
Ex-priest who led ‘cult-like' church group GUILTY of sexually abusing women he called ‘Lycra Nuns'
Chris Brain, 68, abused his position as head of the Nine O'Clock Service (NOS) to allegedlytarget a "staggering number of women".
The organisation targeted 18 to 30 years by using rave music and club culture to persuade them to sign up in the 1980s and 1990s.
Brain then created a "homebase" team of "attractive women" that served him, his wife and his daughter at their home in Sheffield.
He called them the "the Lycra Lovelies" or "the Lycra Nuns" after they were forced to wear lingerie and other revealing clothing.
Brain has now been convicted 17 counts of indecent assault against nine women following a trial at Inner London Crown Court.
Jurors are still deliberating on a further four counts of indecent assault and one charge of rape.
Brain was cleared of a further 15 charges of indecent assault.
Jurors heard the NOS services, which took place at 9pm on Sundays, featured multimedia, scantily dressed women and a live band.
They attracted 600 people at their peak and were led by Brain, who wore the same cassock sported by actor Robert De Niro in the movie "The Mission".
The court heard Brain's Church of England ordination was "fast tracked" in 1991.
Some members donated large sums of money or gave up their inheritances or homes to NOS.
But behind the scenes, Brain would groom his victims, force them to give him massages and re-enacted a film scene involving sexual abuse, it was said.
He would also control the women by ostracising them from friends and family, make them wear the same clothing and lose weight.
Brain, who had led a Christian rock band called Present Tense, used his power to turn the group into a "cult".
Prosecutor Tim Clark KC said: "In truth, NOS became a closed and controlled group which the defendant dominated and abused his position first as the leader and then as an ordained priest to sexually assault a staggering number of women from his congregation."
Concerns were raised about Brain's activities away from the church - including by one official who spoke about "scantily clad, lycra-wearing pretty young women" going to-and from the fiend's home.
The man said they would go on a "regular basis" to perform "domestic duties" but was given a "roasting" for raising the issue.
One "founder member" of the "homebase" team, who said she viewed Brain as "a form of prophet", told how up to five Lycra Nuns at a time would keep his home spotlessly clean.
Another victim described Brain as a "predator hiding in plain sight", who "would pick off women who he viewed as vulnerable".
Brain accepted engaging in sexual activity with some of the women but maintained it was consensual.
But Mr Clark said any capacity the victims had to say no was removed by the "cult-like domineering nature" of Brain's control over them.
He added: "He was the central figure in a cult, he decided the rules, he designed the punishments.
"The defendant knew, as perhaps no one else in NOS knew, that these women feared ostracisation more than anything."
In his evidence, Brain denied he was an "egomaniac" who wanted to "demonstrate power and control".
He claimed the clothes worn by his homebase team were "completely normal" for that era and compared the outfits to those worn by Brit music group Soul II Soul.
Brain also admitted massages from some NOS members but told jurors it was to relieve his tension headaches.
The court heard he resigned from holy orders after allegations first emerged in the mid-1990s.
The jury are expected to return to court tomorrow to continue their deliberations.
2
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's own guidelines ‘should have spared Lucy Connolly from jail'
Sir Keir Starmer has become embroiled in a hypocrisy row over the prosecution of Lucy Connolly on the eve of her release from prison. The Prime Minister supported the conviction of Mrs Connolly for inciting racial hatred over an expletive-ridden post on X after the Southport attacks, but it has emerged that he had previously suggested that people who swiftly deleted offensive social media statements should not necessarily face criminal action. On Thursday, Mrs Connolly will be released after being sentenced to 31 months in prison for posting the comments, which she deleted hours later. The mother-of-one's supporters claim she has been subjected to an unfairly long jail term and made a scapegoat for the rioting last summer. Sir Keir has defended Mrs Connolly's conviction, saying that while he was strongly in favour of free speech he was 'equally against incitement to violence' against other people. He added: 'I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.' However, in 2013, when director of public prosecutions, he introduced guidance for prosecutors to consider a more lenient approach towards suspects who 'swiftly' deleted social media posts and expressed 'genuine remorse'. The guidance urged prosecutors to consider four factors where 'a prosecution is unlikely to be both necessary and proportionate'. These included if 'swift and effective action has been taken by the suspect and/or others for example, service providers, to remove the communication in question or otherwise block access to it'. Mrs Connolly was jailed for a post on the day three children were killed at a dance class in Southport, on Merseyside, urging followers to 'set fire' to hotels that housed asylum seekers 'for all I care.' At the time, the childminder had about 9,000 followers on X. Her message was reposted 940 times and viewed 310,000 times before she deleted it three and a half hours later, saying she regretted it. Sir Keir's 2013 advice was caveated with a warning to prosecutors that it was 'not an exhaustive list' of mitigating circumstances and that 'each case must be considered on its own factors and its own individual merits.' Legal experts who have followed Mrs Connolly's case noted that the guidance suggested public order offences, such as inciting racial hatred, should be treated separately and suspects would not therefore necessarily benefit from the same protections. Sir Keir followed up publication of the guidance with interviews in which he said: 'There's a lot of stuff out there that is highly offensive that is put out on a spontaneous basis that is quite often taken down pretty quickly, and the view is that those sort of remarks don't necessarily need to be prosecuted. 'This is not a get out of jail card, but it is highly relevant. Stuff does go up on a Friday and Saturday night and come down the next morning. 'Now if that is the case a lot of people will say that shouldn't have happened, the person has accepted it, but really you don't need a criminal prosecution. It is a relevant factor.' The 2013 guidance is repeated nearly word for word in the latest version for prosecutors. However, the initial advice that the factors could make a prosecution 'unlikely' has been tempered to state that prosecutors should take 'particular care' to ensure prosecution is 'necessary and proportionate'. Critics who have claimed Mrs Connolly was a victim of two-tier justice said it raised further questions over her treatment. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'Keir Starmer's enthusiasm for prosecuting Lucy Connolly appears to contradict his own guidelines. She rapidly deleted the message and showed remorse. This suggests Keir Starmer is guilty of hypocrisy and double standards by supporting a breach of his own prosecution guidelines. 'Lord Hermer personally authorised this prosecution, in what looks like another example of two-tier justice bearing in mind the very long sentence given when compared to others who committed actual acts of violence.' Lord Toby Young, the director of the Free Speech Union, said: 'Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, should have listened to the advice of Sir Keir Starmer, the director of public prosecutions, and urged the CPS not to bring charges against Lucy Connolly. 'Sentencing her to more than two and a half years for a single tweet which she quickly deleted and apologised for has undermined public confidence in the criminal justice system, particularly when Labour councillors, MPs and anti-racism campaigners who have said and done much worse have avoided jail altogether. 'The public have concluded – rightly – that it's one rule for people on the Right and another for people on the Left. 'The Free Speech Union urged Lucy to plead not guilty, and offered to pay for her defence. Had she done so, I'm confident she would have been acquitted. But she decided against that precisely because she wasn't granted bail and was worried that her case would take so long to come to trial that she would end up spending more time in jail than she would if she pleaded guilty.' Richard Tice, the deputy Reform UK leader who visited Mrs Connolly in prison, said she should have pleaded not guilty. 'There was pressure in the legal system to get her to plead guilty. That was the establishment working in its mystical ways,' he claimed. 'The proof of my point is that Ricky Jones, the Labour councillor, can urge for people's throats to be slit live on TV in front of a big crowd and be found not guilty by a jury. It proves the whole point about two-tier justice and two-tier Keir. He is the biggest hypocrite that has been in Downing Street.' Frank Ferguson, the head of the Crown Prosecution Service's special crime and counter-terrorism division, said: 'It is not an offence to have strong or differing political views, but it is an offence to incite racial hatred – and that is what Connolly admitted to doing. 'The prosecution case included evidence which showed that racist tweets were sent out from Lucy Connolly's X account both in the weeks and months before the Southport attacks – as well as in the days after. The CPS takes racial hatred extremely seriously, and will never hesitate to prosecute these cases where there is enough evidence to do so.' The CPS also noted messages raised during her appeal on her remorse, in which she suggested she might claim that it was not her who had posted but that she was a victim of 'doxing', and that she had published the apology at the suggestion of a third party and her husband. A Government spokesman said: 'Sentencing is a matter for independent courts, and we support the action taken by the courts, as well as the police, to keep our streets safe. 'In all cases where Law Officers' consent is required, the Law Officers carefully consider whether to grant consent, including all relevant factors to the public interest in the prosecution.'


BBC News
a minute ago
- BBC News
First look at Baby Reindeer creator's new TV series Half Man
The first pictures from Half Man, the new TV series by Baby Reindeer creator Richard Gadd, have been for the six-episode BBC drama took place in and around Glasgow this stars Gadd opposite Jamie Bell, best known for his performance in the 2000 film Billy Elliott and, more recently, for All Of Us Strangers and Rocket two play half brothers Ruben and Niall, who reunite after years of estrangement, prompting an exploration of the highs and lows of their relationship from the 1980s to present day. The BBC said the series will capture the "wild energy of a changing city" and "plumb the depths of what it means to be a man". The show, written by Gadd, was first announced in November last year, with further cast members confirmed in stars Neve McIntosh (Tin Star, Chemistry of Death) as Niall's mother Lori, and Marianne McIvor (Screw, The Nest) as Ruben's mother Maura. It also features Charlie De Melo (Rivals), Bilal Hasna (The Agency), Julie Cullen (Traces), Amy Manson (The Nevers), Philippine Velge (The Serpent Queen), Stuart McQuarrie (The Rig), Piers Ewart (The Primrose Railway Children), Scot Greenan (T2 Trainspotting), and newcomers Charlotte Blackwood and Calum Robertson (Curfew, Mayflies) and Stuart Campbell (SAS Rogue Heroes, The Winter King) play the brothers in their younger is due to air in 2026 on the BBC and on HBO Max. Baby Reindeer lawsuit Half Man follows both successes and much controversy over Gadd's first project, Baby Reindeer, which was shown on from his one-man show, Baby Reindeer is based on the true story of how the comedian, from Wormit in Fife, was stalked by a woman after a brief, innocuous encounter in a London drama also depicts how he was groomed and raped by an older man he considered a friend, and the harrowing impact on his won six Emmys, two Golden Globes and received the most nominations at this year's Bafta TV awards - though won only one for Jessica Gunning as best supporting actress. Although steps were taken to prevent identification of some of the characters, viewers speculated about the real identity of stalker, Martha, as well as that of a male TV writer who rapes Gadd's character, led to real-life figures getting touch with police after being linked with the year Netflix has failed in its attempt to persuade a judge to throw out a defamation lawsuit brought by Fiona Harvey, the woman who inspired the stalker character in Baby Harvey claims the streaming giant told "brutal lies" about her to more than 50 million viewers around the show is billed as "a true story", but a judge concluded certain key events, like a conviction for stalking, did not happen in real has vowed to "defend this matter vigorously".


The Sun
a minute ago
- The Sun
Perrie Edwards wows as she returns to stage after revealing trauma of losing baby at 24 weeks
PERRIE Edwards returned to the stage today to perform after opening up about having two miscarriages. The 32-year-old looked amazing in a Western inspired black outfit, complete with silver tassles, as she belted out tunes in her hometown Newcastle for the Come Together Festival. 5 5 The Little Mix singer is gearing up to release her new single If He Wanted To He Would and her debut solo album. It comes after she revealed for the first time she had two miscarriages, describing the most recent as the "worst day of my life". Speaking on the We Need To Talk podcast with Paul C Brunson, Perrie said her first miscarriage before the birth of her son Axel in 2021, occurred very early in the pregnancy. "I remember finding out I was pregnant. Obviously, I started bleeding not long after, and I went to hospital and I had the scan and they were like, 'There's no baby.' "And I was like, 'Oh, I've made this up. Maybe I got a false positive or something'. "I remember being on my own at the appointments." She went on to describe Axel - her son with fiance Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, a former England footballer - as her "rainbow baby", a term for a child born after pregnancy loss. Less than a year after Axel's birth, she became pregnant again. "I was rehearsing for the last Little Mix tour, and I thought, 'I don't feel good'. Every symptom under the sun. I was like, 'I think I'm pregnant,'" she said. But by 24 weeks, after Edwards had started planning the nursery, doctors told the couple the baby had no heartbeat, in what the singer said was the "worst day of my life". Brave Perrie Edwards reveals devastating miscarriage at six months & shares heart-breaking detail of how she'd already planned baby's bedroom She said: "It's weird, because the first time it happened, I think because it was so early, I was like, 'Oh, that's hard'. "But I think when you're 24 weeks and you've planned out that room and all these things, it's really hard. And nobody knows other than immediate friends and family." Perrie, from South Shields in Tyneside, has been with former Liverpool and Arsenal midfielder Oxlade-Chamberlain since 2017 and they became engaged in 2022, the same year Little Mix went on hiatus and around the time she suffered her second miscarriage. The group also included Leigh-Anne Pinnock, Jesy Nelson and Jade Thirlwall. 5 5 5 What is miscarriage and why do pregnancies fail? MISCARRIAGE is generally the death of an unborn baby in the first 24 weeks – approximately six months – of pregnancy. Miscarriages may not be spoken about a lot but they are very common. Baby loss charity Tommy's estimates there are at least 250,000 per year in the UK and that one in every five pregnancies ends in miscarriage. It may not be clear why a miscarriage happens but they are rarely caused by anything done by the mother or father. Usually the embryo has a random genetic defect that means it cannot develop properly. Most women can go on to successfully have healthy babies in the future. The NHS says most miscarriages cannot be prevented but avoiding smoking, alcohol and drugs while pregnant can reduce the risk. Some of the other most common reasons for a pregnancy to fail in the first 24 weeks are ectopic pregnancy and molar pregnancy. Ectopic pregnancy is where a fertilised egg implants somewhere outside of the womb, usually in a fallopian tube. It cannot survive and grow there so either dies naturally or must be terminated. Molar pregnancy is rarer but happens when a fertilised egg and/or placenta does not develop properly at the start of a pregnancy. There is no single reason why it happens and cannot be prevented, though it may be more common in very young or old mothers. A baby who dies after 24 weeks is considered a stillbirth. Source: NHS