
Harvard's China ties become new front in battle with Trump
In his war with Harvard, President Trump has sought to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding from the school and strip its tax exemptions, measures the White House initially tied to perceived antisemitism at the school amid Israel's war in Gaza.
In recent weeks, long-simmering Republican anger over Harvard's links to China has increasingly gained traction. In escalating calls to punish the school, a training event two years ago in the Chinese city of Kunming has emerged as Exhibit A.
The training, on the bland topic of healthcare financing, was co-hosted by a Harvard professor and involved a few dozen provincial-level bureaucrats. Among them was at least one representative from Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a large Chinese Communist Party paramilitary organization in the country's far west that also handles civilian government services, including managing hospitals.
U.S. authorities in 2020 imposed sanctions against the Xinjiang corps, accusing it of ethnic and religious abuses against Uyghurs and other mostly Muslim minorities and forbidding U.S. persons from providing it 'funds, goods, or services."
On Wednesday, as Trump moved to bar Harvard from enrolling foreign students, his order cited the event, charging that in exchange for Chinese funding the school 'has, among other things, 'repeatedly hosted and trained members of a Chinese Communist Party paramilitary organization.' "
Harvard, which didn't respond to questions, hasn't publicly addressed the allegations involving the Xinjiang corps. The school is fighting Trump in court, calling some of the administration's measures illegal.
To its detractors, Harvard epitomizes American elite universities' dependence on Beijing as a profit center—and how that helps the country's rulers, the Chinese Communist Party, challenge the U.S.
The conservative Heritage Foundation took aim at higher education in its Project 2025 recommendations, saying, 'Universities taking money from the CCP should lose their accreditation, charters, and eligibility for federal funds."
Chinese citizens represent some 23% of Harvard's international students, and Education Department data show that in recent decades individuals and companies from China and Hong Kong together have been the university's No. 2 source of large foreign gifts and contracts, behind only England.
In 2023 and 2024 combined, the data show, Harvard reported $55.6 million in gifts of $250,000 or more from China, including Hong Kong, plus $13.7 million in contracts, some 13% and 8.2% respectively among all large-scale funding from non-U.S. partners.
The Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps booth during a 2021 trade fair in Beijing.
In previous responses to questions about its China exposure, such as acceptance of financial gifts, the school has cited its broad global alumni network across over 200 nations.
With some 90 million members, the Chinese Communist Party has a deep reach into Chinese society. But while some tuition payments and funding might ultimately be traced to decisions by Chinese Communist Party officials, neither China's government nor the party would be likely to directly underwrite activities involving universities abroad, and there is no indication of such payments to Harvard.
The Xinjiang corps, colloquially known as Bingtuan, is central to the Chinese Communist Party's ironclad rule over Xinjiang. Widespread evidence shows its paramilitary operations have played a leading role in Beijing's suppression of Uyghurs, including the detention of more than a million people. In imposing sanctions on the corps and its leaders in 2020, the Treasury Department cited 'their connection to serious human-rights abuse."
The organization also has a massive administrative role in providing social services to ordinary citizens, such as managing hospitals and healthcare systems, the topic of the 2023 Harvard training, co-hosted by Winnie Yip, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
Analysts say the Xinjiang corps's participation in the training—organized by a Chinese health-insurance regulator, the National Healthcare Security Administration—was hardly the kind of nefarious activity American sanctions are designed to halt.
Still, U.S. sanctions laws don't differentiate between types of interaction, said Julian Ku, a law professor at New York's Hofstra University. 'Providing services to a blocked entity is prohibited, so Harvard does indeed face some possible liability here," he said.
Trump indicated that his concern about the Xinjiang corps was based on findings of a House Select Committee on China. Its chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar (R., Mich.), late last month wrote to Harvard President Alan Garber, demanding explanations about university activities that 'create risks to U.S. national security and further the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) genocide in Xinjiang."
Harvard President Alan Garber
A China committee statement about Moolenaar's letter charged that Harvard researchers did transplant studies with 'PRC-based collaborators, amid mounting evidence of the CCP's forced organ harvesting practices." Allegations that Beijing is engaged in institutionalized theft from prisoners and others of body parts for organ transplants have recently gained traction among Republican China critics. While few human-rights groups make that claim today, the anti-Beijing spiritual group Falun Gong has forcefully promoted the issue.
The Moolenaar letter described a number of Harvard studies as problematic, including one on cardiac transplants involving mice, detailed in a March 2024 scientific paper that indicated one of the 20 researchers had an affiliation with a hospital in northern China.
A spokeswoman for Harvard Medical School's Brigham and Women's Hospital told The Wall Street Journal that the study was done at that institution and had no association with China. By the time the paper was published, she said, one researcher had joined the Chinese hospital.
Harvard hasn't responded to Moolenaar's May 19 letter, which was also signed by Reps. Tim Walberg (R., Mich.) and Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.), but by no Democrats on the China committee.
Winnie Yip, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
In a response to questions, Moolenaar called the Xinjiang corps 'a sanctioned, paramilitary organization complicit in genocide" and said, 'I stand by the letter, and I will continue demanding answers from those enabling or ignoring the CCP's abuses."
Criticism over the Xinjiang organization's participation in the 2023 healthcare event originated in a late April report by Strategy Risks, a research firm run by Isaac Stone Fish, a New York-based journalist, which concluded that Harvard's behavior raised doubts about its effectiveness in 'limiting [Chinese Communist Party] and authoritarian influences." The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a New York public-policy organization, funded the report but hasn't independently published the findings.
Last month the report found an audience with Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.), who cited Strategy Risks in an open letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that urged an investigation into Harvard's potentially 'prohibited behavior" with the Xinjiang organization.
Rep. John Moolenaar
Four days later, Moolenaar and his fellow House members sent their letter to Harvard's Garber, noting the Xinjiang organization's role in mass detentions and describing healthcare efforts in Xinjiang as a 'fig leaf" to whitewash crimes.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem then called out the training as she moved to strip Harvard of its right to educate foreign students.
Harvard's public materials on the meetings don't say how the corps came to participate in the training, an iteration of a series on healthcare finance basics known as the Flagship Program developed by the World Bank and Harvard in the 1990s. It has been offered to bureaucrats in dozens of low- and middle-income nations; the 2023 version in China had a special focus on eldercare insurance.
A Chinese-language website published by Harvard said the Xinjiang group joined the annual training in 2019, but an internet archive tool showed that reference to its participation was later deleted.
Yip, far left, at healthcare-finance training event in China in 2023.
The congressional letter also took issue with a photo Harvard published from the 2023 event that blurred out name plates in front of four speakers, which the politicians charged 'raises questions about why Harvard wanted to keep their identities hidden."
It couldn't be determined who had obscured the nametags; the photo had previously been widely published that way in China. Key participants are nonetheless easily identified, including the Harvard professor, Yip.
Write to James T. Areddy at James.Areddy@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Did Elon Musk use ketamine, ecstasy drugs? What Donald Trump said
Elon Musk with Donald Trump (File photo) US President Donald Trump on Monday responded cautiously to recent reports alleging Elon Musk used recreational drugs while advising his administration, calling the claims troubling but unverified. "I really don't know. I don't think so," Trump told reporters on June 9 when asked whether Musk had brought drugs into the White House. "I hope not." The remark marks Trump's first major comment on the issue since The New York Times reported in late May that Musk had allegedly used ketamine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms while campaigning with Trump in 2024. The report cited unnamed sources. Musk swiftly responded to the allegations in a post on X: "You can tell immediately that someone is a massive liar if they're claiming I'm on drugs, as I am one of the most photographed people on Earth and am in meetings 7 days a week!" He added that he underwent random drug testing for nearly three years following a widely-publicized 2018 podcast appearance with Joe Rogan . "Not the slightest trace of drugs or alcohol was found." USA Today reported it remains unclear whether Musk used any substances while serving in an official capacity. When asked about it on his final day as a special government employee, Musk avoided the question, saying, 'Let's move on.' The drug allegations come amid a broader fallout between Trump and Musk. Their once-close relationship soured after Musk denounced Trump's tax and spending package as a 'disgusting abomination.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sanitize & Smooth Clothes Fast with Philips Steamer Philips Garment Steamers Shop Now Undo Trump retaliated by suggesting he might scale back federal contracts held by Musk's companies, while Musk hinted that Trump appeared in classified files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Despite the tensions, signs of de-escalation have emerged. Trump took a softer stance when asked about Musk's satellite internet company, Starlink. 'It's a good service,' he said, indicating no plans to discontinue its use at the White House. He also struck a conciliatory note personally, saying: 'We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well.' The highly public spat has complicated Republican efforts to pass Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress, where the GOP holds narrow majorities. However, with Musk deleting earlier posts—some of which had supported impeachment—insiders suggest the billionaire may be ready to mend ties with the president.


The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Students living in U.S. being repeatedly mistreated but PM Modi is silent: Congress
The Congress on Tuesday (June 10, 2025) slammed the government after a video emerged showing an Indian student being handcuffed and pinned to the floor at a U.S. airport, and demanded that Prime Minister Narendra Modi should immediately talk to President Donald Trump to appeal for intervention on the 'mistreatment' of Indians in America. Congress leaders shared the video and pictures of an Indian student handcuffed and pinned to the floor at U.S.'s Newark Airport before he was allegedly deported. The Consulate General of India in New York has said it is in touch with local authorities after the video surfaced online showing the young Indian man being handcuffed and allegedly being deported. 'We have come across social media posts claiming that an Indian national is facing difficulties at Newark Liberty International Airport. We are in touch with local authorities in this regard,' the Indian Consulate said in a post on X. U.S. crackdown on students | What are New Delhi's options | Worldview Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh alleged that the Modi Government is continuously failing to protect the honour of India and Indians. 'For the first time in history, a foreign head of state has declared ceasefire between India and Pakistan in India's absence. US President Trump is continuously claiming to have ensured a ceasefire by pressuring India,' Mr. Ramesh said in his post in Hindi on X. 'For the past one year, Indian citizens and students living in America are being repeatedly mistreated but Prime Minister Modi is maintaining silence or it should be assumed that he is unable to muster the courage to speak,' Mr. Ramesh said. He is the Prime Minister of India, it is his most important responsibility to protect the honour and respect of India and Indians, Mr. Ramesh asserted. 'We demand that Prime Minister Modi should immediately talk to President Trump and appeal for intervention on the mistreatment and atrocities being committed against Indians in America,' he said. Congress' media and publicity department head Pawan Khera tagged a post on X carrying the video, which was posted online by an Indian-American social entrepreneur Kunal Jain. The video shows the Indian man pinned to the ground by Port Authority Police and being handcuffed. 'I witnessed a young Indian student being deported from Newark Airport last night — handcuffed, crying, treated like a criminal. He came chasing dreams, not causing harm. As an NRI, I felt helpless and heartbroken. This is a human tragedy,' Mr. Jain said in his post. Tagging Mr. Jain's post, Mr. Khera said, 'This is too painful, too humiliating and too distressing to watch. As a country, why should we tolerate this humiliation?' 'From the days where we showed the muscle to the U.S. during the Devyani Khobragade issue to now seeing our citizens being treated like animals, do we have no goodwill left in the world?' the Congress leader said.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Explained: China's monopoly on rare earth minerals spooking the world; what does it mean for India & what is it doing?
China's firm grip on rare earths, essential components in the production of phones, automobiles and missiles, is giving a headache to countries world over, including India. (AI image) China's firm grip and worldwide monopoly on rare earth metals, essential components in the production of phones, automobiles and missiles, is giving a headache to countries world over, including India. Despite mounting pressure from countries including the US, EU and India, China remains steadfast in its stance regarding export limitations of these critical rare earths. Recent reports have highlighted increasing worries within the Indian automotive sector regarding the limited availability of rare earth magnets. These components are essential for electric vehicles and certain parts in conventional internal combustion engine vehicles. Furthermore, India's industrial sectors have expressed apprehension over China's decision to restrict rare earth exports, particularly germanium. This plays a vital role in the production of semiconductors, fibre optic cables and solar panels. Critical minerals and metals, including cobalt, copper, lithium, nickel and rare earth elements, are fundamental components in manufacturing environmentally friendly energy solutions, from wind power installations to battery-powered automobiles. What's China's hold on rare earths? China has established control over critical mineral deposits worldwide. Rare earth minerals comprise a collection of 17 metallic elements. While these elements are found across various countries, extracting them is expensive and environmentally damaging, resulting in substantial pollution. The International Energy Agency reports that whilst China produces 61 % of globally mined rare earths, it dominates 92% of worldwide production output. Following Premier Li Qiang's decree implementing export controls on rare earths, China has reportedly intensified these restrictions after US President Donald Trump levied 146% tariffs on Chinese exports. Recently Trump said that Chinese President Xi Jinping has allowed some rare earths to flow to the US. In a recent column in TOI, Tanmay Kumarr Baid & Pranay Kotasthane of Takshashila Institution argued that by restricting shipments, Beijing is lifting prices worldwide and incentivising countries to set up processing elsewhere. 'Once the capital is sunk into new refining in the rest of the world, even a later U‑turn by China cannot quickly claw these customers back,' they said. However, experts Ajit Ranade and Shardul Manurkar believe that China's rare-earth dominance is not a fragile or accidental monopoly, it is a product of deep, deliberate, and sustained strategy. 'Attempts to counter this dominance must acknowledge the scale of the challenge,' they say. Also Read | Move away from China: Shein & Reliance aim selling 'Made in India' clothes abroad; to list India-made clothes on US, UK websites How much does it impact India? The Indian automobile sector continues to face challenges as China maintains restrictions on critical rare earth magnet supplies, even though nine parts manufacturers received endorsements for their import requests from the Chinese embassy. The flow of supplies remains halted, pending approval from China's commerce ministry. These magnets play a crucial role in the production of electric vehicles and are essential for various automotive components, including gear mechanisms and drive trains. The Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers delivered a presentation to Indian government officials on May 28, urging immediate dialogue between India and China to expedite stalled approvals and simplify the complex procedures. The automotive industry body emphasised the need for bilateral discussions to address these regulatory challenges, according to a Bloomberg report. Saurabh Agarwal, Partner & Automotive Tax Leader, EY India says, 'The recent actions by China have significantly disrupted global supply chains, particularly through their increasing export control over critical commodities. This underscores the urgent need for India, and indeed any nation, to foster a self-sustaining economy. We must prioritize developing our own critical mineral resources and building an end-to-end domestic supply chain, especially as the world shifts towards greater self-reliance. ' 'Given the current trajectory of our growing economy, it's imperative that the government introduces a Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme specifically for rare earth magnets and critical mineral recycling. This will be crucial in the mid-term for establishing a robust domestic supply chain,' he tells TOI. 'In the short run, we must leverage our diplomatic channels to engage with the Chinese government and resolve the immediate challenges around export control licenses. This is essential to prevent production stoppages in our industries,' he adds. Also Read | 'No longer any question..': Donald Trump says China's Xi Jinping has agreed to let rare earth minerals flow to US; sign of thawing tensions What India is doing India is currently negotiating with China regarding the procurement of permanent magnets made from rare earth minerals, whilst simultaneously exploring alternative supply channels for these vital components, according to commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal. The minister confirmed that the administration maintains regular communication with domestic industry stakeholders to accelerate the development of indigenous sources. "There is a concern... our embassy is in dialogue with them (China)... commerce and industry ministry is also working," Goyal said, adding that the government had already begun work on developing alternate sources. The minister addressed concerns regarding China's halt on permanent magnet exports to India, acknowledging its impact on the automotive sector, white goods and other industries. He mentioned that whilst some companies have submitted applications, they anticipate favourable responses for permanent magnet approvals. Additionally, the government is collaborating with Indian Rare Earths Ltd to accelerate domestic resource development, Goyal stated. When questioned about potential production-linked incentive schemes for magnets, Goyal confirmed discussions with the automotive industry and expressed confidence in finding a solution. He noted that ongoing dialogues with innovators and startups indicate their willingness to support funding requirements and price adjustments necessary to stimulate sector growth and expansion. Also Read | Economy in dire straits, India's Indus Waters Treaty blow: Can Pakistan avoid the 'begging bowl'? Regarding alternative solutions, the minister highlighted potential technological developments within India. Goyal emphasised the collaborative efforts between government, industry, startups and innovators. He acknowledged possible short-term challenges but expressed confidence in achieving success over medium to long-term periods. Goyal recently said that the world must acknowledge the dangers of critical minerals and their supply chains being concentrated in a few geographies, as this concentration could impede economic progress of countries. He said that India has initiated measures, including support for startups conducting research and development, to discover innovative and alternative solutions, he noted. This will help reduce "our over dependence and over reliance on certain critical minerals," Goyal said. Critical minerals like copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt and rare earth elements play a vital role in advancing clean energy technologies. These critical minerals are fundamental components in the manufacturing of wind turbines, electricity networks, electric vehicles and batteries. As countries worldwide accelerate their shift towards clean energy, the requirement for these essential minerals continues to rise. The government's initiative for recycling critical minerals, including copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt and rare earth elements, is approaching its conclusive phase, according to a mines ministry official's statement. The National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM) has received Rs 1,500 crore in the Union budget for recycling critical minerals, Dinesh Mahur, Joint Secretary in the Mines Ministry has said. The government's earlier approval of the National Critical Mineral Mission, with a budget of Rs 16,300-crore and a total allocation of Rs 34,300 crore distributed across seven years, aims to boost self-sufficiency and expedite India's shift towards green energy. The mission, which seeks to encourage exploration of critical minerals domestically and in offshore regions, anticipates a substantial contribution of Rs 18,000 crore from public sector enterprises. The primary aims of this initiative include enhancing exploration activities, lessening dependence on imports, securing mineral deposits abroad, advancing processing technologies for these crucial minerals and establishing recycling mechanisms. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now