Check out the Hellhound, a 375-mph 3D-printed turbojet-powered exploding drone competing for a spot in the US Army's arsenal
The system is mostly 3D-printed, can fly at speeds over 375 mph, and is powered by a turbojet engine.
CEO Sheila Cummings told BI said the drone's design and features make it unique compared to others on the market.
A couple feet long, rounded, relatively lightweight, and easy to make, this exploding drone can fly fast and attaches to a rucksack.
That's the basics of Hellhound, a loitering munition made by Cummings Aerospace based in Huntsville, Alabama. This kind of weapon features characteristics of both missiles and drones, delivering surveillance and strike in a single package.
The Hellhoud recently completed flight tests and a few demonstrations before being submitted to a top US Army drone competition. Earlier in the year, it was tested in the Army's Expeditionary Warrior Experiment 2025.
Loitering munitions are becoming more prolific and playing a role in conflicts like the war in Ukraine. As a turbojet-powered drone, the Hellhound is unlike many other loitering munitions. The top speed is nearly three times faster than the popular Switchblade made by AeroVironment.
Hellhound wrapped up flight tests earlier this year, and the S3 version of it, which Business Insider saw up close at SOF Week 2025 in Tampa, Florida, is in submission for the US Army's Low Altitude Stalking and Striking Ordnance, or LASSO, program.
LASSO requires select companies to build 135 munitions and 35 prototypes immediately. It's a new-start program, the goal of which is to give infantry brigades better stand-off weapons capabilities.
Cummings Aerospace's CEO Sheila Cummings told BI that much of how her company is thinking about the Hellhound has been with modularity, ease of manufacturing, and warfighter feedback in mind. She also said the system is affordable but wouldn't disclose a specific cost or price range.
At first glance, the Hellhound loitering munition, sitting inside its case, looks a bit like a boogie board. Weighing less than 25 pounds, the weapon is fairly lightweight and easy to pick up and carry. There are straps on the bottom that can attach it to a soldier's rucksack, something Cummings said was a key suggestion from soldiers who wanted the system to be as man-portable as possible.
The majority of a Hellhound is 3D printed. Cummings estimated that, depending on the number of printers, they could fully print a Hellhound in a few days at least and a week at most.
Any part that isn't 3D-printed is commercial off-the-shelf, an increasingly important quality for the weapons and systems that the US military acquires as it speeds up the process.
The US military has been pushing for more of its systems, especially the uncrewed weapon systems, to be suitable for production on a large scale, interchangeable capabilities and components, and supply chain flexibility.
There's a growing realization that for future wars, inexpensive, easily made weapons will be needed in mass in a protracted, large-scale conflict against a major rival like China.
A key development of the Ukraine war has been how Ukraine has created an arsenal of cheap drones for surveillance and precision strike. That's something militaries around the world are watching closely given how effective it's been.
"We're really trying to minimize the exquisite, custom products," Cummings told BI, explaining that the Hellhound's payload, too, can be interchanged with different sensors or warheads depending on what the mission requirements are simply by twisting and unlocking the nose.
A defining characteristic of the Hellhound is its turbojet engine. Cummings said it's a differentiator for the system and company as it not only reduces fuel usage but also increases speed. Cummings Aerospace advertises the Hellhound as being able to fly faster than 375 mph with a range of around 25 miles.
The turbojet engine is also a commercially available product, Cummings said. She said the munition's shape, sleek and long, also aids with aerodynamics. Cummings Aerospace has imagined Hellhound swarms in the field providing a mix of intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance and strike.
The focus on loitering munitions — which can, as the name suggests, loiter in an area before diving in to strike a target — comes amid efforts to give troops on the ground stand-off strike capabilities. These weapons have seen widespread use in the war in Ukraine, and Russian loitering munitions, like its Lancet drones and Iranian-made Shaheds, have been high-value targets for Kyiv's forces.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
8 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Armies Tormented by Drones Innovate Ways to Spot, Jam and Zap on the Cheap
BEMOWO PISKIE, Poland—When U.S. Army Sgt. Sebastian Zouzoulas became an electronic-warfare specialist, his main focus was detecting remote-control roadside explosives. That was four years ago—a whole generation back on the battlefield. Today, his work is all about countering drones.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Cummings fine-tunes Hellhound drone for Golden Dome mission
Cummings Aerospace unveiled a variant of its Hellhound drone designed to meet homeland defense missions at the Space and Missile Defense Symposium in Huntsville, Alabama, this week. The company is taking its S3 variant and beefing it up into a new S4 variant to take on air defense missions, particularly countering drone threats, that could fit within the framework of President Donald Trump's homeland missile defense shield dubbed Golden Dome. The turbojet-powered, 3D-printed Hellhound S3 drone can carry a variety of payloads, and the company is putting that version forward as a loitering munition option for a competition that the U.S. Army is planning to kick off this year. The S4 variant, designed to take on Golden Dome mission sets, is a scaled-up version of the S3 that adopts its modular architecture such as the removable nose that allows the unmanned aerial system to shift from countering drones to intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance or serving as a weapon itself like a low-cost cruise missile, according to Sheila Cummings, the company's CEO. The S4 is 'really a multimission capability as well as a multilaunch platform capability,' she added, 'so ground-based is kind of the primary, but then the airframe and launch canister can support both an air- and sea-based launch.' 'Mobility and multimission capability are obviously paramount to any sort of layered approach for Golden Dome,' she said. While the S3 variant is roughly 12 to 14 pounds, depending on the payload, the S4 falls in the 45-pound range. But the majority of the capability uses the same software, additive manufacturing techniques, 3D-printed materials and other commercial-off-the-shelf parts. The S4 is in the engineering development phase and the company is building prototypes. The plan is to go into flight tests with the capability from as early as this fall through next spring, Cummings said. Like the S3 manufacturing strategy, the S4 design also takes into account the reality that it will need to be manufactured at a large scale. The military is changing the way it acquires weapon systems and, in many cases, requires companies to prove they can build systems at scale as part of competitive acquisitions. Historically, a weapon system might be chosen for its performance on the battlefield without much attention paid to the amount of work it would take to build a system or even how stable the supplier base was. The Huntsville-based company chose a space next door to Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, home to the program office and testing and development for Army aviation, in 2021 and designed and built a facility intended to produce large numbers of the drones. A large portion of the Hellhound air vehicle is made using commercially available 3D printers in-house and buying commercially available standard parts that are not unique to just a few suppliers, Cummings said. 'If you think about low-cost solutions — that's part of the strategy — is we have to design something that we can get screws from multiple vendors, we can get 3D print material from multiple vendors,' she said. 'We talk about exquisite payloads, that's a different challenge, but electronics, we have to make sure we can source them from multiple vendors.' For the Huntsville facility, Cummings said her goal is to produce at least 100 S3 air vehicles a month. 'The same distributed manufacturing approach that we have considered for the Hellhound S3 through our supplier partners is the same approach that we're looking to take with S4 again,' Cummings said, such as, 'the combination of U.S. and international partners [and] licensing agreements for the vehicle design, whether it be with the government or with industry partners, in order to meet the production demand.' The company is 'well suited to bring forward the solution set for Golden Dome as part of that layered defensive strategy,' she said. 'Cummings Aerospace was built on missile defense programs. That's how we first got started, and so we have, over the last 16 years, contributed to almost every interceptor, sensor or [command-and-control] program within the missile defense portfolio.' Solve the daily Crossword
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
Skin tightening is getting more advanced — and less painful. Here are the new techniques replacing facelifts.
Facelifts have gotten, well, a facelift. Previously associated with botched celebrity plastic surgeries, facelift techniques have vastly improved over the years, making them more subtle — and more sought out. From Kris Jenner to Lindsay Lohan's recent makeovers, expertly executed (and extremely expensive) facelifts have caught the eye of those wishing they had a spare six figures to shell out for a fresher look. Dr. Joshua Korman, a board-certified plastic surgeon and founder of Korman Plastic Surgery in Northern California, told Business Insider that his office has experienced an uptick in requests for minimally invasive procedures, such as one that involves a small, concealed incision near the hairline to gently lift the skin up. But he's also seen more interest in skin tightening, achieved through less invasive methods (radiofrequency, ultrasound, lasers, microneedling) and sometimes referred to as " non-surgical facelifts" by clients. Though different in their approaches and how they target the skin, these treatments generally work the same way: stimulating collagen production to increase firmness and smooth fine lines. These treatments aren't particularly drastic, especially after just one session. "There's really no such thing as a 'non-surgical facelift' because no matter what, these devices are not going to be able to accomplish what a surgical facelift can accomplish," Dr. Jimmy Sung, a board-certified plastic surgeon and founder of Tribeca Aesthetics in New York City, told BI. However, he said stacking skin-tightening techniques that target different layers of the skin can "achieve a pretty significant, clinically observable end result" similar to a subtle facelift. He said about 50% to 70% of his client roster comes in for some form of skin tightening. So far, the financial roadblocks are steep. But investors are already eyeing the opportunity for cheaper, all-in-one skincare treatments. "This is definitely a growing market," Sung, who's seen more dual-purpose skincare devices on the market, many from South Korea, told BI. "We age in four ways," Korman said. "Gravity, volume loss, dynamic wrinkles, and sun damage." While surgical facelifts (if done well) can be great for tackling the issue of gravity, skin tightening treatments can touch upon all four. The key, Korman said, is starting early and staying consistent. Skin tightening is an umbrella term that refers to triggering natural collagen production in the skin, which boosts cell turnover. An abundance of new skin cells can plump and firm up skin, smooth wrinkles, and fade dark spots. The simplest, cheapest way to boost collagen production is to use vitamin C serums and retinol in your daily skincare routine. Chemical peels, which cost around $1,800 on average, are more potent. They remove dead skin cells on the outer layer of skin while encouraging collagen production. Energy-based devices are the next step and can penetrate deeper layers of the skin, resulting in a more drastic effect. They vary based on your skincare needs: Laser resurfacing targets the outer and middle layers of the skin (epidermis and dermis), smoothing overall skin texture. Non-ablative treatments like Clear + Brilliant and Fraxel (which don't target the outer layer of skin) can cost a few hundred dollars to around $1,000 per session, while ablative laser treatments (which remove dead skin cells from the epidermis), typically cost more. Ultrasound reaches the deeper dermis and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS), the fibrous tissue surrounding facial muscles. Treatments like Ultherapy and Sofwave can create a subtle facelift effect and can cost around $200 per session, adding up to $4,000 or $5,000 in total. Radiofrequency impacts the dermis and subdermal fat, the deepest layer of skin containing both fat and connective tissue. With multiple sessions, it can tighten areas like the neck and jowls. Radiofrequency can also be combined with other treatments like microneedling for a stronger skin tightening and smoothing effect. Treatments like Thermage typically start at $1,000-$4,000 per session. Unlike more involved treatments like surgical facelifts or PDO thread lifts (weaving threads under the skin for the appearance of one), these treatments aren't particularly high risk if you're going to reputable, licensed professionals. With the exception of ablative laser treatments, most have a very short recovery time. Usually, the results last at least a year or even several years, requiring fewer touch-up appointments than Botox. Sung said that, with commitment, ultrasound treatments like Sofwave pay off. "If you do it once a year, you kind of start having this 'Benjamin Button' effect." What's more, skin tightening treatments may line up more with younger generations' skincare habits. While social media-fueled cosmetic injections are all the rage among some Gen Zers, there's a competing " notox" movement," in which people seek to maintain youthful skin without the invasiveness and risks of frozen facial muscles, filler migration, or botched plastic surgery. To many, skin tightening devices can just feel like more intense deviations from prescription retinoids — without involving any knives or needles. Korman, whose daughter is in her 20s and uses a red light mask to prevent wrinkles, feels there's been a generational shift in reducing signs of aging — a big change from the sun-baking trends of decades past. "We're living longer," he said, noting that people are thinking about what they'll look like in their 60s and 70s. "Probably because of social media, people are more educated about this." Brow lifts via Botox — comparable costs, different breakdowns Facelift costs vary wildly, starting from $7,500 to $200,000, depending on the exact procedure and where it's done. To cut down on costs, some consumers try to get similar results through " filler facelifts" and brow lifts à la Botox. The latter, which usually requires upkeep at least a few times a year for as long as one wants those perky eyebrows, can cost a pretty penny. A Botox appointment usually racks up several hundred dollars to $1,000, Korman said, with recommendations to follow up every three to four months. Fillers can range in the thousands, depending on how many syringes are used. Korman said a lot of his patients who come in asking for plastic surgery are partly motivated by seeing the numbers — added altogether, five years of consistent Botox and filler can cost the same as a surgical facelift, so they figure they may as well go all in. Skin tightening treatments aren't much cheaper. But done once a year, some clients might prefer a one-shot skincare treatment that costs more upfront than several sessions of injectables. "It's really important to be an informed consumer," Korman said. "It's good to understand, as best you can, what it is that bothers you and what you can do," rather than hopping on skincare trends like fillers, which he said go in and out of style. Some may also prefer skin tightening, which relies on triggering natural processes in the skin like creating new skin tissue, rather than freezing muscles or adding volume via hyaluronic acid. Botox and fillers "were there to mask aging," Sung said, neither of them slowing down skin aging. "But these devices, they actually make you more youthful." What's next? Because skin tightening treatments target different layers of the skin, Sung usually recommends "stacking" multiple treatments, such as using different ultrasound devices, for more noticeable changes. Doctors are still searching for technologies that can combine multiple features without sacrificing quality. "If you have a machine that's a fax machine, a copier, and a printer, usually it won't do any of them great," Korman said. But he's also seen an "increasing number of devices that are trying to address more than one thing." The wait might not be long. Attending the 2025 Aesthetic Show in Las Vegas, Sung noted new treatments like the XTherma, a radiofrequency device that simultaneously cools the face for added comfort. He said he's seen more interest from investors in merging and combining skin tightening devices for more drastic results. If recent history reveals anything, it's that youthful skin has always been coveted. Investment in achieving it more cheaply and quickly probably won't go to waste. "I have a little poster in one of my offices, which is from 100 years ago, where there's a chin strap you can buy at a pharmacy to stop wrinkles," Korman said. "People were thinking about it a long time ago, but it's gotten a lot more sophisticated in recent times."
