Facebook enables gender discrimination in job ads, European human rights body rules
A European human rights body has ruled that Facebook's algorithm shows gender bias when promoting job advertisements, marking what activists say is a crucial step in holding big tech companies accountable for the design of their platforms.
The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights said in a February 18 decision that Facebook's algorithm reinforced gender stereotypes by mainly showing 'typically female professions' to female Facebook users in the Netherlands and that Meta (META), the social platform's owner, should have monitored and adjusted its algorithm to prevent that.
The Institute's decision follows CNN As Equals reporting revealing that Facebook users in Europe were missing out on job opportunities due to gender bias.
The 2023 article was based on findings shared with CNN by international non-profit Global Witness, which investigated Facebook's job ads and found that ads in the Netherlands and five other countries often targeted users based on historical gender stereotypes.
For example, ads for mechanic positions were predominantly shown to men, while those for preschool teacher roles were primarily directed to women. Global Witness said its experiments in the Netherlands, France, India, Ireland, the United Kingdom and South Africa demonstrated that the algorithm perpetuated similar biases around the world. The non-profit's investigation led to four complaints from the Dutch human rights group Bureau Clara Wichmann and the French organization Fondation des Femmes.
The Netherlands Institute for Human Rights said in its February ruling that Meta Platforms Ireland Ltd., which manages Facebook ads in Europe, failed to demonstrate that its advertising algorithm does not engage in prohibited gender discrimination. The Dutch body said Facebook must revise its advertising algorithm to prevent further discrimination.
The European Union has several directives that prohibit discrimination based on gender, including in online advertising.
The Institute's ruling added that 'Meta Ireland has acknowledged that the gender data point can be part of the algorithm. Meta Ireland has not refuted that this data point can promote stereotyping via the algorithm.'
A Meta spokesperson told CNN that it would not be commenting on the matter.
Meta spokesperson Ashley Settle previously told CNN that the company applies 'targeting restrictions to advertisers when setting up campaigns for employment, as well as housing and credit ads.' Those audience targeting restrictions are in place in the United States, Canada and more than 40 European countries and territories, including France and the Netherlands, according to Meta.
'We do not allow advertisers to target these ads based on gender,' Settle said in a 2023 statement. 'We continue to work with stakeholders and experts across academia, human rights groups and other disciplines on the best ways to study and address algorithmic fairness.' Meta did not respond to questions from CNN at the time about how the algorithm that runs its ad system is trained. In a 2020 blog post about its ad delivery system, Facebook said ads are shown to users based on a variety of factors, including 'behavior on and off' the platform.
Berty Bannor of Bureau Clara Wichmann celebrated the Dutch institute's decision, telling CNN that the ruling was significant.
'Today is a great day for Dutch Facebook users, who have an accessible mechanism to hold multinational tech companies such as Meta accountable and ensure the rights they enjoy offline are upheld in the digital space,' Bannor said.
'I see this as a first step in showing that anti-discrimination laws apply just as much to big tech companies as they do to the offline world,' she added.
Rosie Sharpe, Senior Campaigner on Digital Threats at Global Witness, said the ruling 'marks an important step towards holding Big Tech accountable for how they design their services and the discriminatory impact their algorithms can have on people.'
'We hope this ruling can be used as a springboard for further action, in Europe and beyond,' she added.
While the decision by the Netherlands Institute for Human Rights is not legally binding, experts say that, if the case is further escalated, a court will be required to consider the Institute's findings.
Dutch lawyer Anton Ekker, who specializes in artificial intelligence and digital rights, told CNN that the Institute's ruling could lead to fines by the Dutch data protection regulator or orders to modify specific algorithms, specifically those that reinforce inequalities and disproportionately harm marginalized groups based on gender, race, ethnicity or religion.
If Meta does not take action on the job ads algorithm, NGOs might choose to pursue further legal action to stop the discriminatory use of its algorithms, he said.
The Dutch ruling comes as protection of digital rights has been severely undermined, particularly for women and marginalized groups, Bannor said.
Last month, Meta said it would end its diversity, equity and inclusion programs, change its policies on hateful conduct on its platforms and drop its third-party fact-checking programs in the US.
Users are now allowed to, for example, refer to 'women as household objects or property' or 'transgender or non-binary people as 'it,'' according to a section of the policy prohibiting such speech that was removed. A new section of the policy notes Meta will allow 'allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality.'
Previously, such comments would have been subject to removal by Meta's moderators.
Meta has faced various allegations of discrimination over the past decade, including lawsuits in the US regarding housing, employment and credit ads. As a result, the company has modified its algorithm for these ads in the US.
Sharpe at Global Witness told CNN that it's 'outrageous' the same changes were not applied globally, arguing that algorithms and AI are increasingly impacting everyday life and posing significant risks to social justice.
CNN's Kara Fox contributed reporting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's electric cars are becoming slicker and cheaper - but is there a deeper cost?
Theo will be responding to reader comments about this article between 12pm and 1pm today. Go to the comments section at the bottom of this page to share what you think about the rise of these more affordable EVs. In China, they call it the Seagull, and it has looks to match. It is sleek and angular, with bright, downward-slanting headlights that have more than a hint of mischievous eyes about them. It is, of course, a car. A very small one, designed as a cheap city runabout – but it could have huge significance. Available in China since 2023, where it has proved extremely popular, it has just been launched in Europe with the name Dolphin Surf (because Europeans apparently aren't as keen on seagulls as Chinese people). When it goes on sale in the UK this week, it's expected to have a price tag of around £18,000. That will still make it, for an electric car on western markets, very cheap indeed. It won't be the outright lowest-priced model on offer: the Dacia Spring, manufactured in Wuhan jointly by Renault and Dongfeng, and the Leapmotor T03, which is being produced by a joint venture between Chinese startup Leapmotor and Stellantis, both cost less. But the Dolphin Surf is the invasive species that has long-established brands most worried. That is because the company behind it has been making ever bigger waves on international markets. BYD is already the biggest player in China. It overtook Tesla in 2024 to become the world's best-selling maker of electric vehicles (EVs), and since entering the European markets two years ago, it has expanded aggressively. "We want to be number one in the British market within 10 years," says Steve Beattie, sales and marketing director for BYD UK. BYD is part of a wider expansion of Chinese companies and brands that some believe could change the face of the global motor industry – and which has already prompted radical action from the US government and the EU. It means once-unknown marques like Nio, Xpeng, Zeekr or Omoda could become every bit as much household names as Ford or Volkswagen. They will join classic brands such as MG, Volvo and Lotus, which have been under Chinese ownership for years. The products on offer already encompass a huge range, from runabouts like the tiny Dolphin Surf to exotic supercars, like the pothole-jumping U9, from BYD's high-end sub-brand Yangwang. "Chinese brands are making massive inroads into the European market," says David Bailey, professor of business and economics at Birmingham Business School. In 2024, 17 million battery and plug-in hybrid cars were sold worldwide, 11 million of those in China. Chinese brands, meanwhile, had 10% of global EV and plug-in hybrid sales outside their home country, according to the consultancy Rho Motion. That figure is only expected to grow. For consumers, it should be good news – leading to more high-quality and affordable electric cars becoming available. But with rivalry between Beijing and western powers showing no sign of subsiding, some experts are concerned Chinese vehicles could represent a security risk from hackers and third parties. And for established players in Europe, it represents a formidable challenge to their historic dominance. "[China has] a huge cost advantage through economies of scale and battery technology. European manufacturers have fallen well behind," warns Mr Bailey. "Unless they wake up very quickly and catch up, they could be wiped out." China's car industry has been developing rapidly since the country joined the World Trade Organisation in 2001. But that process accelerated rapidly in 2015, when the Communist Party introduced its "Made in China 2025" initiative. The 10-year plan to make the country a leader in several high-tech industries, including EVs, attracted intense criticism from abroad, and particularly the US, amid claims of forced technology transfers and theft of intellectual property – all of which the Chinese government denies. Fuelled by lavish state funding, the plan helped lay the groundwork for the breakneck growth of companies like BYD – originally a maker of batteries for mobile phones – and allowed the Chinese parent companies of MG and Volvo, SAIC and Geely, to become major players in the EV market. "The general standard of Chinese cars is very, very high indeed," says Dan Caesar, chief executive of Electric Vehicles UK. "China has learned extremely quickly how to manufacture cars." Yet competition in China has become ever more cut-throat, with brands jostling for space in an increasingly saturated market. This has led them to hunt for sales elsewhere. While Chinese firms have expanded into East Asia and South America, for years the European market proved a tough nut to crack – that is, until governments here decided to phase out the sale of new petrol and diesel models. The transition to electric cars opened the door to new players. "[Chinese brands] have seen an opportunity to get a bit of a foothold," says Oliver Lowe, UK product manager of Omoda and Jaecoo, two sub brands of the Chinese giant Chery. Low labour costs in China, coupled with government subsidies and a very well-established supply chain, have given Chinese firms advantages, their rivals have claimed. A report from the Swiss bank UBS, published in late 2023, suggested that BYD alone was able to build cars 25% more cheaply than western competitors. Chinese firms deny the playing field is uneven. Xpeng's vice chairman Brian Gu told the BBC at the Paris Motor Show in 2024 that his company is competitive "because we have fought tooth and nail through the most competitive market in the world". Concerns that Chinese EV imports could flood international markets at the expense of established manufacturers reached fever pitch in 2024. In the US, the Alliance for American Manufacturing warned they could prove to be an "extinction-level event" for the US industry, while the European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen suggested that "huge state subsidies" for Chinese firms were distorting the European market. The Biden administration took dramatic action, raising import tariffs on Chinese-made EVs from 25% to 100%, effectively making it pointless to sell them in the US. It was condemned by Beijing as "naked protectionism". Meanwhile, in October 2024, the EU imposed extra tariffs of up to 35.3% on Chinese-made EVs. The UK, however, took no action. Matthias Schmidt, founder of Schmidt Automotive Research, says the EU's tariffs have now made it harder for Chinese firms to gain market share. "The door was wide open in 2024... but the Chinese failed to take their chance. With the tariffs in place, Chinese manufacturers are now unable to push their cost advantage onto European consumers." European manufacturers have been racing to develop their own affordable electric cars. French car-maker Renault is among them. At its factory in Douai, in northeastern France, an army of spark-spitting robots weld sections of steel to form car bodies, while on the main assembly line, automated systems mate together bodyshells, doors, batteries, motors and other parts, before human workers apply the finishing touches. The factory has been making cars for Renault since 1974, but four years ago, the ageing production lines were replaced with new highly automated, digitally-controlled systems. Part of the site was also taken over by the Chinese-owned battery firm AESC, which built its own "gigafactory" next door. It's part of Renault's wider plan to set up an ultra-modern EV "hub" in northern France. Mirroring the lean production techniques of Chinese manufacturers, the hub cuts costs by maximising efficiency and ensuring that suppliers are located as close as possible. "Our target was to be able to produce affordable electric cars here to sell in Europe," explains Pierre Andrieux, director of the Douai plant, arguing that automated processes "will enable us to do that profitably". But the company is also exploiting something the Chinese brands do not have: heritage. Its latest model, the Renault 5 E-tech, built in Douai, borrows its name from one of the company's most famous products. The original Renault 5, launched in 1972, was a quirky little everyman car with boxy looks and low running costs that became a cult classic. The new design, despite being a state-of-the art EV, pays homage to its predecessor in name and appearance, in an effort to emulate its popular appeal. But irrespective of how desirable Chinese cars are in comparison with European rivals, some experts believe we should be wary of them – for security reasons. Most modern vehicles are internet-enabled in some way – to allow satellite navigation, for example – and drivers' phones are often connected to car systems. Pioneered by Tesla, so-called "over-the-air updates" can upgrade a car's software remotely. This has all led to concerns, in some quarters, that cars could be hacked and used to harbour spyware, monitor individuals or even be immobilised at the touch of a keyboard. Earlier this year, a British newspaper reported that military and intelligence chiefs had been ordered not to discuss official business while riding in EVs; it was also alleged that cars with Chinese components had been banned from sensitive military sites. Then in May, a former head of the intelligence service MI6 claimed that Chinese-made technology in a range of products, including cars, could be controlled and programmed remotely. Sir Richard Dearlove warned MPs that there was the potential to "immobilise London". Beijing has always denied all accusations of espionage. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in London says that the recent allegations are "entirely unfounded and absurd". "China has consistently advocated the secure, open, and rules-based development of global supply chains," the spokesperson told the BBC. "Chinese enterprises operating around the world are required to comply with local laws and regulations. "To date, there is no credible evidence to support the claim that Chinese EVs pose a security threat to the UK or any other country." Joseph Jarnecki, research fellow at defence and security think-tank The Royal United Services Institute, argues that potential risks can be mitigated. "Chinese carmakers exist in this highly competitive market. While they're beholden to Chinese law and that may require compliance with national security agencies, none of them want to damage their ability to grow and to have international exports by being perceived as a security risk," he says. "The Chinese government equally is conscious of the need for economic growth. They're not hell-bent on solely conducting surveillance." Tesla's challenges run deeper than 'toxic' controversy around Elon Musk Xi's real test is not Trump's trade war Trump's chips strategy: The US will struggle to take on Asia But the car industry is just one area in which Chinese technology is becoming increasingly enmeshed in the UK economy. To achieve the government's climate objectives, for instance, "It will be necessary to use Chinese-supplied technology", adds Mr Jarnecki. He believes that regulators of key industries should be given sufficient resources to monitor cyber security and advise companies using Chinese products of any potential issues. As for electric cars powered by Chinese technology, there's no question that they're here to stay. "Even if you have a car that's made in Germany or elsewhere, it probably contains quite a few Chinese components," says Dan Caesar. "The reality is most of us have smartphones and things from China, from the US, from Korea, without really giving it a second thought. So I do think there's some fearmongering going on about what the Chinese are capable of. "I think we have to face the reality that China is going to be a big part of the future." Top image credit: Reuters BBC InDepth is the new home on the website and app for the best analysis and expertise from our top journalists. Under a distinctive new brand, we'll bring you fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions, and deep reporting on the biggest issues to help you make sense of a complex world. And we'll be showcasing thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. We're starting small but thinking big, and we want to know what you think - you can send us your feedback by clicking on the button below.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Apollo eyes $100 billion Germany investment as private capital swerves U.S. turmoil for Europe
MEGA, or "Make Europe Great Again," was a hot topic at this year's biggest private markets event last week. The about-turn in sentiment toward the continent was illustrated no better than when the boss of industry juggernaut Apollo said he saw the opportunity to put $100 billion "in the ground" in Germany over the next decade. "I think many investors in Europe see the opportunity, and many investors in U.S. see the opportunity right now in Europe. They see it across the private equity ecosystem. They also see it across the credit ecosystem," Apollo Global Management President Jim Zelter said during a keynote interview. As well as direct lending, Zelter said he saw big opportunity in investment-grade commercial and residential real estate, highlighting domestic housing shortages in Spain and the U.K. On Germany, Zelter said the $100 billion investment figure would be hard to match anywhere in the world outside of the U.S., and that the country had "woken up Europe to focus on financing industry, military and a variety of other critical industries." His comments will be welcomed by Germany's new government, which has called for private capital to help meet its infrastructure needs alongside public funding. Sentiment began to significantly shift around the sluggish German economy in March, when lawmakers approved alterations to longstanding debt restrictions to allow the establishment of a $500 billion fund for defense, infrastructure and climate-related projects. At the start of May, center-right, pro-business politician Friedrich Merz — who has served on the boards of BlackRock Germany, EY Germany and the Deutsche Börse — was confirmed as Germany's new chancellor, ending months of political uncertainty. Merz met with U.S. President Donald Trump last week , achieving some diplomatic wins in his attempt to strengthen ties between the countries and urge further support for Ukraine. Europe bulls, U.S. nerves Joana Rocha Scaff, head of European private equity at Neuberger Berman, told CNBC that many investors had started the year overweight the U.S. and intending to extend their allocations, expecting deregulation and a boost to economic growth, only to be abruptly stymied by Trump's tariff policies. "In the midst of this turbulence and noise in the U.S., we have seen capital be redirected towards Europe," she said, with her own investment firm "actively investing in the market" alongside its core general partners, or GPs. Neuberger Berman's active market investments deploy around $4 billion of capital on a direct basis a year, she said. So far this year, Europe has accounted for around 65% of direct investment activity, up from around 20-30% of global market activity on a typical year, she noted. Those investments have been broad, she continued but generally oriented around developed parts of Europe, energy security and transition, defense, digitalization and industrial assets. Private equity's enthusiasm toward Europe has also been reflected in public markets. Germany's blue chip DAX index is up around 22% this year, versus around 1% for the Dow Jones Industrial Average . Europe's Aerospace and Defense Index is up nearly 50%, while a tracker index of the long-buzzy Magnificent 7 U.S. tech giants is down 2%. For retail investors seeking opportunities in the space, JPMorgan recently named its top European stock picks for the next year — and they include defense names Rheinmetall and Babcock International , IT firms SAP and Dassault Systems , and infrastructure picks Alstom , Heidelberg Materials and Saint-Gobain . There are also new ways for retail investors to track private credit returns through exchange-traded funds — though experts warn private markets are complex and come with significant risks . Earlier this year, State Street and Apollo Global Management launched the SPDR SSGA Apollo IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) exchange-traded fund (ETF), which aims to have at least 80% of its assets in investment-grade private and public debt securities.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
IZMO Ltd (BOM:532341) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Revenue Growth Amid Rising Costs
Release Date: June 06, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. IZMO Ltd (BOM:532341) reported a robust 20.27% year-on-year revenue growth for FY25, driven by expanding clientele across the US and Europe. The company has made significant R&D investments, particularly in AI and semiconductor sectors, positioning itself for future growth. The operational launch of a cutting-edge semiconductor manufacturing facility in Bangalore is expected to contribute significantly to revenue. The acquisition of Geronimo Web has expanded IZMO Ltd's footprint in European and Latin American markets, enhancing cross-selling opportunities. IZMO Ltd's Frog Data AI platform continues to gain traction, driving increased investment in sales, engineering, and marketing. Despite revenue growth, the company's profit after tax (PAT) for Q4 FY25 was subdued, reflecting increased expenses from new verticals. The company's working capital has increased due to longer payment cycles from large clients, impacting cash flow. Employee costs have risen, with further increases expected due to annual appraisals, potentially affecting profit margins. The semiconductor business, while promising, is still in its early stages and currently incurs expenses that impact overall profitability. The company faces geopolitical risks and uncertainties that could affect its growth projections and market conditions. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with BOM:532341. Q: Your top line is growing well, but salary and other expenses are rising due to new verticals. When will this reflect in PAT growth, and what is the outlook for FY26? A: We expect to break even in Ismo Micro operations this financial year, with PAT growth starting from Q3. We have signed up several clients, including a major automotive client, and anticipate significant contributions to PAT from Q3 onwards. We project a top-line growth of 25-30% for FY26, which will also reflect in the bottom line as other businesses stop burning cash and start contributing positively. - Unidentified_2 Q: How has the Geronimo acquisition progressed, and what revenue can we expect from it in FY26? A: We have made significant progress with Geronimo, including a successful contract in Germany. We expect to generate around 3 million in revenue from Geronimo in FY26. The acquisition has allowed us to cross-sell and upsell products, and we are already seeing positive results. - Unidentified_2 Q: Can you provide guidance on EBITDA margin for FY26, given the cost impacts from Ismo Micro and Geronimo? A: Excluding the costs from Ismo Micro and Geronimo, we aim to return to last year's EBITDA margin levels, targeting between 35% to 40%. The costs from these new ventures have temporarily impacted margins, but we expect improvements as they start contributing positively. - Unidentified_2 Q: What is the growth outlook for Frog Data, and how many clients do you currently have? A: Frog Data is targeting a revenue of close to 100 crore next year, with an internal target of 100 crore. We currently have around 800+ clients for Frog Data, with significant room for growth, especially in the US market. - Unidentified_2 Q: What are the expected contributions from Ismo Microsystems, and what is the competitive landscape like? A: We expect Ismo Microsystems to contribute significantly, with a target of 200 crore in revenue over the next three years. Currently, there is no competition in India for our specialized 3D packaging. Internationally, competition exists in countries like Korea, the US, and France, but we focus on high-value niche areas rather than high-volume production. - Unidentified_2 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
