
More than 100 MPs threaten to halt welfare reforms in PM's biggest rebellion
Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on a reasoned amendment declining to give the welfare reform Bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on July 1.
The rebellion, the Prime Minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the Government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels.
The amendment, published on Tuesday's order paper, notes there is a 'need for the reform of the social security system'.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's Commons majority could be under threat by rebel Labour MPs opposed to his Government's welfare reform plans (Jordan Pettitt/PA)
But it calls for the Commons to decline to continue scrutinising the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill 'because the Government's own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of these provisions, including 50,000 children'.
There has been no formal consultation with disabled people who will be impacted by the changes, the MPs said.
They also point to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn.
Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including chairwoman of the Treasury committee Dame Meg Hillier, and Debbie Abrahams, chairwoman of the work and pensions select committee.
The MPs who signed the amendment 'want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill', Ms Abrahams said.
She added: 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.'
Vicky Foxcroft, the former Government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has also signed the amendment.
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading.
Under the proposals in the Bill, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC).
Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year.
Amid the growing threat of rebellion, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden warned on Tuesday morning it would be a 'very serious thing' for Labour MPs to effectively vote down the Bill at its first major outing in the Commons.
He added: 'You're right to point out that this phrase reasoned amendment isn't just a small tweak. It would stop the legislative process if it succeeded.'
Mr McFadden insisted the growing costs of welfare were unsustainable, as a 'city the size of Leicester' was being added to the population on benefits each year.
Pat McFadden said the increasing welfare bill was unsustainable (James Manning/PA)
'I don't think as the party of labour, the party of work, we can sit back and be relaxed about so many people going on to long-term sickness and disability benefits,' he added.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall spent Monday night speaking to backbench MPs about the reforms at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP).
Those leaving the meeting insisted there was broad consensus in the room, with only few MPs standing up to make their opposition known.
The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'.
She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it.
Ms Kendall added: 'Above all, they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support.
'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
36 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Car makers call for planned easing of electricity costs to go further
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) called for the proposed relief on standing charges included in the Industrial Strategy published on Monday – which will apply to battery manufacturing – to be extended to automotive manufacturing. It stated that UK automotive manufacturers pay more for electricity than anywhere else in Europe, and in excess of double the average. This is partly because of energy taxes which are six times higher and added more than £200 million to manufacturers' bills last year, the SMMT said. It stated: 'Rapid implementation of the reforms to industrial energy costs set out in the Industrial Strategy would cut the sector's electricity bill by a fifth, helping ease this structural disadvantage.' The SMMT added that compared with other major economies, the UK has the highest business rates and is 'among the worst for the burden of government regulation'. It called for the Government to 'recreate a competitive edge', declaring that 'the time now is for giant leaps'. SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said: 'We welcome the Government's Industrial Strategy, a 10-year plan which answers our call for a long-term commitment to automotive manufacturing. 'With action to reduce electricity costs, upskill workers and unlock finance, it lays the foundation on which we can build our future. 'We now need to see the strategy implemented and at pace, because competitors will move fast so our window of opportunity will not remain open for long. 'The prize, however, in terms of jobs, innovation and economic growth – green growth at that – is worth the investment.'

Rhyl Journal
38 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Car makers call for planned easing of electricity costs to go further
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) called for the proposed relief on standing charges included in the Industrial Strategy published on Monday – which will apply to battery manufacturing – to be extended to automotive manufacturing. It stated that UK automotive manufacturers pay more for electricity than anywhere else in Europe, and in excess of double the average. This is partly because of energy taxes which are six times higher and added more than £200 million to manufacturers' bills last year, the SMMT said. It stated: 'Rapid implementation of the reforms to industrial energy costs set out in the Industrial Strategy would cut the sector's electricity bill by a fifth, helping ease this structural disadvantage.' The SMMT added that compared with other major economies, the UK has the highest business rates and is 'among the worst for the burden of government regulation'. It called for the Government to 'recreate a competitive edge', declaring that 'the time now is for giant leaps'. SMMT chief executive Mike Hawes said: 'We welcome the Government's Industrial Strategy, a 10-year plan which answers our call for a long-term commitment to automotive manufacturing. 'With action to reduce electricity costs, upskill workers and unlock finance, it lays the foundation on which we can build our future. 'We now need to see the strategy implemented and at pace, because competitors will move fast so our window of opportunity will not remain open for long. 'The prize, however, in terms of jobs, innovation and economic growth – green growth at that – is worth the investment.'


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
What countries are in Nato and how much do they spend on defence?
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to meet a new Nato target to spend 5% of the UK's GDP on national security by Secretary General Mark Rutte has called on members to commit 3.5% on core defence spending, and the remaining 1.5% on related areas such as resilience and are expected to agree the 5% goal at a two-day Nato summit in the Netherlands. What is Nato and why was it set up? Nato - the North Atlantic Treaty Organization - was formed in Washington DC in 1949 by 12 founding members were Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the UK and the US. Nato's primary purpose was to block expansion in Europe by the former Soviet Union - a group of communist republics which included agree that if one of them is attacked, the others will help defend does not have its own army, but member states can take collective military action in response to international instance, the alliance supported the UN by intervening in the war in the former Yugoslavia between 1992 and also co-ordinates military plans and carries out joint military exercises. Which countries are Nato members? Nato has 32 members across Europe and North America - the original 12 founders plus 20 countries which have joined since the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991, many Eastern European countries became members, including Albania, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Finland - which has a 1,340km (832 mile) land border with Russia - joined in April 2023. Sweden became a member in March been neutral for decades, both applied to Nato in May 2022, shortly after Russia invaded Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia have also asked to join. How much do Nato members spend on defence? Nato members are currently expected to spend 2% of their national income, or GDP on defence. The US and countries which are close to Russia - such as Poland and the Baltic states - have traditionally spent the most on is thought that 23 countries met the 2% target in 2024, compared to only three in 2014. The new split 5% target is seen as a concession to US President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly urged European Nato allies to boost defence spending. The US currently spends 3.4%. Nato chief Rutte said the US had agreed to meet the new target, although Trump later suggested it might not. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said France, Germany, the Baltic and Nordic countries, Poland, Greece and Hungary backed the 5% - which spent just 1.24% of GDP on defence in 2024 - said it had secured an opt-out from the new spending plan, something Rutte later February, Sir Keir set out plans to increase the UK's core defence spending to 2.5% by April 2027 and expressed a "clear ambition" to reach 3% by 2034 if economic conditions government has now said it will spend 2.6% on core defence and 1.5% on wider security measures by 2027. Core defence spending is not expected to hit 3.5% until has not confirmed how it will fund the additional spending. Why isn't Ukraine a member of Nato? Russia has consistently opposed the idea of Ukraine becoming a member, fearing it would bring Nato forces too close to its in 2008, the alliance said that Ukraine could eventually Russia's invasion, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky asked for this process to be Nato chief Jens Stoltenberg said Ukraine could join "in the long term" but not until after the war ended. However, speaking at a defence summit in Brussels in February 2025, Defence Secretary Hegseth said "the US does not believe that Nato membership for Ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement".Some Nato defence chiefs pushed back against the later said he was prepared to "give up" his presidency if it meant Ukraine could join Nato."If to achieve peace you really need me to give up my post, I'm ready," he told reporters."I can trade it for Nato membership."Nato previously described Russia's invasion of Ukraine as the "most significant and direct threat to allies' security".It has not sent troops to Ukraine or enforced a no-fly zone over the country for fear of being pulled into a direct conflict with individual member states have supplied arms and to the German research organisation the Kiel Institute, the US spent 65bn euros (£55.6bn) on military support between February 2022 and April 2025 - although no new aid was allocated in March or April. European Nato members provided aid worth 72bn euros (£61.6bn) over the same period.