Zohran Mamdani, filmmaker Mira Nair's son, nominated for Mayor of New York City
Indian-origin politician Zohran Mamdani has clinched the Democratic Party's nomination to become the next Mayor of New York City. The 33-year-old state representative, son of noted filmmaker Mira Nair, mounted an aggressive grassroots campaign to defeat former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. Should he win the mayoral election against Republican Curtis Sliwa in November, Mamdani will become the city's first-ever Muslim mayor. Zohran Mamdani announced a campaign platform focused on appealing to the everyday concerns of New Yorkers (PTI)
Going into the primary election, Cuomo was heavily favoured to win. Cuomo enjoyed the support of the Democratic Party's political heavyweights and its existing base of donors. However, he was also weighed down by a number of scandals, especially after he stepped down as governor in 2021 following multiple sexual harassment allegations. Mamdani began the race trailing Cuomo in the polls.
The two candidates represented many of the tensions within the Democratic Party. The 67-year-old Cuomo — the son of former Governor Mario Cuomo — has been a political force since the 1990s, while the 33-year-old Mamdani entered the political fray in 2020 when he was elected to the New York State Assembly. Cuomo ran as a candidate of the Democratic establishment, while Mamdani — who describes himself as a democratic socialist — represented the younger, progressive wing of the party.
Faced with stiff odds, Mamdani announced a campaign platform focused on appealing to the everyday concerns of New Yorkers. He backed rent freezes, free bus services, and the establishment of government-run grocery stores to help people cope with rising prices of essentials. Essential to Mamdani's success was a slick social media campaign that featured him walking the streets of New York, engaging voters, and even echoing Bollywood movies to win support. His campaign struck a chord with many voters struggling with rising costs and looking for a new political vision for the Democratic Party. That allowed Mamdani's campaign to swiftly close the gap with Cuomo and even pull ahead in some polls.
However, Mamdani also faced tough questions about his past progressive political positions, including his support for 'defunding the police,' which was seen as a serious liability. His criticism of Israel's government for its policy in Gaza also attracted scrutiny in a city where Jewish voters are an active political force. In general, Mamdani's opponents characterised him as too young, too inexperienced, and too radical to govern America's most populous city.
Also Read: Zohran Mamdani, 33, billed as 'America's Sharma ji ka beta' by internet after defeating Andrew Cuomo
Despite this, Mamdani pulled off a political upset on Wednesday by beating Cuomo. His victory is significant for two reasons. First, Mamdani placed his identity as a Muslim immigrant at the centre of his political identity — a positioning that holds particular weight as battles over religion, identity, and immigration have intensified during President Donald Trump's tenure in the White House. Second, Mamdani's victory poses serious questions for the Democratic Party's leadership. The established, moderate Cuomo was seen by many as the choice of the party's establishment. But his defeat at the hands of a younger, avowedly more radical politician could herald a resurgence of the party's progressive wing. This could set up a clash between the party's factions as it grapples with how best to tackle the political challenge posed by Trump ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
Mamdani's victory also speaks to the broader political rise of Indian-origin politicians in America. In 2004, Louisiana's Bobby Jindal became the first Indian-American elected to the US House of Representatives in half a century. In the two decades since, Indian-origin politicians like Nikki Haley, Kamala Harris, and Ro Khanna have risen to prominent national roles. Should he win the mayoral election in November, Mamdani would become one of the highest-profile Indian-origin politicians in America.
Also Read: Who are Zohran Mamdani's parents? All about father Mahmood Mamdani and mother Mira Nair
Indian-Americans — and the South Asian diaspora more broadly — were a key target demographic for Mamdani's campaign. According to the Pew Research Center, roughly 710,000 Indians live in the New York metropolitan area. Mamdani reached out to voters in regional languages — from critiquing income and wealth inequality in Hindi to explaining the election's ranked-choice voting system in Bengali. Mamdani also hosted 'Chai with Zohran' sessions throughout his campaign in an effort to connect with voters. His comments on Prime Minister Narendra Modi have generated controversy.
Mamdani's political battle is not over yet. While Cuomo has conceded the Democratic primary to Mamdani, the former governor may choose to run as an independent in November. And although New York City leans heavily in favour of the Democratic Party, Mamdani will also face an independent challenge from incumbent Mayor Eric Adams and Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
30 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Reverberations of Zohran Mamdani's New York Mayoral campaign in far away Thiruvananthapuram
It is not often that an election in the Thiruvananthapuram Corporation makes much news outside Kerala or even the capital. But the elections in 2020 were different as it culminated in the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)]'s Arya Rajendran becoming the youngest Mayor of the Corporation at the age of 21, an event which got attention far and wide. Now, five years later, an old tweet on that election by another young person in the running to be the Mayor of New York has gone viral. On Wednesday, after 33-year Zohran Mamdani won the Democratic Primary race defeating former governor Andrew Cuomo, the old tweet popped up again, with the CPI(M) also retweeting it and wishing 'Congratulations @ZohranKMamdani! Hope to see you as New York Mayor'. Born to Indian parents, filmmaker Mira Nair and academic Mahmood Mamdani, he is also set to make several firsts if he manages to win the New York Mayor's post in the elections later this year, including becoming the first Muslim Mayor and first Indian American Mayor of the city. His poll promises have also led him to be branded a 'leftist' by some sections. Mamdani, who identifies as a democratic socialist, has pitched for affordable housing, government-run grocery stories, cheaper public transport and other steps to address the cost of living crisis. He promises to impose higher taxes on major corporations and the super rich to fund his initiatives. Along with this his unapologetic support to the Palestinian cause, has led to online attacks from the far right. Such comments appeared even on Wednesday under the old tweet on the Thiruvananthapuram Mayor. Sharing an image of oathtaking posted by the official handle of the CPI(M)'s Puducherry committee, he had written 'so, what kind of mayor does nyc need right now?' Some of the recent comments under the post include 'No way they elected a communist', 'You are an enemy of the United States Constitution' and 'McCarthyism needs to make a comeback'. Mamdani's campaign, marked by forthright messaging using crisp video content, has grabbed eyeballs globally.
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Echoes of Oslo Accord: Trump's Israel-Iran ceasefire puts him in Nobel spotlight
US Representative Buddy Carter, a Georgia Republican, nominated Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday. In justification, he credited Trump with 'preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet,' referencing the US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. Trump himself reposted a message by right-wing podcaster Charlie Kirk that called for him to receive the Nobel. His son, Donald Trump Jr., claimed that denying his father the prize while Barack Obama received it would amount to 'affirmative action.' Trump has aired his frustration publicly and often, saying, 'I should have gotten it four or five times . . . they won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.' The last (and only) time a Nobel Peace Prize was awarded for efforts to bring peace to the Middle East was in 1994, when the committee honoured Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, Israeli Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, and Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat for brokering the Oslo Accords. The accords, conducted in secret, laid out a 'Declaration of Principles' that for the first time formally acknowledged mutual recognition. Israel recognised the PLO as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, and Arafat renounced terrorism and recognised Israel's right to exist in peace and security. The accords also promised Palestinian self-governance in parts of the West Bank and Gaza, eventual elections, and negotiations on a permanent resolution within five years. The visual of Arafat and Rabin shaking hands on the White House lawn, with President Bill Clinton standing between them, became a global symbol of an optimistic new era. 'Oslo rewrote the political map of the West Bank and Gaza,' noted Khalil Shikaki, a Palestinian political scientist, writing in Foreign Affairs Magazine. 'It halted the continued rise of the Islamists, diminished the appeal of the leftist nationalists, and shifted the overall balance in favour of the pro-peace camp.' However, while the Oslo Accords marked a significant diplomatic achievement, they were far from a comprehensive solution. Palestinians for one, were unhappy that Israel's settler policy was allowed to continue. 'What Israel has gotten is official Palestinian consent to continued occupation,' Edward Said wrote in Peace and its Disconnects. 'A kingdom of illusions, with Israel firmly in command.' Israelis on the other hand were reluctant to concede any land, especially to the PLO, a group they associated with violence and terrorism. Additionally, core issues driving the conflict – final borders, the fate of Jerusalem, and the right of return for Palestinian refugees – remained unaddressed. 'In theory, Oslo sought to transform the Israeli-Palestinian political and psychological environment… In reality, its two-step approach let each side raise its own expectations. When these remained unfulfilled, disillusionment set in, impeding further progress,' Shikaki writes. This kind of an opinion is easy to express in retrospect, but even at the time, the Nobel Committee had to balance potential hope against past grievances. The decision to award the prize sparked immediate controversy, especially with the inclusion of Arafat. As leader of the PLO, Arafat had long been associated with attacks on Israeli civilians and for decades, the organisation was branded a terrorist group by Israel and much of the West. One member of the Nobel Committee, Kare Kristiansen, resigned in protest, declaring that 'Arafat's past is too tainted with violence, terrorism, and bloodshed.' Many also doubted Arafat's commitment to nonviolence, and others questioned whether the three leaders had yet achieved anything lasting. Peres, whose political career lasted until 2014, would later face criticism for participating in Israeli military operations in Gaza and the West Bank. Some Nobel Committee members even expressed regret, saying his actions in government contradicted the spirit of the prize. Within months of the Oslo signing, events on the ground began to unravel, shattering with them the prospect of long term peace in the region. In February, an American-born Israeli settler, Baruch Goldstein, massacred 29 praying Palestinians in Hebron. Hamas, fiercely opposed to the Oslo process, launched its first suicide bombing two months later. Then, in November 1995, Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated by an Israeli extremist. 'According to Jewish law, the minute a Jew gives over his land and people to the enemy, he must be killed,' the assassin Yigal Amir told a judge at his sentencing hearing. Rabin had few supporters in government at the time the accords were signed, and his death proved to be the final nail in its coffin. His successor Benjamin Netanyahu, was a vocal opponent of the accords and had little problem mustering public sentiment as attacks from Hamas continued. By the early 2000s, the Oslo framework had effectively collapsed. Yet the 1994 prize followed a pattern. The Nobel Peace Prize has never been reserved solely for pacifists and the actions that it has rewarded have not always proved fruitful. Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho were awarded in 1973 for ending the Vietnam War, despite their roles in prolonging it. In 1978, Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat won for brokering peace between Israel and Egypt, despite their wartime pasts. Mikhail Gorbachev, who ended the Cold War, had also presided over military crackdowns in the USSR. As the New York Times editorial board wrote in 2016, 'The Nobel jurors have generally seen the prize not only as a recognition of achievement, but also as encouragement and endorsement of ongoing actions.' As to its ability to foreshadow long lasting peace, its record is similarly tainted. Jay Nordlinger, in his history of the prize, Peace, They Say, points out the gap between honouring peace-making and achieving peace. 'Few ideas today are as fashionable as the belief that nongovernmental organisations, aroused citizens, and supporters of civic awareness and good governance are saving the planet,' he wrote, but 'intractable problems… are just that: intractable.' These complicated legacies mirror that of the prize's founder, Alfred Nobel who built his fortune by inventing and producing powerful explosives before willing his fortune to the Nobel committee. If Trump were to win, he would join an exclusive list. Four American presidents have won the Nobel Peace Prize – Theodore Roosevelt in 1906, Woodrow Wilson in 1919, Jimmy Carter in 2002 (as a former president), and Barack Obama in 2009. However, despite Obama winning the prize for normalising relations with the Arab world, even he didn't claim to be worthy of the accolade. Trump, by comparison, hopes to claim a more permeant solution, one he firmly believes he deserves to be rewarded for. Whether it's through his brokering of the Abraham Accords in 2020 or his bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities in 2025, Trump argues that he has done more for the Middle East than any American president before him. Juan Manuel Santos, who received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016 for ending Colombia's decades-long civil war, appeared unconvinced by his bid for the honour. 'We still don't have peace, so I don't think right now there are many arguments in favour of this desire,' he said in an interview. 'I don't think he or anybody will win the Nobel Peace Prize simply by working to earn that prize.' History seems to disagree with Santos, but even using the current situation as a barometer, one would be hard pressed to argue that the conflict in the Middle East is close to being resolved. 'With me here are five million citizens of Israel… five million hearts beating for peace,' Rabin said upon receiving his Nobel. 'And cemeteries. Graves as far as the eye can see. From the plane's window, from thousands of feet above them, the countless tombstones are silent. But the sound of their outcry has carried from the Middle East throughout the world for decades.' Thirty years later, the view from that plane has only darkened. The cemeteries Rabin spoke of have grown with new rows of graves in Gaza, southern Israel, the West Bank, Iran, and Lebanon. The silence he described has been broken by the roar of airstrikes, missile sirens, and the desolate wails of those left behind. Trump's supporters claim he deserves to win. His detractors vehemently disagree. The families of those in the graves likely don't care at all. For them, peace isn't an esoteric notion or a point of validation, it's a distant, yet tangible desire. A desperate hope that generations to follow won't have to suffer as they do now.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian-origin Mamdani to be next NYC mayor: Zohran's old post on 'Queer Liberation' goes viral; Vivek Ramaswamy suggests 'move to Ohio'
Zohran Mamdani (AP) and Vivek Ramaswamy (ANI) The recent election of Zohran Kwame Mamdani, a New York City mayoral candidate of Indian origin, has ignited reactions on social media. Railey Gaines, a former University of Kentucky swimmer turned conservative political activist and vocal advocate for women's sports not allowing transgenders, stirred controversy by posting a blunt critique of New York City's future, replying to an old 2020 post on X by Mamdani that called for defunding the police as part of 'queer liberation. ' In her response, Gaines tweeted, 'New York City is so screwed,' expressing her disapproval of Mamdani's stance. The comment quickly gained attention, reflecting the broader cultural and political divides shaping American politics. Adding another layer to the conversation, Vivek Ramaswamy , another prominent Indian-American Republican businessman and 2024 presidential hopeful, responded to Gaines's tweet with a suggestion to relocate. 'Here's a solution: move to Ohio. The heart of the nation, with 4 full seasons & an economic boom on the horizon. Friendly, hardworking, family-oriented people. Diverse viewpoints. Zero capital gains tax, zero income tax, & a gold standard for K-12 education. All coming very soon.' Ramaswamy said in a post Zohran Kwame Mamdani recently won the Democratic primary for New York City mayor and is the son of Indian immigrants.
