Women's Prize for Fiction ‘greatest honour' as an intersex woman, says winner
The winner of the Women's Prize for Fiction has said the award is 'the greatest honour of my life as a woman' as she reflected on her experience growing up intersex.
Dutch author Yael van der Wouden won the accolade for her debut novel, The Safekeep, and used her winner's speech to champion the trans community, who have 'changed the system' and 'fought for health care'.
The book, which explores repressed desire and the unresolved aftermath of the Holocaust in post-Second World War Netherlands, was described as an 'astonishing debut' by the head of the judges.
The ceremony, held in central London on Thursday, saw the non-fiction prize awarded to physician Dr Rachel Clarke for The Story Of A Heart, which explores the human experience behind organ donation.
In her winner's speech, after thanking the judges, van der Wouden said: 'I was a girl until I turned 13, and then, as I hit puberty, all that was supposed to happen did not quite happen.
'And if it did happen, it happened too much, and all at once my girlhood became an uncertain fact.
'I won't thrill you too much with the specifics, but the long and the short of it is that, hormonally, I'm intersex.
'This little fact defined my life throughout my teens, until I advocated for the health care that I needed.
'The surgery and the hormones that I needed, which not all intersex people need. Not all intersex people feel at odds with their gender presentation.
'I mention the fact that I did, because in the few precious moments here on stage, I am receiving, truly, the greatest honour of my life as a woman, presenting to you as a woman, and accepting this Women's Prize.
'And that is because of every single trans person who's fought for health care, who changed the system, the law, societal standards, themselves. I stand on their shoulders.'
The NHS website says intersex, or differences in sex development (DSD), is a group of rare conditions involving genes, hormones and reproductive organs that mean a person's sex development is different to most.
In contrast, people who are transgender identify as a gender separate to the sex they were born in and sometimes go through gender-affirming surgery.
Van der Wouden's novel follows Isabel, a young woman whose life in solitude is upended when her brother's girlfriend Eva comes to live in their family house in what turns into a summer of obsession, suspicion and desire.
The chairwoman of the judges for the fiction prize, writer Kit de Waal, said: 'This astonishing debut is a classic in the making, a story to be loved and appreciated for generations to come. Books like this don't come along every day.'
Van der Wouden will receive £30,000 and a limited-edition bronze statuette known as the Bessie, which was created and donated by artist Grizel Niven.
The judging panel for the Women's Prize for Fiction included novelist and journalist Diana Evans, author and journalist Bryony Gordon, writer and magazine editor Deborah Joseph, and musician and composer Amelia Warner.
Clarke said she has 'literally been a feminist since I was too young to know what that word even meant', as she collected her award.
The physician's book recounts two family stories, documenting how medical staff take care of nine-year-old Kiera in her final hours after a car accident, while offering a new life to nine-year-old Max who is suffering from heart failure from a viral infection.
Clarke, who is behind the books Breathtaking and Your Life In My Hands: A Junior Doctor's Story, will receive £30,000 and a limited-edition piece of art known as the Charlotte, both gifted by the Charlotte Aitken Trust.
The judging panel for the non-fiction prize included writer and broadcaster Dr Leah Broad, whose work focuses on women's cultural history, and novelist and critic Elizabeth Buchan.
Previous winners of the fiction prize include Tayari Jones for An American Marriage and Madeline Miller for The Song Of Achilles, while the first non-fiction prize was awarded last year to Naomi Klein for Doppelganger: A Trip Into The Mirror World.
The awards were announced by the Women's Prize Trust, a UK charity that aims to 'create equitable opportunities for women in the world of books and beyond'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
ESPN's Mike Greenberg opens up about horrifying heart condition and the procedure he says changed his life
It wasn't just an irregular heartbeat bothering ESPN's Mike Greenburg when the married father of two was diagnosed with an atrial fibrillation (AFib) in 2015. As the long-time sports media personality told the New York Post, his condition led to severe anxiety, sleepless nights, and fear of another episode like the one that left him hospitalized that ultimately took its toll. 'I was in my mid-40s, I was just sitting on my couch and suddenly felt my heart racing up in the 160s or 170s,' the 57-year-old said. 'Imagine sprinting on a treadmill, that was my heart rate while sitting.' Greenberg knew about his condition before the episode, but admits that still didn't prepare him for what was to come over the ensuing years. 'At first, it was manageable with meds, I was on beta blockers and used a "pill-in-the-pocket" approach,' Greenberg said. 'It worked — until it didn't. 'The episodes became more frequent,' he continued. 'The meds didn't stop them anymore. I'd lay awake at night feeling my heart race, frustrated and scared.' Greenberg's workload wasn't helping. Typically waking up at 3am, Greenberg kept his condition a secret from coworkers while frequently logging seven days a week. 'The moment that pushed me to act was in summer 2022,' he said. 'My wife [Stacey] and I went to Burgundy, France — my favorite wine region. But I was afraid to enjoy it. I was sipping tiny amounts, scared of setting off an episode. That trip was one of many other moments that made me realize, I couldn't live like that.' By March of 2023, Greenberg got a second opinion from Dr. Jim Cheung, who suggested a minimally invasive catheter ablation procedure. Not only was this an outpatient procedure, allowing Greenberg to sleep in his own bed that night, but he was back at work within a week and hasn't suffered any subsequent symptoms. 'That second opinion changed my life,' Greenberg said. 'I met with Dr. Cheung, who said I was a good candidate. We scheduled the procedure around my ESPN schedule, right between NFL free agency and the NBA playoffs. 'I had the procedure on a Monday, slept in my own bed that night and was back to work the following Monday. Within three weeks, I was working out again. And since then — no episodes. It's been transformational. 'The device used in my procedure was manufactured by Johnson & Johnson MedTech, a global leader in cardiac arrhythmia treatment. Without this procedure, I couldn't have done it. The sleepless nights, the anxiety — I wouldn't have made it. 'I didn't have the "Sunday Countdown" job yet in spring 2023, but I do now. It's the highlight of my career, and I couldn't have taken it on without having that procedure.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘They entrusted me with their daughter's memory': Women's prize winner Rachel Clarke on her story of a life-saving transplant
To read Rachel Clarke's The Story of a Heart, which has won this year's Women's prize for nonfiction, is to experience an onslaught of often competing emotions. There is awed disbelief at the sheer skill and dedication of the medical teams who transplanted the heart of nine-year-old Keira, who had been killed in a head-on traffic collision, into the body of Max, a little boy facing almost certain death from rapidly deteriorating dilated cardiomyopathy. There is vast admiration for the inexhaustible compassion of the teams who cared for both children and their families, and wonder at the cascade of medical advances, each breakthrough representing determination, inspiration, rigorous work, and careful navigation of newly emerging ethical territory. And most flooring of all is the immense courage of two families, one devastated by the sudden loss of a precious child, the other faced with a diagnosis that threatened to tear their lives apart. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion To write such a story requires special preparation. 'I was full of trepidation when I first approached Keira's family,' Clarke tells me the morning after she was awarded the prize. 'I knew that I was asking them to entrust me with the most precious thing, their beloved daughter Keira's story, her memory.' The former journalist trained as a doctor in her late 20s, and has spent most of her medical career working in palliative care. Subsequently, she has also become an acclaimed writer and committed campaigner, publishing three memoirs: Your Life in My Hands, Dear Life and Breathtaking. She turned to her medical training for guidance when writing The Story of a Heart. 'I said to myself, my framework will be my medical framework, so I would conduct myself in such a way that they would, I hoped, trust me in the same way that someone might trust me as a doctor. And if at any point they changed their mind, then they could walk away from the project.' Each family read the manuscript in its entirety, with Clarke determined that she would not publish if they had any qualms. On the morning that we speak, she has been in touch with them, and she reads me a message from Loanna, Keira's mother. It says simply: 'Keira really has made such a difference to so many people. She is just incredible.' Loanna, she goes on to tell me, now visits schools to tell children about Keira; Max's mother, Emma, is an 'indefatigable' ambassador for the NHS's organ donation programme. Nobody who reads the book could forget the almost superhuman fortitude of Keira's father, Joe, or her sisters, all of whom not only consented but pressed forward with donating her organs, even as Loanna and Keira's brother were gravely injured. There, too, is the bravery of Max's father, Paul, supporting his desperately ill son through the pain and trauma of treatment; and Max's brother, Harry, now finishing his second year at medical school. It is because of these people that in 2020, Max and Keira's Law entered the statute books, ruling that adults would be presumed to have given consent to organ donation, rather than having to opt in, an enormously important step in addressing the scarcity of donor organs. For Clarke, it was also important to shine a light on the care with which the medical teams treat those who, in death, are giving someone else the chance of life; from the 'moment of honour' that precedes all surgery to retrieve donor organs, in which all fall silent to consider the patient, to the last offices of washing and dressing performed by nurses. 'It's the patient that's the important person,' she explains. 'And I think that says something very profound about us as a species, doesn't it?' Clarke, who is the mother of two teenagers, spends half her time working with patients, and half on 'other things'; not only writing books, but shining a light on the challenges her profession – and by extension all of us – are facing. At the moment, she is furious about the government's recent decision to stop issuing visas to foreign care workers, because what they do is regarded as unskilled labour. With a shortage of 100,000 care workers, the result is patients unable to be discharged from hospital: 'A direct consequence of that is I will see more patients on trolleys dying outside an A&E that they can't even get into because we don't have enough care workers. I will look them in the eye. Keir Starmer won't. Wes Streeting won't. But I will, and I will try to give them the best care I can in a corridor where there isn't even a curtain to draw around them for dignity.' She has, she says, always been torn between the arts and science, but that medicine is 'the perfect marriage of hard science and beautiful, messy humanity. And I try to write books that represent medicine accurately in that sense. You are not a good doctor if you're just a scientist and you're not a good doctor if you're just about emotion and feeling: you have to marry the two.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Fears assisted dying bill could be defeated as MPs warn ‘tide is turning'
There are growing fears Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill could be defeated when it returns to the Commons next week, as MPs claim confidence in it is rapidly being lost. The warning comes as Ms Leadbeater suffered her first major defeat on Friday, after MPs voted to introduce new safeguards to prevent health professionals raising the subject of assisted dying with children. They voted 259 in favour and 216 against an amendment tabled by Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier stating 'no health professional shall raise assisted dying with a person under 18'. It is understood Ms Leadbeater didn't support the amendment because she agrees with the British Medical Association, which has said doctors should not be put in the position where they are barred from raising it with patients. It comes amid concerns that if people under 18 with terminal illnesses are unable to get the advice they want from their doctor, they will turn to the internet, where they are more likely to be subject to misinformation. Labour MP Paul Waugh told The Independent that today's voting shows the bill has 'rapidly lost the confidence of MPs', adding that the 'strong momentum against it is now clear'. 'It had a Commons majority of 56 last November. That was cut to 36 last month on a key amendment. Today, we saw a further cut of the majority to 21 and 26 on amendments. And the final vote - a big defeat for the proposer of the bill by 43 votes - just underlined how uncomfortable MPs are.' Mr Waugh added: 'The more the scrutiny of this particular bill, the more MPs have deep concerns about its lack of safeguards for the vulnerable.' But sources close to Ms Leadbeater insisted there is no reason to believe momentum is being lost, pointing out that the decline in majorities came as a result of fewer MPs attending the debate overall. It is understood that Ms Leadbeater is confident that support for it remains strong. Kit Malthouse, who supports the bill said: "The evidence from today is that our numbers held strong. Our majority proportionally was the same. On one vote, where a fine judgment was required, obviously views of colleagues differed. But if anything, that would probably strengthen their conviction to vote for the bill, having supported us in other votes.' Danny Kruger, who has been a vocal opponent of the bill, said he is 'increasingly hopeful' it will be voted down next week. 'The tide is turning on the Assisted Suicide Bill', he said. While he described the success of the amendment to prevent health professionals from raising the subject of assisted dying with children as a 'big victory', he warned that the bill is 'still way too open to abuse'. Rachael Maskell, who is against the bill, added: 'It is clear that now MPs are engaging in the detail of the Bill that they can see the cracks and are losing confidence'. 'A very different picture was painted today to when the Bill passed with 56 votes in the autumn to an amendment passing by 43 votes today against the will of the Bill's sponsor. MPs now need to engage with the evidence which clearly sets out why this particular Bill is not fit for purpose', she told The Independent. But pro-assisted dying sources pointed out that people on both sides of the debate voted to support the extra safeguards for children. Debating the amendment, Dr Neil-Shastri-Hurst MP, a medical doctor, said: 'Those who have had the privilege of meeting a young person living with a terminal illness will know that they often display a maturity and a depth of understanding far beyond their years. 'To deny them the opportunity of a considered conversation about their future upon reaching adulthood is not an act of compassion, in my view; it is to abandon them. 'It is to leave them isolated, navigating a complex and deeply personal journey through the filter of online forums, rather than in dialogue with trusted, qualified professionals. We owe them better than that.' Opinion in the medical community has been divided over the bill, with the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) expressing concern, while some MPs who are doctors are among the Bill's strongest supporters. Seven RCPsych members, including a former president and vice president, have written to MPs to distance themselves from their college's concern, instead describing the Bill as 'workable, safe and compassionate' with a 'clear and transparent legal framework'. Meanwhile, Claire Macdonald, director of My Death, My Decision said 'no-one should be forced to suffer, and the British public wants politicians to change the law on assisted dying'. In a letter to MPs this week, Ms Leadbeater said supporters and opponents appear in agreement that 'if we are to pass this legislation, it should be the best and safest Bill possible'. She added: 'I'm confident it can and will be.' The proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
