MTN under investigation by US government for Afghanistan and Iran operations
Image: Supplied
One of South Africa's largest telecommunications companies, MTN, is being investigated by the US Department of Justice (DoJ) through a grand jury inquiry related to its former subsidiary in Afghanistan and Iran.
The company revealed this information in its 2025 interim financial results on Monday, saying it had been approached, through its external US counsel, regarding the DoJ investigation into MTN Group.
"MTN has been approached, through its external US counsel, regarding a DoJ grand jury investigation relating to MTN Group, its former subsidiary in Afghanistan and Iran". MTN said.
The company added that it is fully cooperating with the DoJ and voluntarily responding to requests for information.
"MTN is cooperating with the DoJ and voluntarily responding to requests for information. The Company will update the market as appropriate on any material developments in the matter," the company said.
Grand juries determine if there is enough evidence to file formal charges, but do not decide guilt. Depending on the findings, MTN could potentially face a criminal trial in the US.
According to reports, the US Department of Justice is investigating MTN's former operations in Afghanistan and its stake in Iranian mobile operator Irancell.
The probe reportedly includes allegations that MTN paid protection money to militant groups in Afghanistan and questions around how the company acquired its licence in Iran, which has also sparked legal disputes in South Africa.
MTN is currently involved in a legal dispute with Turkish telecom giant Turkcell. Turkcell alleges that MTN obtained its 49% stake in Iranian mobile operator Irancell through corrupt practices.
Turkcell claims it was unfairly edged out of the deal in 2006, when MTN was awarded the minority shareholder position in the government-controlled Irancell.
This comes amid worsening tensions between South Africa and the US with the Trump administration having recently imposed 30% tariffs on all South African products.
The US government has also accused South Africa of human rights abuses, particularly against the Afrikaner community.
IOL Business
[email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
17 minutes ago
- IOL News
Trump presses Fed's Cook to quit after mortgage fraud allegation
Trump said Wednesday that Cook 'must resign now,' citing Pulte's allegations, while the FHFA head posted on social media that the accusations give Trump 'cause to fire' her. Image: Bloomberg President Donald Trump called on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to resign after a staunch ally called for an investigation of the board member's mortgages, intensifying his campaign on the central bank. Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate Cook over a pair of mortgages, the latest in a series of moves by the Trump administration to increase legal scrutiny of Democratic figures and appointees. Cook was nominated to the Fed by former President Joe Biden. Trump said Wednesday that Cook 'must resign now,' citing Pulte's allegations, while the FHFA head posted on social media that the accusations give Trump 'cause to fire' her. The dollar declined, yields pared losses and gold rose after Trump's call for Cook's ouster. Pulte wrote a letter to Bondi and Justice Department official Ed Martin on Aug. 15 suggesting that Cook may have committed a criminal offense. The letter, which was first reported by Bloomberg News, alleges that Cook 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud under the criminal statute.' The Justice Department has received the letter, according to an official, who declined to elaborate further. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading A resignation would create another opening for Trump to fill on the Fed board, potentially tipping the balance of Republican appointees to four of its seven members. The president has explicitly said that he'll only pick a successor to Fed Chair Jerome Powell who agrees that borrowing costs should come down, a demand that has already raised questions about whether a new chair can credibly preserve the bank's independence. Trump's administration has also pursued mortgage fraud allegations against high-profile Democrats, including California Senator Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Both are longtime political foes of Trump. The Cook referral expands that effort to the Fed, as Trump allies — including Pulte — press the US central bank to lower rates and Powell to resign before his term as chair expires in May. No charges have been filed and it's not clear whether Bondi will investigate. The Justice Department declined comment. The Federal Reserve declined comment. Cook did not respond to requests for comment late Tuesday. BLOOMBERG
Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
If BEE goes, how do we address racialised inequality?
The past few months have seen an unprecedented attack on Black Economic Empowerment. Strangely, the voices that you would expect to defend it have been oddly muted. If we accept that BEE has too many problems to work properly, it is time for a proper national debate on what could replace it. As predicted several months ago, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) is now under intense fire. This is partly because the ANC has been dramatically weakened, partly because the DA is now in government, and partly because of the Trump administration's attacks on it. Last week, even The Economist opined that it was time for our country to stop BEE. On Tuesday, Deputy President Paul Mashatile said in an answer to a parliamentary question that BEE was 'not discriminatory'. While he was trying to defend BEE, he clearly missed the point. BEE is absolutely discriminatory. That is why we have it. To reduce our racialised inequality. But, in a comment by Professor William Gumede that has been widely quoted, BEE has cost around R1-trillion and yet most black people have not benefited from it in any substantive way (this is likely to be hugely contested). BEE is intensely controversial. Not just because a small group of people have been made rich, but because of what it is: A deliberate attempt to empower one group of people at the expense of another group. No matter the moral legitimacy of such an aim, in any society, to take from one group to give to another leads to huge arguments. This is one of the reasons tax policy can be hugely controversial. The cost of scrapping As a starting point, it may be important to ask: if there is no BEE and no other measure of race-based redress, what would happen? The economy would probably grow a little more quickly than it is now. Companies could simply scrap all the measures they take to qualify for BEE points. This might make them, and their owners, richer. But there would be a huge cost. For example, some of the big banks insure the geysers of people they grant mortgages to (this is to protect the value of the property they are lending money against). As a BEE measure, they then use a long list of black-owned suppliers to repair those geysers if they break down. The big banks would probably find it much more efficient to use one big company to fix all these geysers. These suppliers, usually the first in their families to own a small business, would lose out dramatically. Most would probably have to close. The consequence of this is that all these people, and their extended families, who they support, would lose faith in the democratic project. This would be just one example of how inequality, both racialised inequality and general inequality, would be re-entrenched. That would lead to greater demands for political and economic change, and perhaps, more calls for some kind of radical, or even revolutionary change. The impact test The tools that the state has to really make a change for one group, but not for another, are essentially quite limited. And each tool would have to satisfy certain tests. The first is, would it work? In other words, does the policy really make a substantive difference for a large number of people? This is the test that BEE arguably fails. Another test is whether such a tool would be both legitimate and fair. Legitimacy is absolutely vital. It means you essentially have to convince white people that they must be treated differently from black people. It seems unlikely that even Siya Kolisi and Eben Etzebeth could convince most white people to accept this. There are alternatives to BEE, all of which have serious problems. Government could decide to radically change the tax system and essentially try to tax white people more than black people. One of the main arguments against that, apart from the fact that it would lead to intense debates about racial designations, is that there are obvious examples of some white people who were born into poorer homes than some black people. That would fail the fairness test. There could be other strategies. Government could decide that our geography, still defined by apartheid in so many ways, provides a proxy for race. Thus, as a deliberate strategy, the Basic Education Department could decide to spend more money per child in rural and township schools than on children in suburban schools. While this might seem unfair, the argument could be that communities in suburbs can just increase the contribution they already make to the education of their children (through what are often called 'Governing Body Teachers' – teachers paid by the parents, not government). Although that would be staggeringly unfair to black parents who have made huge sacrifices to get their children into these schools, and to keep them there. There are other problems, too. At least one would be that we would not know whether it had been effective for a full generation. Which might defeat the purpose, which is to show that there is a measure of race-based redress that actually works. From BEE to BIG? There are other ways to look at this problem. They could be controversial in themselves. It might be seen as legitimate by the vast majority of voters to remove the idea of race-based redress in favour of a different measure to help improve the lives of millions of the poorest people in our country. So, for example, BEE could be removed at the same time a substantive Basic Income Grant (BIG) is introduced. In other words, there would be a deal (sort of). Businesses would no longer have to comply with BEE, which would allow them to be more efficient and make more profit. Those profits would, in turn, help to fund a BIG that would make a real difference to the lives of millions of people. While there appears to be no public polling on this, it might be worth asking if the millions of people who receive the R370/month Social Relief of Distress Grant would prefer that money in their pockets to retaining the current model of BEE. Considering that these people clearly need more help than most of those who currently benefit from BEE, there may be a compelling moral argument in this direction. But that might be creating a false binary. And it would not satisfy the demand for race-based redress, although it would help to reduce inequality. The attacks on BEE will not stop. But the intensity of our inequality, as racialised as it still is, demands measures to address it. A window is now opening for a proper debate on what might be more effective. It's vital that we grab it. DM
The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
Top 10 stories of the day: KT Molefe denied bail
Here's your daily news update for Wednesday, 20 August 2025: An easy-to-read selection of our top stories. News today includes controversial businessman Katiso 'KT' Molefe will remain behind bars after his bid for bail failed on Wednesday. Meanwhile, Parliament's Police Portfolio Committee Chairperson Ian Cameron and two other DA members fell victim to an attempted hijacking in Cape Town. Furthermore, Kaya FM has suspended broadcaster Sol Phenduka with immediate effect. Weather tomorrow: 21 August 2025 Extremely high fire danger conditions are expected in all provinces except Gauteng and the Western Cape. There will be rough seas between the Western Cape and the Northern Cape, but conditions will be mostly warm nationwide. Full weather forecast here. Stay up to date with The Citizen – More News, Your Way. DJ Sumbody murder: Katiso 'KT' Molefe remains behind bars as bail denied Controversial businessman Katiso 'KT' Molefe will remain behind bars after his bid for bail failed on Wednesday. Molefe appeared in the Alexandra Magistrate's Court to hear the outcome of his bail application. Controversial businessman Katiso Molefe appears for bail application at the Alexandra Magistrate's Court in Johannesburg on 6 August 2025. Picture: Nigel Sibanda /The Citizen The alleged mastermind was arrested alongside three hitmen in connection with the murder of South African artist Oupa John Sefoka, widely known as DJ Sumbody. CONTINUE READING: DJ Sumbody murder: Katiso 'KT' Molefe remains behind bars as bail denied De Lille dissolves SA Tourism board – but Outa calls her decision 'disgraceful' Tourism Minister Patricia de Lille has dissolved the SA Tourism board with immediate effect over what she called unlawful decisions. De Lille informed the board of her decision on 19 August, following consideration of their written representations as to why the board should not be dissolved. Minister of Tourism, Patricia de Lille. Picture: Neil McCartney / The Citizen The minister said the board members neglected to address the crucial question of the legality of the process the board used when calling a special board meeting on 1 August, when the unlawful resolution was taken. CONTINUE READING: De Lille dissolves SA Tourism board – but Outa calls her decision 'disgraceful' Ian Cameron, DA colleagues escape hijack attempt in Philippi after police academy visit Parliament's Police Portfolio Committee Chairperson Ian Cameron and two other DA members fell victim to an attempted hijacking in Cape Town. It is understood that Cameron and his fellow DA colleagues Nicholas Gotsell and Lisa-Maré Schickerling were in one car when three unknown men attacked their vehicle with bricks, smashing at least three windows, on the corner of Eisleben and Govan Mbeki Road on Tuesday afternoon. Chairperson of the portfolio committee on police Ian Cameron. Picture: X / @ParliamentZA They were returning from an oversight visit to the police training college in Philippi East when the incident occurred. CONTINUE READING: Ian Cameron, DA colleagues escape hijack attempt in Philippi after police academy visit Increase in inflation of 0.5% expected, but could drift higher The inflation rate increased by 0.5% from 3% in June to 3.5% in July. Economists expected an increase and say it could drift higher towards the end of the year, although not much. However, they are divided about whether the Reserve Bank will cut the repo rate again this year. Jee-A van der Linde, senior economist at Oxford Economics Africa, says the sharp increase of 0.5% is due to municipal tariff increases but the overall inflation outlook remains favourable. He expects that headline inflation will drift to slightly above 4% by the end of the year. Picture: iStock 'There was a risk of an upside inflation surprise, as July is a high-survey month, with municipal tariff increases typically coming in higher than the headline rate. However, the latest outturn does not change our view of inflation, with the benign outlook still intact.' CONTINUE READING: Increase in inflation of 0.5% expected, but could drift higher Kaya FM suspends Sol Phenduka pending an internal investigation Kaya FM has suspended broadcaster Sol Phenduka with immediate effect. 'Kaya 959 confirms that presenter Sol Phenduka has been placed on suspension with immediate effect. This step has been taken pending the outcome of an internal process currently underway,' read a statement shared with The Citizen by Ian Bredenkamp, who handles PR for the station. Sol Phenduka has been suspended by Kaya FM pending an investigation. Picture: solphenduka/Instagram When asked about the reason behind the suspension and its duration, Bredenkamp said they would release a follow-up statement 'once the internal process is concluded'. CONTINUE READING: Kaya FM suspends Sol Phenduka pending an internal investigation Here are five more stories of the day: Yesterday's News recap READ HERE: Rand manipulation saga in ConCourt | Eldos' Nikita laid to rest | RIP Tendai Ndoro
