Taylor Swift announces she has acquired the rights to all of her music
The 35-year-old also announced she has purchased the rights to all of her concert films, music videos, album art and photography, as well as unreleased songs, in an announcement on her website on Friday.
She also confirmed she will release Taylor's Version re-recordings of her self-titled and Reputation albums.
In the announcement, the singer said: 'I'm trying to gather my thoughts into something coherent, but right now my mind is just a slideshow. A flashback sequence of all the times I daydreamed about, wished for, and pined away for a chance to get to tell you this news.
A post shared by Taylor Swift (@taylorswift)
'All the times I was this close, reaching out for it, only for it to fall through. I almost stopped thinking it could ever happen, after 20 years of having the carrot dangled and then yanked away. But that's all in the past now.
'I've been bursting into tears of joy at random intervals ever since I found out that this is really happening. I really get to say these words, all of the music I've ever made now belongs to me.
'And all my music videos, all the concert films, the album art and photography, the unreleased songs, the memories, the magic, the madness, every single era, my entire life's work.
'To say this is my greatest dream come true is actually being pretty reserved about it.'
Swift also thanked her fans for their 'passionate support' which she said is 'why I was able to buy back my music'.
The singer added: 'I can't thank you enough for helping to reunite me with this art that I have dedicated my life to, but have never my owned until now.'
Swift said the process of gaining ownership of her work was 'honest, fair, and respectful' and said she was 'endlessly thankful' to private equity firm Shamrock Capital, which offered her the deal.
In a post on LinkedIn, Shamrock Capital said: 'We are thrilled with this outcome and are so happy for Taylor.'
The value of the deal has not been disclosed.
The singer announced plans to re-record all her songs in 2019 following a dispute with retired talent manager Scooter Braun after he acquired the recordings of her first six studio albums when he bought her former label.
Though the masters changed hands again after a deal with Shamrock Capital, Swift continued with a bid to regain ownership of the music by creating new versions of the songs.
She has been re-recording of all of her albums, re-releasing them as 'Taylor's Version'.
To date Swift has released new versions of her previous albums Fearless (2008), Red (2012), Speak Now (2010) and 1989 (2014), with Reputation and her self-titled debut yet to be re-released as Taylor's Versions.
In the announcement Swift spoke about plans to release Taylor Swift (Taylor's Version), originally released in 2006, and Reputation (Taylor's Version), which was originally released in 2017.
She added: 'I know, I know. What about (Reputation (Taylor's Version))? Full transparency, I haven't even re-recorded a quarter of it. The Reputation album was so specific to that time in my life, and I kept hitting a stopping point when I tried to remake it.
'All that defiance, that longing to be understood while feeling purposely misunderstood, that desperate hope, that shame-born snarl and mischief. To be perfectly honest, it's the one album in those first six that I thought couldn't be improved upon by redoing it. Not the music, or photos, or videos.
'So I kept putting it off, there will be a time (if you're into the idea) for the unreleased vault tracks from that album to hatch.
'I've already completely re-recorded my entire debut album, and I really love how it sounds now.
'Those two albums can still have their moments to re-emerge when the time is right, if that would be something you guys would be excited about.
'But if it happens, it won't be from a place of sadness and longing for what I wish I could have. It will just be a celebration now.'
Braun gained ownership of some of Swift's back catalogue in 2019 when his holding company, Ithaca Holdings, acquired her former label, Big Machine Label Group.
Swift signed with Big Machine, founded by former Universal executive Scott Borchetta, in 2005 and moved to Universal Music Group in November 2018 in a deal ensuring she maintained the rights to her work.
When Braun acquired her masters, Swift said she was 'sad' and 'grossed out' and accused the 43-year-old of being behind 'incessant, manipulative bullying'.
Braun sold the recordings to Shamrock Capital in 2020 and reports in the US suggested the deal was worth more than 300 million dollars (about £227 million).
Swift said before negotiations could start, Braun's team wanted her to sign an 'ironclad NDA stating I would never say another word' about him 'unless it was positive'.
She said at the time: 'So I would have to sign a document that would silence me forever before I could even have a chance to bid on my own work.
'My legal team said that this is absolutely not normal, and they've never seen an NDA like this presented unless it was to silence an assault accuser by paying them off.'
It was at this stage she confirmed she had begun the process of re-recording her old music, in a bid to gain control, saying 'it has already proven to be both exciting and creatively fulfilling'.
A master recording is the original recording of a song and whoever owns it earns revenue through avenues including streaming and use in TV, film and adverts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
15 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Taylor Swift fans are convinced her ex Joe Alwyn silently supported her amid battle to buy back her masters
Taylor Swift fans think her ex-boyfriend Joe Alwyn subtly showed support for her while she was in the midst of buying back her music empire. On Friday the 35-year-old Eras Tour artist announced that she bought her master recordings from Shamrock Capital. And by Sunday, a fan with the TikTok handle @manumelm created a 17-second clip connecting the 34-year-old actor's last Instagram post — shared more than two months ago — to his pop star ex. Sandwiched into Joe's carousel post, uploaded on March 12, was a photo of a heart-shaped white bowl with a four-leaf clover painted at the center. Some Swifties have taken it as a symbol related to the aforementioned Los Angeles-based investment firm Shamrock. It was noted in the brief social media snippet that the photos Taylor used for her Instagram announcement last week were taken on March 27, fueling the theory that Joe knew about the deal before it was finalized in late May. While some of Swift's diehard fan base latched onto the idea, others were skeptical that Alwyn was secretly supporting the singer. 'Let's be real. He did it for St. Patrick's Day,' one person wrote, collecting over 3,000 likes. Another added to the comments thread, 'This is a bit of a stretch, I think.' A social media user named Susie Sunshine agreed, 'I kinda think we're reaching, seeing something that's not there.' There was also a fan who offered, 'He got so good at the art of secret, coded message, because he learned it from her.' And someone else wrote in all capital letters, 'It's so suspicious!' The TikTok, soundtracked by Taylor's song Right Where You Left Me, has so far racked up 30,000 likes. Taylor and Joe reportedly met when they crossed paths at the 2016 Met Gala. They were first pictured together in Nashville, Tennessee in 2017. They were an item, keeping their relationship under tight wraps, until April 2023. Following their split, Taylor began dating Kansas City Chiefs star Travis Kelce later that summer, and the two are going strong. Billboard reported that Swift spent nearly $360 million to buy back her music catalog from Shamrock Capital after 'bully' Scooter Braun sold her masters to the private equity firm in 2020, a year after buying them from Big Machine. 'I almost stopped thinking it could ever happen, after 20 years of having the carrot dangled and then yanked away,' Taylor wrote on her website on Friday. She continued, 'But that's all in the past now. I've been bursting into tears of joy at random intervals ever since I found that this is really happening. I really get to say those words. All of the music I've ever made… now belongs… to me.' Her Instagram post teasing the full statement about the masters read, 'You belong with me. Letter on my site :).' It was accompanied by several pictures of her in a simple pale blue sweater and light wash jeans while posing and smiling with six of her records.
Scotsman
a day ago
- Scotsman
Taylor Swift's Versions: did the re-recordings outperform the original works leading to a sale?
Did the Taylor's Version album releases lead to Shamrock Capital's hand being forced to sell her masters? Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Swifties have been celebrating over the weekend after news broke that Taylor Swift now owns the masters to her first six records. The deal also sees videos, concert films, album art, photography, unreleased songs from those albums now in Swift's ownership. So, did the practice of releasing 'Taylor's Versions' lead to a drop in revenue for the firm due to dwindling streaming returns? After years of acrimony and re-recording albums to devalue the original masters, Taylor Swift is now the owner of her original recordings. An announcement was made last week (May 30) that the 1989 and Reputation singer had bought the rights to the masters of her original six albums from Shamrock Capital, who acquired the recordings in a deal with Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings in 2020. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, the original deal was structured to ensure that Braun (and Ithaca Holdings) would continue to profit from her old musical catalogue for many years. This profit stream for Braun was a major point of contention for Taylor Swift and fuelled her determination to pursue her re-recordings. Did the re-recording of some of Taylor Swift's earlier albums lead to Shamrock Capital having no other choice but to sell her masters back to her due to streaming revenue? | Getty Images/Canva/Spotify Consequently, Swift initially declined an offer from Shamrock to partner, stating that Braun's continued financial participation was a 'non-starter' for her. She expressed that she couldn't 'in good conscience bring myself to be involved in benefiting Scooter Braun's interests.' But after several years and back-and-forth, coupled with the successes of Taylor's Versions, the singer bought back the rights for an estimated $300 million to $360 million. This was a direct purchase deal, rather than 'earning back' the rights to the previous works through new album sales. Crediting her fanbase after her victory, Swift stated that she still intends to release the re-recorded versions of her debut album and Reputation, but 'from a place of celebration now.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So, how much of an effect did Taylor's Versions have on the original Big Red Machine recordings, and was it enough to force the hand of Shamrock Capital and, by proxy, Scooter Braun? Did Taylor's Versions earn more streams than her original albums in the end? To compare Taylor Swift's original recordings with her new Taylor's Versions, we analysed Spotify streaming statistics provided by Kworb. We specifically cross-referenced releases that are available on streaming services, encompassing both sets of recordings from her battle for the masters. Fearless Original (Main Version): Fearless - 2,961,959,672 streams Taylor's Version: Fearless (Taylor's Version) - 4,961,308,265 streams Difference: +2.00 Billion streams Red Original (Main Version): Red (Deluxe Edition) - 3,746,587,693 streams Taylor's Version: Red (Taylor's Version) - 6,304,100,156 streams Difference: +2.56 Billion streams Speak Now Original (Main Version): Speak Now (Deluxe Package) - 3,557,666,436 streams Taylor's Version: Speak Now (Taylor's Version) - 3,286,728,208 streams Difference: -0.27 Billion streams 1989 Original (Main Version): 1989 (Deluxe) - 9,130,478,775 streams Taylor's Version: 1989 (Taylor's Version) - 5,252,299,630 streams Difference: -3.88 Billion streams Why hasn't the Taylor's Version of 1989 or Speak Now eclipsed the original versions? There are a couple of key reasons why 1989 (Taylor's Version) and Speak Now (Taylor's Version) haven't yet surpassed the streaming levels of their original counterparts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One of the biggest reasons stems from their respective release dates: 1989 (Taylor's Version) and Speak Now (Taylor's Version) debuted in 2023, while their original releases came out in 2014 and 2010, respectively. As two massively popular albums that appeared on countless playlists, the original master recordings have a significant advantage in cumulative streams due to their longer time on the market – for now, at least. For years, the original versions of these mega-hits were the only ones available for streaming, and so they likely reside in countless user-created playlists, curated Spotify playlists, and are the versions people naturally sought out for a very long time. The albums that haven't been eclipsed yet are simply fighting against a longer history of accumulated streams and the immense, enduring popularity that their original versions cultivated over years in a heavily streaming-dominated era. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Given time and continued fan support, it's very possible that Speak Now (Taylor's Version) and 1989 (Taylor's Version) will eventually surpass their original counterparts in total streams, as part of Swift's strategy to re-release her music now that she owns her masters. Did you add the newer versions of Taylor Swift's catalogue to your playlists when they were released, or are you still using the original album versions? Let us know your thoughts on the sale and what you think Taylor will do next by leaving a comment down below.
Daily Record
a day ago
- Daily Record
Fans hail Netflix period drama 'one of the best TV shows ever'
Netflix's The Queen's Gambit was released in 2020 and quickly became one of the streaming giants' most-watched series of all time - and it's not hard to see why "Arguably, the best show ever made" reads one review of The Queen's Gambit, a sentiment that appears to be universally shared. Netflix's 2020 coming-of-age period drama set during the Cold War captivated audiences when it was released at the height of the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic. Boasting an impressive 96 per cent rating on Rotten Tomatoes, the series' grip on viewers, regardless of their interest in chess, could almost serve as a case study. Debuting on the streaming platform on October 23, 2020, The Queen's Gambit quickly became Netflix's most-watched scripted miniseries within just four weeks of its release. It went on to top the charts in 63 countries, prompting Netflix to release a statement: "The Queen's Gambit now stands as our biggest scripted limited series ever. The series has captivated 62 million households in its first 28 days." Based on Walter Tevis's 1983 novel of the same name, The Queen's Gambit was written and directed by Scott Frank, who co-created it with Allan Scott, the rights holder of the book. The title, Queen's Gambit, refers to a well-known chess opening, reports Surrey Live. Set in the mid-1950s to 1960s, this fictional miniseries follows the life of orphan Beth Harmon (Anya Taylor-Joy), a rising chess prodigy competing against the sport's elites, while simultaneously grappling with her alcohol and drug addictions and emotional struggles. The series garnered critical acclaim, securing 11 Primetime Emmy Awards – including the prestigious accolade for Outstanding Limited or Anthology Series – this marked the first occasion a show on a streaming platform clinched the title. Fans also agreed, with one saying: "The Queen's Gambit is one of my favorite miniseries of all time and one of Netflix's best productions. The scoring behind the cinematography is perhaps one of its greatest strengths, creating an air of intrigue throughout." The show also claimed two Golden Globe Awards, one for Best Limited Series or Television Film and another for Best Actress – Limited Series or Television Film, which Anya Taylor-Joy earned. She further won the SAG Award for her remarkable performance as a female actor in a Television Movie or Limited Series. Critics heaped praises on Taylor-Joy, with one commentator writing: "It's so natural it's easy to overlook, but growing up onscreen is hard, precise work, and this young talent makes it look easy." Another review highlighted Taylor-Joy's standout performance: "What makes The Queen's Gambit so satisfying comes in large measure from the character Taylor-Joy brings to screen: a charming, elegant weirdo who delivers her lines with a cool, wintergreen snap, and never really reacts the way one might expect." A different critic focused on her presence: "The budding star at the center of Scott Frank's new Netflix series has a rare magnetism, the kind that can sell even the most esoteric of subjects." The miniseries also left reviewers captivated, with comments like "with excellent pacing and a sure sense of itself out of the gate, The Queen's Gambit is a work of art-riveting, radiant, and simply spellbinding. Like Beth, it triumphs through its devotion to a love of the game." One critic said: "Just as you feel a familiar dynamic forming, in which a talented woman ends up intimidating her suitors, The Queen's Gambit swerves; it's probably no coincidence that a story about chess thrives on confounding audience expectations." Another lavished the show with praise, saying: "This is the sort of delicate prestige television that Netflix should be producing more often. It's smart and gentle and tastefully assured in the worthiness of its subject." Audience feedback echoed these sentiments, with one viewer adding: "The Queen's Gambit is one of my favourite miniseries of all time and one of Netflix's best productions. The scoring behind the cinematography is perhaps one of its greatest strengths, creating an air of intrigue throughout. "Perhaps what I find most enjoyable about the series is watching Anya Taylor Joy's character build her life through fascinating trials and tribulations. She's a fighter and a winner and shows what it takes to get to that next level that few will ever ascertain." Another viewer review said: "I mean WOW! ! Brilliant, captivating, and nerve-wracking in the best way! I've literally watched it 4 times in the past 3 years (and I don't rewatch things), and I'm STILL not sick of it! ! ! It's literally my favourite limited series on Netflix! ! I never thought I'd find a show about Chess so here we are! I love shows that invoke emotion, and this one will give you ALL of them!". A viewer disclosed a profound emotional attachment to the series, posting: "I connected with The Queen's Gambit in an emotional and intellectual way that will last my lifetime. It's a rich and complex story with every character and plot point perfectly crafted, every location exquisitely designed and lensed, and all performances - especially Anya Taylor-Joy in the lead - among the best I've ever seen."
