Justice secretary set for showdown with judges over sentencing guidelines
A spokesperson for Ms Mahmood has confirmed that a meeting is set to go ahead with the Sentencing Council on Thursday where she will make clear her displeasure at new guidance which could lead to lighter sentences for some based on ethnicity and gender.
The Labour minister is in rare agreement with her right wing Tory shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick who raised the issue last week after the Sentencing Council ignored the views of ministers from the previous government to go ahead with the new guidelines.
But after expressing her own disapproval of the guidelines, the Sentencing Council, which is independent of government, angrily put down Ms Mahmood's objections this week and rejected claims it was creating a 'two tier system'.
New guidance for judges to consider a criminal's ethnicity before deciding their punishment prompted Ms Mahmood to write to the independent body to make clear her "displeasure" and call for the changes to be reconsidered.
The Sentencing Council published new principles for courts to follow when imposing community and custodial sentences, including whether to suspend jail time, last Wednesday.
The updated guidance, which comes into force from April, says a pre-sentence report would usually be necessary before handing out punishment for someone of an ethnic, cultural or faith minority, alongside other groups such as young adults aged 18 to 25, women and pregnant women.
Ms Mahmood wrote: "A pre-sentence report can be instrumental in assisting courts in the determination of their sentence. But the access to one should not be determined by an offender's ethnicity, culture or religion."
In a letter to Lord Justice William Davis, chairman of the Sentencing Council for England and Wales, Ms Mahmood said she was considering whether policy decisions such as this should be made by the Sentencing Council and what role MPs should play.
But Lord Justice Davis replied that the Sentencing Council preserves the "critical" position of the independent judiciary in relation to sentencing.
He said: "I respectfully question whether the inclusion of a list of cohorts in the imposition guideline was a policy decision of any significance.
"However, whatever the import of the decision, it is related to an issue of sentencing."
He further warned: "In criminal proceedings where the offender is the subject of prosecution by the state, the state should not determine the sentence imposed on an individual offender.
"If sentencing guidelines of whatever kind were to be dictated in any way by ministers of the Crown, this principle would be breached."
The council's chief said he was taking legal advice on whether the Justice Secretary's power under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 to ask for guidelines to be revised could be applied in this circumstance, and if it could, it will be considered at the body's next meeting.
"This is not a power which ever has been used to ask the council to revise a guideline immediately after it has been published and which has been the subject of detailed consultation with the Lord Chancellor," Lord Justice Davis said.
Ms Mahmood had said "no minister" in this government approved of the guidance or was involved in the consultation.
The previous government was also consulted on the change during the consultation period between November 2023 to February 2024.
Lord Justice Davis said in response that there were 150 responses to the consultation on the new guidance, including from the then-minister for sentencing, with "no concern expressed about the term now under debate".
Of the new guidance, the chairman added there is "good evidence" of a disparity in sentence outcomes between white offenders and those of an ethnic minority for some offences.
"Why this disparity exists remains unclear," he said.
"The council's view is that providing a sentencer with as much information as possible about the offender is one means by which such disparity might be addressed.
"I do not accept the premise of your objection to the relevant part of the list of cohorts for whom a pre-sentence report will normally be considered necessary.
"I have seen it suggested that the guideline instructs sentencers to impose a more lenient sentence on those from ethnic minorities than white offenders. Plainly that suggestion is completely wrong."
But Ms Mahmood had support from the influential think tank Policy Exchange.
David Spencer, head of crime and justice at Policy Exchange said: 'The Sentencing Council's letter to Shabana Mahmood is remarkable.
'The chair rejects call to amend the guidelines – and defends prioritising Pre-Sentence Reports for ethnic minority criminals.
'The Justice Secretary cannot let this stand. There is no place for two-tier justice.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Farage slams ‘two-tier justice' as Labour councillor who urged crowd to ‘cut throats' of far-right protesters is CLEARED
THE decision to clear a Labour councillor who encouraged a crowd to cut the throats of protesters has been slammed by furious Nigel Farage as an "outrageous example of two-tier justice". Ricky Jones was filmed at the anti-racism demonstration in Walthamstow, East London, after the Southport murders last summer making a slashing gesture across his neck. 5 5 5 He branded far-right demonstrators as "disgusting Nazi fascists" and said "we need to cut their throats". But Jones has now been found not guilty of one count of encouraging violent disorder following just over 30 minutes of jury deliberation. Reform UK leader Mr Farage said: "This is another outrageous example of two-tier justice." While Zia Yusuf - head of Reform's Department of Government Efficiency - said: "The UK is now a country in which those who have the correct 'regime' political views can openly call for their political opponents to be brutally murdered, be filmed doing so, and face no criminal consequence. "A watershed moment in British politics." Former Tory Housing Secretary James Cleverly said in a post on X: "This unacceptable. Perverse decisions like this are adding to the anger that people feel and amplifying the belief that there isn't a dispassionate criminal justice system." Jones, 58, had attended the protest in August last year following the murders of Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, Bebe King, six, and Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, in Southport. The representative for Dartford, Kent, was told by his party to stay away but attended regardless before being suspended. During a court hearing today, prosecutor Ben Holt said: "Last summer, three young girls were killed at a dance-themed party in Southport. "There was some hysteria… Some of that grief manifested itself in anger, and regrettably, violence." Furious Farage blasts 'It's a national EMERGENCY' as Starmer reveals 'ridiculous' migrant deal The horror brought out counter-protests, one of which Jones decided to go to, the prosecutor explained. Mr Holt continued: "He attended in the face of considered advice not to do so. "During that event, he made a speech, amplified through a public address system, to the crowd. "He called the other side disgusting Nazi fascists. He said that their throats needed to be slit. "He drew his finger along his throat as he said that. "This, in a setting where, we suggest, violence could readily have been anticipated. "We ask rhetorically, what did Mr Jones think was going to happen?" Jones later told police his speech was a response to seeing stickers planted on trains by far-right group National Front. He claimed they contained concealed razor blades and included the words: "National Front Rights for Whites". The councillor also apologised for the comments but said they were not meant to be "taken literally". Following the video of his speech being shared, Jones received a message telling him he was "on BBC News". Jones was said to have appeared "satisfied" and told the contact: "I served". He also co-authored a declaration on behalf of Labour, that read: "There is no excuse for what we've seen. No possible justification. "This is mindless criminal thuggery, fuelled and perpetrated by the far right spreading their divisive, destructive ideas on the streets and on social media." The court heard Labour had sent out an "instructive" email referring to the Southport rallies taking place across the UK at the time. It told its councillors to "follow the clear advice" issued by police, which urged anyone "not to take part in, attend, or encourage others to attend any sort of demonstration or counter demonstration". But Jones alegedly chose to "ignore" the advice, with the video showing him making a "conscious" decision to take to the stage and ask an aide to film his speech. In his evidence, Jones described the mood in the crowd at the time as "happy and joyful". The father-of-four and grandfather also told the court he felt "horrified" after realising what he had said. "When I had time to view the footage after the demonstration, I was shocked at what I had actually said," he told jurors. 5
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'Keir Starmer has met his match in Liverpool - and his own goals are costing Labour the football vote'
New data shows football supporters at nationwide would rather vote Reform than back Labour. Fleet Street Fox argues Keir Starmer's betrayal of the Hillsborough Law shows how good he is at own goals There's something about a blend of football and politics that makes for a heady brew. Perhaps it's the tribalism, the down-to-the-wire elections, or the hope that, this time, your lot might finally be able to deliver. And, of course, the chance to shout at the telly for ignoring a BLATANT foul. Maybe it's just that both are run by men in suits who play with the happiness of millions, but more often than not leave you with an alleged meat pie and a deep sense of betrayal, while twatting around in a helicopter at our expense. But walk into any match day boozer on a Saturday afternoon and you'll hear the real state of the nation, filtered through lager, community and the honesty of people who know exactly whose side they're on. Their debate is a full-blooded tackle, studs up and sod the VAR. That is perhaps why Prime Ministers don't ever go there, and my but it shows. For if he had ever set an Islington brogue into a pub within spitting distance of Anfield or Goodison Park, he would know the depth of fury that would greet his failure to implement the Hillsborough Law he has promised half a dozen times, and hummed and hawed about since missing his own transfer-it-to-statute deadline of April. This, for those who don't know, is a bill that would make it a crime for a public official to lie. Not just when a mistake leads to the witness box, but when writing the first report, when briefing a superior or the media. It would have protected young police constables who were ordered to rewrite their pocket books after official negligence caused a deathly crush among Liverpool fans at Hillsborough Stadium in 1989. It would have meant that 97 grieving families wouldn't have had to fight for 20 years for the right inquest verdict. It would protect every little guy in the country, and make all the pompous fat cats keep their noses clean. Scousers - even the ones who support the blue team - have been solid Labour for a century. They've been on the raw end of entitlement and London dismissiveness for too long to ever vote any other way, and their ballot papers are traditionally weighed rather than counted. But when the PM didn't institute the Hillsborough Law "on day one" as he promised, when he missed the April 15 anniversary, and now as grumbles spread across Merseyside that it may never appear at all as a result of tinkering by civil servants who don't fancy being subject to it - they're snubbing Labour like it's just turned up in a Man Utd shirt and a bucket hat. A survey by More In Common has found that Liverpool has the lowest proportion of football supporters of any club in the country who'd back Starmer, at just 27%. Even that seems optimistic, when you consider the Runcorn by-election three months ago had a decent 46% turnout and Reform still pinched the seat by just 6 votes. Today you don't need scales, but instead a microscope to count the majority. Starmer has ducked and weaved, tried to placate the bureaucrat linesmen, and spent too much time dancing down the right wing. Despite having a team of 398 MPs, he has feigned a limp, tripped over his laces, and consistently failed to put the ball in the back of the net. It's just not what you expect from someone who holds the premiership, Gary. And it's not just the north west that feels let down. The survey shows the mood has turned sour on every terrace, with Reform top on the transfer list for fans of Premier League and lower league clubs, and even non-football fans. Football fans have long memories, and know when they're being fobbed off by a crap manager and a lack of investment. Hillsborough has deeper meaning in Liverpool and Sheffield, but its protections would resonate nationwide. Wages are stagnant, the NHS is in need of intensive care, and the waiting list for a dentist is worse than the queue for a Wembley final. On immigration, Starmer has failed to crow about the victories he's had in bringing down some big name people smugglers, but even that has not stemmed the flow of huddled masses trying to be somewhere, anywhere, other than Afghnistan, Syria or Iran. Into the void strides Nigel Farage, a yellow-trousered golf club bore who has never worked well in a team and wouldn't set foot in a stadium unless there was a camera crew and a spotlight involved. Even then he'd station himself in a VIP suite, not the terraces. Imagine him, stood baa-ing about how awful the team is: a cup of something warm and wet might be thrown, but eventually, people would just decide to steer clear. That's what's happening on Merseyside, where the disillusionment will never be enough to make them vote Tory but has already persuaded thousands to stay at home. It's underway too in Manchester, Newcastle, London, at the Sunday morning municipal pitches and the after-school clubs: Labour is a dirty word where just a year ago it was the best hope. People are tired of politicians who only turn up to wave a scarf once every 5 years. They're fed up of soft-handed tossers putting up prices and neglecting the foundations, people who talk a good game but never actually play one. They want a government, and a team, they can be proud of. Starmer promised all that when he took over, but he's ignoring the commentary since, and there's no analysis of what's going wrong in Liverpool. When he turns up there next month for conference, the odds are he'll be taking an early bath every night to avoid the people who aren't his fans any more. If Labour has lost Liverpool, and a football-playing PM has lost the terraces, then it's the biggest own goal of all time. In football, as in politics, you can't hope to win if you forget who you're playing for.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
No-fault evictions surge under Labour
The number of 'no-fault' evictions has surged under Labour as landlords rush to free up properties ahead of rent reforms that will ban the practice. So-called Section 21 evictions enforced by bailiffs rose by 8pc in the 12 months since Sir Keir Starmer was handed the keys to Downing Street, new figures show. Section 21 notices allow landlords to force renters out during their tenancy without needing a specified reason. It comes after Rushanara Ali, the Government's homelessness minister, was forced to resign after it was revealed she evicted tenants at her London property before increasing the rent. There were 11,402 repossessions by county court bailiffs following a Section 21 notice in the year to June, up from 10,576 from the previous 12 months, according to Ministry of Justice figures. The notices are served on tenants by landlords to begin the process of regaining possession of a property despite their shorthold tenancy not having expired. Under Labour's Renters' Rights Bill, landlords will need to apply for a hearing before they can evict a tenant. During the same period, there were 30,729 uses of fast-track evictions. These are available to landlords when a tenant has not left the property by a specified date. This was a slight drop from 32,103 in the preceding 12 months. A spokesman for the National Residential Landlord Association said: 'It is concerning that the number of bailiff repossessions relating to no-fault proceedings is increasing at a time when claims, orders warrants, and overall repossessions are decreasing year on year according to the Ministry of Justice's latest statistics. 'This illustrates that, even after receiving a court order to leave a property, tenants are opting to wait until they are removed by a bailiff. This is not in the interest of households or landlords, all of whom will have to endure additional stress and costs associated with evictions.' Last week Ms Ali quit her role as homelessness minister amid claims she gave tenants at a property she owned in east London four months' notice to leave before relisting the property with a £700 rent increase within weeks. Ms Ali's house was put up for sale while the tenants were living there, and it was only relisted as a rental because it had not sold, according to the i newspaper. Her actions went against Labour's flagship Renters' Rights Bill, which is in the final stages of becoming law, and introduces stronger protections for tenants. Once the law comes in, landlords who evict their tenants in order to sell their property will be banned from relisting it as a rental for six months. Instead, buy-to-let owners will only be able to evict for a very limited number of reasons, using a Section 8 notice, which requires a court hearing. The bill will also introduce a 12-month protected period from eviction at the start of a tenancy. Mairi MacRae, from homelessness charity Shelter, said: 'It is unconscionable that more than a year after the Government came to power, thousands of renters continue to be marched out of their homes by bailiffs because of an unfair policy that the Government said would be scrapped immediately.' A government spokesman said: 'No one should live in fear of a Section 21 eviction and these new figures show exactly why we will abolish them through our Renters' Rights Bill, which is a manifesto commitment and legislative priority for this Government. 'We're determined to level the playing field by providing tenants with greater security, rights and protections in their homes and our landmark reforms will be implemented swiftly after the Bill becomes law.'
