PS5 Teardown: Every Piece of the PlayStation 5 Pro & DualSense Edge
The Sony Playstation 5 Pro is the most advanced home gaming console to hit the market to date. But you've likely never had a look inside at what puts it atop the current generation's console wars. WIRED breaks it down so you don't have to: this is every piece of a Sony PlayStation 5 Pro and DualSense Edge Controller.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Gen Z ditches traditional dating rules not to just ‘go through the motions'
Dating's latest trend? Total anarchy — and not in the punk rock way. A new report from the sex-positive app Feeld and educator Ruby Rare found that a growing number of Gen Zers are opting out of traditional relationship models and into something called 'relationship anarchy' — and one in five may be practicing it without even realizing. Coined in 2006 by Swedish writer Andie Nordgren, relationship anarchy — or RA — is a radical, anti-hierarchical, anti-capitalist take on love and connection. As Nordgren noted in her manifesto, it 'questions the idea that love is a limited resource that can only be real if restricted to a couple.' In other words, why should romance get top billing when your BFF, roommate or creative collaborator might fulfill your soul more than a spouse? 'It's a relationship style that is founded on politically anarchic principles. It takes being intentional,' Rare explained in the study. 'You have to examine the relationships you currently have in your life, and reflect and deep dive. Are you just going through the motions?' Feeld's findings show RA devotees report feeling less lonely and more supported — but it's not all communal bliss and pillow talk. Feeld's findings say RA fans feel less lonely and more backed up — but it's not all group hugs and sweet nothings. Alberto – 'It's challenging to figure out what your boundaries are,' Rare said. 'But I don't think relationship building should be about shying away from challenge.' Instead of prioritizing sexual exclusivity or 'Disney fairy-tale romance,' RA promotes mutual care across all connections — romantic or not. 'Everyone is taught the rules at a young age: One person in your life is meant to be your everything,' Sam, a 33-year-old gender-fluid music licensing administrator, told Wired in a recent interview. People would feel more fulfilled in their relationships 'if they were able to prioritize others based on what they actually wanted versus what they believe is expected of them.' Forget fairy tales — RA ditches monogamy for a mix-and-match lovefest built on mutual care, whether it's with a partner, pal or podcast co-host. Pixel-Shot – The goal? Freedom, not perfection. 'A lot of people will tell me, 'Oh, I wish I could be polyamorous or a relationship anarchist, but I just get too jealous,'' Lavvynder said. 'And it's like, well, I get jealous too… It's really f—king hard, actually.' Still, many say it's worth the mess. As Rare puts it: 'Human connection is inherently messy. The better we are at embracing that, the better we are at enjoying our lives.' And for a rising number of romantics, relationship anarchy might just be the escape route. Polyamory — and its close cousin, relationship anarchy — may not just be about love and liberation. It can also be practical.
New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Former OceanGate employees slam Titan sub disaster company CEO in new doc: ‘Borderline clinical psychopath'
A damning new documentary condemns Stockton Rush, the founder and CEO of OceanGate, the defunct company whose Titan submersible imploded in the Atlantic Ocean June 2023. Former employees allege in 'Titan: The OceanGate Disaster' on Netflix that their boss' self-absorption and consistent willful negligence tragically led to the death of the five passengers, including Rush — a news story that captured the entire world's attention for days. 'I worked for somebody that is probably [a] borderline clinical psychopath,' said former OceanGate engineer Tony Nissen. 6 The late OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush is ripped by former employees in 'TItan: The OceanGate Disaster.' Courtesy of Netflix 'He wanted to be a Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk,' said Bonnie Carl, director of finance and administration, in the doc. 'He referred to those guys as 'big swingin' dicks,' and he loved that term and used it all the time.' Engineering project manager Emily Hammermeister added that repeatedly expressed safety concerns by workers with years of expertise fell on deaf ears and Rush's tunnel vision. 'Stockton was just so set on getting to the Titanic that nothing that anybody said made much of a difference,' she said. Rush was a wealthy California-born engineer who loved 'Star Wars' and 'Star Trek.' He co-founded OceanGate in 2009 with the goal of bringing deep sea exploration to the public — especially dives to the Titanic. In pursuit of his pipe dream, he decided to create the first submersible made from carbon fiber, a strong and cheap material consisting of many small strands. 'It's not like metal,' said Wired journalist Mark Harris, who profiled Rush. 'You know, titanium is extremely well understood. Carbon fiber is far more idiosyncratic in that the little fibers inside there can snap.' 6 Rush aimed to take paying passengers down to the Titanic in cheaply made submerssibles. Courtesy of Netflix Knowing the risks, OceanGate engineers built sensors into the hull — a series of small microphones — to alert people in the sub if there were breaches to the carbon fiber so they could quickly surface. In theory. 'The monitoring system for the hull was something that was dreamt up by OceanGate to try and give some comfort to people who were asking too many questions,' said submersible operations expert Rob McCallum. The film terrifyingly shows years of pressure tests conducted on the sub in which the hull cracked and the vehicle imploded. 'Pop' noises of breaks are loud and frequent — portending the loss of life that was to come. 6 Titan's hull was made of carbon fiber. Courtesy of Brian Weed 'I just can't believe it,' Rush angrily reacted during a trial five years before their first dive. 'We couldn't even get past f–king 4,300 PSI.' Eventually, Titan successfully reached the Titanic — in spite of persistent safety issues. 'It was a mathematical certainty that it would fail,' said McCallum. 'So, having a dive or two or 10 to the Titanic is not a measure of success. And personally I will never understand how it survived the first test dives.' 6 Rush routinely dismissed his experts' safety concerns. Courtesy of Netflix Lochridge emailed Rush and others a safety report in 2018, and was called into a contentious meeting the next day. Rush recorded the interaction. 'I don't want anybody in this company who is uncomfortable with what we're doing,' said an irate Rush. 'We're doing weird s–t here, and I am definitely out of the mold. There's no question. I'm doing things that are completely non-standard. And I'm sure the industry thinks I'm a f–king idiot. That's fine. They've been doing that for eight years. And I'm going to continue on the way I'm doing, but I'm not going to force people to join my religion if they don't want to.' Reacting to Lochridge's report, an angry Rush told Nissen, his engineer, that 'it would be nothing for him to spend $50,000 to ruin somebody's life.' 'That changed my life in that company,' said Nissen. 'I had to make sure nobody spoke up.' 6 Courtesy of Netflix Nissen, Lochridge, Hammermeister and Carl went on to all leave the troubling company. Carl was pushed over the edge when Rush brazenly suggested she assume the role of lead pilot. 'Are you nuts? I'm an accountant,' she remembered thinking. On June 18, 2023, one hour and 33 minutes into a dive, the Titan lost communication with the surface. A four-day search ensued and voracious news outlets displayed countdown clocks of when the sub would run out of oxygen. Debris was finally discovered on June 22. The Titan had actually imploded the same day it ceased pinging. The passengers — Rush, Hamish Harding, Paul-Henri Nargeolet, Suleman Dawood and Shahzada Dawood — all died. Hammermeister still feels shaken up by her association with OceanGate. 6 The five passengers aboard the Titan all died on June 18, 2023. AP 'I've reflected a lot on my time there,' she said. 'And my time there was not normal. I mean, I think back to the times where I was part of dives that happened. And thinking back how uncomfortable I felt bolting people into the sub. And so when that initial news article popped up and it said 'Tourist sub lost in the Atlantic,' I knew right away it was OceanGate.' Lochridge said the tragedy was a result of Rush's narcissism. 'He wanted fame,' he said. 'First and foremost to fuel his ego, fame. That was what he wanted. And he's got it.'
WIRED
18 hours ago
- WIRED
Inside the AI Party at the End of the World
Jun 11, 2025 7:00 AM At a mansion overlooking the Golden Gate Bridge, a group of AI insiders met to debate one unsettling question: If humanity ends, what comes next? Photo-Illustration:In a $30 million mansion perched on a cliff overlooking the Golden Gate Bridge, a group of AI researchers, philosophers, and technologists gathered to discuss the end of humanity. The Sunday afternoon symposium, called 'Worthy Successor,' revolved around a provocative idea from entrepreneur Daniel Faggella: The 'moral aim' of advanced AI should be to create a form of intelligence so powerful and wise that 'you would gladly prefer that it (not humanity) determine the future path of life itself.' Faggella made the theme clear in his invitation. 'This event is very much focused on posthuman transition,' he wrote to me via X DMs. 'Not on AGI that eternally serves as a tool for humanity.' A party filled with futuristic fantasies, where attendees discuss the end of humanity as a logistics problem rather than a metaphorical one, could be described as niche. If you live in San Francisco and work in AI, then this is a typical Sunday. About 100 guests nursed nonalcoholic cocktails and nibbled on cheese plates near floor-to-ceiling windows facing the Pacific ocean before gathering to hear three talks on the future of intelligence. One attendee sported a shirt that said 'Kurzweil was right,' seemingly a reference to Ray Kurzweil, the futurist who predicted machines will surpass human intelligence in the coming years. Another wore a shirt that said 'does this help us get to safe AGI?' accompanied by a thinking face emoji. Faggella told WIRED that he threw this event because 'the big labs, the people that know that AGI is likely to end humanity, don't talk about it because the incentives don't permit it' and referenced early comments from tech leaders like Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Demis Hassabis, who 'were all pretty frank about the possibility of AGI killing us all.' Now that the incentives are to compete, he says, 'they're all racing full bore to build it.' (To be fair, Musk still talks about the risks associated with advanced AI, though this hasn't stopped him from racing ahead). On LinkedIn, Faggella boasted a star-studded guest list, with AI founders, researchers from all the top Western AI labs, and 'most of the important philosophical thinkers on AGI.' The first speaker, Ginevera Davis, a writer based in New York, warned that human values might be impossible to translate to AI. Machines may never understand what it's like to be conscious, she said, and trying to hard-code human preferences into future systems may be shortsighted. Instead, she proposed a lofty-sounding idea called 'cosmic alignment'—building AI that can seek out deeper, more universal values we haven't yet discovered. Her slides often showed a seemingly AI-generated image of a techno-utopia, with a group of humans gathered on a grass knoll overlooking a futuristic city in the distance. Critics of machine consciousness will say that large language models are simply stochastic parrots—a metaphor coined by a group of researchers, some of whom worked at Google, who wrote in a famous paper that LLMs do not actually understand language and are only probabilistic machines. But that debate wasn't part of the symposium, where speakers took as a given the idea that superintelligence is coming, and fast. By the second talk, the room was fully engaged. Attendees sat cross-legged on the wood floor, scribbling notes. A philosopher named Michael Edward Johnson took the mic and argued that we all have an intuition that radical technological change is imminent, but we lack a principled framework for dealing with the shift—especially as it relates to human values. He said that if consciousness is 'the home of value,' then building AI without fully understanding consciousness is a dangerous gamble. We risk either enslaving something that can suffer or trusting something that can't. (This idea relies on a similar premise to machine consciousness and is also hotly debated.) Rather than forcing AI to follow human commands forever, he proposed a more ambitious goal: teaching both humans and our machines to pursue 'the good.' (He didn't share a precise definition of what 'the good' is, but he insists it isn't mystical and hopes it can be defined scientifically.) Philosopher Michael Edward Johnson Photograph: Kylie Robison Entrepreneur and speaker Daniel Faggella Photograph: Kylie Robison Finally, Faggella took the stage. He believes humanity won't last forever in its current form and that we have a responsibility to design a successor, not just one that survives but one that can create new kinds of meaning and value. He pointed to two traits this successor must have: consciousness and 'autopoiesis,' the ability to evolve and generate new experiences. Citing philosophers like Baruch Spinoza and Friedrich Nietzsche, he argued that most value in the universe is still undiscovered and that our job is not to cling to the old but to build something capable of uncovering what comes next. This, he said, is the heart of what he calls 'axiological cosmism,' a worldview where the purpose of intelligence is to expand the space of what's possible and valuable rather than merely serve human needs. He warned that the AGI race today is reckless and that humanity may not be ready for what it's building. But if we do it right, he said, AI won't just inherit the Earth—it might inherit the universe's potential for meaning itself. During a break between panels and the Q&A, clusters of guests debated topics like the AI race between the US and China. I chatted with the CEO of an AI startup who argued that, of course , there are other forms of intelligence in the galaxy. Whatever we're building here is trivial compared to what must already exist beyond the Milky Way. At the end of the event, some guests poured out of the mansion and into Ubers and Waymos, while many stuck around to continue talking. "This is not an advocacy group for the destruction of man,' Faggella told me. 'This is an advocacy group for the slowing down of AI progress, if anything, to make sure we're going in the right direction.'
