Utah County wildfire: Massive blaze in Cedar Hills threatens structures, burns several acres
A wildfire in Utah County is now burning several acres and threatening structures. On Wednesday evening, June 25, Utah Fire Info said that the Hub City Fire is burning on a hillside in Cedar Hills. Utah County wildfire: Massive blaze in Cedar Hills threatens structures, burns several acres (Unsplash - representational image)
The X post says that the fire is 'Estimated at 5 acres' and 'Started on private land and is burning onto USFS lands.' Fire crews are on the scene. People have been asked to avoid the area 'to keep access clear for emergency vehicles.'
The fire was an estimated 14 acres as of 10:20 pm Wednesday, according to Justin Roach with the Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands, kslnewsradio.com reported. The fire is 20% contained. The fire is human-caused, according to Utah Fire Info.
A video by the outlet, shared on Facebook, has the caption, 'Fire crews are responding to a #wildfire in Utah County that is threatening structures and burning several acres.'
Battalion Chief Brandon Boshard with the American Fork Fire Department said the fire started in the foothills of Mount Timpanogos. 60 to 70 firefighters are working to contain the fire, he added. They are prioritising protecting homes in the area.
Boshard said that at the moment, the biggest concern is the shifting wind. Crews are expected to work through the night.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How to weigh the benefits and risks of disclosing a disability to your employer
Whether you decide to tell your employer about a disability or a long-term health condition is a personal decision. In an ideal world, disclosing this kind of information should be easy – and enable you to access support and accommodations, should you need them. But in reality, it often carries the risk of bias and discrimination. 'I have had long-term mental health issues, autism and ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder),' says Claire Fisher, head of communications and engagement at Inclusion Barnet, an organisation for deaf and disabled people. 'When I tried to advocate for myself in a previous role, the board had no understanding or expertise in reasonable adjustments,' she explains. 'Instead, they reacted by focusing on why I had not previously disclosed my disability. In fact, I had done so but they had failed to document it or provide any follow up support. At the time I'd not understood myself what should have happened.' Read more: How to stay motivated during a long job hunt Legally, nobody has to tell their employer they're disabled, have a health condition or that they are neurodivergent. But if you have an informed and supportive employer, telling them can give them the opportunity to provide support. For many, though, deciding whether to tell an employer about a disability or condition involves weighing up the benefits and risks. So what should you take into consideration before deciding what is best for you – and how can you approach the conversation? Consider your employer's attitude First, do your research on the organisation. 'What do existing employees say, how do they talk about health, disability, long-term conditions?' says Fisher. Have a look on the company's website and social media accounts to see if there is any mention of inclusivity. You could also look at reviews left by current or former employees on sites like Glassdoor, which can provide an insight into an organisation's culture. Think about your needs It can help to consider your wants, needs or requirements before disclosing personal information about yourself. For example, if workplace adjustments like working from home or an adapted desk are non-negotiables, telling your employer may be the right move. Equally, it may be important to you to be able to speak openly about yourself – which is a valid reason. Consider the pros and cons Some positives of disclosure include legal protections from discrimination, the chance to discuss health-related needs, support from management and access to accommodations. 'Often, a few simple adjustments can make a world of difference to both the employee and the employer – everyone wins,' says Fisher. However, it's common for a disability disclosure to lead to negative attitudes – both intentional and unintentional. Studies show that telling an employer can lead to accusations of 'faking' it, as well as stigmatisation and bullying. According to a 2025 survey by the TUC, half of disabled workers reported being bullied or harassed in the past year, with experiences ranging from exclusion from activities to verbal and physical threats. 'Employers may make assumptions about what you can and cannot do based on misinformed knowledge of your condition or impairment,' adds Fisher. 'Awareness of others mistakenly feeling like they need to tread on egg shells around you or protect you from certain duties can be patronising.' Know your legal rights It's essential to know your legal rights so that you can spot discrimination in the first place and decide if and how you want to address it. 'If an employee does not disclose a disability to their employer, it cannot generally be held that they discriminated against the employee because of it,' says Kate Palmer, employment services director at Peninsula. 'If they were to bring a claim of disability discrimination, it would fail.' Read more: How to give your job applications a 'human touch' in the AI era However, Palmer explains that if an employer could reasonably have known about a disability – for example, seeing an employee use a walking aid – they have 'constructive knowledge' and can be liable for any unfair treatment. 'Employers have a legal duty to make reasonable adjustments for employees with a disability,' says Palmer. 'Where this does not happen, the employee is entitled to make a claim to an employment tribunal. It's important, therefore, for employers to discuss with their employees any adjustments that may help and, where these are reasonable, to make them.' Choose the right time Disclosing may help you access accommodations, but choosing the right time is important. Whether you talk about your condition in a job interview is your choice, but it can lead to discrimination. 'Employers should not ask job applicants any questions about their health or medical history until after a job offer has been made and accepted, except in specific circumstances permitted by the law,' says Palmer. If a candidate discloses a medical condition after accepting a job offer, employers must ensure they make reasonable adjustments to remove any barriers to work caused by a disability. Focus on your skills If or when you do disclose, focus on your skills, experience and expertise – and how these align with the company's goals and values. 'Be clear about what reasonable adjustments you need, if you know,' says Fisher. 'It would be impossible for any employer, even if they had other staff with the same condition or impairment as you, to know exactly what you need to succeed in the role. You might not fully know yet yourself. If you can go in with possible solutions and an open mind to work together with your employer you can usually work something out.' Read more: What to expect from a maternity discrimination employment tribunal Deciding whether to disclose a disability at work is rarely simple. It's a balance between protecting your privacy and ensuring you have the support you need to thrive. By weighing the culture of your workplace, understanding your legal rights and thinking about your personal needs, you can make a choice that feels right for you. Ultimately, the responsibility for creating inclusive workplaces lies with employers – but until that's the norm, only you know what the right decision is. Read more: How to speak to your boss about miscarriage How to stay motivated during a long job hunt Does mental health first aid work?Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hawks lay down their marker with thrilling first-up win
Hawthorn have laid down their marker as the AFLW team to watch after claiming a thrilling four-point away win over perennial contenders Brisbane in their season opener. The Hawks, who lost to eventual grand finalists Brisbane in their qualifying final last season, headed to Brighton Homes Arena on Sunday with a point to prove. Daniel Webster's charges defended their hearts out to claim a 4.9 (33) to 3.11 (29) victory in front of 4208 fans, leaving Brisbane to rue their wastefulness. "Especially after last year's finals, we wanted to make a statement, and I think we came out and did that, which is really good," defender Tilly Lucas-Rodd told the Seven Network. Midfield tough nut Eliza West (25 disposals, 18 contested possessions), running defender Lucas-Rodd (27 disposals) and skipper Emily Bates (20 touches) led the charge. Aine McDonagh (two goals) and Ainslie Kemp (nine intercepts) were excellent at each end. Hawthorn were defensively brilliant, keeping Brisbane goalless in the second and third quarters. For Brisbane, Jade Ellenger (10 intercepts, 19 disposals) was a fierce competitor down back with support from Jennifer Dunne (six marks), while Ally Anderson (21 disposals) and Belle Dawes (16 disposals) were busy. The Hawks suffered a massive pre-game blow when Irish gun Aileen Gilroy withdrew through injury, but they still flew out of the blocks, with the first five inside-50s of the game. But Hawthorn could only claim four points from those entries and Brisbane pounced through Taylor Smith. Good luck catching Greta Bodey 🏃♀️#AFLWLionsHawks — AFL Women's (@aflwomens) August 17, 2025 Greta Bodey ensured the Hawks finally got some bang for their buck when she kicked a classy goal late in the term, but Dakota Davidson nudged Brisbane out to a four-point lead at quarter-time. The second term was all Hawthorn, with McDonagh putting Hawthorn back in front, before Casey Sherriff extended the lead to nine points after the half-time siren. The Hawks had a scare when Jasmine Fleming went down grabbing her right knee, but she had her leg taped and was able to return to play. Hawthorn led by 13 points at the start of the final term when Fleming burst out of a stoppage and hit McDonagh on the chest for her second goal. But a wonderful goal from Ellie Hampson gave Brisbane a second wind. Ellie Hampson keeps the Lions alive! 💥#AFLWLionsHawks — AFL Women's (@aflwomens) August 17, 2025 The Lions kept peppering Hawthorn's goal without snatching the lead, and instead opened a third consecutive season with a home loss. Craig Starcevich's Brisbane next travel to face Fremantle on Saturday, before Hawthorn host Carlton in Frankston that night.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sick Gazan children denied life-saving medical care by UK visa delays
When Keir Starmer announced last month that he was 'accelerating' efforts to evacuate sick children from Gaza, there were celebrations among medical charities horrified by the humanitarian crisis. Yet Whitehall bureaucracy means that the first children to be treated by the NHS will not arrive until the start of September, nearly six weeks after the prime minister's pledge. The delay may be fatal, according to Project Pure Hope, the charity that has funded the medical evacuations of the only three children to be granted medical visas for the UK. Omar Din, the charity's co-founder, said: 'Each day of delay is costing children their lives. Needless death. A n entire list of patients that Project Pure Hope has readied could die before the UK finally implements its scheme.' On Saturday, 96 MPs wrote to ministers asking them to give a timeline and adequate funding for the evacuations. The letter, coordinated by Dr Simon Opher, a Labour MP, said they should act "without delay" as the children were at risk of imminent death, the BBC reported. Italy took in 31 children and their families on 13 August last Wednesday, having accepted 17 in June. The United States allowed 11 children in early August. The UK's approach contrasts with the previous government's decision to send a team to Kyiv to evacuate 21 Ukrainian children with cancer to the UK for treatment by the NHS days after the Russian invasion. Delays may lead to medical complications. Doctors in Jordan and Lebanon told The Observer they have been forced to postpone treatment for some children because they are too malnourished to recover from surgery. More than 17,000 children in Gaza have been killed and another 33,000 have been injured, Unicef said last month. Din said some of those deaths were due to a lack of basic medical care in Gaza, since many of its hospitals have been destroyed. He said the charity was 'pleased' that the government had accepted its proposal to bring 30 to 50 children and their families to the UK to be treated by the NHS. 'However, the delays establishing a UK scheme for Gazan children are unacceptable and must now proceed at pace and scale,' Din said. 'When a patient arrives with severe acute malnutrition on top of a war-related injury, our first priority is stabilisation, not surgery' Since the Gaza war began on 7 October 2023, EU countries including Spain, Italy, Ireland, Norway and Romania have accepted more than 200 children, mostly with complex medical needs. Most of the 5,000 children needing treatment have been evacuated to other countries in the region, including Egypt, the UAE, Qatar, Lebanon and Jordan. Six children arrived on 6 August at a reconstructive surgery hospital run by MSF, the international medical charity, in the Jordanian capital Amman . Dr Earnest Emetole, deputy clinical director at the hospital, said two of them arrived with 'severe acute malnutrition'. They have been put on a high-protein diet so that they can be stabilised. 'When a patient arrives with severe acute malnutrition on top of a war-related injury, our first priority is stabilisation, not surgery,' he said. 'Malnutrition severely weakens the immune system, causes anaemia, delays wound healing, and can also affect mental health. Operating immediately in such cases carries very high risks, so we focus first on gradually restoring nutritional status.' One of the two malnourished patients who has severe burns requires frequent visits to the operating theatre for dressing changes to prevent infection and protect the wound, a process that is often painful. Once the patient's condition allows, our plastic surgery team will plan a skin graft.' MSF's clinics in Khan Younis and Gaza city are screening more than 1,000 people a week, and there has been 'a marked increase in severe acute malnutrition rates' since the end of June, Emetole said. 'The arrival of these two malnourished patients in Amman reflects the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza and is a direct consequence of the ongoing siege and resulting food deprivation in the Strip.' Project Pure Hope has helped another 30 children from Gaza go to the American University of Beirut hospital, for treatment by a team from the Ghassan Abu Sittah Children's Fund, who have expertise in treating war wounds based on decades of experience of other conflicts. Professor Ghassan Abu-Sittah, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon from London who has worked in conflicts in Gaza, Yemen, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, said it was disappointing that the UK government had not done more to help Gazan children. 'The first you know about the fact that the Spanish are doing it is when you see kids landing in Spain,' he said. 'That's the difference [with the UK]. Do you talk about it for six or seven months or do you just get up and do it?' His team is also not able to treat some children because they are severely malnourished, he said. A government spokesperson said they were 'accelerating plans to evacuate children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care'. Photograph by Abdallah F.s. Alattar/Anadolu via Getty
