Using AI to write your dating profile is just high-tech catfishing
I didn't respond. The other guy we were with is so much an AI fanboy that it's hard to get through a conversation without him describing how much simpler the technology has made his life.
Still, the idea of trusting machines to bridge the gender divide and unlock secrets generations of humans have sought seemed sketchy to me.
I've heard all the hype. I've been told, repeatedly, about how AI will change our lives in wonderful and unimaginable ways.
Even so, are we really ready to move toward a future where we rely on AI to fill our social calendars?
Computer-assisted canoodling comes with risks
Sharpening a business résumé with computer assistance is one thing. Since olden times, lots of books have been devoted to that subject, so enlisting AI's help is a logical progression there.
Dating is − or at least should be − different. It is, after all, among the most interpersonal experiences human beings can have.
Do we really want microprocessors more involved in matters of the heart than they already are?
No question, if you are using a dating site, an algorithm already helps pick your matches. That decreases the likelihood of those Hallmark Channel pairings with people of very different backgrounds meeting by chance and falling in love.
Opinion: Indiana prides itself on work. What happens when AI takes our jobs?
Maybe that's no great loss. The odds of mismatched couples staying together anywhere but in those fictitious and perpetually snowy Hallmark villages may be on the low side, anyway.
Still, is it wise − or even ethical − to use AI to make a dating profile more attractive to potential matches?
Using an old photo or a "glamour" portrait with a dating profile is a familiar trick. But AI has the ability to take photo doctoring to a whole new level.
Rather than just sending would-be suitors images of what we looked like in our prime, AI can manufacture super-buff versions of ourselves that we might not recognize in a mirror.
If relationships never advance past the online flirting stage, that's fine. If potential romantic partners finally meet face-to-face, that's when those AI-generated illusions will be shattered.
Some might argue keeping virtual relationships going a while gives less physically attractive people more opportunities to demonstrate their good qualities, before being dismissed based on their appearance.
Hicks: AI won't steal your job. It will make human tasks more valuable.
I would counter that relationships grounded in deception probably aren't headed anywhere good.
Using AI to provide more clever answers to dating profile questions isn't much better than digitally altering photos.
If your dating profile gives people the impression you are smarter, funnier or more self assured than you really are, you will be found out eventually.
I think most people would agree that creating AI-generated profiles that are purely fake to scam people is wrong. Yet AI-assisted dating profiles are at least a step − and maybe several steps − in that direction.
Will AI have to teach us the facts of life someday?
Overall, AI's intrusion into the dating world is a disturbing trend. If people become so reliant on technology to handle the most intimate details of their personal lives, it won't be long before a "date" might be two people sitting across from each other in a restaurant, parroting what their smartphones are telling them to say to each other.
Opinion: Let Hoosier kids have summer. School shouldn't start in late July.
Some of us worry about AI eventually overthrowing human civilization. Research already suggests that AI programs would resort to blackmail to protect themselves from deactivation or replacement.
The end for our species might not be as dramatic as Skynet commissioning an army of Terminators to wipe us out. At the rate we're going, maybe all AI would need to do is provide enough bad dating advice so we're no longer able to procreate.
Blake Fontenay is USA TODAY's commentary editor.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: AI dating profiles: Why fake personalities kill romance | Opinion
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Major bank's Australian-first move to crack down on costly $9.5m scourge: 'Screenshot the text'
Commonwealth Bank (CBA) has launched an Australian-first tool to help people check whether they're about to be scammed. It can be difficult sometimes to work out whether a text message that's landed in your phone is real or from a criminal trying to steal your information or money. But CBA's new AI-powered Scam Checker aims to crack down on this issue. Users will now be able to send a screenshot of the message to the Truyu app, which is owned by CBA, to check what they should do. "When you upload a suspicious text to Scam Checker, you're not just protecting yourself. You're also helping keep others safe by sharing valuable information that can be used to help protect them too," Melanie Hayden, Truyu's managing director, said. RELATED Duplicitous new scam targeting 'vulnerable' Aussies costs pensioner $45,000 Text message 'proves' common dinner bill foul play as woman left '$500 out-of-pocket Woolworths shopper saves $60 after discovering game-changing new trick How does CBA's Scam Checker work? Scammers have been able to impersonate banks big and small across Australia, as well as other trusted organisations like Centrelink, the ATO, telcos, internet service providers, and myGov. Some text messages can arrive in the same thread as previous legitimate conversations from that person or organisation, which can make it hard to know what to trust. But Scam Checker uses a "powerful combination" of generative AI and CBA's scams intelligence to dig into the nitty-gritty of any message you give it. While scammers might try their best to look and sound exactly like the group or person they're imitating, they're not always perfect. The tool will be able to scan the message and any links included within seconds to determine whether you should reply to avoid. In the first half of 2024, nearly 58,000 scam text messages were reported, but calls led to the highest reported losses. There have been more than 11,700 of these dodgy messages reported in 2025 so far, with $9.5 million in reported is Truyu? The Truyu app was launched last year between CBA and its digital business arm x15ventures as a way to prevent customers from being scammed. They can check the app to see whether their personal or banking information has been exposed in a data breach. Users will get alerted if their name, date of birth, passport or driver's licence details are being used by thousands of retailers and vendors across the country. If there's a company or business that doesn't ring a bell, customers can find out how the details are being used and shut it down if it's illegitimate. Scam Checker is another weapon in Truyu's arsenal, which has already saved thousands of Australians from being hacked. You can get three months of free access when you sign up, and then after that it costs $4.99 per month. CBA users will be asked to verify certain card purchases One-time passwords (OTPs) have been used by many banks across Australia to help verify a payment or money transfer. However, CBA customers will be asked to log in to the bank's app to approve certain card payments instead of receiving those OTPs. "We are able to give clearer guidance and warnings in the app than in a text message," James Roberts, CBA's general manager of Group Fraud, said. It's aimed at relying less on text messages for important communication between the bank and its customers, as these messages can be hijacked by scammers. 'Earlier this year CommBank introduced in-app authentication to help stop unauthorised access to a customer's online banking, even if a would-be intruder has obtained the customer's password," Roberts added. "We're now looking at progressively moving other sensitive notifications and actions into the app – such as transaction alerts and security prompts – to enhance customer protections."Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Reddit Stock Skyrocketed This Week
Key Points Reddit reported its second-quarter results on July 31, and the stock has been on a tear since then. Reddit's sales and earnings are rising rapidly. Data licensing for artificial intelligence models has turned into a powerful growth driver for Reddit. 10 stocks we like better than Reddit › Reddit (NYSE: RDDT) stock continued to rocket higher in this week's trading thanks to strong quarterly results. The social media player's price rose 14.2% over the last week of trading. Reddit published its second-quarter report on July 31, and the results spurred a surge in bullish momentum that extended into this week's trading. The company's share price is now up roughly 308% over the last year of trading. Reddit stock roars higher on big Q2 beats Reddit's second-quarter report arrived with results that caused investors to adopt a far more bullish stance on the company's outlook. In Q2, Reddit reported a profit of $0.45 per share on sales of $500 million. The performance came in far better than the average analyst estimate, which had targeted earnings per share of $0.19 and revenue of $426 million. The company's sales increased 78% year over year in the period, and the strong performance beats caused a wide range of Wall Street analysts to significantly increase their one-year price targets on the stock. With excitement surrounding Reddit's future growing, strong post-earnings valuation gains continued over the last week of trading. What's next for Reddit? For the current quarter, Reddit expects its sales to come in between $535 million and $545 million. Hitting the midpoint of that guidance range would mean posting year-over-year sales growth of roughly 55% in the third quarter. Reddit is seeing strong sales and earnings momentum in conjunction with data generated from its platform being a go-to resource for the training of artificial intelligence (AI) models. While the platform's user base has historically monetized at relatively low levels compared to other social sites, data licensing for AI models seems to have changed the game. Should you invest $1,000 in Reddit right now? Before you buy stock in Reddit, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Reddit wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Reddit Stock Skyrocketed This Week was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CEO Bob Iger Announces Joint Hulu and Disney+ Streaming Service. What Does It Mean for Investors?
Key Points Hulu is to be absorbed into Disney+ by the end of this year. Also, Disney will no longer be updating subscriber counts for any of its streaming services. Wednesday's resulting setback in Disney stock provides a buying opportunity. 10 stocks we like better than Walt Disney › It's official. The Walt Disney Company's (NYSE: DIS) stand-alone streaming service Hulu is going of. The company announced on Wednesday that Hulu will soon be fully integrated into Disney+, although it will still be its own category within the Disney+ menu. Hulu will also replace Star in the international version of Disney+. That's not the detail that interested investors will care the most about, however. Even more noteworthy is the fact that Disney will no longer be reporting the number of streaming subscribers for either service, or how much revenue these accounts generate every month. The decision removes two of the most closely watched metrics that investors are currently using to gauge the health of the company's increasingly important streaming business. Here's what you need to know about all of it. Another (mostly) solid quarter As a recap, The Walt Disney Company turned $23.7 billion worth of revenue into an adjusted per-share profit of $1.61 for its fiscal third quarter of 2025, which ended in June. The bottom line was up from the year-ago comparison of $1.39, and handily topped expectations for earnings of $1.47 per share. The top line, though -- while 2% better than sales in fiscal Q3 2024 -- fell just a bit short of analysts' estimates, sending shares lower as a result. Blame the company's cable television arm, mostly. Linear network revenue slipped 15% (with most of the setback stemming from Disney's international TV business), dragging cable TV's operating income down 28% year over year. Theme parks, films, and sports ventures, in contrast, did pretty well given the challenging economic environment. And Disney's streaming division? It's doing pretty well too. Its revenue grew 6% year over year to nearly $6.2 billion, leading to an operating profit of $346 million versus the slight loss reported for the same quarter of 2024. This extends a healthy streak of slow but persistent progress: The company's direct-to-consumer arm added another 1.4 million Disney+ subscribers to the fold last quarter as well, with 1 million of them signing up for the U.S.-Canada platform. Hulu added 1.3 million streaming subscribers of its own, although it also lost a couple of hundred thousand subscribers to Hulu's live-TV service. And again, this extends tepid but long-established growth trends: This is the next-to-last time, however, the chart immediately above will be able to be updated. No more subscriber metrics It's true. As CEO Bob Iger noted in his executive commentary published along with Wednesday's earnings report, "We believe quarterly updates on the number of paid subscribers and ARPU [average revenue per user] have become less meaningful to evaluating the performance of our businesses, and we will no longer report these metrics starting with the first quarter of fiscal 2026 [beginning in October] for Disney+ and Hulu." The company will, however, continue to share information about its streaming business's overall profitability. Iger explains: "We believe our reporting going forward will better align with changes in the media landscape, the unique nature of our integrated assets, [and] how we operate our businesses, and will reflect how management evaluates the progress and success of our strategic initiatives." If it sounds like CEO prattle, though, that's because it arguably is. Don't misunderstand. At least in some ways the decision does "align with changes in the media landscape." Early last year streaming rival Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) made the same decision to stop disclosing its subscriber counts and ARPU (as of the beginning of this year), aiming -- as Disney is now -- to put the focus on more meaningful metrics like revenue and profitability. Like Netflix's then, the timing of Disney's decision suspiciously coincides with a measurable slowing of its streaming business's subscriber growth, removing two of the more-watched measures of the entertainment giant's progress when investors need them the most. Perhaps at least some of Wednesday's setback was the result of waning transparency, and wasn't just in response to the company's revenue shortfall. Opportunity knocks So what does this mean for investors? The market was largely prepared for the fold-in of Hulu into Disney+ already. The possibility was first floated several quarters ago, and making Hulu's content available to its subscribers from within the Disney+ app early last year was an obvious step in this direction. Combining the two services into a single one now -- with a single payment -- isn't exactly a big leap, technological or otherwise. As for its impact on marketability, although the combo isn't any more marketable, it isn't less marketable either; the cost of subscribing to both is only between $1 and $4 more per month, depending on your plan. Indeed, in light of the media company's relatively new focus on monetizing both streaming services' content by injecting advertisements into its programming, anything that makes it easier to watch any of Disney's streaming content is a win for this fast-growing business. Adding Hulu to Disney+ at least does that. It will also just be cheaper to manage one content stack rather than two different ones, which is another modest win for The Walt Disney Company. But the decision to not share a couple of key customer metrics that investors had grown accustomed to seeing? Sure, that's a sticking point for some current and would-be maybe not as much of one as you might think. Netflix's shares also initially stumbled in response to word that it would no longer be reporting subscriber numbers, but its stock has more than doubled since that April 2024 low, reaching record highs in June. Investors mostly just want to see strong top and bottom lines, which Hulu and Disney+ can certainly team up to deliver. Data from streaming-market research outfit JustWatch indicates that, when combined, Hulu and Disney+ are collectively just as watched within the U.S. as Netflix, as well as Amazon's Prime. They were also two of only three streaming platforms to gain U.S. viewing time during the second quarter of this year (with the third being Max). So, this pairing should hit the ground running. Let's also not forget that the entirety of Disney's direct-to-consumer business still only makes up about one-fourth of its total revenue. Whether its streaming arm thrives, flops, or something in between, almost all of its other ventures are doing just fine anyway. More to the point, there's nothing about the Hulu-Disney+ decision, or last quarter's results, that's a reason to steer clear of the stock. In fact, since it's already down from its early-July peak, Wednesday's setback is arguably a great opportunity to step into very ownable Disney shares. The analyst community thinks so, anyway. The vast majority of them currently rate Disney stock as a strong buy, with a consensus price target of $135.12 that's 17% above the ticker's present price. Should you invest $1,000 in Walt Disney right now? Before you buy stock in Walt Disney, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Walt Disney wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Netflix, and Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. CEO Bob Iger Announces Joint Hulu and Disney+ Streaming Service. What Does It Mean for Investors? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
