Trump freed to pursue even more of his agenda after Supreme Court win on injunctions
By setting new limits on federal judges using nationwide injunctions, the court freed Trump's hand to pursue his already sweeping view of presidential power in ever more expansive ways. The morning decision punctuated what has been an extraordinary week for the president, both at home and abroad, as he approaches the six-month mark of his second administration.
For a president who continually rails against unelected judges exceeding their mandate by blocking his policies, Friday's Supreme Court ruling amounted to a form of vindication.
And after a string of presidents chafed against judges who blocked their policies from taking effect, Trump now finds himself freed from some of the burdens his predecessors faced.
'In practice, he has now become a more powerful executive than he was before this decision came down,' said Shira Scheindlin, a former US District Court judge. 'But I will say that many presidents have been very unhappy with these national injunctions. It started under George W. Bush, then Obama, then Biden, and of course, Trump,' she said. 'It depends whose ox is being gored.'
White House officials were quick to cite a line in Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion as bolstering Trump's criticism of judges he thinks rule beyond their remit.
'When a court concludes the executive branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power too,' wrote Barrett, whom Trump appointed during his first term but had recently been the subject of his frustration — at least before Friday's ruling.
The ostensible issue at hand in the ruling was birthright citizenship, and there could be immediate repercussions on who is eligible to become a citizen in at least some states. Some Democrats and immigrant rights groups warned of pending bureaucratic chaos, where a baby's birth state would determine whether they qualified for US citizenship.
But the citizenship issue itself won't be decided by the court until later. And when Trump emerged in the White House Briefing Room on Friday morning, the matter appeared almost secondary to the larger win that erases one of the checks on his executive authority.
'Thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file to proceed with these numerous policies and those that have been wrongly enjoined on a nationwide basis,' an ebullient Trump said from the White House podium.
Aside from the birthright citizenship issue, he listed ending funding for 'sanctuary cities,' suspending refugee resettlement, freezing federal funding and blocking taxpayer funds for transgender medical care as examples of areas where the administration now plans to use the ruling to unblock Trump's orders.
'We have so many of them,' Trump said. 'I have a whole list. I'm not going to bore you.'
There are other avenues plaintiffs could pursue to block Trump, including class action lawsuits. And while Friday's ruling could slow his orders from being blocked, many may still ultimately end up before the Supreme Court.
But at least for Friday, Trump was in a celebratory mood.
The president not only took great delight in the court's ruling, but in the court itself. He walked into the briefing room wearing a smile of satisfaction, the capstone of one of the most remarkable weeks since returning to power.
His hourlong news conference played out as a victory lap not only for his birthright citizenship executive order but also for his decision to launch military strikes on Iran, despite not knowing the ultimate outcome of either.
The court has yet to rule on the merits of the immigration question and the long-term fate of the Iranian nuclear program is still in question.
'Well,' Trump said Friday as he stepped to the lectern, 'this was a big one, wasn't it?'
He was referring to the Supreme Court opinion handed down less than two hours earlier, but the words also served as a metaphor for the past weeks of his presidency, one that is forever shaped by his first term in office.
Not only does Trump enjoy the luxury of an obedient Republican Party, he also has the enviable benefit of a high court majority shaped by his hand.
Trump is only the latest occupant of the Oval Office to test the powers of the executive branch of government. The court's ruling on Friday will almost certainly be applauded by future presidents of either party.
'These injunctions have allowed district court judges to be emperors,' Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi, standing alongside the president, said Friday. 'They vetoed all of President Trump's power, and they cannot do that. This has been a bipartisan problem that has lasted five presidential terms. Five different presidents and it has ended today.'
But the fact that he had the good fortune of nominating three Supreme Court justices in his first term and is back to see the fruits of their conservative labors makes him somewhat distinct from nearly all presidents who have come before him.
'I'm grateful to the Supreme Court for stepping in and solving this very, very big and complex problem, and they've made it very simple,' Trump said. 'I want to thank Justice Barrett, who wrote the opinion brilliantly, as well as Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Thomas. Great people.'
That is not how he was describing Barrett in private over the last several months. Behind the scenes, the president had griped about some of the Supreme Court justices he appointed during his first term, believing they were not sufficiently standing behind his agenda.
In private, some of Trump's allies have told him that Barrett is 'weak' and that her rulings have not been in line with how she presented herself in an interview before Trump nominated her to the bench in 2020, according to sources. Many conservatives were apoplectic in March when Barrett voted to reject Trump's plan to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid.
'It's not just one ruling. It's been a few different events he's complained about privately,' a senior administration official told CNN in June.
Now, however, Barrett — along with the court's other five conservatives — handed Trump a win in the most prominent case of the term.
As another Supreme Court term comes to an end, questions will inevitably rise about potential retirements on the bench. The prospect of Trump gaining another appointment is far from certain, but hardly out of the question. White House lawyers have developed an early roster of contenders should a vacancy occur, a standard practice for all administrations.
The president decided to forego a trip Friday to his golf course in Bedminster, New Jersey, opting to spend a rare weekend at the White House as Senate Republicans work through an impasse over a monumental tax-and-spending bill that contains virtually all of Trump's domestic agenda. He once again called out those who are raising concerns about the measure, describing them as 'grandstanders,' and although he initially suggested his July 4 deadline was not 'the end-all,' he later upped the pressure on Truth Social.
'The House of Representatives must be ready to send it to my desk before July 4th — We can get it done,' he posted.
As Trump turns toward the second half of his first year in office, myriad challenges await him and his party as the early stages of the midterm election campaign begin taking shape.
Republican pollsters have privately warned party leaders of the potential political fallout from the megabill, particularly the proposed deep cuts to Medicaid and other social safety-net programs to help pay for the extension of Trump's tax cuts. The president has repeatedly pledged to not touch Medicaid, a promise that may well be litigated in the 2026 campaign.
But Trump offered no signs of anxiety that many of his fellow Republicans in Congress have expressed – particularly about funding for rural hospitals – arguing again Friday that his bill would be beneficial to all Americans.
'It's a great bill. It's a popular bill,' Trump said. 'But we'll get no Democrats, only because they don't want to vote for Trump.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California man who admitted shipping weapons to North Korea is sentenced to 8 years in prison
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A California man has been sentenced to eight years in prison after admitting to shipping weapons and ammunition to North Korea that he said were to be used for a surprise attack on South Korea, authorities said Tuesday. Shenghua Wen, 42, came to the U.S. from China on a student visa in 2012 and remained in the country illegally after it expired, according to a statement from the U.S. Attorney's office in Los Angeles. Wen pleaded guilty in June to one count of conspiracy to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and one count of acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government, the statement says. He was sentenced on Monday. Wen told investigators that before he entered the U.S., he met with North Korean officials at an embassy in China, where they instructed him to procure goods for the North Korean government. He also admitted that he tried to buy uniforms to disguise North Korean soldiers for the surprise attack, a federal complaint says. North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has demonstrated an intent to deploy battlefield nuclear weapons along the North's border with South Korea, a U.S. ally, recently delivering nuclear-capable missile launchers to frontline military units. United Nations resolutions ban North Korea from importing or exporting weapons. In 2022, North Korean officials contacted him via an online messaging app and instructed him to buy firearms, prosecutors said. He shipped two containers of weapons and other items from Long Beach, California, to North Korea via Hong Kong in 2023. He told U.S. authorities that he was wired about $2 million to do so, according to the complaint. Authorities did not specify in the complaint the types of weapons that were exported. To carry out his operation, Wen purchased a business in 2023 called Super Armory, a federal firearms licensee, for $150,000, and registered it under his business partner's name in Texas. He had other people purchase the firearms and then drove them to California, misrepresenting the shipments as a refrigerator and camera parts. Investigators did not say whether Wen had organized any shipments during his first 10 years in the U.S. The FBI in September seized 50,000 rounds of ammunition from Wen's home in the LA suburb of Ontario that had been stored in a van parked in the driveway, the complaint says. They also seized a chemical threat identification device and a transmission detective device that Wen said he planned to send to the North Korean government for military use, the complaint says. The Associated Press
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shenandoah investigates financial mismanagement
Shenandoah borough officials have made inroads in their ongoing investigation of alleged financial mismanagement. Over the past few months, Shenandoah has taken measures to investigate claims of mismanagement presented by Borough Manager Mike Cadau, who was hired in January and found what he says are financial improprieties and misappropriation in the way previous borough administrators did business. On Monday, Cadau announced that officials from the Pennsylvania Auditor General's office will visit borough hall in September to conduct a comprehensive audit of the borough's Liquid Fuels account. Cadau has previously shared that he believes Shenandoah misappropriated funds from that account for projects not typically associated with it. The Department of the Auditor General, Cadau said, 'has been following what's been happening (from media reports), and they want to come in and they want to take a look at our Liquid Fuel accounts.' Also, Cadau said that he will join council president Joseph R. Boris and the borough's forensic auditor, Joseph Yanushefsky, at a meeting with the Internal Revenue Service in Wilkes-Barre on Aug. 25. Cadau said they were summoned by the IRS to go over an ongoing forensic audit led by Yanushefsky, whom the borough appointed this spring. At the meeting, they are expected to examine issues such as 941 forms, 1099 forms and pensions that the borough has provided over the years, Cadau said. Shortly after he was hired in January, Cadau described the borough as being in a 'very difficult' situation due to funding mishaps over the past two years. In May, the borough council appointed attorney Maria Casey as special counsel to help investigate the alleged mismanagement. At the July meeting, Cadau told council members that the Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General also will lead a criminal investigation into the matter. Other business Council members discussed an ongoing effort to repave several streets in the borough. After the successful curb-to-curb paving job done on five streets last year, the borough plans to pave five more by the end of November, Boris said. Boris said the borough will first repave North Jardin and Market streets, which will cost nearly $100,000 combined. Community Development Block Grant funds of $70,000 will be used to pay for those projects, with the remainder coming from interest received through the sale of the Municipal Authority of the Borough of Shenandoah, Boris said Tuesday. M&J Excavation Inc. of Bloomsburg has been tapped as the contractor for the two streets. The contract will be tentatively awarded at the Aug. 27 county commissioners meeting, Boris said. Also on Monday, Boris announced that attorney Shane Hobbs has resigned as the borough's solicitor. He read Hobbs' resignation letter, in which Hobbs stated that recent challenges — notably, his accepting a part-time job as a Schuylkill County Public Defender — resulted in his decision to leave. 'It was a pleasure working with you all,' wrote Hobbs, who served as solicitor since January 2024. Following Hobbs' decision, Boris said, council members interviewed a candidate, James E. Crossen III, of the Pottsville law firm Williamson, Friedberg & Jones. Council members appointed him as the new solicitor Monday. Council members also approved the hire of a new full-time secretary, Nazareth Perez. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump moves to use the levers of presidential power to help his party in the 2026 midterms
President Donald Trump has made clear in recent weeks that he's willing to use the vast powers of his office to prevent his party from losing control of Congress in next year's midterm elections. Some of the steps Trump has taken to intervene in the election are typical, but controversial, political maneuvers taken to his trademark extremes. That includes pushing Republican lawmakers in Texas and other conservative-controlled states to redraw their legislative maps to expand the number of U.S. House seats favorable to the GOP. Others involve the direct use of official presidential power in ways that have no modern precedent, such as ordering his Department of Justice to investigate the main liberal fundraising entity, ActBlue. The department also is demanding the detailed voter files from each state in an apparent attempt to look for ineligible voters on a vast scale. And on Monday, Trump posted a falsehood-filled rant on social media pledging to lead a 'movement' to outlaw voting machines and mail balloting, the latter of which has become a mainstay of Democratic voting since Trump pushed Republicans to avoid it in 2020 — before flipping on the issue ahead of last year's presidential election. The individual actions add up to an unprecedented attempt by a sitting president to interfere in a critical election before it's even held, moves that have raised alarms among those concerned about the future of U.S. democracy. 'Those are actions that you don't see in healthy democracies,' said Ian Bassin, executive director of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan organization that has sued the Trump administration. 'Those are actions you see in authoritarian states.' Trump has already tried to overturn an election Bassin noted that presidents routinely stump for their party in midterm elections and try to bolster incumbents by steering projects and support to their districts. But he said Trump's history is part of what's driving alarm about the midterms. He referenced Trump's attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, which ended with a violent assault on the Capitol by his supporters. 'The one thing we know for certain from experience in 2020 is that this is a person who will use every measure and try every tactic to stay in power, regardless of the outcome of an election,' Bassin said. He noted that in 2020, Trump was checked by elected Republicans in Congress and statehouses who refused to bend the rules, along with members of his own administration and even military leaders who distanced themselves from the defeated incumbent. In his second term, the president has locked down near-total loyalty from the GOP and stacked the administration with loyalists. The incumbent president's party normally loses seats in Congress during midterm elections. That's what happened to Trump in 2018, when Democrats won enough seats to take back the House of Representatives, stymieing the president's agenda and eventually leading to his two impeachments. Trump has said he doesn't want a repeat. He also has argued that his actions are actually attempts to preserve democracy. Repeating baseless allegations of fraud, he said Monday during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that 'you can never have a real democracy with mail-in ballots.' Earlier this month, Trump said that, because he handily won Texas in the 2024 presidential election, 'we are entitled to five more seats.' An attempt to engineer GOP control of the US House Republicans currently have a three-seat margin in the House of Representatives. Trump pushed Texas Republicans to redraw their congressional map to create up to five new winnable GOP seats and is lobbying other red states, including Indiana and Missouri, to take similar steps to pad the margin even more. The Texas Legislature is likely to vote on its map on Wednesday. There's no guarantee that Trump's gambit will work, but also no legal prohibition against fiddling with maps in those states for partisan advantage. In response, California Democrats are moving forward with their own redistricting effort as a way to counter Republicans in Texas. Mid-decade map adjustments have happened before, though usually in response to court orders rather than presidents openly hoping to manufacture more seats for their party. Larry Diamond, a political scientist at Stanford University, said there's a chance the redrawing of House districts won't succeed as Trump anticipates — but could end up motivating Democratic voters. Still, Diamond said he's concerned. 'It's the overall pattern that's alarming and that the reason to do this is for pure partisan advantage,' he said of Trump's tactic. Diamond noted that in 2019 he wrote a book about a '12-step' process to turn a democracy into an autocracy, and 'the last step in the process is to rig the electoral process.' The Justice Department acts on Trump's priorities Trump has required loyalty from all levels of his administration and demanded that the Department of Justice follow his directives. One of those was to probe ActBlue, an online portal that raised hundreds of millions of dollars in small-dollar donations for Democratic candidates over two decades. The site was so successful that Republicans launched a similar venture, called WinRed. Trump, notably, did not order a federal probe into WinRed. Trump's appointees at the Department of Justice also have demanded voting data from at least 19 states, as Trump continues to insist he actually won the 2020 election and proposed a special prosecutor to investigate that year's vote tally. Much as he did before winning the 2024 election, Trump has baselessly implied that Democrats may rig upcoming vote counts against him. In at least two of those states, California and Minnesota, the DOJ followed up with election officials last week, threatening legal action if they didn't hand over their voter registration lists by this Thursday, according to letters shared with The Associated Press. Neither state — both controlled by Democrats — has responded publicly. Attempts to interfere with voting and elections Trump's threat this week to end mail voting and do away with voting machines is just his latest attempt to sway how elections are run. An executive order he signed earlier this year sought documented proof of citizenship to register to vote, among other changes, though much of it has been blocked by courts. In the days leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol to reverse his 2020 loss, Trump's allies proposed having the military seize voting machines to investigate purported fraud, even though Trump's own attorney general said there was no evidence of significant wrongdoing. The Constitution says states and Congress, rather than the president, set the rules for elections, so it's unclear what Trump could do to make his promises a reality. But election officials saw them as an obvious sign of his 2026 interests. 'Let's see this for what it really is: An attempt to change voting going into the midterms because he's afraid the Republicans will lose,' wrote Ann Jacobs, the Democratic chair of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, on X. The president has very few levers to influence an election Derek Muller, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, said the idea of seizing voting machines in 2020 was a sign of how few levers the president has to influence an election, not of his power. Under the U.S. Constitution, elections are run by states and only Congress can 'alter' the procedures — and, even then, for federal races alone. 'It's a deeply decentralized system,' Muller said. There are fewer legal constraints on presidential powers, such as criminal investigations and deployment of law enforcement and military resources, Muller noted. But, he added, people usually err in forecasting election catastrophes. He noted that in 2022 and 2024, a wide range of experts braced for violence, disruption and attempts to overturn losses by Trump allies, and no serious threats materialized. 'One lesson I've learned in decades of doing this is people are often preparing for the last election rather than what actually happens in the new ones,' Muller said. ___
