New York detectives head to gunman's home in Nevada amid calls for gun control, World News
Authorities say Shane Tamura, 27, drove from his Las Vegas home to Manhattan, marched into an office skyscraper on Monday and fatally shot four people, including an off-duty police officer, with an assault-style rifle before taking his own life.
Tamura legally purchased a revolver in Nevada in June at a gun store, New York police said, even though, according to multiple news reports, he was hospitalised under an emergency "mental health crisis hold" in 2022 and again in 2024.
The details of those episodes were not known.
Authorities have said Tamura carried a note on Monday in which he claimed he suffered from chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, a brain disease linked to football and other contact sports that can affect behaviour. The disease can only be confirmed after death.
New York City's medical examiner said in an email that Tamura's brain would be examined as part of a complete autopsy but did not say whether it would be screened for CTE.
Tamura, who shot himself in the chest on Monday, bought the rifle he used in the attack from a supervisor at the casino where he worked for US$1,400 (S$1,811), CNN reported on Wednesday, citing law enforcement sources. Nevada law requires private gun sales to go through a licenced firearms dealer and include a background check.
Whether he obtained the rifle legally or not, advocates for stricter gun laws said the case showed a need for tougher regulations nationwide, especially for people with mental health problems.
[[nid:720757]]
"It is horrifying... that a man with documented mental health struggles was able to purchase a weapon, let alone a weapon of such devastating capability," New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani told reporters on Wednesday, urging a national ban on assault rifles. New York is one of 10 states that bans such weapons, according to the advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety.
The National Rifle Association, the New York State Firearms Association and the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The groups oppose restrictions on guns as an infringement on individual rights. Red flag laws
Under Nevada law, officers can detain individuals on emergency holds in mental health facilities or hospitals for up to 72 hours for evaluation.
In a handful of states including New York — which has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation — such emergency holds trigger some version of a ban on possessing guns, according to experts. But in most states, including Nevada, as well as under federal law, only a court-ordered involuntary commitment results in a prohibition on buying and owning guns.
"What this shooting in New York highlights more than anything else is that we're only as safe as the laws of the weakest state," said Nick Suplina, Everytown's senior vice president for law and policy.
Nevada has enacted a series of gun limits since an October 2017 mass shooting that killed 58 people in Las Vegas. Giffords, another gun safety advocacy organisation, gave Nevada a "B-" grade in its annual scorecard of gun laws, compared with an "A" for New York.
A new Nevada law that took effect this month — too late to apply to the Manhattan shooter — allows law enforcement officers to take away guns temporarily from someone who is on an emergency mental health hold. The officer can also petition a court to retain the guns if the person is deemed a danger to themselves or others.
That law is similar to Nevada's "red flag" statute, which allows law enforcement or relatives to ask a court to seize firearms from anyone considered a risk.
[[nid:720741]]
The new law was needed because patrol officers often don't have time to petition a court when they're dealing with someone in a mental health crisis, according to John Abel, governmental affairs director at the Las Vegas Police Protective Association.
"We needed the ability to be able to safely and legally pick up that firearm while we were on the scene," he said.
Had the new law been in effect in 2022 and 2024 when Tamura was placed under mental health holds, officers could have temporarily impounded his firearms. But he would have been able to pick them up from the police station once he was discharged from the hospital.
Although he identifies as a "proud Second Amendment supporter," Abel said he thinks Nevada needs further legislation to "take firearms out of the hands of someone who is deemed incompetent to hold them because of mental health reasons."
Twenty-one states have enacted red-flag laws, according to Everytown for Gun Safety.
Tamura was able to obtain a concealed carry permit in 2022, according to news reports, although it was unclear whether he did so before or after his first hospitalisation.
His permit would have allowed him to buy the revolver last month without a background check under state law.
[[nid:720721]]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
21 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Relief in Taiwan as Trump's 100% chip tariff fails to bite, but experts say it's too early to relax
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company has so far pledged a total of US$165 billion (S$212 billion) in investment to build six state-of-the-art fabs in Arizona. TAIPEI – Taipei heaved a temporary sigh of relief even as US President Donald Trump said that he would slap a shocking 100 per cent tariff on imports of semiconductors, the crucial components that form the backbone of Taiwan's economy. That is because companies that commit to making chips in the US would be exempted – according to Mr Trump – which would mean that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the crown jewel of the island's tech industry, would likely be spared. The firm, which is the world's largest contract manufacturer of chips, has so far pledged a total of US$165 billion (S$212 billion) in investment to build six state-of-the-art fabs , or semiconductor plants , in the US state of Arizona. But while things don't look too dire now, the impact of the tariff on Taiwan's chip industry could yet be far-reaching. Large clients of smaller Taiwanese chip suppliers could demand that they move some of their production to the US to sidestep the punishing duties; this could lead to a decline in Taiwan-based chip production and affect the island's position as a key part of the global tech supply chain, say analysts. And while Mr Trump's latest tariff measure is part of a push to boost domestic chip manufacturing, it could lead to higher prices of electronic devices such as smartphones, which could in turn depress demand for such devices and the chips that drive them. Such an outcome would mean uncertainty for Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Still, on Aug 7, TSMC stocks surged nearly 5 per cent to close at a record high of NT$1,180 (S$51), reflecting investor confidence in the wake of Mr Trump's announcement. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Liquor licences for F&B, nightlife venues extended to 4am in Boat Quay, Clarke Quay Singapore Chikungunya cases in Singapore double; authorities monitoring situation closely Singapore Student found with vape taken to hospital after behaving aggressively in school; HSA investigating Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree on Asean observers monitoring truce, but fundamental differences remain Singapore CDC and SG60 vouchers listed on e-commerce platforms will be taken down: CDCs Asia Australia's purchase of Japanese frigates signals a new era for Indo-Pacific security Singapore Jail for driver who drove over leg of special needs woman in accident on church driveway Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds Officials in Taiwan were also cautiously optimistic. Speaking to lawmakers during a parliamentary briefing on Aug 7, National Development Council chief Liu Chin-ching argued that a steep 100 per cent tariff rate would not necessarily be disastrous even for Taiwan's smaller chipmakers that do not have a US presence. 'Taiwan currently holds a leading position in the world (in chipmaking) and I believe that if the leader and competitors are all on the same starting line, the leader will continue to lead,' he said. Taiwan is a global powerhouse in chipmaking, with 60 per cent of the world's chips and almost all of the most advanced ones produced there. But experts warned that the lack of details about how the new tariff would be applied means that it is still early days yet to assess its full impact. 'The scope and mechanism of the chip tariff remain unclear. Further developments will need to be closely monitored,' said Ms Joanne Chiao, assistant research manager at Trendforce, a Taiwanese tech research firm. For starters, how much manufacturing a company would need to commit to the US to qualify for a tariff exemption is unclear. It is also unknown if Mr Trump's exemption would cover only chips produced entirely on domestic soil, or also the semiconductors that foreign companies with a US presence , such as British firm Arm, or American companies import from overseas. American chip designers such as Qualcomm typically send their designs to TSMC to be manufactured in Taiwan, before the chips are imported into the US. Moreover, more clarity is needed on whether the new tariff would apply to raw semiconductors and integrated circuits, or also chips in end devices such as smartphones and laptops. During the first quarter of 2025, only around 4 per cent of Taiwan's total exports of electronic components, including semiconductors, were shipped directly to the US. The vast majority of Taiwan-made chips were sent to other countries where they were assembled into consumer electronics. But Professor Julien Chaisse, an international trade expert at City University of Hong Kong, said that it would be 'misleading' to think this would mean that Taiwan's chip exports could be naturally immune to Mr Trump's tariff measure. 'The US government doesn't need a direct shipment to apply pressure – it can change how it interprets rules of origin,' he told The Straits Times. 'If Washington starts insisting that any product with a certain percentage of Taiwanese-made components falls under the tariff, then the effect spreads quickly,' he said. Prof Chaisse added that Mr Trump's tariff also posed a threat to Taiwan's future position in the global tech supply chain. 'Larger buyers may start demanding more Taiwanese capacity be built inside the US, just to sidestep tariffs,' he said, noting that this would, in turn, drain investment from domestic expansion in Taiwan. 'This will have consequences for how Taiwan grows its chip sector over the next five years,' he added. Ultimately, Mr Trump's push to rebuild chip manufacturing in the US will drive up costs for everyone in the supply chain. 'A high tariff on chips would inevitably raise the price of smartphones and laptops, which would also hurt demand for electronic products,' said Ms Liu Pei-chen, an analyst at Taiwan Institute of Economic Research. 'This will bring a lot of uncertainty to the chip industry,' she added. For now, however, Taiwan retains a major advantage – the US will still need to rely on the island for its semiconductor needs, particularly for advanced chips. Taiwan's intricately connected semiconductor ecosystem, which was built up over decades, is not easily replicated. The island's dominance in the sector extends to the technical prowess and efficiency among its chip engineers, which means it is not a simple matter of plonking a factory wherever one wishes. 'Even with the big investments happening in US fabs, it will take years before local production can cover demand,' said Prof Chaisse. 'In the end, this feels like pressure aimed at getting more investment from Taipei. Not because Taiwan is a threat, but because Trump wants quick wins he can point to.'
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Who pays for Trump's tariffs?
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Higher tariffs on goods from dozens of trading partners kicked in on Aug 7, ranging between 15 per cent and 41 per cent. PARIS - US President Donald Trump says the United States will reap billions of dollars from his tariff blitz, but who pays the bill? Higher tariffs on goods from dozens of trading partners kicked in on Aug 7 , ranging between 15 per cent and 41 per cent. Here is a look at the effects of Trump's tariff onslaught. Higher prices for US consumers? The tariffs are paid by US-based companies to US customs when they import goods from abroad. US consumers could see a range of products become more expensive if companies choose to raise prices to offset the higher costs of importing goods. For instance, Japanese cars face a 15 per cent tariff, while made-in-Vietnam T-shirts now have a 20 per cent duty. But companies have other options: they can absorb the higher cost, which would hit their bottom line, or they can try to negotiate lower prices with exporters. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Liquor licences for F&B, nightlife venues extended to 4am in Boat Quay, Clarke Quay Singapore Chikungunya cases in Singapore double; authorities monitoring situation closely Singapore Student found with vape taken to hospital after behaving aggressively in school; HSA investigating Asia Cambodia, Thailand agree on Asean observers monitoring truce, but fundamental differences remain Singapore CDC and SG60 vouchers listed on e-commerce platforms will be taken down: CDCs Asia Australia's purchase of Japanese frigates signals a new era for Indo-Pacific security Singapore Jail for driver who drove over leg of special needs woman in accident on church driveway Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds US Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell estimated at the end of July that higher tariffs were beginning to be felt on certain goods. For example, the US toy company Hasbro, maker of the Monopoly board game and the owlish electronic toy Furby and which imports half of its products from China, began raising prices in May and June. Procter & Gamble, the maker of Tide laundry detergent and Pampers diapers, has projected a US$1 billion (S$1.29 billion) hit from US tariffs over the next year said it would institute limited price hikes in the United States. The tariffs are even more problematic for US economic sectors which don't have an option to switch to local suppliers, said Dr Philippe Chalmin, emeritus professor at Paris-Dauphine University. The United States imports lots of copper, a key metal in electrical machinery and wiring, which Mr Trump announced would face a 50 per cent tariff on August 1. 'Half of what the United States needs is imported from Chile, and following the announcement the price of copper on the US market rose 25 per cent compared with the global reference price,' said Dr Chalmin. In the end, however, the Trump administration backpedalled and applied the tariff only to semi-finished copper products such as pipes and wires. Loss of competitiveness The bill could also weigh on companies which depend heavily on exports, with the rising prices of their products in the United States leading to a loss of competitiveness. This is the concern for the European wine and spirits sector, which has yet to obtain an exception from US tariffs. Higher prices on Champagne or Chianti could easily push US consumers to grab a bottle of Californian wine. The impact 'will be all the harsher' since in addition to the tariffs the value of the dollar has fallen, which further increases the price of the bottles on shelves in US shops, warned Mr Gabriel Picard, president of the French Federation of Wine and Spirits Exporters. He estimated that this combined effect could result in a €1 billion (S$1.49 billion) loss for French producers. 'There will be sectoral differences and even within the same sector, it will depend on the negotiating power' between the producer, the wholesaler, and the retailer, said Mr Bruno de Moura Fernandes, head of macroeconomic research at Coface, a firm which provides insurance and financial services for exporters. However, he said that the effect will be especially significant for industries already facing difficulties remaining competitive against their American counterparts, notably in chemicals and steel sectors. Thinning margins Some companies have already announced that they will cut into their profit margins to offset the effects of US tariffs. Automakers, among the first affected by US tariffs, have already seen sales and profits hit. German auto giant Volkswagen said in July that US tariffs had cost it €1.3 billion in the first half of the year as it reported falling profit. It now forecasts a profit margin for the year of between four and five per cent, down from 5.5 to 6.5 per cent previously, amounting to billions of euros for the group. US tariffs prompted Japanese auto giant Toyota – the world's largest carmaker by sales, to cut its annual net profit forecast by 14 per cent. AFP
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Russia and India talk up ‘strategic partnership' after Trump tariff hike
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval was quoted as saying that New Delhi was looking forward to a visit from President Vladimir Putin by the end of the year. MOSCOW/NEW DELHI - Russia and India stressed their commitment to a 'strategic partnership' in bilateral security talks in Moscow on Aug 7, a day after US President Donald Trump announced higher tariffs on imports from India because of its purchases of Russian oil. Interfax news agency quoted Indian national security adviser Ajit Doval as saying that New Delhi was looking forward to a visit from President Vladimir Putin by the end of the year. At Mr Doval's meeting with Mr Sergei Shoigu, secretary of Russia's Security Council, both sides emphasised the importance of the countries' relations. Mr Trump's imposition of an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods from India, coming into force on Aug 28, signals the most serious downturn in US-India relations since his return to office in January, threatening to disrupt India's access to its largest export market. 'We are committed to further active cooperation in order to form a new, more just and sustainable world order, ensure the supremacy of international law, and jointly combat modern challenges and threats,' Mr Shoigu told Mr Doval in televised comments. Interfax quoted Mr Doval as saying: 'We have now established very good relations, which we value very much, a strategic partnership between our countries'. India and China have become the top buyers of Russian seaborne crude oil since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, precipitating Western efforts to choke the Russian economy. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Liquor licences for F&B, nightlife venues extended to 4am in Boat Quay, Clarke Quay Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds Singapore CDC, SG60 vouchers listed on e-commerce platforms will be taken down: CDC Singapore Fine for man who damaged PAP campaign materials on GE2025 Polling Day Singapore Jail for driver who drove over leg of special needs woman in accident on church driveway Singapore Wastewater overflow in Bedok and Chai Chee due to choked sewer at BTO worksite: PUB Singapore Ex-Hyflux director fined over firm's failure to disclose Tuaspring info Business S'pore firm looks to buy SMEs lacking successors, launches CEO training programme to foster renewal Mr Trump had threatened measures against countries buying Russian oil before he announced the new tariff on Indian goods, which raised the total duty to 50 per cent. On Aug 5, the Kremlin accused the United States of exerting illegal trade pressure on New Delhi, saying India has the right to trade with whomever it chooses. India's state refiners have stopped Russian oil purchases as the discounts narrowed and Mr Trump warned countries not to buy Moscow's oil, industry sources said. Private refiners Reliance Industries and Nayara are Russia's top oil clients in India, trade data shows. An Indian official familiar with the matter said Mr Doval would discuss India's purchases of Russian crude during his visit to Moscow. He was also expected to discuss India's defence collaboration with Russia, the official said. India signed a US$5.5 billion (S$7 billion) deal with Russia in 2018 for five S-400 Triumf long-range surface-to-air missile systems, which New Delhi says it needs to counter a threat from China. But deliveries of the systems have been delayed several times. Moscow is expected to deliver units of the final two S-400 systems to India in 2026 and 2027. New Delhi has traditionally relied heavily on arms imports from Russia, although it has dramatically reduced those imports and shifted to Western buyers in recent years. REUTERS
