Trump's executive order seeks to remove homeless from streets. What is seen in Erie County
The executive action makes it easier for cities and states to remove homeless people from the streets by ending consent decrees that limit local and state governments' ability to move homeless people into treatment centers and other facilities.
The issues that pertain to homelessness that the executive order focuses on are seen in Erie County.
The 2024 PA 605 In Time Census, as cited by the Erie County Home Team Homeless and Housing Coalition, provides the following statistics of note for the county:
454 residents in Erie County we're identified as homeless.
76 residents were unsheltered and living in a place that was considered inhumane.
378 were living in an emergency shelter or a transitional housing program.
37 families could be found in shelters consisting of 116 people and 37 children under the age of 18.
47% of adults dealing with homelessness battled mental illness while 36% battled substance abuse.
An additional 577 people were in supportive housing or considered 'near homeless."
"Talking to all of my colleagues across the country like in Philadelphia, their challenges are far different than ours in Erie County," Erie County Executive Brenton Davis said. "Honestly, I am thankful for the first world problems that we have. For all the different things that we have, we know what the finite number is and if you know what the number is then you can work towards solving it."
From 2024: Erie County opens single-site location for Our Neighbors' Place overflow homeless shelter
What to know about the executive order
The executive order is divided into several objectives, according to Whitehouse.gov which provides the following order details:
The purpose and policy (of the order) which is due to the endemic vagrancy, disorderly behavior, sudden confrontations and violent attacks making cities unsafe.
Restoring civil commitment and what to take appropriate action on.
Fighting vagrancy on America's streets and how immediate steps will be taken to assess grants.
The redirection of federal resources towards effective methods of addressing homelessness and where to take appropriate action.
The increase in accountability and safety in America's homelessness programs.
Finally, the general provisions of the order.
The full order can be found on Whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions.
"To me, anything that provides a resource to local government to be flexible to solve the issues in our community I fully support," Davis said.
Organizations in Erie to assist with homelessness
In Erie, there are multiple organizations that are on the front lines in battling homelessness, including but not limited to the Erie City Mission, Mercy Center for Women, Mental Health Association, Emmaus Soup Kitchen, Erie County Care Management and more.
Endhomlessnesseirecountypa.org provides a list of multiple resources from shelters to free clothing to medical services and more.
More: Could visit to Erie's Mercy Center for Women help the state craft a maternal health plan?
"I can only speak to this locally, Erie County is a social service-rich environment," Davis said. "Everything is finite, resources and funding are finite. I think it's a matter of finding an array of tools to make it more accessible and flexible. That'll be the key."
Contact Nicholas Sorensen at nsorensen@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: What to know about homelessness in Erie County
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US lenders weighed reputation rules, not politics, in closing accounts, sources say
By Nupur Anand and Saeed Azhar NEW YORK (Reuters) -Decisions by some major U.S. banks to close accounts were based on rules around reputational risk, people familiar with the matter said, pushing back on President Donald Trump's accusation that he and his conservative supporters were denied services for political reasons. Trump on Tuesday renewed his criticism of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, saying they discriminated against him by refusing to accept hundreds of millions of dollars in deposits. While banks have been careful not to contradict the president directly and provoke his ire, two industry sources cited regulations under the former President Joe Biden's administration that forced them to weigh reputational risks as the reason lenders have dropped clients or avoided others. The sources declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. One bank was concerned about this issue when dealing with Trump because of his legal woes during the Biden administration, the first source said. Spokespeople for JPMorgan and Bank of America both said they do not consider political affiliations in banking decisions and welcomed Trump's efforts to change regulations. A source familiar with the matter said that JPMorgan continues to have a banking relationship with members of the Trump family and it also banks a number of campaign accounts linked to Trump. The White House did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. BIDEN ERA RULES Under the Biden era, regulators who oversaw the banks would judge the lenders' compliance with the rules, which banks said were based on subjective judgments by government supervisors, the first industry source said. Banks were also concerned about whether regulators would punish them for providing services to individuals who faced legal proceedings, like Trump, the first and second sources said. The main U.S. bank regulators -- the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency -- have all directed its supervisors this year to stop considering reputational risk when examining banks, a metric that had drawn industry complaints for being too subjective. "The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion," the Bank Policy Institute, an industry group, said in a statement. A looming executive order expected as early as this week would instruct regulators to review banks for "politicized or unlawful debanking" practices, according to a draft reviewed by Reuters. Banks also plan to use the current debate to push the government to clarify anti-money laundering laws and establish a clear federal standard on fair access to financial services, the third source said. NOT ISOLATED Trump's criticism echoed longstanding "debanking" complaints from Republicans, who have accused Wall Street banks of "woke capitalism," as well as denying services to gunmakers, fossil-fuel companies and others perceived to be aligned with the political right. Earlier this year, the Trump organization sued Capital One for closing 300 accounts related to the group. The closures came after thousands of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Capital One declined to comment beyond its earlier legal filings. Trump also drew headlines in January when he blasted banks for debanking at a gathering of business leaders in Davos, Switzerland. Paul Chesser, director, corporate integrity project at the conservative-leaning National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), cited former Kansas Governor and Senator Sam Brownback as among the conservatives who were debanked by JPMorgan and other banks. Brownback wrote in the New York Post that JPMorgan had abruptly canceled his newly opened account for the National Committee for Religious Freedom in 2022. The JPMorgan spokesperson said the decision to close the accounts was not related to politics. "The Senator is fully aware why his accounts were closed," the spokesperson said, without elaborating on the reasons for the closure. Brownback told Reuters he had been given five different reasons by the bank for the account closure and was not certain what the final explanation was. NLPC has raised debanking concerns with BofA and JPMorgan through shareholder proposals, which were not included in the banks' proxies, Chesser said. Bank supervision by government regulators is a mostly confidential process that limits banks from explaining to clients why they are declined services. "Customers should not be in the dark about why they are being de-banked," said Chesser. "Nobody got any explanation. They're totally left in the dark. And that is probably the number one priority." Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Homelessness minister facing calls to resign after ‘hiking rent at London townhouse by £700'
Homelessness minister Rushanara Ali is facing calls to resign over her handling of a rental property, following reports she raised the rent at her east London townhouse by £700 weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. Shadow housing secretary Kevin Hollinrake accused the Labour minister of "staggering hypocrisy", saying: 'Rushanara Ali has been somebody who's obviously a government minister in charge of homelessness. She's spoken out about exploiting tenants, about providing more protections to tenants. "You can't say those things, then do the opposite in practice, as a landlord. She's got to resign." He said the conduct appeared to be "unethical, not illegal" but "we can't just say one thing and do another." Ms Ali has been accused of raising the rent on the property, which has four bedrooms, from £3,300 to £4,000 after the previous tenants vacated the property. According to the i paper, the previous occupants were handed just four months' notice last November, informing them that their lease would not be renewed. And weeks after they had left, the house was reportedly once again up for rent – but for £700 more each month. It is understood that Ms Ali – who is the Labour MP for Bethnal Green and Stepney – told the occupants their tenancy would not be renewed as the house was being put up for sale and were offered a rolling contract while the house was on the market, but chose to leave. The property was then re-listed as a rental when a buyer could not be found, it is understood. Mr Hollinrake said her handling of the situation seemed "extremely unfair". Asked whether an investigation should take place before a resignation, he said: "Well, I think the facts are pretty clear, and that's up to the prime minister, I think, to do whatever, to take whatever steps he needs to take to ascertain the facts of the matter. "But the facts of the matter, as we see today, and I always believe people have a right of reply, of course, but the prime minister should investigate. If these these facts are as we've heard that they are today, then she must resign." Shadow housing secretary James Cleverly echoed Mr Hollinrakes calls, saying the allegations 'would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and she should not have the job as homelessness minister'. Meanwhile, Tom Darling, director at the Renters' Reform Coalition, added: "It's mind-boggling that we have a homelessness minister who has just evicted four people in order to rake in more rent - something that will soon be illegal under the Renters' Rights Bill her own department is bringing through parliament. "The government are currently considering an amendment to the legislation from the House of Lords which reduces the ban on reletting after eviction from 12 months to 6 months. 'The government must remove this amendment, and at the very least Minister Ali must recuse herself from any discussions on this within government." Ms Ali has previously criticised 'private renters being exploited and discriminated against' when defending the government's Renters Reform Bill, which will eliminate "no-fault" evictions, where landlords can end tenancies without a specific reason using Section 21 notice. She said the legislation would 'empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases'. The bill will also stop landlords who have terminated a tenancy to sell the property from re-listing it with higher rent until six months or more after the occupants vacated the premises. The Renters' Rights Bill has received its third reading in the House of Lords having already been through the Commons. A spokesperson for Ms Ali told The Independent: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.'
Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Thursday briefing: Trump's tariffs; Fort Stewart shooting; Alzheimer's study; making potatoes healthy; and more
President Donald Trump's new tariffs for dozens of countries took effect overnight. Tulsi Gabbard overrode CIA officials' concerns in a push to release a classified report. The U.S. plans to scale back its human rights criticisms of certain countries. Five soldiers were shot at Fort Stewart Army base in Georgia. Scientists found a potential key to reversing Alzheimer's disease.
