logo
Ministers on resignation ‘watch list' over welfare reforms, Harman warns

Ministers on resignation ‘watch list' over welfare reforms, Harman warns

Telegraph17 hours ago

Ministers are on a resignation 'watch list' over Labour's planned welfare reforms, Baroness Harman has claimed.
The former party chairman said there were fears in the Government that frontbenchers could quit over Sir Keir Starmer's plans to slash disability spending by more than £4 billion.
It comes as up to 130 Labour MPs are preparing to abstain on or vote against the plans when they are put before the Commons in the coming weeks.
Many in the party are concerned about changes that would mean only the most severely disabled adults could claim Personal Independence Payments (PIP).
Under-22s would also become ineligible for Universal Credit under proposals by Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, that would cut the benefits bill by £4.3 billion.
Speaking on Sky News's Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Baroness Harman was asked whether it was likely ministers would resign over the cuts.
She replied: 'There might be, but I don't think… Not Cabinet [ministers].'
Asked whether more junior ministers may feel unable to stay in post, she said: 'There are people on a watch list at the moment, but not Cabinet ministers.
'And I still think that although Labour MPs will feel very badly about it, and feel 'this is not what I got into Parliament in order to do', most of them will think: 'it's a difficult time, we'll stick with it, we don't want to undermine our Government'.'
Baroness Harman also argued that the issue would be 'harder' for Labour MPs to vote on because they would have to 'put themselves on the line, whether they are for or against it'.
She added: 'There is a lot of rumbling about this, there's a lot of discontent. And there's quite a lot of wild talk that there's going to be over 100 MPs who are going to rebel, and the Government could even lose their majority on this.
'And I would be very surprised about that. There is definitely a lot of nervousness about it, but I would be surprised because I think these MPs have only recently been elected.
'And if they vote in such large numbers that they actually cut across a major plan from the Chancellor and the Prime Minister, it's almost like a vote of no confidence.'
The Telegraph understands that a handful of parliamentary private secretaries (PPS), who hold the most junior ministerial rank, are said to be wavering on the issue.
The revolt follows an outcry over Sir Keir and Ms Reeves stripping 10 million pensioners of their winter fuel payments last summer, a decision that has now been partially reversed.
In a letter that was sent last month to Alan Campbell, the Government's Chief Whip, about 130 MPs called on Sir Keir to change course or risk defeat over his welfare plans.
The Government has a working majority of 165 in the Commons, meaning that 83 MPs would need to vote down the legislation in order to force a parliamentary defeat.
Sir Keir has doubled down on his policies and repeatedly insisted that there is nothing 'progressive' about the current size of the welfare state.
He said the moral thing to do is to tackle the worklessness crisis and ensure more disabled people find employment.
The Government's own figures predict that the benefit changes will push 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children, while about 3.2 million families will lose out financially.
Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, is understood to be engaging with concerned MPs.
Ms Kendall is convinced she has a strong argument to make and believes MPs will be won round once details of the bill have been published.
Speaking in the Commons in May, she said that at the heart of the reforms is a push to get long-term sick and disabled people back into work where possible.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can Starmer be trusted not to give away the Falkland Islands?
Can Starmer be trusted not to give away the Falkland Islands?

Spectator

time32 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Can Starmer be trusted not to give away the Falkland Islands?

No sooner had the Chagos deal been struck than attention turned to the Falklands. Would Keir Starmer support the Islands as steadfastly as his predecessors? Would he seek some sort of grubby compromise with Argentina? Can we trust him with British overseas interests? As the Islands celebrate their liberation day today, marking 43 years since the end of Argentina's military occupation during the Falklands War, these questions seem particularly poignant. Many asking those questions, however, care not a jot for the people of the Falklands and are still less inclined to bother asking them what they actually think. And that's a shame, because if they did, they might be surprised by what they'd discover. There's no doubt that the hoopla surrounding Chagos has had a major impact on the inhabitants of the Falklands. That's not because they fear that Starmer and Lammy are about to hand away sovereignty.

Ballymena disorder: Six arrested in Northern Ireland - as 32 officers injured in second night of violence
Ballymena disorder: Six arrested in Northern Ireland - as 32 officers injured in second night of violence

Sky News

time44 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Ballymena disorder: Six arrested in Northern Ireland - as 32 officers injured in second night of violence

Six people have been arrested after disorder broke out for a second night across Northern Ireland, with 32 officers injured. The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said officers in Ballymena "came under sustained attack over a number of hours" with fireworks, petrol bombs and bricks. Tuesday evening saw a second night of rioting and disorder in the Co Antrim town, with "sporadic disorder" reported in Belfast, Newtownabbey and Carrickfergus. Protests also took place in areas of Lisburn and Coleraine. Stormont ministers across the powersharing Executive have condemned the disorder, saying those who look to exploit anger over an alleged sexual assault in Ballymena over the weekend to "sow racial tensions... have nothing to offer their communities but division and disorder". Meanwhile, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer told MPs: "I utterly condemn the violence that we have seen overnight in Ballymena and in other parts of Northern Ireland." Some of the officers injured in Ballymena required hospital treatment, the force said, adding that it deployed Attenuating Energy Projectiles and a water cannon in an attempt to disperse the crowds. Five people were arrested on suspicion of riotous behaviour. They remain in police custody as of Wednesday morning. The PSNI said a man was also arrested on suspicion of disorderly behaviour on the O'Neill Road in Newtownabbey. Violent disorder broke out in Ballymena on Monday following a peaceful protest supporting the family of a girl who was allegedly sexually assaulted in the area over the weekend. Two teenage boys have been charged with attempted rape. The charges were read to them by a Romanian interpreter at Coleraine Magistrates' Court on Monday. Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson said on Tuesday that some anti-immigrant groups then broke away from the Ballymena vigil. He described the scenes as "racist thuggery" and said the force was actively working to identify those responsible for the "racially motivated disorder". Sky correspondent Connor Gillies, who was in Ballymena on Tuesday, said one family had to barricade itself into the attic of their home as the clashes worsened. 2:11 Other families displayed posters on their windows in a desperate bid to ensure their house did not become a target, or had Union Jack flags on full display. Photos from Ballymena show one property with its windows boarded up and signs saying "Filipino lives here". 'Justice needs to take its course' In response to the disorder, the leader of the conservative party Traditional Unionist Voice, Jim Allister, said that while the scenes were "very distressing," he pointed to concerns about "unchecked migration". "There has been a bit of authorities not wanting to face up to the racial background of some of this over the years," the MP for North Antrim added. "That unchecked migration which is beyond what the town can cope with, is a source of past and future tensions, that is the reality of it." Mr Allister then called for the violence to stop, and added he had spoken to the family of the girl who was the victim of the alleged sexual assault and that they did not want to see violent scenes. "There needs now to be a period of calm and justice needs to take its course," he added. Meanwhile, the leaders of Sinn Fein, the DUP, Alliance Party and UUP called for calm in a joint statement from the Stormont Executive. They said: "While all of our citizens have the right to engage in peaceful protest, there can never be any justification for the violence that has taken place in recent days, during which residents have been terrorised and numerous PSNI officers injured." 'Absolutely no justification' for violence - minister PSNI Chief Constable Jon Boutcher said: "The mindless violence witnessed over the past two nights in Ballymena is deeply concerning and utterly unacceptable." He added that "ironically, and frustratingly, this violence threatens to derail the very pursuit of justice it claims to challenge," and said: "Let me be clear: this behaviour must stop. I appeal to everyone involved to cease all further acts of criminality and disorder immediately." Hilary Benn, secretary of state for Northern Ireland, added on X: "The terrible scenes of civil disorder we have witnessed in Ballymena again this evening have no place in Northern Ireland. "There is absolutely no justification for attacks on PSNI officers or for vandalism directed at people's homes or property."

Dominic Cummings may have just blown the grooming gangs scandal wide open
Dominic Cummings may have just blown the grooming gangs scandal wide open

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Dominic Cummings may have just blown the grooming gangs scandal wide open

All progressives solemnly honour LGBTQIA+ Pride Month. And Islamophobia Awareness Month. And Black History Month. Plus many other such events. This is because they're passionately committed to 'raising awareness' of social injustice. So why not the grooming gangs scandal? For some reason, this is one example of social injustice which has failed to grip progressives' attention. To rectify this, I suggest we introduce Grooming Gangs Awareness Month. Fly an official Grooming Gangs Scandal flag from all public buildings. Get civil servants to wear Grooming Gangs Scandal lanyards. Then perhaps these people might finally take an interest. Then again, we may be wasting our time. In all likelihood, progressives have never lacked 'awareness' of the grooming gangs. They just didn't want anyone else to be aware of them. Which brings me to the explosive allegations made on Thursday by Dominic Cummings. In an interview with GB News, he claimed that, when he was working at the Department for Education in the early 2010s, there were 'mass cover-ups of the whole thing in Whitehall'. Are Mr Cummings's allegations true? I don't know. But then, that's why we need the full national inquiry that Labour continues to deny us. A handful of mere 'local inquiries' won't do – not least because it wouldn't be within their scope to investigate Mr Cummings's claims about what went on in Whitehall. Yesterday, incidentally, seven members of yet another grooming gang were found guilty of raping two teenage girls in Rochdale. Labour may not like Mr Cummings. But this time I think it should listen to him. And, for that matter, to the increasingly furious public. Talking Bull Personally, I was somewhat taken aback when, on Tuesday, the new chairman of Nigel Farage's Reform UK told voters that 'immigration is the lifeblood of this country, and it always has been'. I was even more surprised when, on Wednesday, he told Richard Madeley on ITV's Good Morning Britain that he was once strangled by an evil spirit masquerading as the ghost of his late grandmother. To my mind, though, Dr David Bull's most intriguing comment of the week was this. Asked whether he supports calls to ban the burqa in this country, he replied: 'I'm very anxious about the rise in people that think it is OK to hide their faces. We had a conversation yesterday about whether that was the burqa, crash helmets, scarves or whatever.' Hang on. Crash helmets? I for one have always admired Reform's bracingly no-nonsense attitude towards health-and-safety-gone-mad. But a ban on crash helmets, I feel, might be taking it a touch too far. In any case, I'm not convinced that there's a huge public clamour for such a ban. There are plenty of people who want to ban the burqa, and they have strong arguments for doing so. But I've never heard a voter say: 'I'm sorry, but I'm sick of seeing all these women walking around the streets in crash helmets. It's not as if it's their choice, either. Their husbands force them to do it. The crash helmet is a disgusting symbol of misogyny and patriarchal oppression. 'Also, crash helmets make normal human interaction impossible. When a motorcyclist zooms past me at 70mph, I expect to be able to see his face. 'Anyway, it's just not British. If motorcyclists want to wear crash helmets, they can go and do it in their own country.' Remarks like those, I would guess, aren't heard all that often in focus groups. So why Dr Bull raised the idea, entirely unprompted, in reply to a question about banning the burqa, I don't know. Still, I'm not complaining. Far from it. When I stepped down as this newspaper's parliamentary sketch writer in 2021, after 10 years, I felt that politics was in danger of becoming dull. The previous decade had teemed with the most glorious eccentrics, on Left and Right alike. Increasingly, however, they seemed to be fading from view, to be replaced by robotic regiments of Starmers and Sunaks. How wonderful it is to see a new generation coming through. Violence: a Left-wing guide I don't know whether you ever read Left-wing news outlets. But if you do, this week you'll probably have noticed something peculiar. In such outlets, the violence in Ballymena is always described as 'rioting' – yet the violence in LA is always described as 'protests'. You may well have wondered why this is. After all, both Ballymena and LA have seen cars set on fire, missiles thrown, and police officers injured. These are all very bad things. So why don't Left-wing news outlets refer to both as 'rioting'? The answer is simple. The violence in Ballymena is being perpetrated by people who are against mass immigration. The violence in LA, in contrast, is being perpetrated by people who are in favour not only of mass immigration, but of 'irregular' (i.e., illegal) immigration. And, just as importantly, they hate Donald Trump. Therefore, their actions must be made to sound understandable and legitimate. In other words: sometimes setting people's cars on fire is nasty and frightening. And sometimes it's noble and compassionate. Please update your records accordingly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store