Macao police arrest former pro-democracy lawmaker for colluding with foreign forces
Local media outlets reported former pro-democracy lawmaker Au Kam San was the suspect.
A police statement Thursday said the 68-year-old Macao resident with the surname Au allegedly colluded with an anti-China group outside of the city and provided false and seditious materials for public display online or abroad.
The man, whose full name was not disclosed in the statement, also was accused of maintaining long-term contact with multiple anti-China entities outside of Macao and repeatedly providing unfounded information to them or their media outlets for dissemination.
'This was intended to incite hatred against China's central government and Macao's government among Macao residents and even people from other countries who may not understand the truth," police said.
The authorities added that the acts aimed to undermine Macao's 2024 chief executive election and trigger hostile actions by foreign countries against Macao.
Au was taken from his home Wednesday afternoon for investigation, they said.
Local media outlets in Hong Kong and Macao reported the man was Au. Online outlet All About Macao said it was the first publicly known arrest under the national security law after the legislation was enacted in 2009 and revised in 2023.
Au's wife arrived at the prosecution's office on Thursday and was listed as a 'witness," the outlet added. The Associated Press could not reach Au by phone Thursday afternoon.
Au served as a pro-democracy lawmaker in Macao's legislature dominated by Beijing loyalists before stepping down in 2021. He remained a rare voice in the city who still regularly criticized government measures and political development on Facebook and in media interviews.
Since the former Portuguese colony returned to Chinese rule in 1999, Macao has grown from a monopoly-driven gambling enclave into the world's biggest gaming hub.
Under Beijing's grip, its pro-democracy camp was never as influential as the one in neighboring city Hong Kong, which is a former British colony that returned to China in 1997. Its government also faced far less massive protests challenging its rule when compared to Hong Kong.
More intrusive political controls were introduced to the casino hub in recent years, especially after huge anti-government protests in Hong Kong in 2019 that led Beijing to crack down on virtually all public dissent.
A vigil commemorating China's bloody 1989 military crackdown on the Tiananmen Square pro-democracy protests was banned. Pro-democracy figures were barred from running in Macao's 2021 legislative elections. Earlier this month, an incumbent lawmaker known for his centrist stance was also disqualified from running in this year's legislative election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump taking on Modi risks worst of both worlds
Secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian oil were meant to be the bunker buster in Washington's sanctions armoury, a weapon so devastating it would cripple Moscow's economy. Yet by appearing to punish India alone, Donald Trump risks squandering its impact. He may end up with the worst of all worlds: dropping a bomb too small to do significant damage to Russia while alienating a vital ally and counterweight to China. After months of resolutely refusing to punish Russia, the US president has changed tack. Convinced that Vladimir Putin has no interest in ending the war in Ukraine, Mr Trump has concluded that targeting Russia's energy sector – which generates a third of government revenue – is the key pressure point. 'If energy goes down, Putin is going to stop killing people,' he said this week. India has undeniably helped prop up the Kremlin's war machine, buying £42bn of Russian oil last year. But other nations have also helped fund Putin's invasion. China buys more than India, while Turkey, Brazil, the United Arab Emirates and even some European Union states are significant consumers. It is possible that Mr Trump may widen his net in the coming days. He has given Putin until Friday to agree to a ceasefire or face consequences. Until now, Russia has faced a 10 per cent tariff, the lowest level Mr Trump applies. That figure is almost certain to rise, but with bilateral trade at £3.9bn last year, such a move will barely trouble the Kremlin. More direct sanctions on Russia's banks or its shadow tanker fleet could follow, but these too seem unlikely to force a change of course. Secondary tariffs on countries buying Russian oil could, in theory, bite harder. Yet, by singling out India with a 25 per cent penalty, the weapon has been fired half-cocked. Analysts speculate that Mr Trump may extend the measures to other countries. If that is his intent, it is curious he would shame India rather than wait 48 hours to announce a broader policy. The strategy risks misfiring. Narendra Modi, India's prime minister, has endured repeated humiliations from a man he once called a friend. Yet in recent months Mr Trump has imposed higher tariffs on India than on most of its Asian competitors and caused anguish by courting Pakistan, which is closely aligned with China. With public anger in India growing over Washington's perceived high-handedness, Mr Modi would find it politically tricky to halt all Russian oil purchases, even if he wished to. Given the importance of the US market for Indian exports, he may have to find a fudge. Any concession, however, will come at a cost. Analysts say India is now likely to edge closer to China and Russia, weakening one of Washington's most valuable relationships in Asia. Even if India reduces imports, it is unclear whether losing a single buyer – even one as important as Delhi – will seriously dent Russia's war economy. A policy that leaves Putin undeterred while estranging India is hardly a triumph of statecraft – though final judgment must wait until Mr Trump reveals the rest of his plan.
Times
30 minutes ago
- Times
Angela Rayner orders China to explain redacted mega-embassy plans
The deputy prime minister has told China that it must explain why parts of the plans for its new mega-embassy in London have been redacted as she prepares to rule on whether it can go ahead. Angela Rayner, who is also the minister in charge of planning, has given Beijing two weeks to justify why several areas are blacked out in drawings of its proposed redevelopment of the former home of the Royal Mint. In a letter from her department, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, it was revealed that a decision will be taken on the giant embassy on or before September 9. The department said that while 'no view has yet been formed', Rayner had been made aware of 'concerns' over redacted parts of the plans. It told Beijing that it must provide unredacted versions of the plans or 'identify precisely and comprehensively' the plans that have been redacted and to 'explain the rationale and justification'. The letter also said the Home Office had pointed out that a 'hard perimeter' would be needed around the embassy but that this may need a new planning application. Luke de Pulford, executive director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, which revealed the letter, told The Times: 'There's such hubris in Beijing that they think they can get away with simply hiding swathes of their mega-embassy from legitimate scrutiny. 'They also think they can bluntly refuse the very modest conditions placed upon their disastrous development by the foreign and home secretaries, and have their plan get the green light regardless. 'The government should stand firm by their conditions, because China won't meet them in time. This letter could be the beginning of the end for this ruinous plan.' The letter from Rayner's department suggested she would need to be persuaded that she could make a 'lawful determination' on the plans if they remained redacted. Beijing plans to move its diplomatic mission in the UK to Royal Mint Court, a 5.5-acre site in East Smithfield on the east side of the City of London. It was home to the Royal Mint until 1967. It would be the largest Chinese embassy in Europe. The 20,000 sq m plot would be transformed into an enormous complex designed by Sir David Chipperfield, the prizewinning architect behind the Neues Museum in Berlin and the Turner Contemporary in Margate. The planning decision for the embassy was called in by Rayner, the housing secretary, last year. The plan was initially refused by Tower Hamlets council in 2022. Sir Keir Starmer's government has attempted to improve relations with China since last year's general election but he has been urged by the United States to block Beijing's plans. The Chinese embassy in London was contacted for comment.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Apple to invest another $100B in the US
President Donald Trump will appear alongside Apple CEO Tim Cook as the tech giant announces another $100 billion in investment in the United States. Apple will commit to the creation of an 'American Manufacturing Program,' as Trump has pushed for more of the company's supply chain to be moved back to the United States. 'President Trump's America First economic agenda has secured trillions in dollars in investments that support American jobs and bolster American businesses,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers told the Daily Mail in a statement. 'Today's announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security,' she added. Overall, Apple has made a $600 billion commitment to the U.S. over the next four years. Already, the phone and computer maker supports more than 450,000 jobs in the U.S., spanning all 50 states. Traditionally, Apple has produced its popular iPhone in China, but more recently has moved some of its production to India. During his trip to the Middle East in mid-May, Trump admonished Cook for the India move. 'I had a little problem with Tim Cook yesterday,' Trump said during an event in Doha, Qatar. 'I said to him: "Tim, you're my friend. You're coming here with $500 billion but now you're building all over India. I don't want you building in India,"' the president said. In the hours ahead of the Apple announcement, Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 percent tariff on India after the country purchased Russian oil. The new tariff will go into effect in 21 days and will be on top of the 25 percent tariff already on Indian imports. When Trump originally announced his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on April 2, smartphones, chips and other tech products were exempt. It appears that policy continues to hold despite the additional round of tariff threats. No iPhones are currently made in the United States and experts have warned that doing so would increase the cost of the popular smartphones exponentially. The Chinese have mocked the idea of United States bringing back widespread manufacturing. In April, amid Trump's trade war with China, a number of Chinese AI videos went viral that showed overweight Americans working on assembly lines. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt blasted the videos saying that 'whoever made it clearly does not see the potential of the American worker, the American workforce.'
