Expelled From RJD, Tej Pratap To Contest Bihar Elections Independently
Former Bihar minister Tej Pratap Yadav, who was recently expelled from the RJD by his father and founding president Lalu Prasad, has announced that he would contest the upcoming Bihar assembly elections from Mahua seat in Vaishali district as an Independent candidate.
He is currently the MLA of Hasanpur seat in Samastipur district.
Speaking to reporters at his residence here on Saturday evening, he said, "Yes, this time, I will contest the elections from Mahua assembly seat as an Independent candidate. My opponents must have started to feel an itch." "I have people's support... a large number of people are now connected with my 'Team Tej Pratap Yadav', a social media platform to reach out to people," he added.
He further claimed that Chief Minister Nitish Kumar would not retain his post after the assembly polls.
"I am confident that 'chacha' (Nitish) will not become the CM... those who would form the government, if they talk about youths, employment, education, and health, Tej Pratap Yadav will stand with them," he said.
The former Bihar minister was expelled from the party on May 25 by his father Lalu Prasad for six years.
He was expelled a day after he reportedly confessed on social media to being "in a relationship" with a woman named Anushka.
He, however, later deleted the Facebook post with a claim that his page was "hacked". Lalu Prasad also disowned Tej Pratap due to his "irresponsible behaviour".
A few days after his expulsion from the party, Tej Pratap had alleged that there was a "conspiracy" to drive a wedge between him and his younger brother Tejashwi Yadav.
He had voiced his sentiments in a couple of posts on his X handle, blaming the crisis on 'Jaichand', a metaphor for traitors.
His expulsion came barely a few months ahead of the Bihar assembly polls, which the RJD will fight under the leadership of Tejashwi Yadav. Born to Prasad and Rabri Devi, both former chief ministers of Bihar, the two brothers are among four of nine siblings active in politics.
Tej Pratap Yadav had made his political debut in the assembly polls of 2015, and is a second-term MLA with two brief stints in the state cabinet.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘My name missing from draft voter list': Tejashwi Yadav questions EC; asks ‘how will I contest polls?'
File photo: Tejashwi Prasad Yadav (Picture credit: PTI) PATNA: RJD leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav on Saturday said his name is not in the draft voter list released by the Election Commission of India on Friday. Addressing a press conference in Patna, Tejashwi said he had filled up the enumeration form during the special intensive revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar. 'How will I contest the upcoming assembly elections?' He asked. The ruling JDU says Tejashwi is misleading the people. "Almost 20 to 30 thousand names have been removed from every assembly constituency. A total of around 65 lakh, meaning about 8.5% of voters' names, have been removed from the list. Whenever the Election Commission issued an advertisement, it used to mention that so many people have shifted, so many people are deceased, and so many people had duplicate names," Tejashwi said. "But in the list provided to us by the Election Commission, they have cleverly not given the address of any voter, no booth number, and no EPIC number, so that we cannot find out whose names have been removed from the voter list," he added. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
UK's online safety law is putting free speech at risk, X says
Britain's online safety law risks suppressing free speech due to its heavy-handed enforcement, social media site X said on Friday, adding that significant changes were needed. The Online Safety Act, which is being rolled out this year, sets tough new requirements on platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, TikTok and X, as well as sites hosting pornography, to protect children and remove illegal content. But it has attracted criticism from politicians, free-speech campaigners and content creators, who have complained that the rules had been implemented too broadly, resulting in the censorship of legal content. Users have complained about age checks that require personal data to be uploaded to access sites that show pornography, and more than 468,000 people have signed an online petition calling for the act to be repealed. The government said on Monday it had no plans to do so and it was working with regulator Ofcom to implement the act as quickly as possible. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said on Tuesday that those who wanted to overturn it were "on the side of predators". Elon Musk's X, which has implemented age verification, said the law's laudable intentions were at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. "When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety'," it said in a statement. "It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made." X said the timetable for meeting mandatory measures had been unnecessarily tight, and despite being in compliance, platforms still faced threats of enforcement and fines, encouraging over-censorship. It said a balanced approach was the only way to protect liberty, encourage innovation and safeguard children. 'It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK,' it said. A UK government spokesperson said it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech.' As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression,' the spokesperson said. Ofcom said on Thursday it had launched investigations into the compliance of four companies, which collectively run 34 pornography sites.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
CBI selectively targeting Lalu Yadav, family: Lawyer argues in land-for-jobs case
Former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav is being selectively targeted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the land-for-jobs case, his lawyer alleged before a Delhi court on Friday. The arguments came just days after the Supreme Court refused to stay the trial proceedings against Lalu Yadav in the advocate Maninder Singh, representing Yadav, claimed the CBI was "cherry-picking" evidence to build a case against the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) chief and his family. He questioned the link between land deals and railway jobs, arguing that the two events were separated by several can the agency connect land sales with job allotments when they happened years apart?" Singh asked, adding, "In three days, the Pacific Ocean changed due to the tsunami." Multiple years is a long-long time to wait". The case pertains to the alleged irregularities in Group D appointments in the Indian Railways during Yadav's tenure as the Railway Minister from 2004 to 2009 under the UPA-I government. According to the chargesheet filed in the case by the CBI, candidates were appointed in return for land parcels that were transferred to Yadav's family or close aides by the pointed out that while there were 103 accused in the case, the chargesheet only mentioned 12 land parcels. He also questioned whether any land seller told the CBI that they were pressured by CBI filed its third and final chargesheet in June this year before the Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi, naming 78 accused, including Lalu Prasad Yadav, his wife Rabri Devi, son Tej Pratap Yadav (charged for the first time), daughter Hema Yadav, former Officer on Special Duty (OSD) Bhola Yadav, and a former RJD include criminal conspiracy, cheating, and forgery under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), along with provisions of the Prevention of Corruption in May this year, the President granted the Enforcement Directorate (ED) sanction to prosecute Yadav in the ED had launched its probe based on the original CBI FIR, which alleged that job aspirants were coerced into transferring land to Yadav's family in exchange for lawyer accused the agency of trying to "dig deep" in order to widen the case against his client and his court is currently hearing arguments on whether to take cognisance of the latest chargesheet filed by the CBI in the case.- EndsMust Watch
