Kentucky State student vows to fight for scholarship stopped by Elon Musk, Donald Trump
Editors Note: A few hours after this story was published, the U.S. Department of Agriculture web page on the 1890 National Scholars Program was updated to say the program had been reopened and applications will be accepted through March 15.
Growing up on the north side of Lexington, Anthony Jackson Jr. didn't have an agriculture background, but his education at Carter G. Woodson Academy and the Locust Trace AgriScience Center soon changed that.
He started in veterinary science, but soon turned to food systems, like how to wrestle with the food deserts in rural and urban America. He was such an exemplary student —with a 4.0 GPA and ACT score of 27 — that as a student at Kentucky State University, he won an 1890 National Scholars program award from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Only 94 students at 19 schools currently have the prestigious full-ride scholarship, all of them attending 1890 land grant institutions, sometimes known as Historically Black Colleges and Universities. In his three-and-a-half years at Kentucky State, the program allowed Jackson to intern with the USDA, travel to Rwanda, meet politicians and policy makers and research food systems all over the world.
Then this weekend, he was alerted to a message on the USDA site: 'The 1890 Scholars Program has been suspended pending further review.'
'I was shocked,' Jackson told me.
He was relieved to find out that USDA authorities believe his scholarship, and those of other current students, will be honored. But now he's worried the program that has supported so many students into important agriculture work will be axed.
He's starting a social media campaign to get the program reinstated. As he said in one statement: 'I have promoted the possibilities of my scholarship to so many that I cannot imagine not passing the baton to the next eager scholar ready to feed the world.'
Like so many other things right now, the program is a victim of an unelected South African billionaire's slash and burn rampage through the federal government. It's all a game to Elon Musk and Donald Trump, part of what looks like an attempt to purge women and people of color — and the programs that might help them — out of the government.
'Throughout history, African-Americans have been significantly cut out of agriculture,' Jackson said. 'This program gives people who have equal qualifications this platform they need to be successful. I would say that I feel as if every single person who has the scholarship has qualified for the opportunity at hand.'
HBCUs were created as part of the Morrill Act of 1890 to force Southern states practicing Jim Crow segregation to offer educational opportunities to Black citizens, who in the post-Reconstruction South, were treated as second-class citizens.
Aaron Thompson, president of the Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Education, said it's important to remember that over time, those schools have widely opened up to everyone, along with the 1890 Scholars.
'It's a prestigious scholarship, and these young people are going into essential places that USDA felt were important to nation and the state,' Thompson said. 'So those scholarships have helped tremendously to get more kids interested in agriculture, to be scientists and business leaders.'
The USDA website describes the program as being aimed at 'increasing the number of students from rural and under-served communities who study food, agriculture, natural resource and other related sciences.
'Scholars attend one of the 1890 land-grant universities and pursue degrees in agriculture, food, natural resource sciences, or related academic disciplines. The scholarship may also include work experience at USDA.'
The Kentucky General Assembly is still trying its own path of eliminating diversity, of course. So far, the bills that failed last year and are back again this session, are mostly aimed at organizational structures like DEI offices in public higher education.
But at the federal level, it appears that the DEI purge could be significantly more dire.
On Feb. 14, the U.S. Department of Education sent a letter to get rid of any programs that even might be related to helping historically marginalized groups. The letter said 'Educational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon 'systemic and structural racism' and advanced discriminatory policies and practices.'
Some have concluded these policies and practices could include Black fraternities and sororities, or an Asian club. Or they could start to come after curriculum, like classes in the history of the civil rights movement, which is, in fact, predicated on the very real premise of 'system and structural racism.'
'We want all students to be able to come on our campuses and explore the opportunities we offer to see themselves belonging there,' Thompson said. 'I would not want any law or bill to stop closing gaps, or stop us from the ability to move our state, and all of our students, forward as a whole.'
In a way, it's brilliant. Take programs that were aimed at helping historically marginalized people and say instead the programs are discriminatory, not the world itself.
In Trump World, there's only room for white men, men like Darren Beattie, a Trump hire in the State Department who wrote on X: 'Competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men.'
That's why we end up with mediocre white men like Pete Hegseth, the least qualified Defense Secretary in U.S. history who just fired the Black chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Navy's top officer, who is female.
But why stop there? If you want to go after expensive programs that get federal funds and help minorities, why wouldn't you go after historically Black schools themselves?
It's not hard to see what's going on here.
As writer Adam Serwer noted in The Atlantic this week: 'The nostalgia behind the slogan, 'Make America Great Again,' has always provoked the obvious questions of just when America was great, and for whom. Early in the second Trump administration, we are getting the answer.'
And the answer is that young people like Anthony Jackson, Jr. are going to pay the price for this cruel war on imaginary demons. Jackson himself will be OK. He'll graduate, get a great job and be an asset in our world by trying to fix food deserts.
He's worried about everyone else.
As he said, 'DEI doesn't hand out opportunities to the unqualified. It ensures that the qualified individuals, who have historically been excluded, get the recognition, access and opportunities they have rightfully earned.
'I stand firm in my request for Secretary Rollins and President Trump to reconsider this abrupt suspension.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Progressive Candidate Bucks Establishment in Run For Governor
Launching a gubernatorial campaign with a conversation about the need for reparations for descendants of the enslaved isn't something you see every day— especially in Georgia. But state Rep. Derrick Jackson, D-Tyrone, who officially announced his bid for governor last week, says he wants to be a voice for Black voters looking for more aggressive Democratic leadership that isn't afraid to fight for bold ideas that benefit the masses. Raising Georgia's minimum wage to $27 an hour over the course of three years, continuing conversations about a Georgia reparations program, and eliminating state income taxes on teachers, nurses, military veterans, and seniors are just a few of the policies Jackson proposed during a recent interview with Capital B Atlanta. The five-term state lawmaker said he won't shy away from fighting for proposals that directly benefit Black Georgians if he's elected. 'Will there be some things specifically for Black people? Yes, because you've got a lot of things specifically for white people,' Jackson said. 'When [the federal government passes] a tax cut for the top 1%, 99% of the top 1% are white. We don't have that many Black millionaires and billionaires.' Jackson, 59, is a Navy veteran and a married father of seven who characterized himself as the anti-establishment, progressive fighter in an increasingly crowded field of candidates vying to replace Brian Kemp in the governor's mansion in 2026. Name-checking rising Democratic stars like U.S. Reps. Jasmine Crockett and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez along with trailblazers like U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, Jackson cites the huge crowds Sanders and AOC received at anti-oligarchy rallies as evidence Democratic voters are looking for more progressive, populist candidates. He accused fellow Georgia Democratic leaders, including state Rep. Carolyn Hugley, D-Columbus, of being too moderate and trying to find common ground with Republicans in the Georgia General Assembly instead of outright opposing the GOP agenda. Hugley overcame Jackson and other Democrats late last year to replace James Beverly as state House Minority Leader. Jackson argues President Donald Trump's victory in Georgia and across the country made some Democrats question whether voters want them to moderate their positions or resist the controversial president's agenda, suggesting the uproar over federal employee layoffs in Georgia shows voters want the party to fight harder. 'I lost when I ran for minority leader because the caucus did not want a fighter as their minority leader,' Jackson said. 'They chose the status quo, and they regret that right now.' Earlier this year, Jackson sponsored a bill that would gradually raise Georgia's minimum wage to $27 an hour in 2028. The legislation, which failed to advance out of committee this year, would have raised the state's current $5.15 an hour minimum wage to $15 an hour this year, $18 an hour next year, and $21 an hour in 2027 before maxing out at $27 an hour in 2028. His plan to get progressive policies like this passed isn't to work with Republicans, who have majority control of the state House and state Senate. It's to defeat them at the ballot box during next year's midterm election cycle and give Democrats control of the state House. 'While I'm running for governor, I'm working to flip the [state] House,' Jackson said. 'I never believed in extending the olive branch to the Republican Party because it never worked. You've never heard a Republican say, 'I'm going to reach across the aisle,' so why am I going to extend my arm so you can chop it off?' Jackson also supports repealing Georgia's six-week abortion ban and the statewide ban on rent regulation that prevents setting limits on increases. He said he wants to make Georgia a top destination for working families, not just business owners, taking a shot at one of GOP Gov. Brian Kemp's primary talking points. 'Instead of us being the number one state for business, we're going to be the number one state for families,' Jackson said. 'If we do this right, eventually single citizens will say, 'Georgia is the best place to raise a family. Georgia is the best place in terms of affordability. Georgia is the best place for health care.'' 'The American Dream is fading for a lot of people,' Jackson continued. 'I know the governor has the responsibility to make sure that the state in which they govern is creating an environment that's conducive for everybody.' He's hoping his policy agenda will help the Democratic Party reenergize the Black voters who helped them turn the state blue in 2020, but haven't matched the same turnout rate since. 'They're disinterested because they see Democrats and Republicans as the same,' Jackson said of Black voters. 'They don't see nobody fighting for them. They don't see our interests being met. They see everyone else's interests being met and satisfied and accomplished, but we're still left behind.' Jackson joins a field of candidates that includes Attorney General Chris Carr, state Sen. Jason Esteves, D-Atlanta, former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms and former lead pastor and founder of Impact United Methodist Church Olu Brown. Other rumored candidates include Stacey Abrams, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, and former DeKalb County CEO Michael Thurmond. The post Progressive Candidate Bucks Establishment in Run For Governor appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
US aid cuts threaten South Africa's status as powerhouse of HIV and tuberculosis research
South Africa risks losing its status as a powerhouse of HIV and tuberculosis research as sweeping American funding cuts jeopardise dozens of experimental trials. At least 27 HIV trials and another 20 TB trials in the country have been put at risk by Donald Trump's deep cuts to foreign assistance and global health spending, new analysis shows. Loss of the trials would hit research projects looking for new vaccines into both infections, as well as new long-lasting protective medicines and studies into the best way to treat children. Having intense HIV and TB epidemics as well as world class universities and research institutes has made South Africa a leader in combating the two diseases. Yet while the research has often been led by South African scientists, it has overwhelmingly been conducted with international funding, particularly with 20 years of generous United States government aid spending. Prof Salim Abdool Karim, director of the Centre for the Aids Program of Research in South Africa, said: 'The US is such a big player in our country – South Africa is a powerhouse in medical research because of what the US spends.' The bulk of funding for research came from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the country receiving an estimated £111m ($150m) each year. Prof Ntobeko Ntusi, the president and chief executive of the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), said earlier this year: 'In many ways the South African health research landscape has been a victim of its own success, because for decades we have been the largest recipients of both [official development assistance] funding from the US for research [and] also the largest recipients of NIH funding outside of the US.' Now, unless alternative sources of money can be found, South African academic and research institutes could lose about 30 per cent of their annual income and may be forced to lay off hundreds of staff, the analysis found. 'There's been a huge dependence on US funding. The loss of it for South Africa means the cancellation of a huge amount of research,' said Tom Ellman, director of the MSF's Southern Africa Medical Unit (SAMU). The joint analysis by Treatment Action Group (TAG) and Doctors Without Borders (MSF) of NIH-funded research found 39 TB and HIV clinical research sites are under threat, placing at least 27 HIV trials and 20 TB trials at risk. The effect of cuts could be wider still, with research also funded through other US channels, including the US President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar), which has been slashed by Donald Trump's administration. Lindsay McKenna, TB project co-director of TAG said: 'Public funding from the US government to South Africa is the scaffold on which pharmaceutical companies, philanthropies, and other governments invest in transformative TB and HIV science.' 'These ongoing funding disruptions by the US government don't just affect US-funded research projects, they put in peril a much wider ecosystem of global research.' Dr Ellman said a combination of the infections found in South Africa, its research base and its strong grass roots activism had combined, with US funding, to make the country so prominent in research. He said: 'For years, South Africa has spearheaded the research and development of critical innovative medical tools for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care of HIV and TB which have saved lives not just within South Africa's borders, but also in communities worldwide.' The country has more HIV patients than any other, with an estimated 8 million currently infected and 105,000 deaths annually. The high prevalence of HIV goes hand-in-hand with a high prevalence of tuberculosis, because TB takes advantage of patients' weakened immune systems. Tuberculosis is the biggest cause of death among those with HIV in South Africa, which recorded 54,000 TB deaths in 2023. At the same time, the country has strong research institutions and universities, and a history of medical innovation, including conducting the first heart transplant in 1969. Finally, the history of the apartheid struggle, and later the fight in the early 2000s to get antiretroviral drugs in the face of government AIDS denialism, has produced well-organised and politically-engaged health activists. According to the joint analysis, HIV trials now at risk include studies into using broadly neutralising antibodies (bNAbs) to find a cure, and also trials into long-lasting anti-HIV preventative jabs. The Brilliant Consortium, a collaboration of African researchers led by the SAMRC working to develop an HIV vaccine, lost all funding even as it was about to begin an early stage vaccine trial. Dr Ellman said: 'I think it would be a disaster if we gave up on the hope of finding an effective vaccine for HIV. All of that has been done with South Africa and without access to South African research and communities, it's not going to be possible.' The emergence of some resistance to antiretroviral drugs has also highlighted the importance of trials to find new drugs which can deal with the phenomenon. HIV trials are also looking at honing and improving existing treatment regimes, as well as simplifying and rolling out expensive techniques first used in the developing world. TB trials at risk include studies for new drugs and shorter, safer regimens for treatment and prevention. The cuts have a ripple effect beyond individual trials, because they also weaken research infrastructure which is used and relied on by other funders. That could have a knock-on effect on trials looking at new TB jab possibilities, including the promising new M72/AS01E vaccine candidate. South Africa is now scrabbling for alternative sources of funding to try to salvage as many of the research projects as possible. Dr Ellman said: 'We call on all potential donors to step up, as without sustained investment, we will never end these deadly epidemics.' Protect yourself and your family by learning more about Global Health Security Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
SNAP Cuts Warning Over $85 Million of Nutrition Assistance
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Rhode Island could foot the bill for $85 million in SNAP benefits if the Republican budget bill passes, a senator has said. Why It Matters Under the Republican-led One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is making its way through the legislative process, states could be made to pay for a portion of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits. As it stands, states pay for half of the administrative costs of running the program, while the U.S. Department of Agriculture pays the other half. The USDA also covers the entire cost of benefits. In Rhode Island—which ranks 15th in the country for SNAP usage, according to an analysis by Trace One—SNAP is delivered to about 144,000 residents, providing monthly benefits to low- and no-income families. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities think tank reported in March that shifting some of the cost of SNAP benefits to states would negatively affect state budgets "at a time when many states are facing revenue downturns." What To Know Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat, has said the Ocean State could be on the hook for $85 million of the roughly $343.5 million the state receives from the USDA to pay for SNAP benefits. Other provisions outlined in the bill, such as expanding work requirements and limiting future benefit increases, could "reduce monthly nutrition assistance for children from low-income families, seniors, disabled Americans, and veterans below what is necessary to maintain a healthy diet," a June 6 news release from Reed's office said. Reed said the entire state would be affected by the proposed SNAP cuts, not only through a potential loss of benefits for recipients but also lost productivity and increased expenditures in other public areas, such as health care. He said it would also affect the state's businesses and economy. A stock image of a SNAP sign in a retailer's window. A stock image of a SNAP sign in a retailer's window. GETTY "Every dollar in federal SNAP investment generates over $1.50 in economic activity," Reed said. "If you start taking hundreds of millions of dollars out of the local economy, it means stores close, farms go under, and food prices keep going up. Ultimately, the Republican plan would make it harder for Rhode Island families to afford their grocery bills." The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities said in its March report: "States are not in a position to absorb these substantial additional costs. In fiscal year 2024, tax revenue fell in 40 states after adjusting for inflation, and many states are projecting budget shortfalls in the short and long term." Other states have also warned that they could be forced to pay millions to keep SNAP benefits available if the bill passes in its current form. In late May, the Wisconsin Department of Health Services said the state would lose about $314 million in food assistance if the legislation came to pass. Michigan has also warned that it could be forced to foot a $900 million bill for food assistance. What People Are Saying Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat from Rhode Island, said in a news release issued on June 6: "When Republicans threaten to cut SNAP benefits, they're really threatening public health, working families, and our economy. Access to food is essential for everyone. The Republican plan would mean less food for the poor, fewer jobs, and less economic activity in the community. It would increase hunger and hardship." Darcy Milburn, the director of Social Security and health care policy at the Arc of the United States, told Newsweek: "Any cuts to SNAP funding would make it even harder for people with disabilities and their families to access the food they need to live healthy lives. We urge Congress to reject proposals for any cuts to SNAP, and to work on a bipartisan basis to strengthen and protect this critical program." Lisa Roth Blackman, the chief philanthropy officer of the Rhode Island Community Food Bank, said in a news release: "The impact that this cut will have on families, children, seniors, and veterans will be catastrophic. Kids will be less ready to learn in school. Working adults won't have the energy to work. Seniors will be forced to make terrible choices about whether to pay for prescriptions and healthcare or food. And veterans and people with disabilities will struggle to get the food they need to survive and thrive." President Donald Trump, who has not commented directly on the SNAP provisions, wrote on Truth Social following the passage of the bill in the House of Representatives: "It's time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work, and send this Bill to my desk AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!" What Happens Next The bill moves to the GOP-controlled Senate this week, where lawmakers may propose changes to the legislation.