Google blocks 5.1 billion harmful ads with AI in 2024
Google has released its 2024 Ads Safety Report, showing how advanced artificial intelligence is transforming the fight against bad ads, scams, and misinformation online. As scams grow more sophisticated—often impersonating public figures or deploying AI-generated content—new tools are helping stop harmful ads before they ever reach people.
In 2024 alone, Google blocked or removed 5.1 billion ads, restricted 9.1 billion more, and suspended over 39 million advertiser accounts—most before a single ad was served. This progress reflects how AI models, powered by Gemini, are enabling faster and smarter detection of fraud signals such as stolen payment methods, fake business identities, or coordinated scam networks.
This shift toward proactive prevention comes at a critical time. Across Africa and beyond, users are navigating a rapidly evolving digital environment—where trust, safety, and transparency matter more than ever. In Nigeria, public figure impersonation scams and misleading election ads have become familiar threats. That's why in 2024, Google updated its Misrepresentation policy, assembled a global team of over 100 experts, and took down over 700,000 scam-related advertiser accounts—contributing to a 90% drop in reported impersonation scams.
With nearly half the world's population heading to the polls in 2024, Google also expanded election ad transparency, requiring all political advertisers to verify their identities and clearly disclose who's paying for the message. More than 10 million election-related ads were removed globally for failing to meet these standards.
While these are global figures, their local impact is deeply personal. From the business owner trying to reach new customers online to the everyday user trying to avoid a phishing scam, online safety remains essential for an open, trustworthy web. In Nigeria and across the continent, safe advertising also helps protect livelihoods—ensuring that small businesses, creators, and publishers can continue to benefit from a free and accessible internet.
'We launched over 50 enhancements to our AI models in 2024,' said Alex Rodriguez, General Manager for Ads Safety at Google. 'These improvements helped us move faster, identify threats earlier, and take action before bad actors could reach users. That's the real power of AI—making the internet safer not just reactively, but proactively.'
While challenges persist, the report emphasizes that AI is improving both the speed and scale of enforcement—and freeing up human reviewers to focus on the most complex, high-impact investigations. Google also continues to work closely with regulators, consumer protection agencies, and industry peers, including through the Global Anti-Scam Alliance, to stay ahead of evolving threats.
Google's 2024 Ads Safety Report offers a glimpse into the systems that help keep billions of people safe online—many without ever realising it. But for those who run small businesses, browse the web, or build tools and content that power Africa's digital economy, safety is not just technical—it's foundational.
Copyright © 2022 Nigerian Tribune Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Campaign ME
2 hours ago
- Campaign ME
Brand versus performance? Is this really the fight?
Our industry loves a good debate. And over the past decade, we have been having one – around brand and performance. You either build emotional connections, or you drive measurable action. You either play the long game, or you deliver this quarter's numbers. Pick a side. We have been pushed into silos, particularly since measuring the business impact of digital ad investments became a mainstream approach in marketing. This shift gave rise to new structures within marketing functions – structures where on one side we have the brand team, armed with storytelling, culture and creativity. On the other, we have the performance team, armed with dashboards, attribution models and media efficiency targets. Different teams. Different budgets. Different KPIs. Often working in isolation, or worse, at odds with one another. This divide has led to ineffective decisions. Performance marketing wins favour because it is easier to measure and appears more efficient. Brand marketing often gets deprioritised because its impact takes longer to surface. But in truth, neither works in isolation. And both are incomplete without the other. At its core, marketing is becoming more fragmented, and measurement is becoming more difficult. Over the last few years, we have seen a shift: from measuring everything to measuring what is measurable. And that shift risks missing what truly matters. Here is my view. All marketing is performance Because what matters to the businesses we work with is growth. If it does not move the needle in leads, conversions, sales, profit or customers, then it does not matter. It might look great. It might even win an award. But if it does not deliver outcomes, it does not sustain for the longer term. The marketing world is evolving as fast as the technology behind it. CMOs are rewriting the growth playbook in real time. Retail media is exploding – new, closed ecosystems are emerging not just globally but also in our region. Budgets are shifting beyond Meta and Google for certain industries where the conversion cycle is relatively longer. Creators are emerging as scalable media channels. Large language model (LLM)-optimised search engine optimisation (SEO) is gaining traction. Search is being redefined, with inbound traffic from ChatGPT, Perplexity and others increasing month over month. We are moving from a search-driven world to an intent-first, moment-driven ecosystem. It is time to rethink everything. Modern marketing is transitioning from brand-versus-performance to marketing performance, and from the age of channels into the age of outcomes. The lines between brand and performance will blur. Not because one will replace the other, but because both must integrate to drive sustainable momentum. What happens to creative in a brand-meets-performance ecosystem? Real marketing power emerges when brand fuels performance storytelling, and creativity is held accountable to business outcomes. I believe the industries poised for growth will be those that embrace performance storytelling –where personalisation is no longer optional, but essential. Why does brand versus performance matter now more than ever? This shift demands that we stop thinking in silos of 'brand' versus 'performance' ownership. I have sat in meetings where marketing was reduced to a cost line, and I have watched marketers defend million-dollar brand campaigns with metrics like reach, impressions and video views. It is not their fault. That is what the industry has rewarded. But chief financial officers do not buy into narratives. They buy into outcomes. That is where our narrative, 'Always Relevant' comes in. It is not just a line we use at Platformance. It is how we operate. Instead of chasing awareness for awareness' sake, we look at moments that matter. What are people searching for, talking about, buying into today? Not as a campaign cycle. As a living, breathing ecosystem. And when relevance is the goal, brand and performance have to work together. Not as separate campaigns, but as part of the same motion. Your brand generates demand. Your performance activity captures the demand. When the two are in sync, marketing starts delivering like a growth engine. The reality? Most companies do not need more ads. They need more alignment – between the creative and the commercial. That does not mean you ditch brand entirely for sales-led tactics. It means you build a brand that sells. And a performance engine that does not forget the power of advocacy. One of the best campaigns I have seen recently in the month of Ramadan did not shout out with a multi-million dollar marketing drive. But it landed because the product, the message, the channel and the timing were all built around a single truth: relevance beats noise. So we need to move beyond the question of 'what does the brand stand for?' and ask something more direct: 'what does the brand do for the business?' That is the future of marketing I believe in. And if we get it right, we will stop debating about 'brand-versus-performance' entirely. Because the customer does not care which team made the ad. They just care it works. By Waseem Afzal, Founder, Platformance
Web Release
a day ago
- Web Release
M2M: The NEW Search Mantra
Marketers have spent the past decade obsessing over Google rankings and social algorithms, and yes, those things have been important in how brands tell their story, find customers, and build loyalty. Here is the gamechanger. You are not just marketing to humans anymore. For the entirety of your lifetime, you have only seen people sell to humans (B2C) or to businesses run by humans (B2B). Artificial Intelligence is creating new rules of marketing. AI is not a passing tsunami. It is a permanent tectonic shift in the way we do business. AI is the new front door to your business for millions of consumers. Google's recently rolled out two new features that are changing how search works: AI Mode and AI Overviews. AI Overviews are those AI-generated summaries that appear at the top of search results. About 30% of searches now trigger these, and they're particularly common for longer questions. Instead of clicking through to websites, people are getting their answers directly from Google. AI Mode is even more dramatic – it's a separate tab that turns search into a conversation. Instead of the usual list of blue links, you get a ChatGPT-style interface that can handle complex questions and follow-ups. You either get mentioned in the AI response, or you're invisible. According to Sharad Agarwal, CEO of Cyber Gear, 'You're not just competing for attention; you're competing for algorithmic favor. Your content needs to be optimized for engagement metrics that train prediction engines, not just humans.' AI platforms and AI agents, the digital assistants that browse and actually do things powered by models like GPT-4o, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and Gemini 2.5 Pro are increasingly becoming the gatekeepers between your business and potential customers. AI agents are helping consumers all over the world find and interact with brands in new ways. AI agents don't have eyeballs and brains and hearts. They have parsers and models and system prompts. When an AI agent visits your site, it needs information. It's looking for clean, accessible, structured data it can easily digest and present back to users. It's looking for clear, organized content that they can gobble up and synthesize back to that human user. The visual bells and whistles will be completely wasted on an AI. These agents scrape, summarize, and synthesize the web to guide users to decisions. If your product information, docs, and CTAs aren't structured, visible, and machine-readable, you'll get leapfrogged by a competitor that is. Become AI-visible. Now. Contact Cyber Gear at to be found!
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Germany plans to tax Google, Facebook
Germany's Culture Ministry is planning to bring a law to tax the American online giants like Alphabet of Google and Meta of Facebook. The rate of taxation is to be 10 per cent. The grounds on which taxation is to be imposed are interesting and even new. German Culture Minister Wolfram Weimer told the magazine, Stern, 'These corporations do billions in business in Germany with extremely high profit margins and benefit enormously from the country's media and cultural output as well as its infrastructure – but they pay hardly any taxes, invest too little, and give far too little back to the country.' There is more than an element of truth in Weimer's statement. Google and Facebook thrive much from the media content that populates their platforms, which is one of the reasons that millions of Net users throng them, to get the news in a jiffy as it were. Both Google and Facebook do not create an iota of their own content. They thrive on what they take from others, either directly or through their own users. Australia overcame the problem by giving in to the demand of newspapers and other old media, that Google should pay them for using their content. Weimer is stating the fact that the online platforms are using cultural output of the country – whether it be music, films, art – and they do not do anything to sustain the cultural events. Similarly, the Internet penetration in the country and the infrastructure that sustains it is what enables millions of Germans to use Google and Facebook, and it is on the large number of users that these online companies earn their revenues. It is but reasonable that the online companies should be made to pay taxes of some kind. Weimer has even suggested voluntary contribution on the part of Google and Facebook. But this may be impracticable. No company will be willing to make voluntary contribution in lieu of taxes. The American online platforms have an advantage over national players because they have worldwide footprint because of the investments they made in the search engines reaching the ends of the globe as it were. They are indeed reaping benefits from it. But do they have an obligation to the regions and countries in which they operate? Google and Facebook can argue that they have built the cyber bridges to connect the different places, and they are allowing a free use of it. The owners of these platforms would not let these sites remain free if they were not earning enough revenue in billions of dollars. If they did not make money, they would have imposed some user-charges from the thousands of millions who use them around the globe. They can say that they have boosted other businesses through the space they have opened up for other businesses. These arguments do not however discredit the demand for tax payments from national governments. That these online payers use national airwaves is a fact. It can be argued that it is the telecom companies in these countries which have the right to charge these companies. But the search engines with enormous Cloud or memory power which sustain these platforms do cost enough money, but the revenue generated by advertisers outstrips the investment and costs of maintenance. National governments have a legitimate right to demand tax from the online platforms because they operate within the sovereign territory of a country. Facebook and the Google do not have the solidity of an iPhone, but they are at the same time cyber-products. They can be treated as taxable products or services. The rate of taxation should remain flexible enough so that the thriving business of connecting people is not affected or dampened.
