logo
A newly surfaced document reveals the beef industry's secret climate plan

A newly surfaced document reveals the beef industry's secret climate plan

Vox20-03-2025
is a senior reporter for Vox's Future Perfect section, with a focus on animal welfare and the future of meat.
It's now well established that for decades, major oil companies knew that burning fossil fuels would cause global warming, and yet did everything in their power to obstruct climate policy. They intensively lobbied policymakers, ran advertising campaigns, and funded think tanks to cast doubt on climate science.
According to two new papers recently published in the journals Environmental Research Letters and Climate Policy, another industry knew of its role in climate change decades ago and engaged in similar tactics: the US beef industry.
The story begins in February 1989, when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) held a workshop for a report on how to reduce livestock methane emissions. Experts at the time knew that cattle produce significant amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas that accelerates climate change at a much faster pace than carbon dioxide. (Today, almost one-third of methane stems from beef and dairy cattle).
This story was first featured in the Processing Meat newsletter
Sign up here for Future Perfect's biweekly newsletter from Marina Bolotnikova and Kenny Torrella, exploring how the meat and dairy industries shape our health, politics, culture, environment, and more.
Have questions or comments on this newsletter? Email us at futureperfect@vox.com!
There was also increasing awareness among scientists and environmentalists about livestock's impact on other environmental issues, like water pollution and biodiversity loss.
A representative from the nation's largest and oldest beef industry group — the National Cattlemen's Association (NCA) — attended the EPA workshop, and soon after, an arm of the organization began crafting a plan to defend itself against what they anticipated would be growing attacks over beef's role in global warming and other environmental ills.
The Cattlemen's plan — an internal 17-page memo titled 'Strategic Plan on the Environment' — went unnoticed for decades until two University of Miami researchers, Jennifer Jacquet and Loredana Loy, recently unearthed the document in the NCA's archives.
Notably, the beef industry plan had barely a mention about addressing cattle pollution. Instead, it centered around how the public and policymakers would perceive that pollution.
'Public relations activity directed toward key influencers is a fundamental thrust of this plan,' one part reads. Other goals of the plan: to positively influence legislation and regulations, and commission experts to write papers in response to critics as part of its 'crisis management' strategy. They hired one such expert to address the EPA's report, which came out in August 1989 and called livestock 'one of the larger' sources of methane.
A cattle feedlot near Lubbock, Texas. Richard Hamilton Smith /Design Pics Editorial/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
In 1996, the National Cattlemen's Association merged with another group to become the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. The organization didn't respond to an interview request for this story.
Looking back now, the plan seems to be the blueprint for how the beef industry, and the broader animal agriculture sector, would go on to respond to climate scientists and critics for the next 35 years.
While these delay-and-obstruct tactics largely mirror those of the fossil fuel industry, there's one way the two sectors radically differ in their public relations wars: what role they say consumers should play to combat climate change.
What polluting industries want you to do — or not do — on a heating planet
Over the past decade, many environmentalists have become critical of focusing on individual actions — such as purchasing a hybrid vehicle, using efficient light bulbs, or flying less — as meaningful solutions to climate change. Critics argue that putting the responsibility of fighting climate change on individuals has been a tactic purposefully employed by fossil fuel companies to help them evade accountability.
That's largely true. BP popularized the personal carbon footprint calculator while Chevron — which, to be clear, is an energy company — has run ads encouraging its customers to use less energy. A 2021 analysis of ExxonMobil's communications concluded that the company is 'fixated' on individual responsibility.
But when it came to the meat industry, Jacquet and Loy found the opposite: It really doesn't want people to take the individual action of eating less meat.
'Rather than embrace notions of individual responsibility, the animal agriculture industry hired scientists, pressured the media, and formed business coalitions to obstruct' initiatives that encourage people to eat less meat, the two researchers wrote in the Climate Policy paper.
Economist Jeremy Rifkin speaking at the Tribeca Film Festival in 2017.for Ford
One of the earliest examples of such obstruction occurred in the early 1990s, when economist and activist Jeremy Rifkin published the book Beyond Beef: The Rise and Fall of the Cattle Culture. Rifkin paired the book launch with a large coalitional campaign featuring advertisements, mass protests at McDonald's locations, and a book tour, all aimed at persuading people in 16 countries to cut their beef consumption in half and replace it with plant-based foods.
A beef industry publication considered Rifkin's actions a declaration of war and the industry organized a 'determined counterattack,' according to the Chicago Tribune. That counterattack included an advertising campaign telling people not to blame environmental problems on cows and the formation of an alliance of 13 industry groups to push back against activists like Rifkin, which included tactics like handing out hamburgers at one of his events. Around this time, the Beef Industry Council launched the infamous but influential 'Beef. It's What's for Dinner' marketing campaign with a budget of $96 million in today's dollars.
It was effective: According to a 1992 story in the Washington Post, people screamed at Rifkin on call-in radio shows, his publisher received angry letters and phone calls, and his book tour was canceled early on because people called event hosts to either disparage him or pose as his publicist to cancel. Rifkin chalked it up in part to aggrieved cattle ranchers, a claim that the National Cattlemen's Association fiercely denied at the time.
This back-and-forth fight over the American diet has continued ever since:
Meatless Monday: The Meatless Monday campaign rose to prominence in the 2000s with celebrity support, featuring dozens of large university cafeterias and school districts ditching meat on Mondays, all of which angered the livestock sector. Meat industry lobbyists sent Baltimore City Public Schools
The Meatless Monday campaign rose to prominence in the 2000s with celebrity support, featuring dozens of large university cafeterias and school districts ditching meat on Mondays, all of which angered the livestock sector. Meat industry lobbyists sent Baltimore City Public Schools cease and desist letters for participating in the program, and an industry-funded academic at UC Davis named Frank Mitloehner called it a public policy tool to defeat animal agriculture. According to Jacquet, he also downplayed Meatless Monday's potential to cut greenhouse gas emissions. (Disclosure: From 2012 to 2013, I worked at the Humane Society of the US on its Meatless Monday initiative.)
US Dietary Guidelines: In 2015, an advisory committee of government-commissioned nutrition experts recommended that the government modify the US dietary guidelines to encourage Americans to reduce meat consumption to make their diets more sustainable. In response, industry trade groups
In 2015, an advisory committee of government-commissioned nutrition experts recommended that the government modify the US dietary guidelines to encourage Americans to reduce meat consumption to make their diets more sustainable. In response, industry trade groups aggressively lobbied Congress and launched a petition that decried the committee experts as 'nutrition despots.' Ultimately, the committee's recommendation didn't make it into the final dietary guidelines.
The EAT-Lancet report: In 2019, a
In 2019, a landmark report published by nutrition and environmental experts recommended that people in high-income countries significantly cut back on meat for personal and planetary health. Mitloehner, the UC Davis academic, coordinated massive '#yes2meat' counter-campaign that spawned millions of tweets.
So why do fossil fuel companies and livestock producers seemingly have such a different take on personal responsibility? Jacquet says much of it comes down to the simple fact that consumers have relatively little flexibility in reducing fossil fuel use, so messages that encourage people to make lifestyle changes pose little actual threat to fossil fuel companies' bottom line.
Individuals are 'locked into a fossil fuel energy system,' Jacquet said. But 'food is not like that,' she added. 'You really do have a lot of flexibility in your diet, and you make those decisions three times a day. … These are really dynamic decision spaces, and that's a threat' to the meat industry.
To state the obvious, individual dietary change alone is insufficient to reform the cruel, polluting factory farm system. But it is a start. To pass even modest regulatory reforms, policymakers will first need to see public support, and one way the public can show it is by eating less meat.
Not only is it considered one of, if not the most effective individual actions to reduce carbon footprints, but dietary change also has cascading positive effects. Animal agriculture is arguably the leading source of US water pollution, a major air polluter, and far and away the main cause of animal suffering — around 25 land animals are factory-farmed each year to sustain the average American's diet.
According to agricultural economists Jayson Lusk and F. Bailey Norwood, eating less meat, milk, and eggs does affect how many animals are raised for food. It's not on a 1:1 basis, but if more people reduce their animal consumption, they'd collectively send a signal to the industry to raise fewer animals.
'It may be hard to see the consequences of our decisions,' the two wrote in their 2011 book Compassion, by the Pound: The Economics of Farm Animal Welfare, 'but let there be no doubt, each purchase decision matters.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EPA to launch plan Tuesday for undoing climate rule cornerstone
EPA to launch plan Tuesday for undoing climate rule cornerstone

E&E News

timean hour ago

  • E&E News

EPA to launch plan Tuesday for undoing climate rule cornerstone

The Trump administration is planning to release a proposal Tuesday that would overturn a 16-year-old scientific finding that has allowed three administrations to regulate climate pollution. The draft revision to the so-called endangerment finding for greenhouse gases marks a key move by President Donald Trump to weaken the government's authority to curtail carbon emissions from the energy and automotive industries, among others. It will be paired with a proposal for rolling back climate rules for cars and trucks. Five people were granted anonymity to speak about internal discussions on the timing of the plan. The proposal entered White House review in late June, and the Office of Management and Budget has held numerous meetings with industry, environmental groups and Indiana's environmental protection agency. Advertisement The draft takes aim at a 2009 scientific finding that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare — the predicate for most climate regulations under the Clean Air Act. The proposal is expected to focus more on legal arguments about the original Obama-era finding than on the science of climate change. Two people said EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin would make the announcement while visiting an Indiana facility with links to the truck manufacturing supply chain. The transportation sector is the largest source of planet-heating gases in the U.S. If the courts uphold Trump's move to repeal the endangerment finding, it could be easier for EPA to quickly undo a host of Biden-era climate rules for power plants and oil and gas methane without replacing them with new standards.

EPA updates layoff plans for environmental justice staffers
EPA updates layoff plans for environmental justice staffers

E&E News

timean hour ago

  • E&E News

EPA updates layoff plans for environmental justice staffers

EPA told some of its environmental justice employees when their last days at the agency will be, following weeks of ambiguity from court-ordered pauses. 'Consequently, you will be separated from the EPA effective 08/25/25,' according to a specific notice of reduction in force reviewed by POLITICO's E&E News sent by Assistant Deputy Administrator Travis Voyles late Friday afternoon. EPA spokesperson Carolyn Holran said the agency issued RIF 'notices to 50 EJ employees located in the Washington D.C. headquarters offices.' Advertisement The Friday notice says the employees affected 'will be eligible for severance pay' and laid out the procedural steps for appealing the RIF decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board 'if you believe your retention rights were violated.'

Russian airline Aeroflot cancels flights after as pro-Ukraine group claims hack
Russian airline Aeroflot cancels flights after as pro-Ukraine group claims hack

UPI

time4 hours ago

  • UPI

Russian airline Aeroflot cancels flights after as pro-Ukraine group claims hack

Russia's Aeroflot canceled flights after a pro-Ukrainian group claimed an attack on the airline. File Photo by Etienne Laurent/EPA July 28 (UPI) -- A cyber attack on Russia's largest airline on Monday saw dozens of canceled flights after a pro-Ukraine team took responsibility for hacking airline computer systems. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov called it "quite alarming" after at least 42 scheduled Aeroflot flights largely domestic in Russia got canceled. Aeroflot officials gave no specific details or how long it would take to restore its mainframe after officials informed passengers of a "failure" in its tech systems advising service disruptions, but did warn travelers of delays and cancellations. The airline said its tech teams were "actively working to minimize the impact on flight operations and restore all services to normal as quickly as possible." "We kindly ask passengers to monitor real-time updates on airport websites, information displays, and public announcements across the airline's route network," the airline said in a statement. Aeroflot's cyber-security attack was a direct result of Russia's full-on invasion of neighboring Ukraine, the hacker group calling itself "Silent Crow" confirmed. Russia's prosecutor general's office also confirmed that Aeroflot's technological issues were a result of a virtual attack on its computer systems and stated that a criminal investigation is underway. Silent Crow says it worked with a separate group based in Belarus called "Cyber Partisans BY." They pressed unverified claimed of access to flight history data, that it destroyed roughly 7,000 Aeroflot servers, compromised its corporate computer structure and further threatened to released "the personal data of all Russians who have ever flown Aeroflot." On its Telegram channel, Silent Crow wrote how for a year, "we were inside their corporate network, methodically developing access, going deep into the very core of the infrastructure." Meanwhile, Aeroflot partner air carries Rossiya and Probed have not reported any technological issues. The cyber attack on Russia's flag air carrier arrived weeks after another on Australian airline Qantas exposed the data of six million customers. That followed a similar event at the end of June on Hawaiian Airlines by a group FBI officials believe to be young adults and teens living in the United States and Britain. "Glory to Ukraine! Long live Belarus!" Silent Crow said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store