logo
Indiana should cap out-of-state student enrollment to solve brain drain

Indiana should cap out-of-state student enrollment to solve brain drain

Indiana has long been a hotspot for out-of-state students, around 85% of whom return home after graduation. Recent data also shows Indiana residents are going out of state for college more than ever.
A provision hidden in President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill helped address this problem by capping the amount of debt graduate students can take on to pay for college, making it nearly impossible for them to afford studying out of state.
Indiana needs to follow suit by capping out-of-state enrollment at public universities and tying university funding directly to in-state student enrollment.
Opinion: Indiana's college crisis has nothing to do with woke campuses or high costs
An enrollment cap may seem harsh, but North Carolina and California have already successfully enacted one. Indiana almost followed suit with Senate Enrolled Act 448, but its enrollment cap provision was removed due in part to backlash from Purdue University.
That backlash emphasized how state funding cuts to higher education have created a perverse incentive for colleges to market themselves to out-of-state students and subsidize lower tuition for in-state students. That's the wrong approach.
Giving a higher proportion of enrollment capacity to out-of-state students can be beneficial to their bottom line in the short-term. But, over a lifetime, bachelor's degree recipients add around $700,443 more than high school graduates to the economy through higher taxes and spending. They also file less than one-third of unemployment claims and are one-third as likely to be in poverty.
Opinion: Mike Braun's tuition freeze for Indiana colleges is a marketing gimmick
Recognizing that, the state should direct public universities to cut unnecessary or ineffective initiatives and focus more on the academic needs of in-state students.
As an example of unnecessary spending, Indiana University-Indianapolis spent $1.6 million just on diversity, equity and inclusion administrative staff salaries and its Social Justice Scholars program during the 2023-2024 school year. Thankfully, IU recently closed the Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.
IU-Bloomington still gives its student government a nearly $300,000 annual budget with little to no oversight. In turn, it has spent $48,000 on DEI programs, $35,000 on emergency contraception, $4,000 on mail-order lubricants and condoms and much more.
Now, though, Indiana University is starting to make "deliberate and targeted reductions" in expenses as a result of state budget cuts. That's an acknowledgment that Indiana's public universities have room to cut spending without making up for budget cuts by bringing in out-of-state students.
Despite these budget cuts, the Indiana General Assembly is still prone to wasting taxpayer dollars on schools' pet projects.
For example, they recently gave $89 million to IU Indianapolis to build another athletics center and an additional $89 million for restroom upgrades, painting projects and other infrastructure upgrades.
The state could more efficiently use taxpayer dollars to serve the public if it redirected this money to fund tuition for students with financial need. Just that $178 million could more than double the 21st Century Scholarship Program's budget for awards.
Gov. Mike Braun has long emphasized the importance of Indiana's public universities serving residents first.
He recently pushed for a tuition freeze for in-state undergraduate students in exchange for a modest tuition increase for graduate students and those from out-of-state. He has also pushed them to offer automatic admission to in-state students who obtain an Enrollment Honors Plus diploma seal.
However, not all state agencies have fully embraced Braun's resident-first approach. The Commission for Higher Education has long focused on keeping graduates in Indiana by connecting students — both residents and out-of-state — with local job opportunities during and after college.
"It is critical in retaining talent to connect both resident and non-resident students to local employers as a way to better align degrees with a student's intended career and help them to see Indiana as a place where they could stay, work, and build a future," a spokesperson for the Commission for Higher Education told me.
Trying to retain people who grew up across the country is a lost cause. Few young adults move far from where they grew up.
It is getting even harder to put down roots anywhere at all in an economy where homeownership and the ability to obtain affordable housing is becoming further out-of-reach for young people.
Studies have shown the homeownership rate among student borrowers declined by 24% from 2009 to 2019, so the problem is clearly getting worse — and student debt is playing a role. Gen Z, in fact, has racked up almost twice as much debt as the previous generation.
Banning or capping out-of-state enrollment at public universities altogether or tying university funding to in-state student enrollment, then, is the most realistic way to stop Indiana's brain drain and ensure our public universities are sufficiently motivated to serve Indiana first.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Putin direct talks over Ukraine conclude as summit stretches on
Trump-Putin direct talks over Ukraine conclude as summit stretches on

CNBC

time19 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump-Putin direct talks over Ukraine conclude as summit stretches on

U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin met face-to-face for almost three hours over Moscow's war in Ukraine on Friday, the Kremlin said, as the two world leaders sought an end to the deadliest conflict in Europe in 80 years. There was no immediate word on whether the talks had produced any progress toward a ceasefire in the war, a goal that Trump had set at the outset. The pair were set to jointly speak to reporters shortly. Trump and Putin, along with top foreign-policy aides, conferred in a room at an Air Force base in Anchorage, Alaska in their first meeting since 2019. A blue backdrop behind them had the words "Pursuing Peace" printed on it. Trump's publicly stated aim for the talks was to secure a halt to the fighting and a commitment by Putin to meet swiftly with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to negotiate an end to the war, which began when Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022. Earlier in the week, Trump said he would know if Putin was serious about peace within minutes of seeing him. He also threatened to walk out of the talks if they were unproductive. Zelenskiy, who was not invited to the summit, and his European allies fear Trump might sell out Ukraine by essentially freezing the conflict with Russia and recognizing - if only informally - Russian control over one-fifth of Ukraine. Trump sought to assuage such concerns as he boarded Air Force One, saying he would let Ukraine decide on any possible territorial swaps. "I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table," he said. Asked what would make the meeting a success, he told reporters: "I want to see a ceasefire rapidly ... I'm not going to be happy if it's not today ... I want the killing to stop." Once on the ground in Alaska, Trump greeted Putin on a red carpet on the base's tarmac. The two shook hands warmly and touched each other on the arm before riding in Trump's limo to the summit site nearby. The initial talks also included U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump's special envoy to Russia, Steve Witkoff, Russian foreign policy aide Yury Ushakov and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. Trump hopes a truce in the 3-1/2-year-old war that Putin started will bring peace to the region as well as bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. For Putin, the summit is already a big win that he can portray as evidence that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Moscow is retaking its rightful place at the top table of international diplomacy. Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court, accused of the war crime of deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Russia denies allegations of war crimes and the Kremlin has dismissed the ICC warrant as null and void. Russia and the United States are not members of the court. Both Moscow and Kyiv deny targeting civilians in the war. But thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. A conservative estimate of dead and injured in the war in Ukraine - from both sides combined - totals 1.2 million people, Trump's envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, said in May. Trump, who once said he would end Russia's war in Ukraine within 24 hours, conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher task than he had expected. He said if Friday's talks went well, quickly arranging a second, three-way summit with Zelenskiy would be more important than his encounter with Putin. Zelenskiy said Friday's summit should open the way for a "just peace" and three-way talks that included him, but added that Russia was continuing to wage war. A Russian ballistic missile earlier struck Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region, killing one person and wounding another. "It's time to end the war, and the necessary steps must be taken by Russia. We are counting on America," Zelenskiy wrote on the Telegram messaging app. Zelenskiy has ruled out formally handing Moscow any territory and is also seeking a security guarantee backed by the United States. Trump said before the summit that there is mutual respect between him and Putin. "He is a smart guy, been doing it for a long time, but so have I ... We get along," Trump said of Putin. He also welcomed Putin's decision to bring businesspeople to Alaska. "But they're not doing business until we get the war settled," he said, repeating a threat of "economically severe" consequences for Russia if the summit goes badly. The United States has had internal discussions on using Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker vessels to support the development of gas and LNG projects in Alaska as one of the possible deals to aim for, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. One source acquainted with Kremlin thinking said there were signs Moscow could be ready to strike a compromise on Ukraine, given that Putin understood Russia's economic vulnerability and costs of continuing the war. Reuters has previously reported that Putin might be willing to freeze the conflict along the front lines, provided there was a legally binding pledge not to enlarge NATO eastwards and to lift some Western sanctions. NATO has said Ukraine's future is in the alliance. Russia, whose war economy is showing strain, is vulnerable to further U.S. sanctions - and Trump has threatened tariffs on buyers of Russian crude, primarily China and India. "For Putin, economic problems are secondary to goals, but he understands our vulnerability and costs," the Russian source said. Putin this week held out the prospect of something else he knows Trump wants - a new nuclear arms control accord to replace the last surviving one, which is due to expire in February. Russia has said it is open to a full ceasefire but that how it would be monitored needs to be agreed. One compromise could be a truce in the air war.

Treasury restricts solar, wind subsidies
Treasury restricts solar, wind subsidies

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Treasury restricts solar, wind subsidies

The passed by Republicans last month axes the credits for projects that don't begin producing electricity by 2028. However, it contains an exemption for projects that begin construction over the next year. Under the law, those projects would remain eligible for the subsidies even if they don't produce electricity under the specified time frame. The Trump administration's new guidance, however, sets further restrictions on which projects are considered having begun construction. It says that construction of these projects must be 'continuous.' It also defines having begun construction as having done 'physical work of a significant nature.' This includes activities like manufacturing equipment and excavating land to begin placing equipment in it. But it excludes activities like only having done surveys, test drilling or excavation for purposes of altering the landscape. The guidance also says that even if the project meets those other requirements, it still must produce electricity by the end of the fourth calendar year after it begins construction. The renewable energy industry criticized the guidance, saying it would slow the buildup of low-carbon energy sources. 'This is yet another act of energy subtraction from the Trump administration that will further delay the buildout of affordable, reliable power. American families and businesses will pay more for electricity as a result of this action, and China will continue to outpace us in the race for electricity to power AI,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a written statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store