Al-Qaida-linked group claims attack against Mali army position near Senegal
The al-Qaida-linked JNIM extremist group claimed responsibility for the coordinated attack on several Malian army positions in the country's west and central regions.
One position was in Diboli, across the border from Senegal, which has been largely spared the extremist attacks.
'The border region to Senegal is a major gateway for trade and imports from Dakar ports to Mali that had been relatively stable for years,' said Ulf Laessing, head of the Sahel program at the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. 'This will also worry border communities in Senegal.'
Malian army spokesperson Col. Majo Souleymane Dembélé said on national television that the army had 'neutralized' 80 attackers. There were no details on any casualties among soldiers.
Mali, a landlocked nation in the semiarid Sahel region, for more than a decade has battled an insurgency by armed groups, including some allied with al-Qaida and the Islamic State group. Following military coups, Mali's authorities have expelled French forces and turned to Russia's mercenary units for assistance, but the security situation has been deteriorating.
Attacks by extremists have been on the rise in Mali and neighboring Burkina Faso in recent weeks. JNIM has established a strong presence in both.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
17 minutes ago
- Times
Lithuania plans 30-mile ‘Baltic defence line' against Russian invasion
Lithuania has outlined its plan for a 30-mile-deep ribbon of defences along its borders with Russia and Belarus, including minefields and bridges primed for demolition in the event of an invasion. Alongside Poland, the three Baltic states have begun fortifying their frontiers to deter the Kremlin from considering an attack, supplementing existing metal fences with obstacles and redoubts partially inspired by techniques that the Ukrainians have used to fend off Russian assaults. When it is complete, the 'Baltic defence line' will stretch across large sections of the land perimeter of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, from the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad in the west to the mouth of the River Narva in the east. Although critics sometimes disparagingly liken the project to the ill-fated Maginot Line that France laid down along its border with Germany before the Second World War, local commanders and military analysts say the analogy is misplaced. The intent is not to establish a single physical barrier to stop an invasion but rather to slow down any land-based attack and to 'canalise' the enemy force into areas where it is easier to resist. The Baltic states announced the scheme in January last year, and work started on the first ditches, bunkers and embankments a few months after that. Last summer, Lithuania began setting up 27 'engineering parks' with stores of 'counter-mobility' tools such as razor wire, concrete roadblocks and antitank barriers nicknamed 'hedgehogs' (caltrop-like assemblies of crossed metal beams) and 'dragon's teeth' (concrete pyramids). • Edward Lucas: The six Baltic states that could decide the future of Europe However, an update from the Lithuanian defence ministry has sketched out a more ambitious series of layered fortifications that will stretch far enough inland to cover Vilnius, the capital, which is 20 miles from the Belarusian border. It will take the form of three 'echelons'. The first of these, roughly three miles in depth, will start with an anti-tank ditch next to the border fence, followed by an embankment, strips of dragon's teeth and minefields, and then two layers of strongpoints for defending infantry. Dovile Sakaliene, the defence minister, has previously indicated that it is likely to include anti-personnel mines after Lithuania and several other Nato members on the eastern flank withdrew from the Ottawa convention, which prohibits the weapons. Further back, in the second and third echelons, bridges will be prepared for demolition, and there will be further lines of infantry positions. There is also a plan to fell trees along the roads leading to towns and cities, presumably to make it easier to destroy any invading Russian armour. At the same time, Lithuania said it had placed a €10 million order for anti-tank mines, on top of previous deals to buy 85,000 of the mines for a total of €50 million. It has also replenished its stock of 155mm artillery shells, ordered 44 state-of-the-art Leopard 2A8 battle tanks from Germany, and taken delivery of €6 million worth of Israeli-made Spike LR2 anti-tank missiles. Last month, Sakaliene suggested that she would be prepared to ask Nato's international air-policing mission in the Baltic states to destroy drones that encroach on her country's airspace from Belarus after at least two such incidents in the preceding weeks. Lithuania can field about 23,000 professional soldiers and a further 104,000 reservists. It is modernising its equipment with a defence budget that has risen to 5.5 per cent of national GDP, one of the highest levels in Nato. Germany is also upgrading its multinational Nato battlegroup stationed at Rukla, about 40 miles northwest of Vilnius, to a full 5,000-strong armoured brigade. However, war games conducted last year suggested that these forces might struggle to hold their own against a large-scale Russian invasion until the rest of Nato could deliver meaningful reinforcements, particularly if Russia were to seize the Suwalki gap, a section of the Lithuanian-Polish border that is the alliance's only land bridge to the Baltic states. This means that the ability to slow and 'shape' any Russian offensive through the defence line could be decisive in buying more time. Poland and the Baltic states are seeking European Union funding for these projects, arguing that they will serve to protect the entire bloc.
Sky News
17 minutes ago
- Sky News
What would US-backed security guarantees for Ukraine look like?
Promises of security guarantees for Ukraine have been lauded as "game-changing" and "historic" in the hope of bringing an end to the war with Russia. As all eyes moved from Donald Trump's summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska to talks with Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington, the White House claimed Russia has agreed to the US providing 'NATO-style protection' when the fighting ends. Although there has been no confirmation from the Kremlin, Ukraine, the UK, and other Western allies say details of a post-war security agreement will be finalised in the coming days. What has been said so far? Security guarantees have long been talked about as a way of ensuring peace in Ukraine when fighting comes to an end. Since March, when the UK and France spearheaded a largely European 'coalition of the willing' and potential peacekeeping force, many have claimed it would be ineffective without American backing. The US has repeatedly refused to be drawn on its involvement - until now. Two days after Mr Putin travelled to Alaska for talks with the Trump team, US special envoy Steve Witkoff claimed Russia had agreed to Ukrainian security guarantees. He claimed that during the summit, the Kremlin had conceded the US "could offer Article-5 like protection", which he described as "game-changing". Article 5 is one of the founding principles of NATO and states that an attack on any of its 32 member states is considered an attack on them all. This was bolstered by the US president himself after he met his Ukrainian counterpart in Washington on Monday. He said the pair had "discussed security guarantees", which would be "provided by the various European countries" - "with coordination with the United States of America". Writing on X the following day, the Ukrainian leader said the "concrete content" of the security agreement would be "formalised on paper within the next 10 days". US reports say security agreement talks will be headed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 5:57 What would security guarantees look like? Very few details have emerged so far, despite the series of high-profile meetings. Speaking to Fox News on Tuesday, Mr Trump said European nations are going to "frontload" the security agreement with soldiers. "They want to have boots on the ground", he told the broadcaster, referring to the UK, France, and Germany in particular. He insisted the US would not send ground troops, adding: "You have my assurance and I'm president." Sir Keir Starmer said the coalition of the willing is "preparing for the deployment of a reassurance force" in the event of "hostilities ending". This was the original basis for the coalition - soldiers from various European and allied nations placed strategically across Ukraine to deter Russia from launching future attacks. But troops alone are unlikely to be enough of a deterrent for Vladimir Putin, military analyst Sean Bell says. "This is all about credibility and I don't think boots on the ground is a credible answer," he tells Sky News. Stationing soldiers along Ukraine's 1,000-mile border with Russia would require around 100,000 soldiers at a time, which would have to be trained, deployed, and rotated, requiring 300,000 in total. The entire UK Army would only make up 10% of that, with France likely able to contribute a further 10%, Bell says. Several European nations would feel unable to sacrifice any troops for an umbrella force due to their proximity to Ukraine and risk of further Russian aggression. "You're not even close to getting the numbers you need," Bell adds. "And even if you could, putting all of NATO's frontline forces in one country facing Russia would be really dangerous - and leave China, North Korea, Iran, or Russia free to do whatever they wanted." History of failed security agreements in Ukraine Current proposals for Ukrainian security guarantees are far from the first. In December 1994, Ukraine signed the Budapest Memorandum alongside the UK, US, and Russia. The Ukrainians agreed to give up their Soviet-inherited nuclear weapons in exchange for recognition of their sovereignty and a place on the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Twenty years later in 2014, however, Russia violated the terms with its illegal annexation of Crimea and the war between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian in the Donbas region. Similarly, the Minsk Agreements of 2014 and 2015 were designed to bring an end to the Donbas war. Mediated by France and Germany, they promised a ceasefire, withdrawal of weapons, and local elections in the separatist-occupied Donbas, but were repeatedly violated and failed to result in lasting peace. 'Article 5-like protection' When Mr Witkoff first mentioned security guarantees again, he described them as "Article 5-like" or "NATO-style". Article 5 is one of the founding principles of NATO and states that an attack on any of its 32 member states is considered an attack on them all. It has only ever been invoked once since its inception in 1949 - by the US in response to the 9/11 attacks of 2001. Russia has repeatedly insisted Ukraine should not be allowed to join NATO and cited the risk of it happening among its original reasons for attacking Kyiv in 2022. NATO general-secretary Mark Rutte has said Ukrainian membership is not on the table, but that an alternative "Article 5-type" arrangement could be viable. The alliance's military leaders are due to meet on Wednesday to discuss options. It is not clear how such a special security agreement and formal NATO membership would differ. Bell says that negotiations on this - and any surrendering of Ukrainian territory - will be the two most difficult in ending the war. But he stresses they are both key in providing the "flesh on the bones" to what the coalition of the willing has offered so far. "It will be about trying to find things that make the Western commitment to the security of Ukraine enduring," Bell adds. US airpower, intelligence and a better Ukrainian military Other potential options for a security agreement include air support, a no-maritime zone, intelligence sharing, and military supplies. Imposing either a no-fly over Ukraine or no-maritime zone across the Black Sea would "play to NATO's strengths" - as US air and naval capabilities alone far outstrip Russia's, Bell says. Sharing American intelligence with Kyiv to warn of any future Russian aggression would also be a "massive strength" to any potential deterrence force, he adds. Ukraine is already offering to buy an extra $90bn (£66.6bn) in US weapons with the help of European funds, Mr Zelenskyy said this week. And any security agreement would likely extend to other military equipment, logistics, and training to help Ukraine better defend itself years down the line, Bell says. "At first it would need credible Western support, but over time, you would hope the international community makes sure Ukraine can build its own indigenous capability. "Because while there's a lot of focus on Ukraine at the moment, in five years' time, there will be different governments and different priorities - so that has to endure."
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
What happens next as Donald Trump plans Putin-Zelensky talks over Ukraine war
Donald Trump has claimed to be organising a meeting between Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky in an attempt to reach a peace deal. The Mirror looks at what could happen next Keir Starmer said today European and US leaders are drawing up "robust" plans to defend Ukraine if a peace deal is struck with Moscow. Less than 24 hours after crunch White House talks, the Prime Minister and French President Emmanuel Macron chaired a meeting of the 'Coalition of the Willing'. Earlier this year Mr Starmer insisted that Britain is prepared to put boots on the ground and planes in the air in the event of a deal to end the three-year conflict. After the meeting wrapped up, A No10 spokesman said the PM had told those on the call "there was a real sense of unity and shared goal of securing a just and lasting peace for Ukraine" during meetings with President Trump. READ MORE: Donald Trump issues Putin 'VERY severe consequences' warning if Ukraine war doesn't end The PM also said the Coalition's military planning teams will "meet with their US counterparts in the coming days to further strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees and prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended". Here The Mirror looks at what could happen next. What happened at the White House? European leaders flanked Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky for crunch talks at the White House on Monday evening in an unprecedented show of unity. Donald Trump updated them on the US-Russia summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday where the Russian tyrant was given the red-carpet treatment. European allies had feared a repeat of the Ukrainian wartime leader's first visit to the Oval Office back in February where he was ambushed by Mr Trump and Vice President, JD Vance. But Monday's high-stakes meeting was a far more cordial affair with promises of further talks. Keir Starmer left the White House saying there had been a 'real significant breakthrough' in security guarantees to Ukraine in the event of a peace deal. The Prime Minister also said there had been 'real movement' on the next stage of negotiations. What happens next? One of the key takeaways from Monday's meeting was Mr Trump's claim to be brokering a one-to-one meeting between Ukraine's Zelensky and Mr Putin. If the meeting goes ahead - and it's a big if - it will only be the second time the pair have met and the first since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine back in February 2022. READ MORE: The German Chancellor has suggested the meeting could take place within two weeks - but there has been no public commitment from the Kremlin so far. The French President, Emmanuel Macron, has suggested they should meet in a 'neutral country' and said he was pushing for Geneva, in Switzerland. The US President has then proposed a 'trilateral' meeting to follow - between the United States, Russia and Ukraine to discuss next steps. What did the 'Coalition of the Willing' discuss? European leaders are busy at work on military planning in the event of a peace deal. A group of 30-plus nations - the Coalition of the Willing - have signed up to help defend Ukraine if a deal is struck. Its aim is to act as a deterrent for future attacks from Moscow. Keir Starmer has previously said he is willing to put UK troops on the ground and planes in the sky as part of any peacekeeping force in Ukraine. On Tuesday, the Prime Minister and Mr Macron updated the countries on talks at the White House as they chaired a meeting of the group. During the meeting Mr Starmer said military planning teams will soon meet with US teams to 'strengthen plans to deliver robust security guarantees' to Ukraine. What is the US prepared to do? European allies have long insisted the US is vital to guaranteeing Ukraine's security. Donald Trump swerved a question in the Oval Office on Monday on whether the US would be willing to put boots on the ground in Ukraine to help secure any peace deal. He suggested on Tuesday the US would offer air support to Ukraine, bragging that there was no other country with the 'kind of stuff we have'. Will there be a peace deal between Moscow and Kyiv? Downing Street has always insisted Putin has never been serious about the prospect of peace. That appeared evident when Moscow's drones and missiles rained down on Ukraine - even as European leaders met at the White House to discuss the possibility of an end to three-year war. Reports also suggested Putin's price for peace would be for Ukraine to hand over land the Kremlin does not occupy - something Mr Zelensky has dismissed. The US President himself said on Tuesday it is 'possible he [Putin] doesn't want to make a deal'. The coming weeks will be crucial but it is clear European leaders are pushing to ramp up sanctions to turn the screws on Moscow's war machine once again if talks collapse.
