&w=3840&q=100)
German court deals blow to Merz's Trump-like asylum crackdown
Merz had announced the plans to reject refuge to migrants during his campaign after an Afghan asylum seeker fatally stabbed a two-year-old and an adult at the Bavarian town of Aschaffenburg read more
A court in Germany has ruled that the Friedrich Merz administration has violated the law by turning back asylum seekers at the border without following a proper assessment, dealing a blow to the Chancellor's effort to cut down immigration.
Merz had announced the plans to reject refuge to migrants during his campaign after an Afghan asylum seeker fatally stabbed a two-year-old and an adult at the Bavarian town of Aschaffenburg.
Amid rising support for the far-right, anti-immigration Alternative für Germany (AfD), which secured over 20 per cent of the vote and finished second, the conservative leader issued a series of pledges. These promises were swiftly implemented on his first day in office by Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
What has the court said?
The Berlin Administrative Court said on Monday that turning down asylum to immigrants at border controls is unlawful unless they are carried out under EU's Dublin procedure.
The court was hearing the case of three Somali nationals who were sent back to Poland on May 9 as per the new regulation.
'Persons who express the wish to seek asylum while at a border check on German territory may not be sent back before it is known which country is responsible for processing the claim under the EU's so-called 'Dublin' system,' the court said.
What's the case?
On May 9, three individuals—two men and one woman—arrived in Germany by train from Poland. They were stopped by Federal Police at the railway station in Frankfurt an der Oder, located in the eastern state of Brandenburg. Although the trio expressed their intention to seek asylum in Germany, they were sent back to Poland the same day. Authorities justified the decision by stating that the group had entered from a safe third country.
How has the govt responded?
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, who implemented the regulation in Germany, said that the court's ruling applies to one particular case and asserted that the government would continue working on the new system of curbing immigration.
'We will continue with the pushback. We think we have the legal justification for this,' he said.
Dobrindt stated that the Interior Ministry would offer more detailed explanations for the pushbacks, in accordance with the court's request. He also noted that the migrants in question had tried to cross the border three times, only citing their right to asylum on the third attempt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Impact of Trump's new tariffs on steel, aluminium on U.S. economy
While addressing steel workers in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania, Mr. Trump threatened to increase the import tariffs on steel and aluminium from the current 25% to 50% from June 4, upset by the slow progress of a trade deal between the U.S. and the EU. Steel and aluminium are used as basic inputs in a host of industries and sectors ranging from transportation (rail, road, sea and air), defence and aerospace, household appliances, engineering machinery of all kinds, agricultural tools and implements, civil engineering and construction, power generation and transmission and a whole lot of others. Now that the tariffs have come into effect, they would further increase the domestic prices of goods and services in the U.S. where steel and aluminium are used, either as intermediate products and inputs or as fully finished products, lower the consumer and industrial demand for such products and slow down the overall growth of the economy, as steel and aluminium happen to be key basic inputs used in a wide variety of industries and economic activities. The U.S. economy had contracted by 0.2% in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the previous quarter, while inflation had declined to 2.31% at the end of April 2025, still higher than the threshold level of 2% for the Federal Reserve to start cutting interest rates again. Impact on GDP With the economic and trade disruption caused by uncertain trade policies and the widening U.S. Budget deficit, there is a fear that U.S. inflation may go up again, forcing the Federal Reserve to postpone its interest rate cuts to September, and in a worst-case scenario, towards the end of the year. The Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has forecast a slowing down of the U.S. GDP growth rate to 1.6% in 2025 from 2.8% in 2024 and a fall in World GDP growth rate to 2.9% for 2025 as compared to 3.3% in the previous year. In April 2025, the U.S. economy added 1,77,000 new jobs, exceeding previous expectations, though falling short of the 2,56,000 new jobs generated in December 2024, the last month of the Biden administration, before Mr. Trump assumed office. The unemployment rate, however, remained steady at 4.2% April 2025. Loss of consumer's surplus Economic theory tells us that when an import tariff is imposed on a commodity in a free-market economy following free international trade, the higher tariff-inclusive price will become the new domestic price. It reduces the consumer's surplus, which is calculated as the notional difference between what consumers are prepared to pay for a product or service and what they actually end up paying - the lower the actual price the higher the consumer's surplus and vice versa. It transfers some of this lost consumer's surplus to the domestic producers of the import competing industry as producer's surplus, while the rest (of the lost consumer's surplus) is treated as a deadweight loss to society as a whole. Still, Governments all over the world use import tariffs as measures to increase Government revenue (ultimately paid for by the domestic consumers) and to support domestic manufacturers of the import competing products for generating local employment, incomes and economic growth. Rarely are tariffs used as measures to promote national security which Mr. Trump is signalling in justification of his new 50% levies on steel and aluminium imports. Nominal vs. effective rate The rate of effective protection provided by an import tariff to domestic producers of an import competing product is perceived to be high, if the tariff on the imported input used in the manufacture of that product is lower than the tariff on the imported finished product. Otherwise, the domestic producers suffer the consequences of negative protection and the anomalies of an inverted duty structure, which arises when the tax rate on inputs used to produce goods or services is greater than the tax rate on the finished output. Impact on U.S. auto units Let us consider the impact of Mr. Trump's new tariff levies on steel and aluminium imports on the American automobile producers. Currently automobile imports into the U.S. from the EU attract an import tariff of 25%. With the new 50% import tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from the EU and other countries (excepting U.K.), American producers of automobiles who use steel and aluminium as inputs in their manufacturing process, will not only see a sharp rise in their manufacturing costs, but will also see the 25% import tariff on automobiles not providing the protection that it is intended to provide. Far from providing a positive rate of effective protection, the proposed higher tariffs of 50% on steel and aluminium imports, will end up as disincentives to ramping up domestic production of automobiles in the US. Domestic firms Let us illustrate this with a hypothetical example. Assume the basic starting price of a Ford Mustang car in the U.S. is $30,000. The cost of steel and aluminium parts used in the Mustang car is $20,000. The U.S. is taxing a comparable car model of the EU imported into the U.S. (Volkswagen Jetta), an import tariff of 25%, but the imported steel and aluminium metals and components, an import tariff of 50%. The rate of effective protection provided to Ford to ramp up the domestic production of Mustang car can be estimated using the following formula: g = {(t-a¡t¡) / (1-a¡)} where, g= rate of effective protection to domestic producers of the final product, t= nominal tariff rate on consumers of the final product, a¡= ratio of the cost of the imported input to the price of the final product in the absence of tariffs, t¡= the nominal tariff rate on the imported input. In the above example: t= 25% t¡= 50% price of final product = $30,000 cost of steel input = $20,000 Negative vs. positive rate Using the above formula for estimating the rate of effective protection, g can be calculated as -0.25 or -25%, which is a negative rate and acts as a disincentive for ramping up the domestic production of Ford Mustang cars. On the other hand, if the import tariff on steel and aluminium metals and parts is fixed at 10%, like the basic import tariff on all other imports announced by Mr. Trump, then the rate of effective protection, g, will be 0.55 or 55%, which will be a sufficient incentive for Ford to ramp up the domestic production of its Mustang cars. (The writer is former associate professor of economics, Loyola College, Chennai)
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
French trade minister meets Piyush Goyal, says France one of India's best economic partners
'With my Indian counterpart Piyush Goyal, I reaffirmed a conviction: France is one of India's best economic partners… Reforms, stability, innovation, access to EU and India markets: there's everything to strengthen our bilateral relationship,' Saint-Martin stated in a post on X. The minister highlighted the potential to further strengthen bilateral ties through 'reforms, stability, innovation, and enhanced market access to the EU and Indian markets.' Paris : French Foreign Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin on Tuesday reaffirmed the 'conviction' that France is one of 'India's best economic partners' after his meeting with Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal in Paris. Following his meeting with Goyal, Saint-Martin also expressed optimism about the ongoing India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations, anticipating a possible agreement in the coming weeks or months. 'It's important to demonstrate that we believe in free trade, not trade wars,' he stressed. 'Minister Goyal arrived with a strong business delegation – over 50 companies, which is significant. At a time when global trade is facing challenges, we believe it's crucial for India and France to strengthen their ties… The European Union and India are progressing toward a Free Trade Agreement, and as a member of the European Commission, we fully support this… I'm optimistic that we could see an agreement in the coming weeks or months… It's important to demonstrate that we believe in free trade, not trade wars,' the French Minister told reporters. He emphasised the importance of fostering deeper cross-border trade and investments between the two nations. 'At the same time, we must foster deeper bilateral relations between France and India, which means enhancing cross-investments, more cross-border trade… All the friendship that President Macron and PM Modi have will, of course, help our bilateral relations to go deeper now,' he added. Earlier on Monday, the Union Minister held a productive meeting with French Minister of Economy, Finance, and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty, Eric Lombard, focusing on deepening the India-France economic partnership with an emphasis on trade, investments, and technology cooperation. The discussions, which took place during Goyal's three-day official visit to France, also reviewed the progress of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations, signalling a strong intent to bolster bilateral ties amidst a shared commitment to innovation and economic growth. 'Held a productive meeting with Eric Lombard, French Minister of Economy, Finance, and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty. Exchanged views on deepening our economic partnership, enhancing trade & investments with a special focus on technology and innovation across key sectors. Also discussed the progress of the India-EU FTA negotiations. Looking forward to stronger India-France economic ties,' Goyal said in a post on X. He also expressed optimism that India could finalise its Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the European Union (EU) ahead of the year-end deadline, citing minimal divergences between the two economic blocs. Goyal also held a series of high-level meetings in Paris with top French CEOs to explore new opportunities for India's growth across key sectors such as renewable energy, automobile manufacturing, electric vehicles (EVs), and consumer products. The minister commenced his three-day official visit to Paris on Sunday as part of his ongoing visit to France and Italy from 1 to 5 June 2025. This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content Also read: US, India to give preferential access to each other's businesses, says Piyush Goyal
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
3 World War II bombs defused in German city's biggest postwar evacuation
Last Updated: Cologne, Jun 4 (AP) Three unexploded US bombs from World War II were defused on Wednesday in Cologne after the German city's biggest evacuation since the end of the war. More than 20,000 residents were evacuated from the city centre earlier Wednesday after the bombs were unearthed on Monday during preparatory work for road construction. Experts defused the bombs within about an hour, city authorities said in a statement. Even 80 years after the end of the war, unexploded bombs dropped during wartime air raids are frequently found in Germany. Sometimes, large-scale precautionary evacuations are needed. The location this time was unusually prominent — just across the Rhine River from Cologne's historic centre. Significantly bigger evacuations have occurred in other German cities. The evacuations included homes, 58 hotels, nine schools, a hospital and two nursing homes, several museums and office buildings and the Messe/Deutz train station. It also included three bridges across the Rhine, including the heavily used Hohenzollern railway bridge, which leads into Cologne's central station. Shipping on the Rhine also was suspended. Clearance to go ahead with defusing the bombs was delayed somewhat because one person refused in the historic centre initially refused to leave their home, city authorities said. (AP) GSP
