I Just Watched in Real Time How Trump Is Trying to Manipulate People for His Agenda. It Almost Worked on Me.
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
When Mohsen Mahdawi, a Palestinian former student activist at Columbia University, walked free from federal detention this week after a Vermont judge ordered his release, it marked the first major legal setback in the Trump administration's sweeping effort to deport pro-Palestinian students. Mahdawi, a legal permanent resident in the U.S., had been targeted under a rarely used immigration provision that labels individuals as threats to American foreign policy. Among the 94 letters submitted in his defense was one from Roberta Wall—a Jewish activist and former civil rights lawyer in New York. The judge cited those letters as influential in his decision to grant Mahdawi bail. In this as-told-to essay, Wall explains her connection to Mahdawi and what happened since the arrest.
I learned about his arrest first in a headline. It said the student was in Vermont, and I knew Mohsen lived in Vermont, and I just knew right away it was him. The last time we had met in person, he was so excited because he thought Columbia students were finally moving toward creating a joint organization of Palestinian and Israeli students. Mohsen wanted me to do training, and I'm actually in touch with that group now.
But that was the last time we met in person. April 7, I sent him a picture of me holding up a sign outside of Columbia, and it says, 'Hands off Khalil.' And then he wrote back, 'Thank you. I am safe and in good spirit.' So that was April 7. And then, he was seized not too long after that.
We met in January 2024. I lived in the neighborhood near Columbia University, and I have been very involved in Palestinian activism. For many years, I've traveled back and forth to the West Bank and Israel, and we have trainings sometimes in nonviolent communication—some trainings just for Palestinians, some trainings just for Israelis, and then bringing people together.
A Columbia student who I met said, 'Oh, you need to meet my friend Mohsen.' Mohsen reached out to me. And he wrote ,'I am a student at Columbia University and currently co-leading the Palestinian movement on campus. It would be a pleasure to hear your thoughts and intentions.' Mohsen and I met a number of times. It turned out that his high school principal, in the refugee camp where he's from, is one of my very dear Palestinian friends and students—an amazing peacemaker.
I'm Jewish. Mohsen grew up Muslim. It turns out that we both are practitioners of Buddhist meditation, so we had all this sharing of activism and connections in the West Bank, as well as Buddhism. In January 2024, I invited him to a Friday night Shabbat service in the Harlem Jazz Museum, but he already had a Shabbat dinner that night.
What is so just horrifyingly outrageous is that the entire justification for arresting him is that his stance is a threat to U.S. foreign policy. This is someone who is just an open, free human being. And at the same time, that he's a fierce leader, an advocate for Palestinians, he's such a teacher. He is really modeling peacemaking to me, for me. Because not only does he stand for everyone's humanity and not to demonize anyone, he stands firmly for Palestinian rights. So, from my perspective, he's not watering down the Palestinian liberation struggle—he's just sourcing it in a bigger playing field.
After the arrest, the first thing I did was reach out to some rabbis and Buddhist communities I know in Vermont to mobilize them. And there was this horrible disinformation campaign from this Jewish self-proclaimed journalist, just picking apart his life and his statements. I felt sick to my stomach. It was just how it was all so demeaning of this human being that I know, who has been on a journey for 15 years to make sense of what's happened to him in a way that embraces his own and everyone's humanity. I really felt sick to my stomach. And then I learned that some of the rabbis I know were actually affected by that. And for me, it's humbling to see how fragile people's goodwill is.
I actually had an experience of how this disinformation can get into your own brain. I had a moment of, like, 'Whoa, could this incredible human being have been pulling the wool over my eyes?' I mean, I'm more than twice his age—a civil rights lawyer and activist in New York City—I'm not a naive person. And yet, you hear these things, you read these things, I felt humbled to be able to say, 'No, I trust my experience with this human being, and I'm not going to be swayed by these fearmongers who are saying things that have nothing to do with my own experience.' It was humbling to see how it gave me pause. And Mohsen is such a contrast to that.
Next, I joined others in drafting a letter in support of Mohsen. I am a retired civil rights lawyer. I've drafted depositions, I've done all kinds of things in support of people whose civil rights were being compromised or attacked. But I had never done one myself in support for someone I knew.
In the beginning, I was worried, like, 'Oh, my God, what are they going to do to him?' But as it all unfolded, I didn't feel worried about him at all. I had complete trust that he was prepared for whatever would happen.
I was jubilant when I saw him freed this week. It's great to have a small win at this point in time, though his case is ongoing. And I feel an urgency to remind people that everybody else was sent to the 5th Circuit in Louisiana, which is probably the circuit court leading the charge to destroy whatever remnants of democracy we have. We need to protect all the other political prisoners—so Mahmoud Khalil, Yunseo Chung, and Rumeysa Ozturk. This is the tip of the iceberg.
I don't think of myself as someone who's had many illusions about this country, and yet I still feel shock at what's going on. Someone I know—and someone who I think can really create understanding between Jews and Palestinians—is attacked. And then, as a Jewish person, I feel terrified that these racist assaults and attacks are being carried out in my name. My family is very frightened by this, because the whole singling out minorities in this country always ends up being a threat to our safety, and this attempt to separate Jewish people out from that is naive and scary.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

22 minutes ago
Members of the Fulbright scholarship board resign, accusing Trump of meddling
All 12 members of the board overseeing the prestigious Fulbright scholarships on Wednesday resigned in protest of what they call the Trump administration's meddling with the selection of award recipients, according to a statement. A statement published online by the board members said the administration usurped the board's authority by denying awards to 'a substantial number of people' who already had been chosen. Another 1,200 award recipients who were already approved to come to the U.S. are undergoing an unauthorized review process that could lead to their rejection, the board members said. 'To continue to serve after the Administration has consistently ignored the Board's request that they follow the law would risk legitimizing actions we believe are unlawful and damage the integrity of this storied program and America's credibility abroad,' the statement reads. Congress established the Fulbright program nearly 80 years ago to promote international exchange and American diplomacy. The highly selective program awards about 9,000 scholarships annually in the U.S. and in more than 160 other countries to students, scholars, and professionals in a range of fields. A message seeking comment was left with the State Department, which runs the scholarship program. The resignations were first reported by The New York Times. The intervention from the Trump administration undermined the program's merit-based selection process and its insulation from political influence, the board members wrote. 'We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute,' the statement said. 'It is our sincere hope that Congress, the courts, and future Fulbright Boards will prevent the administration's efforts to degrade, dismantle, or even eliminate one of our nation's most respected and valuable programs.' Award recipients are selected in a yearlong process by nonpartisan staff at the State Department. The recipients who had their awards canceled are in fields including biology, engineering, medical sciences, and history, the board members said. The announcement comes as the Trump administration ratchets up scrutiny of international students on several fronts. The administration has expanded the grounds for revoking foreign students' legal status, and recently paused scheduling of new interviews for student visas as it increases vetting of their social media activity. The government also has moved to block foreign students from attending Harvard as it pressures the Ivy League school to adopt a series of reforms. ___ standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge sides with city of Austin in lawsuit involving former American-Statesman site
A judge this week ruled in favor of the city of Austin in a case involving the former American-Statesman site just south of downtown along Lady Bird Lake. The ruling denied a motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit filed by the Save Our Springs Alliance, an environmental watchdog group. The lawsuit alleged that the Austin City Council violated key provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act in 2022 when it approved a special type of zoning known as a planned unit development, or PUD, for the former Statesman site. The lawsuit sought to void the council's Dec. 2, 2022 vote to approve the PUD, based on the alleged open meetings violations. The Statesman moved several years ago from the site at 305 S. Congress Ave. to a new location near the airport. In arguing their case before District Judge Jan Soifer on May 15, Save Our Springs attorneys Bobby Levinski and Bill Bunch contended that the council granted the PUD zoning in violation of two key mandates of the Texas Open Meetings Act: proper public notice, and a reasonable opportunity for the public to speak before the vote was taken. Levinski said today that the Save Our Springs Alliance might appeal the ruling. "Given the importance of this case for governmental transparency and proper enforcement of the Texas Open Meetings Act, we'll be evaluating our options for appeal," Levinski said. "This case ultimately impacts the ability of residents to weigh in on important matters that affect their community, including the relocation of the Hike and Bike Trail and removal of the natural, tree-lined aesthetic of the Lady Bird Lake shoreline. Every case has its challenges, and we may need to work on it a little longer to ultimately prevail." More: Lawsuit seeks to halt planned redevelopment of former Statesman site on Lady Bird Lake Casey Dobson and Sara Wilder Clark represented the landowner, the Cox family of Atlanta, along with Austin-based Endeavor Real Estate Group. The Cox family hired Endeavor several years ago to create plans to redevelop the prime waterfront site. The site formerly housed the newspaper offices and printing plant. Cox sold the Statesman but retained ownership of the 18.9-acre site, a property many developers had long coveted and said was ripe for new development. Dobson did not immediately respond to an email for comment about the ruling and what it means for future plans to transform the property into a mixed-use project with high-rise buildings and other uses, which could include housing, office and retail development. Richard Suttle Jr., an Austin attorney and the spokesperson for the planned redevelopment, said he hasn't seen a final judgment yet in the case, so couldn't comment on what it might mean for the future planned redevelopment. Dan Richards represented the city in the lawsuit. Richards said Soifer's ruling, signed Monday, means "the trial court case is basically over." At last month's hearing, Richards told Soifer that voiding the PUD could jeopardize the developer's ability, in the current economic climate, to secure a new amendment offering the same level of community benefits — such as 6.5 acres of green space — at the site. At the same hearing, Dobson and Wilder Clark said the PUD zoning change was properly noticed, and the public was given sufficient opportunity to speak at nine different meetings. However, Levinski said that, while the PUD was listed on the council agenda as a zoning item, that posting was misleading because it failed to provide "full disclosure of the subjects to be discussed." The proposed PUD ordinance encompassed "numerous provisions that extend well beyond traditional zoning regulations," Levinski told Soifer. Those included "sweeping changes" to environmental protections and other city land-use codes, including a failure to disclose height limits, setbacks and the elimination of two restrictive covenants. "There are so many different parts of this (PUD) ordinance that are not zoning, yet it was sold to public as a rezoning," Levinski said. The zoning changes included modifications to the Lady Bird Lake shoreline; the relocation of the Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail inland away from the lake; the removal of more than 90 mature trees; code waivers; and "amendments to almost every chapter of Austin's land development code," Levinski told Soifer. In arguing their case before Soifer, Leviniski and Bunch said that the Texas Open Meetings Act requires a public notice identifying these major changes to city standards and a public 'right to speak' on them before council granted the approvals. The Cox owners and Endeavor have the right to build high-rises — up to 725 feet tall — within 140 feet of Lady Bird Lake. The development would be "forever exempt from a plethora of water quality, parkland and lakeshore rules and regulations," according to the Save Our Springs Alliance. "The key here is the Statesman PUD went beyond zoning," Levinski said. "This didn't give sufficient notice to the public to say what is occurring with this zoning." Among other issues, he said the PUD included "non-zoning provisions, including items the council doesn't have authority over." There was a way the city could have described with greater detail what was occurring with the zoning case, "but they chose not to, and it's deceptive that they chose not to," Levinski said. The level of specificity "gets enhanced" when the issue involves matters of "significant public interest," Levinski said. "It's not enough to rely on the assumption that the general public may have knowledge of the subject matter." Dobson and Wilder Clark, however, told Soifer that the public notices complied with the Texas Open Meetings Act. The notices properly and adequately disclosed the subject of the PUD at various meetings on the council's printed public agenda, Dobson and Wilder Clark said. Moreover, all the details that Save Our Springs claims were lacking from the notice were available at "the click of a link" in backup materials on the council's online agenda, Wilder Clark said. "Not only did (the public) get to talk in meetings, but they got to submit written testimony," Wilder Clark said. She also noted that the council postponed meetings on the case. Showing slides of newspaper articles, Dobson said the proposed redevelopment of the Statesman site was front-page news. He said the case was "noticed out of the wazoo." "(Opponents) think this was done in the dark of night, with adequate notice to nobody," Dobson said. "In fact, the polar opposite happened." Dobson said no special notice was required, and opponents "didn't need it. They wrote letters, they spoke at length to (the city) Planning Commission and City Council. This did not take place under the shroud of secrecy," Dobson said. Countering the city's arguments, Bunch said the city "invented out of whole cloth" its position that it upheld the open meetings act, saying "there's no support for that in the entire body of open meetings cases." Early in the hearing, Dobson showed a photo of the current Statesman site "in all its glory," showing a low-slung building surrounded by a near vacant parking lot with lots of asphalt and concrete. Attorneys for the city and the developer stated that "virtually no one" opposes the proposed development, which may include condominiums, apartments, a hotel, office space and retail areas. Noting the site's popularity as a prime location for viewing the famed bat colony under the Ann Richards Congress Avenue Bridge, they emphasized the new development will enhance the bat viewing area. Additionally, they said the project has the support of bat conservation groups. Last year, the Save Our Springs Alliance won a lawsuit contesting the city's creation of a special financing district, a so-called tax increment reinvestment zone, to fund infrastructure improvements within the proposed Statesman redevelopment project. A judge ruled that financing method unlawful. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Judge rules for city in case involving former Statesman site
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump White House Begins Paving Over Rose Garden 5 Years After Melania's Controversial Redesign
President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump began their latest White House renovation on June 9, which involves paving over the Rose Garden lawn. The garden area is used to host press conferences, dignitaries, sports teams and special events, and the president has explained that the soft ground can cause people to fall. The president has also promised to self-fund the addition of two massive flagpoles, one on each side of the White Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump began their latest White House renovations on Monday, June 9, as workers broke ground to begin paving over parts of the historic Rose Garden. Photos of the initial construction show a grassy area being dug up and parts of a limestone border — installed by Melania during her husband's first term in office — being moved so that workers can lay down a concrete surface within the border. In a March interview with Fox News' Laura Ingraham, Trump explained his reasoning for turning the grass lawn into something of a presidential patio in the style of Mar-a-Lago. 'You know, we use [the Rose Garden] for press conferences, and it doesn't work because the people fall,' he said. The terrain can be wet, and the soft ground can be an issue for some, Trump added. "Women, with the high heels, it just didn't work.' A White House official described the new construction as a "restoration" and assured PEOPLE that the first couple "have deep respect for the history of the White House and for the Rose Garden." "This restoration to the Rose Garden preserves the beauty of the space and builds on the work done in 2020," the official said, "with a focus on enhancing practical use and guest experience for those attending special events.' In addition to paving over the grass, the project reportedly includes audio and visual upgrades, as well as the installation of two new flag poles on the North and South Lawns. The updates — which are being completed by the National Park Service and funded by the Trust for the National Mall — are expected to be finished by mid-August 2025. Melania faced significant backlash when she initially redid the Rose Garden in 2020. The first lady even made a rare public statement after NBC News presidential historian Michael Beschloss described her botanical vision as 'grim.' "Evisceration of White House Rose Garden was completed a year ago this month, and here was the grim result—decades of American history made to disappear," Beschloss said in 2021, referencing the limestone border Melania laid down in the outdoor space, which often hosts speeches and receptions for visiting dignitaries, sports teams and more. Melania's office fired back at Beschloss on X, sharing a different photo that showed the garden was in full bloom. ".@BeschlossDC has proven his ignorance by showing a picture of the Rose Garden in its infancy. The Rose Garden is graced with a healthy & colorful blossoming of roses," they wrote at the time. "His misleading information is dishonorable & he should never be trusted as a professional historian." Amid news of the latest changes to the garden, a White House official explained to PEOPLE that the 2020 renovation was an attempt to restore the Rose Garden to the design envisioned by Bunny Mellon, who redesigned the outdoor space in 1961 at the request of President John F. Kennedy. The ensuing years have seen the roses fail to thrive — only 12 bushes remained when Melania added over 200. The 2020 work also aimed to improve drainage and increase the amount of sunlight each plant received. Trump announced in April that he would be personally funding the addition of two 'beautiful' 100-foot flagpoles — one on the North Lawn and one on the South Lawn. 'They've needed flagpoles for 200 years,' he told reporters at the time, despite that the American flag and POW/MIA flag fly atop the White House on a flagpole each day. Read the original article on People