Proposed amendment to term-limit county commissioners, school board members goes to House
A Florida House committee on Tuesday passed a resolution (HJR 679) that would place a constitutional amendment on the 2026 ballot asking voters to impose eight-year term limits on county commissioners and school board members.
But its Senate companion bill has stalled, raising doubt about whether the Legislature will approve the limits during this year's legislative session.
Twelve counties in Florida have already imposed term limits on their county commissioners. Eight such counties have imposed term limits of eight years, while four others have imposed 12-year term limits, with Pinellas the latest to do so last fall.
Panhandle Republican Michelle Salzman's resolution would allow county commissioners who want to run for county mayor to do so immediately, and not have to take any time off from public service before running for that office. Orange, Palm Beach and Miami-Dade are among the counties in Florida that have such a county mayor position.
The proposal is fiercely opposed by the Florida Association of Counties.
Jeff Scala, director of public policy with that group, complained the resolution would strip voters of their ability to self govern by forcing them to vote on county commission term limits statewide, 'imposing their choices on other voters.'
If the proposal goes on the 2026 ballot, voters in the 12 counties that have already changed their charters to impose term limits, who represent 58% of the state, could impose their preferences on the rest of the state.
'Miami-Dade voters deciding for Monroe County,' he said. 'What is best for St. Lucie [County]. We have a situation where Orange County voters go back to tell Marion or Lake County voters that eight years is the right number.'
Rich Templin of the Florida AFL-CIO agreed, telling lawmakers that the proposal, if approved, would take away local control.
'You are going to be allowing three or four counties around the state to make a decision about foundational governance for local communities that will have no say,' he said, adding that the more populous counties will outvote small ones.
The only Republican member of the House State Affairs Committee to oppose the measure was Tampa Rep. Karen Gonzalez-Pittman. She said the proposal would be weak unless it included term limits for staff.
'We've seen what has happened when we've had term limits and not having term limits on staff. It has made staff much more powerful, and we're seeing that in the Legislature as well as in D.C., where the current administration is trying to undo that,' she said.
In response, Salzman emphasized that public opinion polls have consistently showed that more than 80% of the country supports term limits. (A Pew Research Center survey from September 2023 showed that 87% of the public want term limits for members of Congress).
She said she had responded to criticism about a similar proposal she carried last year, which wouldn't have given voters any say on the matter. So this year's proposal is a resolution and not a bill, meaning that if it wins 3/5ths support in both chambers of the Legislature, it would be placed on the statewide ballot next year, giving the voters the option of deciding the issue.
Salzman dismissed criticism that certain counties would have more sway in a statewide election.
'We're trying to give the voters what they want and we're over here arguing about whose voice is louder,' she said.
The Senate version (SJR 802), sponsored by West Central Florida Republican Blaise Ingoglia, has passed one committee but has two more stops before reaching the floor.
In 1992, Florida voters approved an amendment to the state's Constitution creating eight-year term limits for legislators. Eight years later, 68 term-limited senators and representatives were forced to retire, and the state saw the highest number of freshman legislators since the first legislative session in 1845, according to the book 'The Failure of Term Limits in Florida,' by Florida International University professor Kathryn A. Depalo.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Republican: ‘We've gotten lucky' with Mamdani
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said Monday his party has 'gotten lucky' with the Democrats' nominee for New York City mayor as Zohran Mamdani makes his case ahead of the November election. 'We've gotten lucky — bad for America, good for Republicans — with Mr. Mamdani in New York,' Kennedy told NewsNation's Leland Vittert. 'If I didn't know better, I would think he was a Republican plant. If I didn't know better, I'd think that Republicans had created Mr. Mamdani in a petri dish in a genomics lab.' 'He's clearly from what I call the Gary Busey wing — the cray cray wing — of the Democratic Party. That's bad for New York, but it's certainly good for Republicans,' the Pelican State Republican added, mentioning the actor turned reality star. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, recently shocked political observers with his win over political heavyweight and former Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Big Apple's primary. Cuomo is now running as an independent against Mamdani. While Mamdani has faced criticism from within the party, some Democrats have defended his rise. In a Sunday interview, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) pushed back against Democratic criticism of the mayoral candidate. 'I don't know why they're attacking him. I think it's stupid when maybe we're not in 100 percent agreement, right? But he has some ideas that are clearly, you know, attracting people. It's OK to say, 'I disagree with this, this and this, but I agree with that,'' Gallego said. 'But the idea that we're again, we're just going to throw out people that are really bringing in new ideas to the fold, exciting people just because they're slightly to the right or to the left of us, I think, is dumb,' he added. The Hill has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment.
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's redistricting push meets local GOP resistance in Indiana
Indiana Republicans are casting doubt on whether they will move forward with a plan to redraw its congressional district lines despite pressure from the White House. Several GOP state lawmakers have come out against the effort, expressing concern about the precedent that it could set for the future and possible backlash against the party. With Republican supermajorities dominating both houses of the state legislature, stopping the effort would require a significant number of Republicans to oppose it and ignore the Trump administration's call for it. But Indiana is already appearing to be a rare exception to most other GOP-led states much more enthusiastic about redistricting. 'I have tremendous respect for President Trump and love what he's doing,' said state Sen. Jim Lucas (R) who is one of a few on record against redistricting. 'But for Hoosiers, Indiana Republicans, to abandon their principles and basically take away the rules, that sets such a dangerous precedent moving forward and for our children.' 'What kind of political structure are we leaving for our children in the future if we all of a sudden, just because we can, decide to redistrict mid-cycle?' he said. Republicans appear to hold the advantage nationally in the redistricting battle. Though California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is moving forward with his own effort to rewrite his state's lines, the GOP, for multiple structural and practical reasons, has more realistic opportunities to add seats ahead of 2026. Texas Republicans seem likely to approve a new map shortly, while GOP leaders in Florida, Ohio and Missouri have shown a clear interest in trying to add seats to pad the party's majority in 2026. But Indiana has been a question mark, with several Republicans preemptively releasing statements against updating the state's map. Republicans currently occupy seven of the state's nine seats in the U.S. House. Redrawn lines would likely have the biggest impact on Democratic Rep. Frank Mrvan, who represents the 1st Congressional District in the northwest and has already been named a national GOP target for 2026. 'It is no surprise that some believe redistricting is the only option to cling to power when they know the American people are rejecting the damage done by the House Republican Majority,' Mrvan said in a statement amid the speculation. But the political will may not be as strong in the Hoosier State as it appears to be in others. Along with Lucas, several other Republicans in the state legislature said they don't support redistricting now, including state Reps. Danny Lopez and Craig Haggard, and state Sens. Jim Tomes and Spencer Deery. Lucas expressed concern that the move would damage the party's credibility, and he said he's received a lot of positive feedback from constituents in favor of standing on principle. 'There are some outliers… that think, 'hey, we need to take the gloves off and do what the Democrats would be doing to us,' but I want to think we're better than that,' he said. 'I have faith in our policy and our principles and our ideology.' The positions of state legislators could be influential in whether Gov. Mike Braun (R) calls a special session to address redistricting. He has said he is 'considering it seriously' but would look to the results of Texas's efforts and the feelings of Indiana state lawmakers. With Republicans controlling 70 out of 100 seats in the state House and 40 out of 50 seats in the state Senate, many more Republicans would need to be opposed to redrawing the map to have enough votes, along with all Democrats, to block any change. But more Republican opposition might come out, said Republican strategist Pete Seat, a former communications director for the state GOP. 'We take great pride in how we draw our maps, and there's a lot of thought and effort that goes into it, into maintaining communities of interest and drawing districts that are compact,' Seat said. 'There are some states that come at it, despite what they might say, from a political perspective and trying to draw lines that achieve a political end game, whereas we try to draw what makes sense and what keeps people with similar interests together.' 'What I've been hearing from the moment this conversation started is a lack of desire to go forward with re-redistricting, as I like to call it, for that reason, and for the reason that it's a lot of political capital to spend on one additional seat,' he added. Democrats said they appreciated the Republicans who have come out against redistricting and hope they can rally support to prevent any mid-decade change from occurring. State Senate Minority Leader Shelli Yoder (D) said the pushback has been bipartisan and represents Indiana's nature as being independent-minded. 'We are independent thinkers, and we can see this cheating behavior a mile away. So whether you are [a Republican, Democrat or independent] or go back and forth because you vote for the person, Hoosiers see this as a cheating agenda, as a cheating move,' Yoder said, adding that these Republicans recognize 'this isn't how we do things in Indiana, and we're going to do by right by the voters.' But even if the political will in Indiana is lacking, the push on the national level for the state to go forward is much stronger, with pressure appearing likely to build from the White House. Vice President Vance visited Indiana earlier this month for a private meeting with Braun and state legislative leaders as chatter built about redistricting possibilities. A source familiar with conversations between the White House and state leadership said they expect the state will ultimately go forward with redistricting with the urging from the president. They said the pressure from the administration will 'intensify' as time goes on, and they don't expect Braun, a Trump ally, to ignore it. 'There's certainly confidence that once the president really makes the case and leans into it, that you could convince and/or flip lawmakers to be supportive of the effort,' they said. The Hill has reached out to the White House and Braun's office for comment about the opposition to redistricting among the handful of Republicans. One key moment may be a meeting set to take place next Tuesday in which the White House invited all Republican state legislators to visit. The meeting was scheduled weeks prior, before Vance's visit, to discuss various issues, but Republicans said they could imagine the redistricting issue coming up. In another sign of the pressure mounting on GOP holdouts, Indiana's entire Republican delegation in the U.S. House released statements Monday declaring their support for the redistricting effort, saying it's necessary to overcome gerrymandering in Democratic-led states, while Sen. Todd Young (R) has previously raised some doubts about the idea. Meanwhile, some voters have received robocalls urging them to back redistricting to support Trump. Seat said he believes the calls are having the opposite effect, strengthening opposition to redistricting. But the source familiar with the White House's conversations said they don't see this letting up. 2024 Election Coverage 'In the conversations I've had with the White House, I don't see this slowing down at any point,' they said. If legislators and the governor say the political will isn't present to do this, 'I don't think the White House is going to consider that to be an acceptable answer,' they said.
San Francisco Chronicle
27 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Texas Democrat spends night in Legislature protesting police shadowing in redistricting battle
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A Democratic Texas lawmaker opted to spend the night in the state House chamber and remain there Tuesday rather than allow a law enforcement officer to shadow her while Republicans try to prevent further delays to redrawing U.S. House maps. Rep. Nicole Collier overnight stay stemmed from Republicans in the Texas House requiring returning Democrats to sign what the Democrats called 'permission slips,' agreeing to around-the-clock surveillance by state Department of Public Safety officers to leave the floor. Collier, of Fort Worth, refused and remained on the House floor Monday night. The Democrats' return to Texas puts the Republican-run Legislature in position to satisfy Trump's demands, possibly later this week, as California Democrats advance new congressional boundaries in retaliation. Lawmakers had officers posted outside their Capitol offices, and suburban Dallas Rep. Mihaela Plesa said one tailed her on her Monday evening drive back to her apartment in Austin after spending much of the day on a couch in her office. She said he went with her for a staff lunch and even down the hallway with her for restroom breaks. 'We were kind of laughing about it, to be honest, but this is really serious stuff," Plesa said in a telephone interview. "This is a waste of taxpayer dollars and really performative theater.' Collier, who represents a minority-majority district, said she would not 'sign away my dignity" and allow Republicans to 'control my movements and monitor me.' 'I know these maps will harm my constituents,' she said in a statement. "I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination.' 2 states at the center of an expanding fight The tit-for-tat puts the nation's two most populous states at the center of an expanding fight over control of Congress ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The battle has rallied Democrats nationally following infighting and frustrations among the party's voters since Republicans took total control of the federal government in January. Dozens of Texas Democratic lawmakers left for Illinois and elsewhere on Aug. 3, denying their Republican colleagues the attendance necessary to vote on redrawn maps intended to send five more Texas Republicans to Washington. Republicans now hold 25 of Texas' 38 U.S. House seats. They declared victory Friday, pointing to California's proposal intended to increase Democrats' U.S. House advantage by five seats. Many absent Democrats left Chicago early Monday and landed hours later at a private airfield in Austin, where several boarded a charter bus to the Capitol. Cheering supporters greeted them inside. Republican House Speaker Dustin Burrows did not mention redistricting on the floor but promised swift action on the Legislature's agenda. 'We aren't playing around,' Republican state Rep. Matt Shaheen, whose district includes part of the Dallas area, said in a post on the X social media platform. Democrats promise to keep fighting Even as they declared victory, Democrats acknowledged Republicans can now approve redrawn districts. Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu said Democrats would challenge the new designs in court. Lawmakers did not take up any bills Monday and were not scheduled to return until Wednesday. Trump has pressured other Republican-run states to consider redistricting, as well, while Democratic governors in multiple statehouses have indicated they would follow California's lead in response. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts. The president wants to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of the midterms during his first presidency. After gaining House control in 2018, Democrats used their majority to stymie his agenda and twice impeach him. Nationally, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. Redistricting typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade after the census. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions, giving Newsom an additional hurdle. California Democrats start redrawing process Democratic legislators introduced new California maps Monday. It was the first official move toward the fall referendum asking voters to override the independent commission's work after the 2020 census. The proposed boundaries would replace current ones through 2030. Democrats said they will return the mapmaking power to the commission after that. State Republicans promised lawsuits. Democrats hold 43 out of California's 52 U.S. House seats. The proposal would try to expand that advantage by targeting battleground districts in Northern California, San Diego and Orange counties, and the Central Valley. Some Democratic incumbents also get more left-leaning voters in their districts. 'We don't want this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we cannot run away from this fight,' said Democrat Marc Berman, a California Assembly member who previously chaired the elections committee. Republicans expressed opposition in terms that echoed Democrats in Austin, accusing the majority of abusing power. Sacramento Republicans said they will introduce legislation advocating independent redistricting commissions in all states. Texas' governor jumped to the president's aid Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott launched the expanding battle when he heeded Trump's wishes and added redistricting to an initial special session agenda that included multiple issues, including a package responding to devastating floods that killed more than 130 people last month. Abbott has blamed Democrats' absence for delaying action on those measures. Democrats have answered that Abbott is responsible because he effectively linked the hyper-partisan matter to nonpartisan flood relief. Abbott, Burrows and other Republicans tried various threats and legal maneuvers to pressure Democrats' return, including the governor arguing that Texas judges should remove absent lawmakers from office. As long as they were out of state, lawmakers were beyond the reach of the civil arrest warrants that Burrows issued. The Democrats who returned Monday did so without being detained by law enforcement. The lawmakers who left face fines of up to $500 for each legislative day they missed. Burrows has insisted Democratic lawmakers also will pay pick up the tab for law enforcement who attempted to corral them during the walkout.
