
Trump's Deportation Quota Comes Under Scrutiny
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Attorneys for the Trump administration have denied that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents were directed to meet a daily quota for arrests or deportations.
In a court filing submitted on Friday, lawyers for the Department of Justice (DOJ) said "neither ICE leadership nor its field offices have been directed to meet any numerical quota or target for arrests, detentions, removals, field encounters, or any other operational activities that ICE or its components undertake in the course of enforcing federal immigration law."
Newsweek has contacted the DOJ and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for comment.
Agents survey migrants coming for their hearings at an immigration court in New York.
Agents survey migrants coming for their hearings at an immigration court in New York.
Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx
Why It Matters
White House officials have previously referenced a daily goal of at least 3,000 arrests. President Donald Trump has ordered his administration to remove millions of migrants without legal status to fulfill his campaign pledge of mass deportations. The Republicans' hard-line immigration policy has raised concerns over racial profiling from immigrant rights advocates.
What To Know
In May, Axios reported that Trump aide Stephen Miller and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem were pressuring ICE to increase daily immigration arrests to three times the number recorded at the beginning of Trump's presidency, signaling a shift toward a more aggressive enforcement strategy.
Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy and a homeland security adviser, told Fox News host Sean Hannity at the time that the agency was looking to hit 3,000 ICE arrests per day.
In the government's filing on Friday, attorneys said claims of a policy mandating 3,000 immigration arrests per day appeared to stem from media reports quoting a White House adviser, who characterized the number as a "goal" the administration was "looking to set" rather than an official directive or mandate.
"That quotation may have been accurate, but no such goal has been set as a matter of policy, and no such directive has been issued to or by DHS or ICE," attorneys wrote in court filings.
The filing is part of an ongoing lawsuit in Southern California, where immigrant advocacy organizations have accused the Trump administration of carrying out unconstitutional immigration enforcement operations in the Los Angeles area.
When federal judges sought clarification about that number last week, the administration denied the existence of any quota. This denial contradicted claims made in a lawsuit alleging that the high pressure to meet arrest targets led ICE to carry out unlawful raids in Los Angeles.
During the July 28 appeal hearing, Judge Ronald M. Gould pressed Department of Justice attorney Jacob Roth to explain the origin of the reported 3,000 daily arrest target, asking whether it came from ICE, the president or another official, Los Angeles Daily News reported. Roth said he was not aware of any such policy, according to the outlet.
There were about 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States as of 2022, according to Pew Research Center. Trump has vowed to deport 1 million people in a year.
What People Are Saying
White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller told Hannity in May: "We are looking to set a goal of a minimum of 3,000 arrests for ICE every day and President Trump is going to keep pushing to get that number up higher each and every single day so we can get all of the Biden illegals that were flooded into our country for four years out of our country."
Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for DHS, said in a statement: "Secretary Noem unleashed ICE to target the worst of the worst and carry out the largest deportation operation of criminal aliens in American history."
Department of Justice attorney Jacob Roth wrote in a letter to the court: "Enforcement activity is firmly anchored in binding legal constraints—constitutional, statutory, and regulatory requirements that apply at every stage, from identification to arrest to custody—with multiple layers of supervisory review to ensure compliance with the law. This framework, not anonymous reports in the newspapers, governs ICE's operations."
What Happens Next
A ruling is expected in the coming months as the court weighs the scope of ICE's enforcement authority.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
What to know as Trump's immigration crackdown strips tuition breaks from thousands of students
The tuition breaks once enjoyed wide bipartisan support but have increasingly come under criticism from Republicans in recent years. Advertisement Here's what to know about the tuition breaks: Texas' program was blocked first Texas' tuition policy was initially passed with sweeping bipartisan majorities in the Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, as a way to open access to higher education for students without legal residency already living in the state. Supporters then and now say it boosted the state's economy by creating a better-educated and better-prepared workforce. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The law allowed students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they had lived in Texas for three years before graduating from high school and for a year before enrolling in college. They also had to sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible. Texas now has about 73,000 qualifying students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the most recent estimate from the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit group of university leaders focused on immigration policy. The latest estimate is an increase over earlier projections because of a change in its methodology for identifying qualifying students. Advertisement Texas has about 690,000 students overall at its public universities. The difference in tuition rates is substantial. For example, at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, a 34,000-student campus along the border with Mexico, a state resident will pay about $10,000 in basic tuition for a minimum full-time class schedule in the upcoming school year. A nonresident student will pay $19,000. Political pushback and a swift end Texas' law stood mostly unchallenged for years, but it came under fire as debates over illegal immigration intensified. In the 2012 Republican presidential primary, Perry apologized after saying critics of the law 'did not have a heart.' The law withstood several repeal efforts in the Republican-dominated Legislature. During the legislative session that ended June 2, a repeal bill did not even get a vote. But the ax fell quickly. After the Trump administration filed a lawsuit calling the law unconstitutional, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, a key Trump ally, chose not to defend the law in court and instead filed a motion agreeing that it should not be enforced. In Oklahoma, which the Presidents' Alliance estimates will have about 2,700 students affected, Attorney General Gentner Drummond, also a Republican, filed a similar motion. 'Rewarding foreign nationals who are in our country illegally with lower tuition costs that are not made available to out-of-state American citizens is not only wrong — it is discriminatory and unlawful," Drummond said in a statement. Advertisement Campuses nationwide feel the impact At least 21 states and the University of Michigan system have laws or policies allowing tuition breaks for the immigrant students, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones such as Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. Nationwide, the Presidents' Alliance estimates more than 510,000 students without legal resident status are enrolled in colleges and universities, about 85 percent of them in undergraduate programs. Immigration lawyers and education advocates said they are assessing whether there are legal avenues to challenge the rulings.


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
GOP senator says FBI will help track down Texas Democrats who fled state
Sen. John Cornyn said FBI Director Kash Patel will have federal officers work with Texas state law enforcement to locate Democrats who fled the state. WASHINGTON - Sen. John Cornyn said FBI Director Kash Patel accepted his request for federal officers to work with Texas state law enforcement in tracking down the Democratic lawmakers who fled the Lone Star State to try to block Republicans' redistricting efforts. Cornyn, a Texas Republican, had sent a letter to Patel on Aug. 5 with his request, noting that "in a representative democracy, we resolve our differences by debating and voting, not by running away." More than 50 Texas Democrats left their state on Aug. 3 in order to deny Republicans the quorum they need to move ahead with their plan to carry out an unusual mid-decade redistricting. The effort could give Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives up to five more seats in the 2026 midterms. The legislators fled to blue states, including Illinois, Massachusetts and New York. Cornyn had noted in his letter there are only about two weeks left in Texas legislature's special session, called by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. "I am proud to announce that Director Kash Patel has approved my request for the FBI to assist state and local law enforcement in locating runaway Texas House Democrats," Cornyn said in a statement on Aug. 7. "I thank President Trump and Director Patel for supporting and swiftly acting on my call for the federal government to hold these supposed lawmakers accountable for fleeing Texas. We cannot allow these rogue legislators to avoid their constitutional responsibilities." House Minority Leader Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, fired back on X. "Shouldn't the FBI be tracking down terrorists, drug traffickers and child predators? The Trump administration continues to weaponize law enforcement to target political adversaries. These extremists don't give a damn about public safety. We will not be intimidated," he wrote. Cornyn, who has served in the Senate since 2002, is heading toward a tough 2026 Republican primary against the state's attorney general, Ken Paxton. Early polls show Cornyn trailing Paxton by double digits. Contributing: Savannah Kuchar


UPI
a few seconds ago
- UPI
Trump order to broaden how colleges report admissions information
President Donald Trump stands with Education Secretary Linda McMahon as he shows an executive order during in a ceremony at the White House in Washington, D.C. in March. File Photo by Jim Lo Scalzo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 7 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order Thursday that will widen the requirements for colleges to report their admissions information. The order is intended to guarantee that universities turn in the information necessary to show they aren't basing any admissions on race, according to a senior White House official. The directive will allow U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon to overhaul the collection of higher education data, deepen the federal government's reporting requirements and increase penalties for schools that submit inaccurate information. Additionally, the order will make the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System the main national source for information on colleges and universities easier to access and understand. Any defiance of the directive from Trump could impede schools from receiving federal financial assistance. Trump has already pulled billions of dollars in funding from schools over admission requirements and alleged acts of prejudice. The Trump administration also announced Thursday it is investigating Baltimore City Public Schools in Baltimore, Maryland for purportedly allowing "numerous incidents of anti-Semitic discrimination and harassment by teachers and non-Jewish students against Jewish students." Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor said in a press release Thursday that alleged acts of anti-Semitism in the Baltimore schools include a teacher directing a Nazi salute toward a Jewish student and non-Jewish students bullying and harassing Jewish students.