Weedkiller ingredient widely used in US can damage organs and gut bacteria, research shows
The ingredient, diquat, is widely employed in the US as a weedkiller in vineyards and orchards, and is increasingly sprayed elsewhere as the use of controversial herbicide substances such as glyphosate and paraquat drops in the US.
But the new piece of data suggests diquat is more toxic than glyphosate, and the substance is banned over its risks in the UK, EU, China and many other countries. Still, the EPA has resisted calls for a ban, and Roundup formulas with the ingredient hit the shelves last year.
'From a human health perspective, this stuff is quite a bit nastier than glyphosate so we're seeing a regrettable substitution, and the ineffective regulatory structure is allowing it,' said Nathan Donley, science director with the Center For Biological Diversity, which advocates for stricter pesticide regulations but was not involved in the new research. 'Regrettable substitution' is a scientific term used to describe the replacement of a toxic substance in a consumer product with an ingredient that is also toxic.
Diquat is also thought to be a neurotoxin, carcinogen and linked to Parkinson's disease. An October analysis of EPA data by the Friends of the Earth non-profit found it is about 200 times more toxic than glyphosate in terms of chronic exposure.
Bayer, which makes Roundup, faced nearly 175,000 lawsuits alleging that the product's users were harmed by the product. Bayer, which bought Monsanto in 2018, reformulated Roundup after the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified glyphosate as a possible carcinogen.
The new review of scientific literature in part focuses on the multiple ways in which diquat damages organs and gut bacteria, including by reducing the level of proteins that are key pieces of the gut lining. The weakening can allow toxins and pathogens to move from the stomach into the bloodstream, and trigger inflammation in the intestines and throughout the body. Meanwhile, diquat can inhibit the production of beneficial bacteria that maintain the gut lining.
Damage to the lining also inhibits the absorption of nutrients and energy metabolism, the authors said.
The research further scrutinizes how the substance harms the kidneys, lungs and liver. Diquat 'causes irreversible structural and functional damage to the kidneys' because it can destroy kidney cells' membranes and interfere with cell signals. The effects on the liver are similar, and the ingredient causes the production of proteins that inflame the organ.
Meanwhile, it seems to attack the lungs by triggering inflammation that damages the organ's tissue. More broadly, the inflammation caused by diquat may cause multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, a scenario in which organ systems begin to fail.
The authors note that many of the studies are on rodents and more research on low, long-term exposure is needed. Bayer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Despite the risks amid a rise in diquat's use, the EPA is not reviewing the chemical, and even non-profits that push for tighter pesticide regulations have largely focused their attention elsewhere.
Donley said that was in part because US pesticide regulations are so weak that advocates are tied up with battles over ingredients like glyphosate, paraquat and chlorpyrifos – substances that are banned elsewhere but still widely used here. Diquat is 'overshadowed' by those ingredients.
'Other countries have banned diquat, but in the US we're still fighting the fights that Europe won 20 years ago,' Donley said. 'It hasn't gotten to the radar of most groups and that really says a lot about the sad and sorry state of pesticides in the US.'
Some advocates have accused the EPA of being captured by industry, and Donley said US pesticide laws were so weak that it was difficult for the agency to ban ingredients, even if the will exists. For example, the agency banned chlorpyrifos in 2022, but a court overturned the decision after industry sued.
Moreover, the EPA's pesticides office seems to have a philosophy that states that toxic pesticides are a 'necessary evil', Donley said.
'When you approach an issue from that lens there's only so much you will do,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
9 minutes ago
- The Sun
My baby ruined my career – trolls call me ‘bad mum' & say I should've ‘kept my legs closed' but I'm a proud single mum
A MUM who admits having a baby "ruined her career" says trolls have dubbed her a 'bad mum' and accused her of hating her son. High-flyer Derricka Hill, 31, unexpectedly fell pregnant with her little boy, Derriawn, one, in October 2023. 3 3 Despite being career-focused in her role as a marketing recruiter - which saw her work 50-hour weeks - Derricka was excited to experience motherhood. Derriawn was born via caesarean on June 28, 2024, weighing 9 lb. But, since returning to work, Derriawn has had a constant three-month chronic ear infection and has contracted salmonella. This left single mum Derricka having to use her annual leave and take unpaid days off to care for him. Some weeks, she is only able to work 25 hours a week in order to look after Derriawn and she says the reduced hours have "ruined her career" because time off means she's "not a valuable employee". But she insists she "wouldn't be without him". Derricka, who has full custody of her little boy, from Seattle, Washington State, said: "I ruined my career by having a son. "When I have time off, I don't bring money into the business. I'm not as valuable as an employee in a business sense. "I wanted to experience the trials and tribulations of motherhood. "People online call me a 'bad mother' or say that I hate my son. I don't, he is my whole world, but being a single mum working full time in corporate America is tough. "Plus, dealing with a child who is sick is an added layer. "I'd never be without him but my career has suffered enormously. I don't have the luxury of giving up work because it's just me and Derriawn. "Everything I do is for him." Before becoming a mum, Derricka said she "worked hard and played harder". Working as a certified nursing assistant for seven years, she then got into marketing recruitment - a job which saw her work up to 50 hours a week. "I lived for my job, I wanted to be successful in my career," Derricka said. "I worked hard but played harder. "I only had myself to take care of and I could do whatever I wanted." Life changed when Derricka unexpectedly fell pregnant in October 2023 and she "decided to go it alone". After an "emotionally intense" pregnancy, on June 28, 2024, she welcomed her son, Derriawn David D'Angelo, two weeks past his due date. Taking her three-month paid maternity leave, in September 2024, Derricka returned to work. Despite having help from her grandma and mum, Dawn Bellmy, 50, who works in healthcare, on the weekends, in March 2025 Derricka began to struggle with the demands of her work and home life. She said: "My grandma wasn't able to have Derriawn as he got too heavy for her to lift on her own, and my mum works full-time during the week. "In March, Derriawn started contracting chronic ear infections one after the other. "He'd cry relentlessly throughout the night because he was in so much pain, which meant I got little to no sleep and struggled to function at work the next day. "It was heartbreaking to see as his mum. "In May, he contracted salmonella too. "Taking him back and forth to doctors and caring for him meant unpaid time off work. "He hasn't gotten better, and doctors aren't able to recommend further than the antibiotics that he's taking. "Corporate America is a beast, but I'm always going to put my son first. "Having him was my beautiful accident. "That's why being a mum ruined my career, but I don't regret it for a second." Posting an honest rant on TikTok on June 20, it has amassed more than 600,000 views. Derricka said: "I didn't expect so many people to watch me in that video, I just wanted to voice how frustrated I was feeling with it all. "Some people have commented, 'should have kept your legs closed' and 'where's the dad?'. "I just try and laugh it off. "I'm a single mum and I'm proud of it. "But other people have reached out with messages of support or said they can relate. "That's the point, motherhood is unpredictable. You don't know what it will chuck at you. "My son is my whole world; everything I do is for him. "I think I'm one and done, I couldn't handle another kid at the moment - I don't think my career would survive it either." Meanwhile, it seems Derricka isn't the only mum struggling. A mum has shared a brutally honest post about how she regrets having a baby and wishes she never had, as parenthood has turned her into a "shell of her former self". Elsewhere, one mum revealed she 'contracted a cold when pregnant and didn't even know' she had it, leaving her baby girl brain damaged for life'. Plus, another mum was left fuming after stranger leaves most passive aggressive note ever on her car BANNING her from using parent parking spot. 3
Telegraph
10 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The 10-minute home workout that beats a long gym session
Some workouts feel like an act of defiance. There are days when the world doesn't want you to take any time for yourself, when it wants all of you, every atom: in meetings, supermarkets, traffic jams, dropping children off at football practice, delivering relatives you don't even like to dental hygienist appointments they probably don't even need. This is where the 10-minute workout rides to the rescue. The good news is that short bursts of exercise can be extremely effective and, depending on your goals, better than more protracted sessions. A review of the evidence carried out in the United States found that 10 minutes of exercise can be beneficial across measures including longevity: 'Physical activity accumulated in bouts that are 10 minutes is associated with favourable health-related outcomes, including all-cause mortality.' Meanwhile a Norwegian study found that two short bursts of resistance could be more effective than a single long session. The study looked at women who trained regularly and found they felt the long session was more enjoyable and valid but, in reality, shorter, more intense workouts enabled them to achieve more. Andrew Scott, an exercise physiologist and senior lecturer at Portsmouth University, says: 'People can get the same fitness benefit from shorter sessions as longer, purposeful exercise.' In other words, even walking up the stairs counts. It doesn't have to be an activity defined as a workout at all. For strength training, in the past I used the kind of workouts bodybuilders recommended. These were very much the War and Peace of resistance training and seemed to take up most of my teen Saturdays. Totally unnecessary says, Scott: 'It doesn't have be multiple sets of the same exercise, one good quality set per exercise, especially for resistance training novices, can be at least as beneficial.' For heart and lung health, multiple short sessions can also be at least as good as a single longer bursts of movement. 'Three 10-minute bursts of brisk walking, as opposed to a single walk of 30 minutes, deliver the same, if not more benefits for body composition and glucose control,' Scott notes. There is a trade-off between intensity and duration – so if you are sufficiently healthy and able, you can give your body 10 minutes of serious, strenuous exercise, deliver Aunt Virginia to the dentist, and still reap the kind of rewards you'd expect from a much more time-consuming workout. The workout This is a 10-minute whole-body workout that does pretty much everything you need. It's been designed by Samuel Quinn, the personal training lead at Nuffield Health gym group. He says: 'There is a combination of exercises that will increase cardiovascular fitness whilst burning body fat, improve upper body, lower body and core strength, whilst improving explosiveness and power. This will also help to improve mobility, stability and balance.' He has carefully divided the work between strength and cardio. 'Of the 10 exercises, four are cardio focused and six are strength-based, however many will benefit both. This workout is to be performed two to three times per week and is perfect for building strength and cardiovascular fitness whilst improving mobility and athletic performance.' 1. Bear crawl Best for: Cardiovascular fitness, full-body strength, mobility, core control. This is an 'animal move', so I get into character a little and really pad around. Supporting your weight on all fours is exhausting, in a good way. How to do it Start on all fours with hands under shoulders and knees hovering off the floor. Keep your back flat and core engaged. Move your right hand and left foot forward, followed by the other side, taking three steps forward. Then, reverse three steps back to the start. Keep hips level and avoid swaying. 2. Squat jump Best for: Lower body power, cardiovascular fitness, agility. This plyometric movement builds strength and explosive power in the legs while enhancing agility, balance, and cardio fitness. Jumping also strengthens the bones. How to do it Stand with your feet shoulder-width apart. Lower into a deep squat, keeping knees aligned with toes and chest upright. Drive through your heels to jump explosively upwards, swinging your arms to aid lift. Land softly, immediately returning to the squat position to absorb impact. Repeat fluidly for one minute. Focus on controlled, balanced landings to protect knees and hips. 3. Reverse crunch Best for: Lower abdominal strength, core control. This controlled movement isolates the lower abdominals, improves trunk stability, and strengthens the hip flexors. It's a safer alternative to traditional sit-ups, reducing strain on the neck and lower back. How to do it Lie on your back with arms at your sides, knees bent. Lift your feet and bring your knees toward your chest. Contract your abs to curl your hips and lower back off the ground, raising your legs vertically. Pause at the top, maintaining tension in your core, then lower slowly without letting your feet touch the floor. Repeat for one minute. 4. Wall walk to handstand hold Best for: Upper body strength, shoulder mobility, core stability. This exercise builds strength, balance, and body control, while improving shoulder and wrist mobility. How to do it Start lying face down with feet against a wall. Push up into a plank, then walk your feet up the wall while moving your hands closer toward it. Continue walking up until your torso is vertical, with core engaged and hips stacked over shoulders. Hold the handstand position briefly, then carefully reverse the movement, walking hands and feet back down. 5. Split squat to lunge jump Best for: Single-leg strength, lower body power, balance. This explosive move builds unilateral strength, improves balance, and increases lower-body power while boosting heart rate. I tend to sway the shoulders with this one – the balance element is so important as we age. How to do it Start in a split squat with one foot forward and one behind, both knees bent. Lower down, then explode upwards, switching legs in mid-air to land with the opposite foot forward. Keep your chest up and core tight. Absorb the landing by immediately bending both knees into another split squat. Continue alternating legs for one minute. 6. Plank rotation with press-up Best for: Core strength, upper body stability, rotational control. This exercise strengthens the chest, shoulders, triceps, and core. I find this a test of balance and mobility – both easy to neglect. How to do it Start in a high plank position with hands under shoulders, feet hip-width apart. Perform a controlled press-up, then rotate your body into a side plank, extending your top arm to the ceiling. Return to plank, complete another press-up, then rotate to the other side. Keep hips lifted and abs engaged to prevent sagging. Continue alternating sides. 7. Kick sits Best for: Full-body mobility, cardiovascular fitness, core and shoulder strength. This functional, ground-based movement improves shoulder stability, hip mobility, and core control, while raising heart rate. It's excellent for enhancing total-body coordination and dynamic mobility. How to do it Start on all fours in a quadruped position with knees lifted off the floor. Rotate your torso and kick your right leg through underneath you so the side of the leg lightly touches the floor. Keep both hands grounded. Pull the leg back and repeat on the other side, moving fluidly from one kick to the next. 8. Hollow hold Best for: Core strength, spinal stability, posture control. This isometric core drill builds deep abdominal strength, improves posture, and teaches proper trunk bracing, crucial for protecting the spine during heavy lifting and dynamic, overhead athletic movements. Holds are underestimated; this will kick in in no time. How to do it Lie flat on your back with arms overhead and legs extended. Engage your abs to lift your shoulders, arms, and legs off the floor, keeping your lower back pressed into the ground. Hold this position, creating a 'hollow' curve through your midsection. Maintain steady breathing and constant muscle tension throughout your body. Avoid arching your lower back. 9. Lateral lunges Best for: Single-leg strength, hip mobility, balance, core stability. This side-to-side lower body exercise builds strength in the glutes, quads, and adductors (the ones on the inside of your thighs) while enhancing hip mobility and improving balance – ideal for multidirectional sports and injury prevention. How to do it Stand tall with feet hip-width apart. Step your right foot out to the side, keeping both feet facing forward. Shift your weight over your right hip, bending your right knee while keeping your left leg straight. Push through your right heel to return to standing. Repeat on the other side. Maintain a tall chest and engaged core throughout. 10. Broad jump Best for: Lower body power, cardiovascular conditioning, explosive strength. This plyometric drill builds lower body power, particularly in the glutes, hamstrings, and quads, while also improving explosive force production, coordination, and overall athletic speed and agility. This feels very school sports day and comes in handy for dodging puddles. How to do it Stand with feet shoulder-width apart in an athletic stance. Lower into a quarter squat, swinging your arms back for momentum. Explosively jump forward, swinging your arms through as you leap. Land softly on both feet, absorbing the impact by bending your knees and pushing your hips back. Reset your stance before repeating. Focus on maximum distance with controlled, stable landings.
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
What is Send? How EHCP reform could lead to a fresh Labour row
Introduced under the Children and Families Act 2014, an Education, Health and Care Plan is a legal document designed to support children and young people aged 0-25 who have special educational needs and disabilities that cannot be met by the support available in mainstream settings. Eligibility is determined through a statutory needs assessment, typically initiated by a local authority. While parents or health professionals may request this, it is increasingly being done by schools. Securing an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) can be a lengthy and bureaucratic process, and in some cases, families appeal through tribunals to get support. • The dyslexia school run by a 90-year-old where pupils nail GCSEs Since they were introduced, the number of children on ECHPs has more than doubled to about 600,000, about one in 20 of all pupils. Spending on high needs children has risen by about 60 per cent to £11 billion, with special needs absorbing half of the increase in the overall schools budget. Another £3 billion increase is forecast over the next few years. Councils warn that the system is pushing them towards financial meltdown and the public accounts committee warned earlier this year that the special educational needs and disabilities (Send) crisis was 'an existential financial risk' for local authorities at was 'failing countless children'. Although there is evidence that more children are being diagnosed with conditions such as autism, much of the rise in ECHPs is thought to be because it is so hard for parents to get help any other way. Facing battles to get extra help for their children, legally enforceable rights are often the only option. Schools also have an incentive for pupils to seek ECHPs to apply for thousands of pounds in top-up funding, while councils are thought to be using them to push those with the highest needs into special schools. Despite all this, there is no clear evidence that educational results for children with special needs have actually improved. Little wonder that ministers describe the system as a 'lose, lose, lose'. An alternative vision, where more preventative help is given earlier, reducing the need for parents to launch an adversarial battle for an EHCP, could improve results all round and, perhaps, save money. The original argument for welfare reform was that more help earlier for people with disabilities to get jobs could reduce benefits spending. Politics quickly intervened and it appears now the same is rapidly happening with Send reforms. • Inside the Liverpool school with an in-house ADHD clinic There are some clear differences. Although the political timetable may make it look as though the government is turning to disabled children after finding it impossible to take money from disabled adults, in fact ministers have been planning reform to the system for months. The issue has long preoccupied Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, who is said to be devoting most of her attention to it. Labour's manifesto explicitly promised reform, saying the system was failing and pledging to improve 'inclusivity and expertise in mainstream schools'. Crucially, unlike in welfare where the Treasury was determined to score billions of pounds in savings to help meet fiscal rules, in Send there is a promise of £760 million upfront to improve early intervention. For this reason, some MPs are more optimistic about a genuine win-win than a repeat of the welfare debacle. But for others, trust in government has evaporated after the attempt to force through disability cuts. The fact remains that any solution acceptable to the Treasury is likely to see fewer children with costly legal rights. For Labour, the big question after the welfare revolt, is whether it is politically possible to take any entitlements away from any vulnerable groups.
