
The Russian oligarch, the arrested brother and the man at centre of an F1 storm
Up until the start of this week no one outside of Formula One or motorsport had heard of Oliver Oakes. In the space of a few days that has changed.
Oakes's abrupt resignation from his role as team principal at Alpine F1 on Tuesday garnered headlines across sport, mainly because of the presumed involvement of Flavio Briatore.
The septuagenarian Italian, who has been involved in a string of controversies in a colourful and controversial career, and who recently returned from a 'lifetime ban' from the sport, was said to have had a disagreement with Oakes over the team's driver line-up.
But that still did not quite explain Oakes's sudden resignation. This was, after all, a highly rated young team principal – the second youngest in the sport's history when he was appointed last summer – who was being tipped to replace Christian Horner at Red Bull one day. Would Briatore have really let him go?
A joint statement from the pair of them the following day, denying any fallout and suggesting that Oakes had departed for 'personal reasons', only added to the intrigue.
Then on Thursday came a new twist: Telegraph Sport broke the news that Oakes's brother, his fellow director at his Hitech Grand Prix, a race team which competes in various world championships, as well as various other entities according to Companies House, had been charged last Friday, just days before Oakes's resignation.
What is more, the Metropolitan Police confirmed to the Telegraph that William Oakes, 31, had been stopped in possession of what it described as 'a large amount of cash', charged with 'transferring criminal property' and remanded in custody after appearing before Northampton Magistrates' Court last Saturday.
Oliver Oakes has not been accused of anything and is not wanted for questioning in relation to anything. He is understood to have travelled to Dubai after Miami but beyond that he has not surfaced in public. He declined to comment when contacted by the Telegraph Sport.
What we do know is that there is a lot of uncertainty at his junior racing teams, who compete in F2, F3, GB3 and British F4, as well as the all-female F1 Academy.
Oakes might have been driving for a Formula One team, rather than running one, had things worked out differently.
From The King's School to karting champion
Growing up in Norfolk, he grew up in the motorsport world. Oakes's father Billy was the founder and owner of the now-defunct F1 team Formula Renault, as well as the British F3 team Eurotek Motorsport.
By the age of four, Oakes was driving karts. And while he was a pupil at The King's School, formerly known as King's Ely, he found enough time to take his karting extremely seriously, becoming the British Open champion in the sport twice.
In 2005, now 17, he became a karting world champion, beating the likes of future F1 drivers Jules Bianchi and Valtteri Bottas to the top prize. This caught the eye of the newly formed Red Bull Junior Programme, as he joined Jaime Alguersuari, Sebastien Buemi, Brendan Hartley and a certain four-time F1 world champion named Sebastian Vettel as a member of the team.
Like Horner, the Red Bull team boss whose shoes he has been tipped to fill, Oakes graduated from karts to race cars where he had a respectable if unspectacular career. He finished sixth in Formula BMW and went on to compete in various other championships including the British Formula 3 International Series in 2008 against Sergio Perez. But like Horner, he quickly realised he was more cut out for driving race teams from outside the cockpit.
In 2011, Oakes formed Team Oakes, which took part in several major European and world competitions. Then in 2015 he formed Hitech Grand Prix, a team first started in 2002 but which he helped relaunch. It was there that his controversial association with Russian oligarch Dmitry Mazepin first began.
Mazepin initially bought a stake in Hitech in 2016, when his son Nikita arrived to compete in F3, with the team also gaining Russian minerals company Uralkali as a sponsor. Over the years, the Russian – a close, personal friend of Russian president Vladimir Putin, with whom he sat in the Kremlin on the day Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 – increased his holding in Hitech to 75 per cent via Cyprus-based investment company Bergton Management Ltd.
In a series of decisions which were important enough to be discussed in Parliament, Mazepin's shares were all handed over to Oakes nine days before Russia's invasion. Oakes then formed a new company to take control of the shares just days after Mazepin and his son were sanctioned by both the Government and the European Union. Nikita Mazepin has since had his ban overturned by the European Court who ruled that 'association' with his father was not enough to warrant it. There is no suggestion Oakes was involved in any wrongdoing.
Oakes, who said at the time that it was 'always part of the strategic plan for Bergton Management to exit Hitech in early 2022 and myself to own Hitech fully', has carried on running his teams very effectively by all accounts. Colleagues describe him as 'competent' and 'gregarious'. He was seen as the strait-laced Brit trying to run a tight ship at Alpine alongside the more volatile, combustible Briatore.
The news cycle has moved on so fast that Oakes was still listed as the Alpine team principal on the French manufacturer's website on Friday. Once tipped to replace Horner, his future is now unclear.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
The Documentary Podcast The tyre scandal
Every year the UK produces around 50 million tyres for disposal. They are supposed to be sent for recycling. Instead, big money is being made by diverting tyres to illegal and dangerous 'pyrolysis' plants where they are melted down to extract oil and steel. Together with a team of journalists from Source Material, a not-for-profit group specialising in climate and corruption, we follow the tyres from the UK to India using tracking devices. The team discovers just how large scale this largely illicit business has become. Earlier this year, a makeshift pyrolysis plant exploded near Mumbai, killing four people. It had been processing tyres from abroad. Reporter Paul Kenyon confronts a tyre trader in the north of England who admits to shipping his waste tyres to India for pyrolysis.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Firm linked to Baroness Bra 'must pay back £122m for faulty PPE': Government suing over Covid contract 'initiated' by Tory peer
A firm linked to Michelle Mone must repay £122million for allegedly breaching a Covid PPE contract, a court heard yesterday. The bra tycoon had recommended PPE Medpro, which went on to provide 25 million 'faulty' surgical gowns. The consortium, led by the Tory peer's husband Doug Barrowman, was awarded contracts by the former Conservative administration during the pandemic. PPE Medpro is now being sued by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), with Government lawyers claiming the gowns couldn't be used because they were not sterile. Baroness Mone and the firm both deny any wrongdoing. The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, plus an additional £8,648,691 for transporting and storing the items. PPE Medpro said it 'categorically denies' breaching the contract, with its lawyers claiming the company has been 'singled out for unfair treatment'. Opening the trial, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: 'This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns.' Mr Stanley said in written submissions the 'initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone', with contract discussions then going through one of the firm's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained 'active throughout' negotiations, he said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had 'years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains'. But he said Baroness Mone's communications were not part of this case, which was 'simply about compliance'. He added: 'The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody.' In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October 2020, with almost £122million paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December 2020 and told the firm it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage. Mr Stanley said 99.9999 per cent of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract. The DHSC claims the deal also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise them using a 'validated process', attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said 'none of those things happened', and that of 140 gowns tested for sterility, 103 failed. He added that the DHSC 'was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs'. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the 'only plausible reason' for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to 'the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject' after delivery. He said testing was done several months after the gowns were rejected, and that the samples were not 'representative of the whole population'. Mr Samek described the DHSC's claim as 'contrived and opportunistic', with PPE Medpro 'made the fall guy for a catalogue of failures... and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money'. Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence during the five-week trial. A PPE Medpro spokesman said it 'categorically denies breaching its obligations' and will 'robustly defend' the claim.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Company boss, 72, 'throttled his neighbour and damaged his Jaguar in 'very messy' dispute over shared driveway of his £540,000 home', court hears
A company boss throttled his neighbour and damaged his expensive Jaguar car during an altercation over a 'very messy' long-running shared driveway dispute, a court has heard. Trevor Hollisey, 72, who owns a kitchen fitting business with his wife Jennifer, 79, is accused of grabbing Neil Ford by the throat 'for ten to 15 seconds' and assaulting his wife, Michelle. He is also charged with causing more than £1,300 of damage to a Jaguar F-PACE belonging to his next-door neighbours. Mrs Hollisey, is accused of assaulting Mr Ford and his 20-year-old daughter, Sophie, as well as causing £3.99 damage to Sophie's phone screen protector. The Holliseys bought their detached home, Highfield House, in the Norfolk village of Bressingham for £540,000 in March 2021, while the Fords moved into their £672,000 home, Copper Dene, six months later. Prosecutor Katherine Newson said the couples had subsequently fallen out in a 'dispute over access to their driveway'. She told magistrates in Norwich that the disagreement centred around the alleged victims opening the gate onto the defendants' section of the driveway. Previously, there had been complaints to the police about the 'paving being smashed'. Matters allegedly came to a head on December 30 last year when Hollisey grabbed Mr Ford by the throat 'for ten to 15 seconds' and assaulted his wife. He is also accused of deliberately damaging the luxury Jaguar, causing £1,363 of damage. Hollisey denies the criminal damage charge and a count of assault by beating against Mrs Ford. No plea was entered for the charge of intentional strangulation during the hearing on Friday. His wife denied two assault by beating charges involving Mr Ford and his daughter and the Crown Prosecution Service withdrew a count of common assault against the pair. She also pleaded not guilty to damaging the screen protector on Sophie's phone. Declan Gallagher, defending the Holliseys, said the 'confrontation' was the result of a 'long-term dispute' and that 'there is a very messy history to this'. When magistrates starting looking for dates to hold a trial, Mr Hollisey interjected and said he and his wife 'have several holidays booked this year and next'. The Bench eventually decided that the case would be heard at Ipswich Magistrates Court on March 10 and 11 next year. The Holliseys were released on conditional bail and told they must have no contact with their neighbours. Mr Hollisey set up Ultimate Choice Bathrooms and Kitchens in Stanford-le-Hope, Essex, in 1987, where there is still a showroom. The company's website says he now works alongside his son Lee. It adds: 'The driving force behind our success for the last 36 years is Trevor's and Lee's high standards and demand for excellent workmanship on every installation.'