Telegram, the president said Russia had launched more than 300 drones and eight missiles. "Today the world has once again seen Russia's response to our desire for peace ... Therefore, peace without strength is impossible," Zelenskiy said on the Telegram app. City authorities announced a day of mourning to be held on Friday. Russia's Defence Ministry said it targeted and hit Ukrainian military airfields and ammunition depots as well as businesses linked to what it called Kyiv's military-industrial complex. Explosions rocked Kyiv from about midnight onwards and blazes lit up the night sky. Yurii Kravchuk, 62, stood wrapped in a blanket next to a damaged building with a bandage around his head. He had heard the missile alert but did not get to a shelter in time, he told Reuters. "I started waking up my wife and then there was an explosion. My daughter ended up in the hospital," he said. Russia, which denies targeting civilians, has stepped up air strikes in recent months on Ukrainian towns and cities far from the front lines of the war. Thousands of civilians, the vast majority of them Ukrainian, have been killed since Moscow invaded in 2022. Kyiv and Moscow have held three rounds of talks in Istanbul this year that yielded exchanges of prisoners and bodies, but no breakthrough to defuse the conflict. At one location in Kyiv, rescuers spent more than three hours reaching a man trapped in rubble by cutting through the wall of a neighbouring apartment, the Interior Ministry said. The man talked to the emergency services during the operation and was pulled out alive, it added. A five-month-old baby was among the wounded, with five children hospitalised, the head of Kyiv's military administration, Tymur Tkachenko, said on national television. Schools and hospitals were among the buildings damaged across 27 locations in the capital, officials said. "The attack was extremely insidious and deliberately calculated to overload the air defence system," Zelenskiy wrote on X. He posted a video of burning ruins, saying people were still trapped under the rubble of one partially-ruined residential building as of the morning. The president said the attacks had killed a six-year-old boy and his mother, but later edited the post to remove the reference to the mother. A senior U.S. diplomat told the United Nations Security Council on Thursday that President Donald Trump had made clear that he wants a deal to end the war by August 8. "Both Russia and Ukraine must negotiate a ceasefire and durable peace. It is time to make a deal. President Trump has made clear this must be done by August 8," diplomat John Kelly told the 15-member council. On Tuesday, Trump said Washington will start imposing tariffs and other measures on Russia if Moscow shows no progress toward ending the conflict. "This is Putin's response to Trump's deadlines," Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko said. "The world must respond with a tribunal and maximum pressure." The air force reported five direct missile hits and 21 drone hits in 12 locations. Ukrainian air defence units downed 288 drones and three cruise missiles, the air force added.
