logo
The right to an education, health and care plan must be retained

The right to an education, health and care plan must be retained

The Guardian06-07-2025
The legal rights to an education that meets the needs of children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities (Send) are under threat. Many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether.
As new education reforms loom, every sign from the government suggests the right to an education, health and care plan (EHCP) is to be removed from children attending mainstream schools. Local authorities want EHCPs drastically reduced, or removed altogether, to relieve them of duties they often find costly and troublesome.
About 85% of children with Send are educated in mainstream settings. Over 270,000 of these children have EHCPs. These legally enforceable documents detail a child or young person's needs, and the support to enable them to fulfil their individual potential. EHCPs allow children and young people with all kinds of disabilities to receive an education.
Without statutory support, underpinned by necessary extra resources for schools, it's extremely unlikely that ministers will achieve their aim of more children with Send thriving, or even surviving, in mainstream education. A reduction or complete snatching-away of EHCPs in mainstream education wouldn't mean their needs magically vanish. It would, instead, increase applications for already overcrowded special schools or mean they would be forced out of school altogether.
We believe the public are on our side, and we support the newly launched Save Our Children's Rights (SOCR) campaign led by Special Needs Jungle, IPSEA and others. This campaign is calling for EHCPs to be retained, now and in the future. SOCR's recent petition reflecting this aim rapidly passed 100,000 signatures, meaning the issue will be considered for a parliamentary debate, and is still growing.
For more than 40 years, children and young people with special educational needs and disabilities have had a statutory right to an education that meets their needs. Set alongside catastrophic plans to cut benefits for disabled people, this raises the question of who we are as a country and the kind of society in which we want to live. Whatever the Send system's problems, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and young people. Families cannot afford to lose these precious legal protections.
Amel Alghrani Professor, school of law and social justice, University of LiverpoolElizabeth Archer CEO, PDA SocietyJane Asher President, National Autistic SocietyProf Simon Baron-Cohen Director, Autism Research Centre, Cambridge UniversityAnna Bird CEO, ContactIan Birrell Journalist and disability campaignerAlison Bloomer Editor, Learning Disability TodayCarol Boys Chief executive, Down's Syndrome AssociationLucy Bray Professor in child health literacy, Edge Hill UniversityJane Campbell Disability rights campaignerMadeleine Cassidy CEO, IPSEA (Independent Provider of Special Education Advice)Samantha Clark CEO, Learning Disability EnglandLuke Clements Cerebra professor of law and social justice, Leeds UniversityDr Mine Conkbayir Early years researcher, author and consultantJustin Cooke Head of policy and influencing, National Deaf Children's SocietyClaire Coussins Director of fundraising and engagement, KidsClaire Dorer CEO, National Association of Special SchoolsRachel Filmer Founder, Send Rights AllianceAnita Franklin Professor of childhood studies, Manchester Metropolitan UniversityCarrie Grant Broadcaster and Send parentFazilet Hadi Head of policy, Disability Rights UKJane Harris CEO, Speech and Language UKJohn Harris Journalist, writer and Send parentAngela Hassiotis Professor in intellectual disability, University College LondonBen Higgins CEO, BildCherylee Houston Actor and disability campaignerDr Rhidian Hughes CEO, Voluntary Organisations Disability GroupSarah Johnson President, PRUsAPDr Anna Kennedy Autism charity founder and campaignerJolanta Lasota CEO, Ambitious About AutismDr Tony Lloyd Former CEO, ADHD FoundationChristine McGuinness Broadcaster, campaigner and Send parentDavid Mitchell Novelist and Send parentRosa Monckton Disability and Send campaignerEmma Murphy Managing director, INFACT (Independent Fetal Anti Convulsant Trust)Chris Packham Broadcaster and neurodiversity campaignerScarlet Page Photographer and Send parentLiz Pellicano Professor of autism research, University College LondonSally Phillips Actor, campaigner and Send parentSharon Pratt Founder member, Send National CrisisTom Purser CEO, Autism ActionBrian Roberts Director of education and wellbeing, National Association for Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder, and Send parentKatherine Runswick-Cole Professor and chair in education, University of SheffieldSara Ryan Professor of social care, Manchester Metropolitan UniversitySaba Salman Journalist and campaignerMelissa Simmonds Autistic campaigner and Send parentTom Shakespeare Professor of disability research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineStephanie Shirley Autism philanthropist and businesswomanCaroline Stevens CEO, National Autistic SocietyJon Sparkes CEO, MencapRachel Stevenson CEO, Reverse RettTania Tirraoro and Renata Watts Co-directors, Special Needs JungleJames Watson-O'Neill Chief executive, SenseEleanor Wright Legal officer, SOS!SENStephen Unwin Director, writer and Send parentSuzy Yardley CEO, Child Autism UKand 50 others (full list at www.saveourchildrensrights.org.uk)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Book festival boss criticised over lack of invite for authors of gender critical books
Book festival boss criticised over lack of invite for authors of gender critical books

Daily Mail​

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Book festival boss criticised over lack of invite for authors of gender critical books

The boss of Scotland's biggest book festival has provoked fury after claiming the authors of best selling gender critical books have not been invited to take part because the issue is too divisive. Edinburgh International Book Festival Chief Executive Jenny Niven told a complainer: 'We do not want to be in a position that we are creating events for spectacle or sport, or raising specific people's identity as a subject of debate.' The event, part funded by public cash, features 700 authors from 35 different countries across the world but has been criticised for ignoring gender critical voices in the books and speakers it is promoting. The event's theme this year is 'Repair', suggesting an open forum for receiving conflicting views, potentially leading to some form of consensus. One woman, who bought almost £300 of tickets, questioned why the EIBF had ignored one of Scotland's most significant books from last year, The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, but was platforming queer and trans writers and speakers. In an email response, the CEO said: 'We appreciate you taking the time to write to us, and acknowledge that you feel that we've missed the mark in this situation. 'As you would know as an audience member, we work very hard to ensure that the conversations that happen on our stages are rigorous, informed and fair. 'As you can see from the range of other challenging topics addressed in the programme, we don't shy away from difficult conversation. 'However, at present, the tenor of the discussion in the media and online on this particular subject feels extremely divisive. 'We do not want to be in a position that we are creating events for spectacle or sport, or raising specific people's identity as a subject of debate.' It added: 'Given the inflammatory tone of a great deal of media – on all 'sides' of this discussion – we did not feel it to be the right move for us to host a conversation which appeared to pit the rights of one minoritised group against another.' Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon - a fierce advocate of gender-ID policy - has been handed a speaking slot at the Festival, which runs until 24 August, to launch her as yet unpublished autobiography, 'Frankly'. Her former Chief of Staff Liz Lloyd became a director of the event earlier this year. The authors of 'The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht', Susan Dalgety and Lucy Hunter Blackburn said they doubted whether Ms Niven had even read their bestselling book. Ms Dalgety said: 'If she had, she would know it is neither divisive nor inflammatory. It's a significant book which captures an important period in Scotland's recent political and cultural life through the voices of more than 30 women. 'It is thoughtful, at times challenging but always respectful. We are disappointed therefore that we were not given the opportunity to discuss it in our own city. 'But if EIBF does not want to hear our voices, perhaps they will heed the words of John Swinney (the First Minister) who last week said our society is healthier when we can all express our views particularly on issues of the greatest sensitivity. 'By cancelling us, the book festival has failed in one of its core principals – to provide a platform for nuanced conversations between people with diverse views and experiences.' The Book Festival said they did have gender critical authors involved but did not name them. A spokeswoman said: 'The Edinburgh International Book Festival is committed to hosting a broad range of nuanced and informed conversations. 'Our 2025 programme includes authors with a diverse range of perspectives on many subjects. 'In this year's festival, authors who hold gender-critical views and authors who are trans are both represented in the programme. 'However, the focus of their events is on their specific books and literary work, including fiction, rather than on the topic of gender politics. 'While our festival theme of 'repair' is broad, programming a major festival requires difficult choices about which big themes to cover in-depth. 'For this year, we have chosen to prioritise other important conversations related to repair, such as geopolitics.'

Transgender pool player loses discrimination case
Transgender pool player loses discrimination case

BBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Transgender pool player loses discrimination case

A transgender pool player has lost a discrimination claim against one of the sport's English Blackball Pool Federation (EBPF) banned players who were not born biologically female from its women's competitions and teams in August player Harriet Haynes took the organisation to court, saying the rule was "direct discrimination" against her on the grounds of her gender a court judge has said he is satisfied exclusion was the only "reasonable" way to ensure "fair competition" and dismissed her representatives said they were disappointed with the decision and are weighing up whether to landmark ruling follows a legal definition of a woman by the UK Supreme Court in April as someone who is biologically female under equalities Equality Act provides protection against discrimination on the basis of various characteristics, including "sex" and "gender reassignment".His Honour Judge Parker said pool is a "gender-affected activity" and that excluding those born as male from the female category was necessary to "secure fair competition". The EBPF said it was delighted by the decision and that it welcomes transgender players in its 'open' argued that players who were born male and went through male puberty have specific physical advantages in cue sports, such as an ability to generate higher break speed, greater hand span to bridge over balls and a longer reach.A spokesperson said: "The court found that pool is a game in which men have an advantage over women and that allowing only those born as women to compete in our women's competitions is necessary to secure fair competition."In her claim, Haynes said her exclusion from the Kent Women's A pool team had caused her distress and upset, and she had been subjected to hurtful comments on social also claimed the policy violated the European Convention on Human Rights, including the right to respect for an individual's private and family the EBPF said the rule did not discriminate against her on the grounds of gender reassignment as "she was born male".Matt Champ, senior associate at Colman Coyle, who represented Haynes, said: "We are reflecting on the judgment and our next steps which will include whether or not we appeal."In January 2024, Haynes said she received "vile" and "horrific" abuse online after her opponent Lynn Pinches refused to play her and conceded the Women's Champion of Champions final in has argued that transgender players have competed in female categories for 20 years, and that there was no categoric evidence they have an advantage in cue sports.

Police pay rise of 4.2% derided as 'barely treading water'
Police pay rise of 4.2% derided as 'barely treading water'

BBC News

time32 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Police pay rise of 4.2% derided as 'barely treading water'

A government-backed pay rise of 4.2% for police officers in England and Wales "barely treads water", the association representing front-line officers Police Federation said the pay rise was "worth the price of a Big Mac per shift" and would not stop "record levels of resignations, record mental health absences or the record number of assaults on officers".The organisation, which represents more than 145,000 officers, said it would now ask its members whether they accept or reject the home secretary said the increase, which is marginally above the current rate of inflation of 4.1% and is recommended by an independent review body, was "a clear signal of our gratitude". The amount is also above the 2.8% proposed by ministers in December, for which police forces will mean the starting salary for a police constable will go up by £1,256 to £31,164. The typical salary for a constable who has been in post for six years will be £50,256 and the average salary for a chief superintendent will be £98, addition, on-call, away from home and hardship allowances will be increased by £10 and London weighting will also rise by 4.2%.Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: "Our brave police officers work day and night, often making enormous sacrifices to keep us safe."She added: "We are committed to investing in the front line and supporting officers who work every day to tackle crime, keep our streets safe and protect our communities."The pay award will be supported by £120 million from the Home Office to "help protect police force budgets", the government Police Federation said while it welcomed the government's decision to reject police chief constables' calls for a pay rise of 3.8%, the award was not national chair Brian Booth said: "After more than a decade of real terms pay cuts, this award does little to reverse the long-term decline in officers' living standards or address the crisis policing faces."British Transport Police Federation chair Stuart Cowan said 4.2% "is simply nowhere near enough".He said: "Officers who are battered and bruised and stretched to their physical and psychological limits are worth so much more than repeated paltry pay increases."But the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) said the 4.2% increase was above inflation and "it is essential that we attract and retain the best people into policing through competitive pay".NPCC lead for pay and conditions, Asst Ch Officer Philip Wells, said the pay award "is what we believe our officers deserve and reflects the nature of the work they are required to undertake to keep our streets safe".He added it was "vitally important that additional costs for pay are fully funded if we are to maintain services and be able to continue to invest in areas such as neighbourhood policing and technology".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store