Provincial code of conduct in schools protects students from gender, sexual orientation disclosure
The Education Department released a new provincial code of conduct for kindergarten-to-Grade 12 schools on June 11.
The 38-page document provides guidance on how to navigate student behaviour issues and communicate with caregivers when necessary.
JOHN WOODS / FREE PRESS FILES
High school teacher Kay Wojnarski, pictured at a rally in support of transgender programming in 2023, says she is impressed and relieved to see protections for queer and transgender students in the new provincial code of conduct for kindergarten-to-Grade 12 schools students.
It states that, when a principal believes a student has been harmed by a peer's behaviour, they must — 'as soon as reasonably possible' — notify the families of all those involved.
'Some students who are part of the (LGBTTQ+) community may not have disclosed or shared their identity beyond the school community,' it adds.
'Discretion must be exercised to protect students from harm in disclosing gender identity or sexual orientation.'
High school teacher Kay Wojnarski said she was impressed and relieved to see that explicit reference to protections for queer and transgender students.
Wojnarski called it 'unethical, conceited and irreversibly damaging' to disclose a student's sexuality or gender identity without their consent.
'A student who is betrayed by adults meant to protect them will not feel safe or cared for in their learning environment,' said the teacher who runs a gender-sexuality alliance at her school in Winnipeg.
She noted that students need to be treated as human beings with agency and dignity 'rather than as property.'
The use of pronouns other than the ones students were assigned at birth has fuelled the 'parental rights movement' and caught the attention of lawmakers across the country.
New Brunswick, Saskatchewan and Alberta have introduced legislation in recent years requiring that schools obtain parental consent before addressing an underage student by their chosen name and gender identity-related pronouns.
New Brunswick has loosened its rules so students under 16 now only need approval to change a name on report cards and other official school records.
Teachers in Saskatchewan and Alberta continue to notify families if a student aged 16 or younger wants to be addressed differently during the school day.
Manitoba Education Minister Tracy Schmidt called K-12 student families 'our No.1 partner,' but she said her department also recognizes teacher expertise.
'We believe in educators as professionals.… Every day, we trust them to make choices that have student safety as their top priority,' Schmidt told the Free Press.
The code of conduct indicates that parents and caregivers should be alerted about the general nature and impact of bullying and other inappropriate behaviour involving students.
While noting that principals have obligations to protect personal information, it says they are required to disclose 'more information beyond the fact that (disciplinary) measures have been taken.'
Wednesdays
Sent weekly from the heart of Turtle Island, an exploration of Indigenous voices, perspectives and experiences.
The household of a child who has been targeted is supposed to be told if an intervention plan is being developed, a suspension is being issued or privileges were removed.
Principals have been given seven months to align local rules with the Provincial Code of Conduct: Behaviour Intervention and Response Using a Student-Centred and Strengths-Based Approach.
Lillian Klausen, president of the Manitoba Teachers' Society, said a reporter was the first to bring the document to her attention and she had yet to review it in full.
'Naturally, we're in favour of anything that protects our students,' she said in a statement. 'We're looking forward to a full consultation with government before the code goes into effect.'
maggie.macintosh@freepress.mb.ca
Maggie MacintoshEducation reporter
Maggie Macintosh reports on education for the Free Press. Originally from Hamilton, Ont., she first reported for the Free Press in 2017. Read more about Maggie.
Funding for the Free Press education reporter comes from the Government of Canada through the Local Journalism Initiative.
Every piece of reporting Maggie produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
14 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump administration freezes $108M at Duke amid inquiry into alleged racial preferences
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is freezing $108 million in research funding to Duke University as the federal government accuses the school of racial discrimination in the form of affirmative action, according to a person familiar with the matter. The National Institutes of Health halted the funding to the private university in North Carolina, said the person who spoke Wednesday on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Earlier this week, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Education Department sent a joint letter alleging racial preferences in Duke's hiring and admissions. Duke is the latest institution to have its federal funding held up as the government investigates allegations of antisemitism and diversity, equity and inclusion policies the administration says are unlawful. It follows other probes including at Harvard, Columbia, and Cornell. Duke did not immediately comment. In Monday's letter to Duke, leaders of HHS and the Education Department accused the university of 'vile racism.' It alludes to allegations of racial preferences at Duke, its medical school and its health system that, if substantiated, would make Duke 'unfit for any further financial relationship with the federal government.' The letter accuses Duke of providing racial preferences in recruiting, admissions, scholarships, hiring and more. It refers to allegations of discrimination without offering specific examples. 'Racism is a scourge when practiced by individuals, but it is especially corrosive when enshrined in the nation's most eminent and respected institutions,' according to the letter, signed by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Education Secretary Linda McMahon. It's part of a broader campaign to eradicate DEI practices the Trump administration describes as discrimination against white and Asian American people. In their letter, the agencies order Duke to end any practices at its health system that give 'benefits or advantages' based on race. Saying Duke is unlikely to be capable of an 'honest and trustworthy review,' the letter takes the unusual step of requesting a new Merit and Civil Rights Committee that would be approved by the government and authorized by the school's board of trustees. The panel would be tasked with identifying and ending any racial preferences. If problems remained after six months, the administration would pursue legal enforcement, the letter said. The Education Department separately opened an investigation into the Duke Law Journal on Monday over allegations that it gave advantages to prospective editors from underrepresented groups. The Trump administration has used federal research funding as leverage in its effort to reshape universities that President Donald Trump has described as hotbeds of liberalism. It has presented a crisis for universities that rely on federal grants as a major source of revenue, spurring some to take on debt and find other ways to self-fund research. Duke University spent $1.5 billion on research last year, with nearly 60% coming from federal sources, according to the university's website. Even before the latest funding freeze, Duke faced financial turmoil. Last week, university leaders said almost 600 employees had accepted voluntary buyouts but that layoffs would still be needed. Officials said they needed to reduce costs amid uncertainty around federal research funding and a hike to the university's federal endowment tax. The Trump administration has been ratcheting up pressure on universities in hopes of striking deals like one that Columbia University signed last week. The Ivy League school agreed to pay $200 million and make changes to admissions, hiring, student discipline and more in exchange for regaining access to federal funding. The administration has described it as a template for other universities including Harvard, which has been in talks with the administration even as it battles the White House in court. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
The politics and process of grade inflation
Opinion For 60 years as an educator in both schools and universities, I have listened to 'University … instructors are warning there's a high level of unpreparedness among first year students …' (Not making the grades, July 25, Free Press). In all of those years, the fault-finding and blame-laying have not changed. Now every time the accusations arise, I am reminded of a memorable cartoon from the Excellence in Education movement of the 1980s. It featured a student talking to another, 'Whenever we have excellence in education, I don't learn more, I just get lower marks.' It's a regular reminder that the recurring 'grade inflation' furore is more a political question than an educational one, as are most of the predictable responses. If we seriously believe what some university professors are implying — that their curricula are critical and indispensable, their teaching and assessment methodologies are above reproach and that today's students are deficient — we should be worried. Something would really be amiss if we were so sure they were right but, of course, the truth is very different. Past discussions suggest the ensuing script. University professors declare that high schools are not preparing student's adequately for the programs they choose, high school teachers say the same about the middle years, middle years about the early years and early years about the parents not readying children for the rigours of school life. Finally, everyone blames the government and the minister of education for lack of oversight, demanding that this emergency situation demands immediate attention. If I was a conspiracy theorist, I would suggest that the whole charade is just a deliberate diversion or distraction. But I am not. I believe that most everyone in the system, from parents to professors, is well meaning and committed to doing their best for young people. And because they care they can easily be drawn into public machinations like the grade inflation scam, and each will process it and respond in their own way — ranging from feeling guilty to being resentful, neither of which is very helpful, and both of which can do our young more harm than good. The political response and its implications are self defeating at all levels. The educational response is different and, I not so humbly suggest, should prevail. Parents get the children they get, not necessarily the ones they imagined, and good parents accept their children as sacred gifts, and do their best to help them become self-regulating, self-governing individuals. This usually includes sending them to the care of others — schools, teachers and other adults. Good teachers at all levels welcome the children and young people as they are, accepting the responsibility to advance their meaningful learning, and helping them accept their self-worth and imagine their positive possibilities. And they concern themselves more with this than with judgments about their presumed deficiencies and faults. Good professors do the same but, because they are the first to deal with these people as adults who have made conscious choices, they can rightfully have greater expectations about attitudes, behaviours, and efforts. That level of responsibility is a step beyond what is expected in schools where the programs are largely, choices aside, predetermined. If the educational imperative is accepted, then grade inflation is a non-issue. However, post-secondary institutions are also responsible for credentialization, and parents and teachers are aware that credentials rely largely on prior academic performance. The stakes can be high, which explains why we continue to return to the question of marks. Marks on tests, although one of the crudest ways to measure achievement and potential, are generally accepted by the system and the public. I think this is because they seem to provide certainty, enhance efficiency, and predict success, again more political than educational. The high stakes would explain why high school parents' appeal their adolescents' marks to the highest levels, insisting that they be raised — university entrance, scholarships and recognition are up for grabs — added to the desire to appear as good parents by their children and peers. And many teachers have learned that it's easier to give slightly higher marks than to have your evaluations be overturned by an administrator bowing to parental wishes. After all, what is the statistical difference between a 93 and a 96 arrived at through subjective tests administered to students at various stages of maturity and states of mental health? At the university and college level similar political decisions are made — why go through the challenges of multiple appeals at various levels to have someone change the grade you gave from or a B+ to an A? It's doubtfully worth the hassle, particularly when you're also aware of the tentativeness of your scholarly reputation, the imperfections and vagaries of your judgments, and sometimes, accompanying threats of retribution. In my view, everyone involved would benefit from not being drawn into the political 'grade inflation' diversion as a substitute for a real meaningful dialogue about why and how we need to educate our young in the first instance. John R. Wiens is dean emeritus at the faculty of education, University of Manitoba.
Winnipeg Free Press
a day ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Canada-U.S. bond strong and will survive, American ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, tells Winnipeg audience
Despite more than six months of economic threats that have sparked anger and strained cross-border relations, the United States ambassador to Canada believes the bond between his country and this one is solid. Pete Hoekstra, who spoke to about 150 local business leaders Tuesday at a Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce luncheon, likened the current state of relations between the two nations to a cloth that's been pulled and stretched, taking on a new shape. 'It will still be a shape that is a strong shape,' Hoekstra said. 'What we need to do is make sure that we don't do anything that starts to tear apart that fabric.' RUTH BONNEVILLE / FREE PRESS The diplomat offered his perspective as the clock continues to tick down to Thursday's Donald Trump-imposed deadline for a new U.S.-Canada trade deal. The president has promised a new round of punishing tariffs on Canadian imports if negotiators are unsuccessful. And while tariffs will raise the price of imported goods in the U.S., almost inevitably leading to a rise in the inflation rate, Hoekstra said the Trump administration doesn't see a cause-and-effect reaction on the horizon. 'We don't see a direct link between the tariffs and inflation,' he said. Acknowledging that economic matters between Canada and the United States will change after a deal is hammered out, he they will continue to be 'strong partners.' Hoekstra, who has been travelling across Canada for speaking engagement, wasn't willing to predict the outcome of the current negotiations. RUTH BONNEVILLE / FREE PRESS 'A lot of action takes place in the last 70 to 96 hours,' he told the crowd at the Winnipeg Art Gallery. He made note of recent U.S. trade deals struck with the European Union and Japan, both of which arrived at baseline 15 per cent tariffs on goods imported into the United States. In a July 10 letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, Trump threatened an additional 35 per cent tariff on a long list of Canadian goods. Steel and aluminum are already being hit with 50 per cent tariffs. Hoekstra said the Trump administration is seeking prosperity for Americans and tariffs, a new tax bill and widespread government cuts are all part of the package. 'As we potentially pivot away from the United States in certain things, that's because we believe in our ability to compete globally.'– Chamber president and CEO Loren Remillard Chamber president and CEO Loren Remillard pointed to the United States consumer price index: in June, the country's inflation rate was 2.7 per cent, a 0.3 per cent monthly increase. It followed another slight increase — 0.1 per cent — in May. Hoekstra said that if inflation does, indeed, jump as a result of the president's imposition of tariffs on international goods, the door is likely open for changes. '(Trump is) focused on one thing, which is results,' he said. 'If we get to a point somewhere down the road where it's like, 'I'm not getting to where I want to be,' the president will adjust. 'If you want to know where Donald Trump is going, just listen to him.' The luncheon crowd, which included elected officials from all levels of government, had to pass through a crowd of roughly 100 protesters who took the opportunity to highlight a variety of concerns with multiple U.S. foreign policies. Ben Carr, Liberal MP for Winnipeg South Centre, declined to comment directly on Hoekstra's note about inflation and tariffs. Carney will ink a deal that is 'done in a way that puts Canada on a path toward greater prosperity,' Carr said. RUTH BONNEVILLE / FREE PRESS Winnipeg businesses will forge on if Canada's trade deal ends up with a 15 per cent export tariff, Remillard said. 'It's a resilient country with strong businesses,' he said. 'As we potentially pivot away from the United States in certain things, that's because we believe in our ability to compete globally.' Canada didn't start to pull on the threads of Hoekstra's metaphorical cloth until the United States inflicted damage, Remillard said later. Canada unleashed 25 per cent tariffs on a collective $59.8 billion worth of goods in retaliation to U.S.-imposed tariffs. 'We need something more than a deal,' Remillard said. 'We need certainty that the deal will live past… 365 days, because businesses don't make investments based on a quarter. 'We need stability.' Evan Funk attended Tuesday's event for clarity on the current business climate. He's watched U.S. sales dip at Lynn & Liana Designs, a Manitoba-based cheeseboard creator. Funk has noticed confusion online — customers seem to think Lynn & Liana products are being tariffed. In reality, the pieces are Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) compliant and ship duty-free. RUTH BONNEVILLE / FREE PRESS 'That's the biggest thing, is just confusion,' Funk said. 'No one knows what's going on.' Both Carr and Remillard mentioned a need for Canada to diversify its export markets. A delegation of 19 European Union representatives visited Manitoba in April, expressing interest in greater trade. Hoekstra said the U.S. will compete daily with the rest of the world for Canadian 'opportunities.' In some markets, the U.S. and Canada are tied very closely, he added. Before the event, a number of Manitoba business leaders sat for a roundtable discussion with Hoekstra. The ambassador also toured Boeing, an American aerospace manufacturer with a Winnipeg plant. Hoekstra chaired the Michigan Republican party during the 2024 elections. He was a businessman in his early career, acting as vice-president of marketing for furniture maker Herman Miller. — With files from The Canadian Press Gabrielle PichéReporter Gabrielle Piché reports on business for the Free Press. She interned at the Free Press and worked for its sister outlet, Canstar Community News, before entering the business beat in 2021. Read more about Gabrielle. Every piece of reporting Gabrielle produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
