logo
Harvard's China ties become new front in battle with Trump

Harvard's China ties become new front in battle with Trump

Mint2 days ago

In his war with Harvard, President Trump has sought to withhold billions of dollars in federal funding from the school and strip its tax exemptions, measures the White House initially tied to perceived antisemitism at the school amid Israel's war in Gaza.
In recent weeks, long-simmering Republican anger over Harvard's links to China has increasingly gained traction. In escalating calls to punish the school, a training event two years ago in the Chinese city of Kunming has emerged as Exhibit A.
The training, on the bland topic of healthcare financing, was co-hosted by a Harvard professor and involved a few dozen provincial-level bureaucrats. Among them was at least one representative from Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a large Chinese Communist Party paramilitary organization in the country's far west that also handles civilian government services, including managing hospitals.
U.S. authorities in 2020 imposed sanctions against the Xinjiang corps, accusing it of ethnic and religious abuses against Uyghurs and other mostly Muslim minorities and forbidding U.S. persons from providing it 'funds, goods, or services."
On Wednesday, as Trump moved to bar Harvard from enrolling foreign students, his order cited the event, charging that in exchange for Chinese funding the school 'has, among other things, 'repeatedly hosted and trained members of a Chinese Communist Party paramilitary organization.' "
Harvard, which didn't respond to questions, hasn't publicly addressed the allegations involving the Xinjiang corps. The school is fighting Trump in court, calling some of the administration's measures illegal.
To its detractors, Harvard epitomizes American elite universities' dependence on Beijing as a profit center—and how that helps the country's rulers, the Chinese Communist Party, challenge the U.S.
The conservative Heritage Foundation took aim at higher education in its Project 2025 recommendations, saying, 'Universities taking money from the CCP should lose their accreditation, charters, and eligibility for federal funds."
Chinese citizens represent some 23% of Harvard's international students, and Education Department data show that in recent decades individuals and companies from China and Hong Kong together have been the university's No. 2 source of large foreign gifts and contracts, behind only England.
In 2023 and 2024 combined, the data show, Harvard reported $55.6 million in gifts of $250,000 or more from China, including Hong Kong, plus $13.7 million in contracts, some 13% and 8.2% respectively among all large-scale funding from non-U.S. partners.
The Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps booth during a 2021 trade fair in Beijing.
In previous responses to questions about its China exposure, such as acceptance of financial gifts, the school has cited its broad global alumni network across over 200 nations.
With some 90 million members, the Chinese Communist Party has a deep reach into Chinese society. But while some tuition payments and funding might ultimately be traced to decisions by Chinese Communist Party officials, neither China's government nor the party would be likely to directly underwrite activities involving universities abroad, and there is no indication of such payments to Harvard.
The Xinjiang corps, colloquially known as Bingtuan, is central to the Chinese Communist Party's ironclad rule over Xinjiang. Widespread evidence shows its paramilitary operations have played a leading role in Beijing's suppression of Uyghurs, including the detention of more than a million people. In imposing sanctions on the corps and its leaders in 2020, the Treasury Department cited 'their connection to serious human-rights abuse."
The organization also has a massive administrative role in providing social services to ordinary citizens, such as managing hospitals and healthcare systems, the topic of the 2023 Harvard training, co-hosted by Winnie Yip, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
Analysts say the Xinjiang corps's participation in the training—organized by a Chinese health-insurance regulator, the National Healthcare Security Administration—was hardly the kind of nefarious activity American sanctions are designed to halt.
Still, U.S. sanctions laws don't differentiate between types of interaction, said Julian Ku, a law professor at New York's Hofstra University. ​ 'Providing services to a blocked entity is prohibited, so Harvard does indeed face some possible liability here," he said.
Trump indicated that his concern about the Xinjiang corps was based on findings of a House Select Committee on China. Its chairman, Rep. John Moolenaar (R., Mich.), late last month wrote to Harvard President Alan Garber, demanding explanations about university activities that 'create risks to U.S. national security and further the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) genocide in Xinjiang."
Harvard President Alan Garber
A China committee statement about Moolenaar's letter charged that Harvard researchers did transplant studies with 'PRC-based collaborators, amid mounting evidence of the CCP's forced organ harvesting practices." Allegations that Beijing is engaged in institutionalized theft from prisoners and others of body parts for organ transplants have recently gained traction among Republican China critics. While few human-rights groups make that claim today, the anti-Beijing spiritual group Falun Gong has forcefully promoted the issue.
The Moolenaar letter described a number of Harvard studies as problematic, including one on cardiac transplants involving mice, detailed in a March 2024 scientific paper that indicated one of the 20 researchers had an affiliation with a hospital in northern China.
A spokeswoman for Harvard Medical School's Brigham and Women's Hospital told The Wall Street Journal that the study was done at that institution and had no association with China. By the time the paper was published, she said, one researcher had joined the Chinese hospital.
Harvard hasn't responded to Moolenaar's May 19 letter, which was also signed by Reps. Tim Walberg (R., Mich.) and Elise Stefanik (R., N.Y.), but by no Democrats on the China committee.
Winnie Yip, a professor at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
In a response to questions, Moolenaar called the Xinjiang corps 'a sanctioned, paramilitary organization complicit in genocide" and said, 'I stand by the letter, and I will continue demanding answers from those enabling or ignoring the CCP's abuses."
Criticism over the Xinjiang organization's participation in the 2023 healthcare event originated in a late April report by Strategy Risks, a research firm run by Isaac Stone Fish, a New York-based journalist, which concluded that Harvard's behavior raised doubts about its effectiveness in 'limiting [Chinese Communist Party] and authoritarian influences." The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a New York public-policy organization, funded the report but hasn't independently published the findings.
Last month the report found an audience with Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.), who cited Strategy Risks in an open letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that urged an investigation into Harvard's potentially 'prohibited behavior" with the Xinjiang organization.
Rep. John Moolenaar
Four days later, Moolenaar and his fellow House members sent their letter to Harvard's Garber, noting the Xinjiang organization's role in mass detentions and describing healthcare efforts in Xinjiang as a 'fig leaf" to whitewash crimes.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem then called out the training as she moved to strip Harvard of its right to educate foreign students.
Harvard's public materials on the meetings don't say how the corps came to participate in the training, an iteration of a series on healthcare finance basics known as the Flagship Program developed by the World Bank and Harvard in the 1990s. It has been offered to bureaucrats in dozens of low- and middle-income nations; the 2023 version in China had a special focus on eldercare insurance.
A Chinese-language website published by Harvard said the Xinjiang group joined the annual training in 2019, but an internet archive tool showed that reference to its participation was later deleted.
Yip, far left, at healthcare-finance training event in China in 2023.
The congressional letter also took issue with a photo Harvard published from the 2023 event that blurred out name plates in front of four speakers, which the politicians charged 'raises questions about why Harvard wanted to keep their identities hidden."
It couldn't be determined who had obscured the nametags; the photo had previously been widely published that way in China. Key participants are nonetheless easily identified, including the Harvard professor, Yip.
Write to James T. Areddy at James.Areddy@wsj.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. states would struggle to administer food stamp benefits under Republican tax bill
U.S. states would struggle to administer food stamp benefits under Republican tax bill

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

U.S. states would struggle to administer food stamp benefits under Republican tax bill

A Republican tax bill proposal could shift $22 billion in SNAP costs to states, potentially forcing them to cut eligibility or leave the program. State officials express concerns about absorbing these costs, which could impact millions of recipients. The bill also expands work requirements, potentially removing millions more from SNAP. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads States would struggle Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads U.S. states will not be able to fully administer food stamp benefits for millions of the nation's poor if a proposal in the Republican tax bill forcing them to shoulder billions of dollars in new costs is signed into law, according to state officials, local government associations and policy than 41 million people receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the nation's largest food aid program, which cost about $100 billion in 2024. The tax bill passed on May 22 by the U.S. House of Representatives and backed by President Donald Trump would shift some $22 billion in administrative and benefit costs to state and local governments, according to a Reuters of the move say it will promote accountability and reduce waste in the program. But states fear it will backfire."No state is going to be able to simply absorb that," Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, a Democrat, told from North Carolina, Oregon and Michigan also said their states did not have the resources to easily take on the spending requirements in the proposal, which is now before the states could be forced to shrink SNAP eligibility or to leave the program altogether, according to letters sent in May to Congressional and agriculture committee leadership from state and county legislatures and health officials."Shifting the financial burden of SNAP onto states is fiscally unsustainable and risks harming the very individuals and families the program is designed to support," said one letter from the National Conference of State letters were sent by the National Association of Counties, National Association of County Human Services Administrators and the American Public Human Services Association. USDA spokesperson said that Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins supports Trump's agenda and that the agency will continue to provide technical assistance to have long supported reduced spending on SNAP, arguing that the program creates a dependence on federal support and should be more narrowly targeted to the most could not reach a representative from the Republican Governors Association or from Texas, Florida or Georgia, the Republican-led states facing the highest SNAP costs The House bill would require states for the first time to pay for a portion of SNAP benefits beginning in 2028, with their payment share from 5% to 25% tied to the state's error rate, a USDA measure of how accurately states determine eligibility and benefit that would amount to more than $20 billion in spending, according to a Reuters analysis of data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The bill would also require states to immediately pay 75% of the cost of administering the SNAP program, up from their existing 50% obligation, adding another $2 billion to the sum, according to USDA states facing the most new spending would be California ($3.7 billion), New York ($2.1 billion), Florida ($1.7 billion) and Texas ($1.2 billion).The state spending requirements would push 1.3 million people off of SNAP in an average month, because some states would modify eligibility requirements or stop administering SNAP, according to a May 22 letter from the Congressional Budget Office to House and Senate agriculture committee does not have the ability to support $850 million in new SNAP spending and may need to restrict eligibility or reduce benefits if the House bill passes, said Elizabeth Hertel, director of the state Department of Health and Human would struggle to absorb more than $477 million and the state is planning for what they would do if forced to take on the spending, said Claire Seguin, director of the division of the Oregon Department of Human Services that administers Carolina is already budget constrained and "there isn't really a way to backfill" more than $650 million in new SNAP spending, said Department of Health and Human Services secretary Dev Sangvai, who did not provide details on what steps the state would take if the provision York also cannot absorb its projected costs, Barbara Guinn, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, told Senators during a June 4 forum on the SNAP most states must balance their budgets and cannot accrue debt to offset new spending like the federal government can, shifting SNAP spending to states risks drawing down resources from other public programs like Medicaid, said Eric Mitchell, president of the Alliance to End Hunger. The bill would also expand work requirements for some SNAP recipients and restrict states' ability to waive those requirements when unemployment ticks up, which together would push another 3.2 million people off of SNAP in an average month, according to the CBO.

US Secretary Rubio targets Harvard over potential sanctions breach at China conference; NYT reports
US Secretary Rubio targets Harvard over potential sanctions breach at China conference; NYT reports

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US Secretary Rubio targets Harvard over potential sanctions breach at China conference; NYT reports

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called for a Treasury Department investigation into Harvard University 's alleged sanctions violations linked to a health conference held in China. The request, which experts call highly unusual, comes amid the Trump administration 's wider campaign to increase scrutiny on the Ivy League school's global partnerships, as per a report by The New York Times. According to the NYT report, Rubio signed a recommendation last month urging the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to examine whether Harvard's collaboration with Chinese officials—some from a blacklisted entity—violated federal law. The case centers on a long-running program called the 'Training Course on Health Financing,' held jointly by Harvard, the World Bank, and China's National Health Insurance Administration. Since 2019, it has hosted officials from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (X.P.C.C.), a group sanctioned by the U.S. in 2020 for human rights violations against Uyghurs and other minorities in China. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villa For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Villas in Dubai | Search ads Learn More Undo Archived versions of a Harvard webpage list the X.P.C.C. among participants, though the university later removed those mentions. A Chinese government site showed the Corps still attended as recently as 2023. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Rubio's action marks a rare case of a cabinet secretary targeting a domestic institution for sanctions enforcement. John Smith, a former OFAC director, told The Times, 'I wouldn't say it's wrong or improper-I would just say it's unusual and not the usual course of business.' Live Events You Might Also Like: US resumes visa processing for Harvard students after court blocks Trump's policy ban The sanctions push is part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to pressure Harvard. The university has already lost nearly $3.7 billion in federal research grants since filing a lawsuit in April that accused the government of politically motivated interference. Trump allies have shifted focus from antisemitism concerns on campus to alleged foreign ties. On May 15, Senator Tom Cotton cited a report from Strategy Risks—funded by conservative think tank Manhattan Institute—calling for an investigation. Days later, the Department of Homeland Security stated Harvard had 'hosted and trained' members of the X.P.C.C. The Treasury and State Departments declined to comment on the probe. Harvard is reportedly conducting an internal review, but details remain undisclosed. A Harvard spokesperson declined to comment. Meanwhile, Education Secretary Linda McMahon defended the administration's actions. At a recent event, she said, 'We're pleased to see that,' referring to the replacement of faculty at Harvard's Center for Middle Eastern Studies. You Might Also Like: Now, lack of a social media profile could prompt US visa denial The Trump administration has also moved to revoke international student visas and continues to investigate Harvard through multiple federal agencies. Isaac Stone Fish, CEO of Strategy Risks, said his report 'should not be read as a blanket condemnation' of Harvard. However, he added, 'The X.P.C.C. is one of the world's most notorious organizations.' You Might Also Like: US to revoke visas of Chinese students linked to Chinese Communist Party or critical fields, Marco Rubio announces

US Riots: American Flag Pulled Down, Set On Fire As Anti-ICE Fire Spreads To Several Cities
US Riots: American Flag Pulled Down, Set On Fire As Anti-ICE Fire Spreads To Several Cities

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US Riots: American Flag Pulled Down, Set On Fire As Anti-ICE Fire Spreads To Several Cities

/ Jun 11, 2025, 03:21PM IST The protests against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown are not limited to Los Angeles, America's second-largest cities. Several cities including New York, Chicago and Seattle are witnessed massive protests that erupted in LA five days ago. Protesters have torched vehicles and burnt American flags despite Donald Trump deploying 5,000 troops including National Guards and Marines to ensure peace.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store