‘Thanks Trump': Aussie beef exports explode amid trade war
Beijing and Washington in recent days accused each other of violating a truce in the tit-for-tat tariff regime sparked by Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement in April.
Now a video posted to X has shown how trade tensions have changed things on the ground in China, where American beef stocks have virtually disappeared.
In the video, a local speaking in English shows a shelf stocked full of Australian beef where US products used to be found.
'I guess I'm having Australian beef for dinner tonight,' she said. 'Instead of American beef.
'And honestly because of the food quality, I probably trust Australian beef better.
'And this box of beef right here is 50 RMB which is about $7 USD (AU$10.82).
'So to answer the question, China ain't hurting. And if anything I think we're probably doing even better because now that we have better beef that tastes better and at a better price.
'So thank you Trump for that.'
Data from Meat and Livestock Australia (MLA) has tracked a significant increase in grain-fed beef exports into China so far this year.
There were 21,885 tonnes shipped in February and March — up nearly 40 per cent on the same period last year – and in April China bought a third of the record 37,000 tonnes exported in a single month.
MLA's global supply analyst Tim Jackson has said Australia's export volumes were high because of record supply levels.
He was more hesitant, however, to attribute the huge intake from China to the ongoing trade war.
'It's difficult to say at the moment, these are fairly early figures and we'd need to wait for more information to come out and get a better understanding of that trade dynamic,' he told the ABC.
But there have been reports that the US$1.6 billion trade (AU$2.5 billion) of American beef to China has been effectively halted by the reciprocal tariffs, which until last month sat at 145 per cent and 125 per cent respectively.
The US Meat Federation said in April that 'the majority of US beef production is now ineligible for China' due to trade restrictions.
'This impasse definitely hit our March beef shipments harder and the severe impact will continue until China lives up to its commitments under the Phase One Economic and Trade Agreement.'
At the time, global meat analyst Brett Stuart told the ABC that Australia was 'now the lone supplier of high-quality white fat marbled beef into China'.
'(US beef) sales to China have fallen to zero … and not only is the market now closed based on the March 16 production date, but the combined retaliation tariffs by China now take the tariff on US beef to 116 per cent, a level that will quickly halt trade.'
The US remains a huge market for Australian beef and imported more of the product (37,213 tonnes) than China (21,572 tonnes) in the month of April.
A 90-day trade war truce was struck between the US and China on May 12, with tariffs reduced to 30 per cent and 10 per cent respectively.
However, both nations have recently accused the other of undermining the agreement.
US President Mr Trump on Friday claimed Beijing had 'totally violated its agreement with us', before China hit back this week, saying Washington had 'seriously undermined' the deal.
Trump, Xi will 'likely' talk this week
Mr Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will likely hold a long-awaited call later this week, the White House said on Monday, as trade tensions between the world's two largest economies escalate.
Trump reignited strains with China last week when he accused the world's second-largest economy of violating a deal that had led both countries to reduce massive tit-for-tat tariffs temporarily.
'The two leaders will likely talk this week,' Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters outside the West Wing when asked whether Mr Trump and Mr Xi would speak.
Mr Trump and Xi have yet to have any confirmed contact more than five months since the Republican returned to power, despite frequent claims by the US president that a call is imminent.
Trump even said in a Time Magazine interview in April that Xi had called him - but Beijing insisted that there had been no call recently.
Stock markets around the world mostly declined on Monday as tensions between the US and China resurfaced.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
University of Technology Sydney ‘temporarily suspends' 146 courses, axing 400 staff
The University of Technology Sydney has 'temporarily suspended' new enrolments for more than 100 bachelor and postgraduate programs, with 400 staff jobs on the chopping block. The suspension affects 146 courses across six faculties which the university says are 'those which have low student enrolments'. In a statement released on Thursday, UTS said it 'continually reviews its course offerings as we want to make sure our curriculum is relevant to what students and employers need'. The affected faculties include the UTS Business School, Faculty of Design and Society, Faculty of Engineering and IT, Faculty of Health, Law, Science and the Transdisciplinary School. The temporary suspension of courses will affect domestic and international students, though the university stressed it 'has no impact on current students at this time and is aimed only at prospective new students for 2026'. In addition, 400 jobs – or about 10 per cent of the UTC faculty – will be cut as part of the cost-saving initiative, including 150 academics and 250 professional staff. Faculty and staff were offered a range of support services, training sessions and counselling, including a list of '50 tips' for staff who may be losing their job, the ABC reported. Some tips included 'bake a dessert' or 'do that task you've been dreading, like washing delicates, organising receipts for your taxes, or cleaning a bathroom'. In response, some staff told the outlet they felt their concerns were 'de-legitimised' by the list. UTS researcher and National Tertiary Education Union representative Hossai Gul said the list 'naturally de-legitimised concerns of already distressed staff'. Speaking to NewsWire, a UTS spokesman said they were 'very mindful of our need to support staff though periods of uncertainty and change'. 'Throughout this period of organisational review we have sought to consult with and hear from staff in town halls meetings, drop-in sessions and QandAs, and have a dedicated internal site with frequent updates, support and feedback channels,' they said. The spokesman said the externally-produced list of '50 tips' was one of multiple different recourses for staff, including 'internal key contacts, training, counselling, wellbeing and career recourses'. 'We recognise that the change process is difficult, and not all resources are going to be suitable for everyone and we review resources available based on the feedback form staff,' they told NewsWire. In an email to UTS staff obtained by NewsWire, UTS vice-chancellor and president Andrew Parfitt said he '(recognised) that we are in a period of great uncertainty' and was 'mindful of our obligations to manage psychosocial risks ensure a safe and supportive work environment'. The email explained the cuts were an 'operational decision' intended to 'minimise potential disruption and dissatisfaction' for prospective students that could arise if 'applications are made for autumn 2026 courses that may subsequently be changed or discontinued'. While more than 100 programs have been paused, the university said the 'suspension of new student intake does not mean a course will automatically be closed'. 'Sometimes intakes are suspended ahead of phase out, some intakes are suspended while courses are redesigned to refresh curriculum and/or better meet student demand before being offered again,' the statement read. 'The suspensions will be in place until a decision is made on the future of these courses following consultation with staff and unions through a change proposal process.'
SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Some Russians are signalling a claim to Alaska ahead of Trump and Putin's visit
As United States President Donald Trump prepares to hold a meeting on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin, old historical ties are re-emerging. Trump has previously said both Russia and Ukraine will have to swap land to end the fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. While the US bought the state from the Russians over 150 years ago, some are hailing the choice of venue as a victory for Russia, and perhaps a step towards it reclaiming Alaska. 'Alaska is ours' Alaska, which was once a Russian colony, was bought by the US in 1867 for US$7.2 million ($11 million), or roughly 2 US cents per acre. It's of strategic importance to the US, as it provides a large coastline across the Pacific and Arctic oceans with several military bases and commercial harbours. "I'm going to see Putin. I'm going to Russia, on Friday," the US president said mistakenly, ahead of the much-anticipated summit. On the streets and airwaves of Russia, the idea that Alaska rightfully belongs to Russia remains alive, often in satirical or provocative forms. A billboard proclaiming "Alaska is ours" briefly appeared in a Siberian region in 2022, stirring political concern before being revealed as a commercial advertisement. Now, as this territory becomes the backdrop for a high-stakes diplomatic meeting, it's a strong reminder of Alaska's Russian roots. Russia's special envoy on international economic cooperation, Kirill Dmitriev, said the decision to hold the summit in Alaska was symbolically important for the US-Russian partnership. "Born as Russian America — Orthodox roots, forts, fur trade — Alaska echoes those ties and makes the US an Arctic nation," Dmitriev wrote on X. Last year, Russian state TV presenter Olga Skabeyeva referred to the US territory as "our Alaska". Kremlin-aligned media outlets are reportedly gushing over their country's links to the region. A Russian billboard that appeared in Siberia in 2022, which read "Alaska nasha", which translates to "Alaska is ours", sparked concern among some US politicians. Credit: Michael McFaul, a former US ambassador to Russia during the Obama administration, said the meeting venue is a reminder to Russian nationalists of a "raw deal". "Trump has chosen to host Putin in a part of the former Russian empire," he wrote on X. "Wonder if he knows that Russian nationalists claim that losing Alaska, like Ukraine, was a raw deal for Moscow that needs to be corrected." Following the 2022 billboard incident, Alaska's governor, Mike Dunleavy, weighed in with a "good luck" post on social media. "To the Russian politicians who believe they can take back Alaska: Good luck," he wrote on X. 'Alaska is the most strategic location in the world' In his latest tweet, Dunleavy described the state as a "bridge between nations", welcoming the upcoming meeting between the two leaders. "Alaska is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia, with the Arctic to our north and the Pacific to our south," he wrote on X last week. "With a mere two miles separating Russia from Alaska, no other place plays a more vital role in our national defence, energy security, and Arctic leadership. He said what happens in the Arctic and the Pacific impacts Alaska before the rest of the country, "so it's fitting that discussions of global importance take place there". "For centuries, Alaska has been a bridge between nations, and today, we remain a gateway for diplomacy, commerce, and security in one of the most critical regions on earth. The world will be watching, and Alaska stands ready to host this historic meeting."
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Australian full-time wages just passed an historic milestone, so why do we all feel broke?
The average Australian full-time worker is now earning more than $2000 a week for the first time in history. New figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) show the average ordinary full-time weekly earnings for adults hit $2011.40 before tax in May. It comes to a 4.5 per cent rise compared to the same time last year. Men working full-time are now earning an average of $2106.40 a week, while women earned $1864.10. 'This is the first time that average weekly ordinary time earnings for full-time adults have been greater than $2000,' ABS head of labour statistics Sean Crick said. 'Annual growth in May 2025 remained high at 4.5 per cent, a rise of $86.60 a week from May 2024. This was just below the annual growth rate of 4.6 per cent in the year to November 2024.' Across the states and territories, the ACT recorded the highest average full-time weekly earnings at $2236, followed by Western Australia at $2154. Tasmania was the lowest at $1793. Industry data showed mining workers were the highest paid, averaging $3174 a week, while employees in accommodation and food services earned the least at $1459. Public sector workers earned more on average ($2167) than those in the private sector ($1966). The ABS also reported the unemployment rate fell to 4.2 per cent in July after a small increase the previous month. Despite the historic wage milestone, many working Australians report feeling poorer than ever, as the rising cost of everyday essentials continues to outpace income growth. A recent Canstar survey found the average weekly grocery bill for a family of four has jumped 11 per cent in the past year, rising from $215 to $240. Weekly pay packets are also being eaten away by housing pressures. Renters are facing historic challenges with availability pushing up prices. Sydney's median weekly rent has hit a whopping $730, while firstâ€'home buyers are finding the market increasingly out of reach. Research shows that to buy a medianâ€'priced house outright without mortgage stress, a household now needs an annual income of about $203,000 across the country, and nearly $300,000 in Sydney. Labor has acknowledged the 30 per cent of Australians with mortgages being kicked by interest rate rises, but renters continue to feel left out of the conversation as their excess cash, normally put away for a home deposit, gets set aside to fund their landlord's mortgage via a rent rise. A further study by the Australia Institute found that 72 per cent of respondents felt their wages had grown slower than the prices they're paying, while 53 per cent said their financial situation had worsened over the past two years. In fact, nearly half of all Australian workers believe their salaries are not keeping pace with living costs. According to the Employee Sentiment Index, 45 per cent of employees report growing financial strain, and many are just managing to get by. It's all a bit wonky in 2025 By and large, Australia's baby boomer generation, and even some of the next, was able to build a family on a single wage. They were also able to capitalise on dirt-cheap real estate, use it to leverage more purchases, and then profit from historically unprecedented price rises. That idea is a fever dream for young Aussies today, unless they've somehow landed themselves a quarter-million-per-year job or fallen into a trust fund or inheritance. Associate Professor at the University of Sydney Gareth Bryant, explains that the housing 'phenomenon' in the early 2000s saw a rapid increase in the home-price-to-income ratio that has never been rectified. He says that the high interest rates of the late 80s and 90s meant home ownership was hard, but it was mostly an 'income issue', meaning you could eventually work your way up to a position to afford high rates. But now, with the average dwelling costing seven to 10 times the average Aussie wage, it's become more than just an income issue. 'The problem now is you still need high income but a reasonable amount of wealth to have the deposit,' Prof. Bryant told 'It used to be much more possible for those with good jobs to save for a deposit. 'For a lot of people in decent jobs, it's really difficult to save, unless you've got some kind of additional assistance.' He says the rise in housing has naturally forced millions to enter the housing market later in life, or not at all. 'There's a delay. People are buying and forming families later, there are many who will be lifelong renters, or 'generation rent'.' In 1980, Australian households typically spent about 60 per cent of their disposable income on essential living expenses, including housing, food, transport, and utilities. This left a modest buffer for savings or discretionary spending. Almost one in two households were single-income, with one partner typically staying at home. By 2025, despite higher average incomes, the proportion of income required for living costs has increased significantly. Rising housing costs, particularly in major cities, have forced many households to allocate a larger share of their income to essentials. Today, around 73 per cent of families with children under 15 have both parents employed. We have also seen the great devaluing of tertiary education. In 1980, approximately 5 per cent of Australians aged 15-74 held a bachelor's degree or higher. By 2024, this figure had risen to a whopping 33 per cent. In the 80s, you could build a family on one income, even if you were among the outstanding majority (95 per cent) of those without university qualifications. Today, the story is the opposite, with several couples claiming their monthly expenses are too high to consider children, despite both working in fields requiring tertiary educations. But yes, wages are 'higher than ever'.
