Murder-accused parents smoked outside as medics tried to save baby's life
Hospital staff discovered Brendon's injuries after Ms Staddon asked them to check on him because "he was cold", the jury was told.Earlier that night, Mr Gunter had asked a nurse for milk to feed his son and when she later checked on him, he answered in a way she "considered odd"."He seemed excited, his response was unusually animated, and he was nodding exaggeratedly," said Mr Row.Ms Staddon began "crying hysterically", saying she wanted to see her baby, but Mr Gunter told her to "let them do what they need to do"."Staff found him [Brendon] lying in his cot with his baby grow open."They immediately saw that he wasn't just cold but that he had suffered catastrophic injuries," he added.
He was later found to have, amongst other injuries, a broken neck, a broken jaw, broken legs, broken ankles and broken wrists.A post-mortem found Brendon died of "blunt force impact(s) head injury," with multiple "non-accidental injuries", the court was told.While nurses tried to resuscitate Brendon, the couple went outside for a cigarette, where they were later arrested.The court also heard how attempts were made to persuade Ms Staddon not to return to live with Mr Gunter - who she had an on-off relationship with.While in hospital, Mr Gunter repeatedly ignored the advice of nurses and removed Brendon from his incubator, overstimulated him to the point of causing distress and removed his nasal gastric tube, the court was told.Mr Gunter is also said to have been "violent" and controlling towards Ms Staddon, jurors heard.A social worker visited the couple in January 2024, telling them that the authorities planned to remove the baby from their care upon birth.Mr Row told the jury that the couple showed no emotion at the news and "seemed much more concerned about their housing situation".The trial continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
Diddy On Trial Diddy bail hearing gets heated
Available for over a year Sean 'Diddy' Combs is denied bail after being found guilty of transportation for prostitution. He was cleared of racketeering and sex trafficking charges earlier on Wednesday, after the jury reached a partial verdict. Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty speaks to BBC New York digital reporter Sakshi Venkatraman and criminal defence attorney Shaun Kent. Details of organisations in the UK offering information and support with some of the issues raised are available at Presenter: Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty Series Producer: Laura Jones Senior Digital Producer: Matthew Pintus Sound Design: Mark Burrows Senior Producer: Chrystal Genesis Production Coordinators: Hattie Valentine and Tammy Snow Editor: Clare Fordham Commissioning Editor: Rhian Roberts Assistant Commissioner: Will Drysdale Commissioning Producer: Adam Eland Commissioning Assistant Producer: Rechmial Miller
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Shamed face of 'speeding' BMW driver who killed four female students in Malibu horror crash
A 'speeding' BMW driver accused of killing four sorority sisters in a Malibu horror crash starred blankly in court during his arraignment hearing. Fraser Michael Bohm, 23, stands accused of recklessly driving his luxury vehicle and fatally plowing into the unsuspecting victims at nearly 100 mph on the night of October 17, 2023. The four women killed - Niamh Rolston, 20; Peyton Stewart, 21; Asha Weir, 21; and Deslyn Williams, 21 - attended Pepperdine University and were on track to graduate in 2024. Bohm appeared in court for his arraignment hearing on Tuesday - his first court date since he was ordered to stand trial after a three-day preliminary trial in late April. The former high school baseball star has been charged with murder, vehicular manslaughter and a slew of other charges related to the gut-wrenching car wreck. But Bohm did not enter an official plea in the Van Nuys courthouse - with his lawyer asking the judge for more time. 'Your honor, before the entry of a not guilty plea, which is what we expect obviously, I would ask the court for one continuance of the arraignment,' Bohm's attorney Alan Jackson said at the hearing, according to ABC 7. Jackson explained he has just been brought onto the case two days before and requested a 30-day postponement, which Superior Court Judge Diego H. Edber approved. The messy-haired Bohm was seen bearing a stoic expression as he glanced around the court room. He was joined by several family members, all of which declines ABC 7's request for comment. The accused-killer is due back in court in early August and remains free on $4 million bond, which was posted a few days after the horrific incident. Bohm previously claimed he lost control of his 2016 BMW while being chased by another speeding vehicle and pleaded not guilty to four murder charges in 2023. The crash, which happened the day after Bohm's 22nd birthday, happened along the notoriously dangerous Pacific Coast Highway - known as 'Blood Alley' and 'Dead Man's Curve.' His BMW slammed into parked vehicles while the college seniors stood nearby - striking them as well. All four victims were pronounced dead at the scene, while Bohm was uninjured. Following the crash, as ambulances took the women's dead bodies from the scene, Bohm was seen sitting on a ledge, bowing his head, next to emergency personnel. According to witnesses, he had attempted to flee the scene and had to be 'tackled down' and stopped by students from the nearby Pepperdine Sigma Chi fraternity. Officials said that there was a Pepperdine fraternity party being held in the area, and that the victims had been planning to meet up with others at the time of the tragedy. Niamh, Asha, and Peyton all lived together in college, their social media pages suggested. A tragic video also emerged of the four sorority girls laughing over dinner and drinks together just weeks before their deaths. The four girls went on vacations together, spent time in their sorority house with one another, and often posed for formals together. Tributes poured in for the women. According to her LinkedIn page, Niamh Rolston also worked as cheer and gymnastic coach while Asha Weir was a writing tutor at the school in her spare time. Peyton Stewart volunteered at an old folks home and recently completed an internship at TikTok. Deslyn Williams's employer paid tribute to her in a heartbreaking Facebook post saying: 'When you get the saddest news -21 miles of devastation - a road full of heart break.' One commenter wrote: 'Deslyn, RIP my queen.' And the vehicle Bohm crashed was actually gifted him on his 18th birthday, according to a divorce settlement previously obtained by the Daily Mail. The speeding car that killed the four seniors was purchased by Bohm's mother Brooke using a down payment of $25,000 in 2017 – with the remaining installments paid by his dad Chris. The settlement also revealed details of his family's lavish lifestyle – including the secluded $8.7 million Malibu gated 'estate' Bohm's mother ended up with in the divorce. The house was put up for sale in late September 2023 for $9,750,000 but within a week the price had been reduced to $8,795,000. Realtors described he house as exuding a 'hip, beach chic vibe' and stressed the panoramic ocean views from the full-length deck. According to Zillow, the property is no longer on the market. It sold for $3,625,000 on December 31, 2024, according to
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Pensioner, 81, loses 'ridiculous' £280,000 neighbour row over 'inches' of land... after seven years of fighting
A pensioner has lost a 'ridiculous' £280,000 legal battle against her neighbour over a just a few inches of land. Christel Naish, 81, and her doctor neighbour Jyotibala Patel had been fighting over an inches-wide strip between their houses too narrow for a person to comfortably walk down. Ms Naish complained that Dr Patel's garden tap and pipe were 'trespassing' on her property in Ilford, east London and after several rounds of litigation, brought her case before the High Court. Senior Judge Sir Anthony Mann said in the High Court that the offending strip of land was 'not worth arguing about' and criticised Ms Naish for 'bringing litigation in to disrepute'. The decision marks the end of an seven-year legal battle started by Ms Naish after she returned to the property in 2001 following her father's death. It comes after a trial at Mayors and City County Court in central London, which last year ruled in Dr Patel's favour on the boundary issue - landing Ms Naish with more than £200,000 in lawyers' bills. Following the trial, the pensioner had been told to pay for 65 per cent of her neighbours' costs - amounting to about £100,000 - on top of the six-figure sum she ran up herself. The appeal is costing more than £30,000, the High Court heard, and Ms Naish's lawyers say there could be 'another £200,000' spent on a second trial if she succeeds. At the High Court, Sir Anthony criticised the parties for the 'ridiculous' row after hearing the tap and pipe issue which began the dispute did not even matter any more - with the tap having now been removed by Dr Patel. He told Ms Naish's lawyers: 'Hundreds of thousands of pounds about a tap and a pipe that doesn't matter - this brings litigation into disrepute. 'You don't care about the pipe and the tap, so why does it matter, for goodness' sake, where the boundary lies? It seems to me to be a ridiculous piece of litigation - on both sides, no doubt.' The court heard Ms Naish first moved into her semi-detached house as a teenager with her parents and, although she moved out, frequently returned as she worked from there in the family's tarmac business. She eventually moved back permanently after the death of her father in 2001, with Dr Patel and husband Vasos Vassili buying the house next door for £450,000 in 2013. The couple's barrister Paul Wilmshurst told the judge the dispute began due to Ms Naish complaining a tap and pipe outside their house trespassed on her land. He accused her of 'terrorising' the couple with 'petty and vindictive' complaints and that they felt forced to sue due to the 'blight' on their home's value caused by the unresolved row. At the county court, they said they owned the tiny gap between the houses created when previous occupants built an extension on a much wider gap in 1983. They insisted the boundary between the two properties was the flank wall of Ms Naish's house and not the edge of her guttering hanging above, as she claimed. After hearing the trial in 2023, Judge Stephen Hellman last year found for Dr Patel and Mr Vassili, ruling that Ms Naish's flank wall was the boundary and the couple owned the gap between the houses. However, he found against them on Ms Naish's counter-claim, under which she sought damages for damp ingress into her conservatory caused by the couple having installed decking above the level of her damp-proof course. The judge found that, although the damp problem was already in existence, the installation of the decking screed was a 20 per cent contribution to it and he awarded Ms Naish £1,226 in damages. But because he had found against her on who owns the gap between the houses, he ordered she pay 65 per cent of her neighbours' lawyers' bills. Concluding his judgment, he said: 'Now that the parties have the benefit of a judgment on the various issues that have been troubling them, I hope that tensions will subside and that they will be able to live together as good neighbours.' Ms Naish has continued to fight and took her case to the High Court for an appeal last week, with judge Sir Anthony asking why the neighbours were pressing on and demanding of Ms Naish's barrister David Mayall: 'What is the point of this litigation?' Mr Mayall replied: 'To be frank, two things - costs and the damp issue.' Dr Patel's barrister Mr Wilmshurst said the couple felt they had to fight to protect the value of their home. He added: 'It's because for many years the appellant has been making allegations about the trespassing nature of the [tap and pipe], thereby making it impossible for them to sell their house.' For Ms Naish, Mr Mayall argued that Judge Hellman's reasoning in finding that the boundary was the flank wall was 'fatally flawed' and should be overturned - although he noted a second trial in the event of a successful appeal would cost the parties 'another £200,000'. Mr Mayall said any 'reasonable purchaser' looking at the houses when they were first built and conveyed in the 1950s would have assumed that the boundary was the edge of Ms Naish's guttering, giving her a few inches of extra land. He added: 'The only proper conclusion that he could have come to when construing the original conveyance was that the boundary ran along the outermost part of the house as constructed, including the eaves, guttering and foundations.' For Dr Patel, who appeared in court, and Mr Vassili, who watched via a video link, Mr Wilmshurst said the appeal was a challenge to findings the judge was entitled to make on the evidence. He said: 'Overall, the judge did not overlook the contention of the appellant as to guttering, eaves and foundations - he considered it directly, evaluated it, and rejected it as being material to where the boundary was. 'The judge correctly held that the legal boundary was shown by the conveyance plans as running along the flank wall of [Ms Naish's house], not the outermost projection.' On the issue of what contribution to Ms Naish's damp her neighbours' decking screed caused, he added: 'There is no basis on which it can be properly said that the judge was wrong to find the concrete screed was only responsible for 20 per cent of the damp problems. 'The judge also carried out a site view and was in the best position to form an assessment of the evidence.' After a day in court, Sir Anthony reserved judgement on the appeal.
