YouTube's misinformation tools are applied inconsistently throughout Europe, report warns
When users watch a YouTube video on a topic that is often embroiled in misinformation, such as COVID-19 vaccines or climate change, a label should pop up to direct them to third-party sources with more information on the issue, for example Wikipedia.
The information panel is also meant to appear in users' search results in their operating language.
However AI Forensics, a Europe-based nonprofit that investigates major tech companies, found that this is often not the case.
The researchers built a web crawler to test the panels, and found that across the 83 languages on the video platform, the information panels are applied inconsistently to 12 topics on Wikipedia's list of conspiracy theories as well as four types of publisher labels.
All of the panels are available in English. In German, videos on all but one topic – the Armenian genocide – have these labels. Meanwhile, very few panels are available in Icelandic or Lithuanian.
Related
Denmark seeks to make spread of deepfake images illegal, citing misinformation concerns
AI Forensics said the tests show YouTube pays 'disproportionate attention towards Western languages' and 'neglects' regional languages like Basque, Catalan, and Galician.
YouTube's content disclaimers go beyond misinformation-prone topics. It also includes labels for news sources and fact-checkers that explain whether they are partially or fully funded by government sources, as a way to 'help you better understand the sources of news content,' the company says.
But public funding was flagged in some countries and not others, the AI Forensics report found.
Euronews, for example, receives some funding from the European Union. YouTube flagged this in some countries, but not in Denmark, Greece, Norway, Iceland, Finland, or Portugal.
'We are scared … there might be some group of people that have differential access to safety' measures to fight misinformation on the platform, Salvatore Romano, head of research at AI Forensics, told Euronews Next.
'Instead of increasing [the] trust of users on the platform, it is undermining [it],' Romano added.
Unclear whether YouTube will address discrepancies
YouTube's website notes that 'information panels may not be available in all countries/regions and languages,' and that the company is working to expand their reach.
The AI Forensics team said they have met with YouTube to present their research. During those meetings, YouTube allegedly indicated that the discrepancies between languages were not supposed to happen, and that it didn't have a way to systematically check how the panels are deployed across Europe.
AI Forensics said YouTube agreed to address these discrepancies but did not go into detail.
Related
Australia adds YouTube to social media ban for children under age 16
YouTube did not respond to a Euronews Next request for clarity on the alleged meetings or the measures it plans to take.
YouTube, under parent company Google, is a signatory to the European Commission's Code of Practice on Disinformation, a voluntary agreement that sets standards for tech companies to fight disinformation.
In March, YouTube said that as part of its commitment, it will 'assess and update the topics prone to misinformation that receive additional context from information panels'.
But Romano believes the haphazard content labeling could be even more extensive than the AI Forensics researchers found, given the report says it shows only a 'partial view' with a small sample of panels.
Commission could put 'pressure on YouTube' over inconsistencies: AI Forensics
Romano said he's hoping YouTube will correct the discrepancies. If it doesn't, he said he will call on the European Commission, the EU's executive body, to investigate a potential breach of the Digital Services Act (DSA).
The Commission could, for example, request more information from YouTube about how it administers its panels, which is the first step of any DSA investigation, he said.
'The EU Commission could put pressure on YouTube to show them that this type of inconsistency is unacceptable across platforms and across products,' he said, noting that it creates 'second-rate markets' throughout Europe where standards meant to protect against misinformation are not being met.
Related
Russia fines Google more than the world's total GDP over YouTube bans
Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to confirm whether it would be asking for more information from YouTube but did not receive an immediate reply.
Romano, at least, will be watching. He said his team built a tool to track how regularly YouTube's information labels come up in various languages.
Through the publicly available tracker, people can see which topics have content labels in their language. It will also allow researchers to identify any changes to the information panels, Romano said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
24 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Readers told us how they use AI in their job search — or why they avoid it
Business Insider recently asked readers about their experiences with the job search process. You told us what you find off-putting in a job posting, and what sticks out to you as red flags in a job interview. We also wanted to know: How do you use AI in your job search, if at all? The readers who answered our poll and reported using AI in the process said they do so primarily for résumés and cover letters. Many readers said they'd ask AI to check their résumés against a job post and tell them what changes they should make to best align with the description, such as organizing bullets in the order in which items appear in the job post or emphasizing the keywords from the listing. Grant Maxfield said he asks AI to review a job listing and summarize the most important qualifications and duties that he should focus on in his application materials. He'll also feed AI a job description alongside his prior résumés and cover letters, and ask it to draft new ones tailored to the specific position. Many respondents stressed that they double-check what AI gives them, and some mentioned having experiences where AI hallucinated a fictitious job experience on their résumé or mixed up their responsibilities between different roles. "I never used the wording ChatGPT spit out, but I definitely used it to figure out where I was lacking in useful information and where I had too much," said Sarah Oglesby. Nicole McCormick said she uses AI to write thank-you emails that draw on the company's culture, values, and mission statement as taken from its website. Clare Apps also uses AI to personalize follow-up messages and to do mock interviews to prepare. "The AI conundrum is painful on both sides," she said. "A part of me is annoyed that recruiters are annoyed by job seekers using AI to assist with cover letters, résumés, and profiles. It's a cake-and-eat-it scenario." Not everyone finds it useful for résumés and cover letters, though. One reader said she only asks it to suggest possible jobs she should apply for because "it hasn't been very useful yet; I write a better résumé and cover letter than AI does at this point." And other readers avoid using AI in their job search. Kelley Murray has heard it can disqualify you if you're caught having used AI on an application. Liz Stout said she's never tried it before but that a coworker mentioned using ChatGPT to write a cover letter, and "that sounded like cheating." "I don't use AI," said Brian Bissonnette. "I put the effort in myself."

Wall Street Journal
24 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Billions Flow to New Hedge Funds Focused on AI-Related Bets
Leopold Aschenbrenner emerged last year as a precocious artificial-intelligence influencer after publishing a widely read manifesto. Then he decided to try his hand at stock picking. The 23-year-old with no professional investing experience quickly raised more money for a hedge fund than most pedigreed portfolio managers can when they strike out on their own.


New York Times
24 minutes ago
- New York Times
Ukraine and Europe Project United Front Ahead of Trump-Putin Summit
Ukraine and its European allies sought on Sunday to present a united front ahead of a meeting this week between President Trump and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia that risks sidelining Kyiv in future peace talks. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' read a statement released early Sunday by seven European leaders, including President Emmanuel Macron of France and Chancellor Friedrich Merz of Germany. President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine was quick to endorse their statement, writing hours later on social media that he was 'grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people today for the sake of peace in Ukraine, which is defending the vital security interests of our European nations.' The coordinated statements came after Mr. Zelensky engaged on Saturday in a series of calls with European leaders. That same day, two senior Ukrainian officials and their European counterparts met with top American officials outside London to try to gauge Moscow's negotiating position and to press Ukraine's case ahead of the Trump-Putin summit on Friday in Alaska. The calls and the meeting near London made clear that Kyiv was once again trying to rally its European allies as Washington pushes to independently negotiate an end to the war with Russia, raising concerns that the Trump administration will make concessions to Moscow that Kyiv cannot accept. Ukraine is also determined not to let Russia set the terms and structure of future peace talks. In their statement, the European leaders said that 'meaningful negotiations can only take place' after a cease-fire or a reduction in hostilities has been put in effect — a position long held by Ukraine but that Russia has consistently rejected. The European leaders also said that they 'remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force' and that the current front line 'should be the starting point of negotiations.' That language amounted to an implicit rejection of Mr. Trump's recent suggestion that a cease-fire deal could include some 'swapping of territories.' The Trump-Putin summit was announced after Steve Witkoff, the U.S. president's envoy, met with the Russian leader last week in Moscow. After the meeting, Mr. Trump briefed European leaders and described a proposal by Mr. Putin that two senior European officials said involved giving Russia the entire Donbas region of Ukraine, an area his forces do not entirely control. Mr. Zelensky warned on Saturday that he would not accept any deal requiring Ukraine to hand over territory that Russia does not currently occupy. 'Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace,' Mr. Zelensky warned on Saturday. 'They will bring nothing. These are dead decisions; they will never work.'