
Alleged White Supremacist Charged In 2019 Arson Of Activist Center Where MLK, John Lewis And Rosa Parks Trained
Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE Source:
Just over six years ago, on March 29, 2019, a Tennessee social justice center that served as a training ground for civil rights legends like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks was tragically burned along with decades of archives. Last week, a suspect was finally arrested in connection with the burning, and, unsurprisingly, he has also been linked to a white supremacist movement as well as another arson.
According to the Associated Press, 27-year-old Regan Prater was arrested last Thursday and charged with one count of arson after authorities linked him to several group chats affiliated with white supremacist organizations. In one chat, Prater was allegedly asked if he had committed the burning of the Highlander Research and Education Center in New Market, Tenn, according to an affidavit filed in federal court in East Tennessee.
From AP:
In one private message, a witness who sent screenshots to the FBI asked a person authorities believe is Prater whether he set the fire.
'I'm not admitting anything,' the person using the screen name 'Rooster' wrote. But he later went on to describe exactly how the fire was set with 'a sparkler bomb and some Napalm.'
A white-power symbol was spray-painted on the pavement near the site of the fire. The affidavit describes it as a 'triple cross' and says it was also found on one of the firearms used by a shooter who killed 51 people at mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, on March 15, 2019, about two weeks before the Highlander fire.
Then there's the fact that Prater had already been charged, convicted and sentenced for another arson he committed less than three months after Highlander was burned.
Prater previously pleaded guilty to the June 2019 arson of an adult video and novelty store in East Tennessee. He was sentenced to five years in federal prison and ordered to pay $106,000 in restitution for the property he destroyed.
One can imagine that after six years with no arrests or suspects being named, local activists and community members were growing restless while wondering if anyone would ever be held accountable for the damage done to such a historic site.
'Every time the wind blew, we would see what was left of it go up in flames again, for weeks,' Ash-Lee Woodard Henderson, a former co-executive director at Highlander, said, describing what she saw when she arrived at the scene of the fire in 2019.
Woodard Henerson said she recalled feeling frustrated and how investigators had been vague and uninformative regarding the investigation, despite early signs that the arsonist had ties to white supremacist groups.
'We were told that it was like finding a needle in the haystack to prove who did it — that that's in fact the point of an arson,' she said. 'You've got to remember this was 2019, so Donald Trump was still in his first presidency. Frankly, for years, we didn't get any updates.'
(Side note: Before readers start wondering why Woodard Henderson would mention Trump, it should be noted that his current administration recently ended a settlement agreement regarding wastewater issues in a mostly Black rural Alabama county, citing Trump's anti-DEI directive as if diversity efforts have anything to do with a court ruling just because it may have corrected environmental racism. It's not difficult to imagine his federal government not caring about some Black activist center that got burned down by one of his 'very fine people.')
Here's a little more history on Higlander via AP:
Highlander is known as a place where Civil Rights icons such as Rosa Parks and John Lewis received training. Parks attended a workshop there on integration in 1955, about six months before she famously refused to move to the back of a bus in Montgomery, Alabama. She always credited Highlander with helping her become a more determined activist.
Parks returned to Highlander two years later with the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. for the school's 25th anniversary celebration, where King gave a keynote address on achieving freedom and equality through nonviolence.
First established in Monteagle in 1932 as a center for union organizing, first lady Eleanor Roosevelt was among its early supporters.
Highlander's co-founder and longtime leader, Myles Horton, a white man, created a place that was unique in the Jim Crow South, where activists white and Black could build and strengthen alliances. In his memoir, Congressman Lewis wrote of how eye-opening being at Highlander was.
The Highlander Research and Education Center will be 93 years old this year, and six years after the fire, administrators say a rebuild of its administrative office is expected to be completed soon, according to Allyn Steele, a co-executive director at Highlander.
SEE ALSO:
Clayborn Temple, Historic Landmark In Memphis With Ties To Martin Luther King Jr., Catches Fire
Candace Owens' MAGA Meltdown: The Hypocrisy, The Flip-Flop, And The Fallout
SEE ALSO
Alleged White Supremacist Charged In 2019 Arson Of Activist Center Where MLK, John Lewis And Rosa Parks Trained was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
12 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Colombian senator and would-be presidential candidate is shot and wounded at Bogota campaign rally
Images circulating on social media showed Uribe Turbay, 39, covered in blood, apparently with a head wound, being held by several people. So far, no official report has been released on the senator's condition. A suspected shooter has been captured, Bogotá Mayor Carlos Galán said on the social platform X. But the federal government said it was offering a reward for the capture of those responsible. 'Respect life, that's the red line,' Colombian President Gustavo Petro said in a message posted on his X account. Shortly after making the post, Petro canceled a planned trip to France 'due to the seriousness of the events,' according to a presidential statement. Advertisement Uribe Turbay is a senator and the son of a journalist who was kidnapped and killed in 1991 during one of the country's most violent periods. Colombia will hold a presidential election on May 31, 2026, marking the end of the current term of Petro, Colombia's first leftist president. Uribe Turbay announced his presidential bid in March. Colombian police chief Gen. Carlos Triana said that at the time of the attack Uribe Turbay was accompanied by Councilman Andrés Barrios and 20 other people. A minor who allegedly participated in the attack was apprehended at the scene and is being treated for a leg injury, he said. A firearm was also seized. Advertisement 'I have ordered the Colombian military and police forces and intelligence agencies to deploy all their capabilities to urgently clarify the facts,' said Defense Minister Pedro Sánchez. Miguel Uribe Turbay, center in blue tie, celebrates after voting against a labor reform referendum proposed by the government, in Bogota on May 14. Fernando Vergara/Associated Press U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'This is a direct threat to democracy and the result of the violent leftist rhetoric coming from the highest levels of the Colombian government,' Rubio said. Reactions poured in from around Latin America, with Chilean President Gabriel Boric saying 'there is no room or justification for violence in a democracy,' and Ecuadorian President Daniel Noboa saying 'we condemn all forms of violence and intolerance.' In Colombia, former President Uribe said 'they attacked the hope of the country, a great husband, father, son, brother, a great colleague.'


Boston Globe
14 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump targets workplaces as immigration crackdown widens
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The high-profile raids appeared to mark a new phase of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, in which officials say they will increasingly focus on workplaces — taking aim at the reason millions of people have illegally crossed the border for decades. That is an expansion from plans early in the administration to prioritize detaining hardened criminals and later to focus on hundreds of international students. Advertisement 'You're going to see more worksite enforcement than you've ever seen in the history of this nation,' Thomas D. Homan, the White House border czar, told reporters recently. 'We're going to flood the zone.' It remains to be seen how aggressively Trump will pursue sectors like construction, food production and hospitality. Raids are sometimes directed based on tips, but otherwise appear to be distributed without a clear pattern, hitting establishments large and small. Advertisement A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to an email seeking details about the government's plans, including an explanation about why the administration is ramping up worksite arrests now. Police detained a man during a protest in the Paramount section of Los Angeles on Saturday, after federal immigration authorities conducted operations. Eric Thayer/Associated Press Over the past month, though, the White House has pressured immigration officials to increase deportations, which have fallen short of the administration's goals. The number of arrests has risen sharply in the past week, according to figures provided by the Department of Homeland Security. Related : Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for Homeland Security, said 2,000 immigrants per day were arrested over the last week, up from 600 earlier in the administration. It was not clear how many of those arrests were made at raids of worksites. More than 4% of the nation's 170 million-person workforce was made up of immigrants lacking permanent legal status in 2023, according to estimates from Goldman Sachs, making job sites a prime setting for agents to find people. The number of immigrants who could be subject to such sweeps increased by at least 500,000 at the end of May, as the Supreme Court allowed the administration to revoke the temporary status that had allowed many Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans to work. Workplace raids require significant planning, can be costly and draw on large teams of agents, but they can yield more arrests than pursuing individual targets. The raids may have become feasible in recent weeks, experts said, as personnel from the FBI and other law enforcement agencies have been enlisted on immigration operations. Advertisement 'Goosing the numbers is a big part of this because it's so much more efficient in manpower to raid a warehouse and arrest 100 illegal aliens than it is to send five guys after one criminal,' said Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates less immigration. Workplace raids also send a warning to a far broader group of people lacking permanent legal status, most of whom have not committed crimes. 'If you want to get people packing up and leaving, that isn't going to happen if you're just focusing on the criminals,' Krikorian said. In interviews, migrants and employers expressed alarm about the toll a sustained crackdown could take on the workforce. Immigrants lacking permanent legal status are concentrated in a few American industries, making up 19% of landscaping workers, 17% of farmworkers and 13% of construction workers, according to the estimates from Goldman Sachs. During his first term, Trump — whose own businesses have employed workers without papers — sent mixed messages about his eagerness to crack down on undocumented labor. Early on, his administration carried out several workplace raids and conducted more audits of worker eligibility paperwork than the Obama administration had. But Trump's Justice Department prosecuted relatively few employers for hiring workers lacking permanent legal status. And in 2017, the president commuted the sentence of an Iowa meatpacking plant executive convicted in the Obama era after a jury found that he knowingly hired hundreds of workers lacking permanent legal status and paid for their forged documents. The COVID-19 pandemic halted efforts to go after workers lacking permanent legal status. 'These were people who were processing our food, making our food, delivering our food so we could all live in the comfort of our Zoom existence,' said Muzaffar Chishti, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. 'That was not lost on people.' Advertisement President Joe Biden, who began his term facing a beleaguered economy and a severe labor shortage, never prioritized workplace immigration enforcement. Still from video of people that were detained and removed from Nantucket last week in a immigration raid by ICE and FBI agents. Jason Graziadei/Nantucket Current The system that gave rise to this shadow workforce dates to 1986, when President Ronald Reagan signed a bill granting amnesty to nearly 3 million immigrants lacking permanent legal status, allowing them to pursue citizenship. The bill also criminalized hiring people without legal status and required that employers collect an I-9 form from every new hire, substantiating their work authorization with identification. In 1996, the IRS created an alternative to a Social Security number that allowed immigrants to file federal tax returns on their earnings. Related : Over the years, raids at farms, meatpacking plants and construction sites have grabbed headlines, but employers have seldom faced severe consequences. Many subcontract to avoid liability, and managers have long asserted that it is difficult to identify fake documents. 'They have plausible deniability for just about any hires,' said Daniel Costa, an immigration labor expert at the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank. 'The system was kind of rigged against workers and in favor of employers from the beginning.' Immigrant workers tend to be younger, while the U.S.-born population is aging into retirement. Millions of people who arrived between 2022 and 2024, largely from Latin America, Ukraine and Afghanistan, were generally eligible to work, since the Biden administration granted most of them some kind of temporary legal status. Advertisement For those reasons, the share of the labor force that is foreign-born rose to 19.7% in March, the highest on record. That is why a serious worksite crackdown could severely affect some industries, especially if employers begin preemptively firing people known to lack permanent legal status. Employers also must balance verifying a worker's status with risking accusations of discrimination on the basis of race and national origin, which is also illegal. 'If you've done your due diligence as an employer, your own doubt or suspicion isn't going to be enough for me to say, 'Yeah, fire that person,'' said Eric Welsh, an attorney with Reeves Immigration Law Group, which helps individuals and companies with visa issues. 'You're damned if you do and damned if you don't.' After Trump's election, employers started performing more internal audits to verify employees' identification documents and work permits, immigration attorneys said. Chris Thomas, a partner with the firm Holland & Hart in Denver, said his business clients had seen more notices of investigation and letters from the IRS flagging Social Security numbers that don't match the agency's records. Protesters gathered after federal immigration authorities conducted an operation on Friday in Los Angeles. Damian Dovarganes/Associated Press The Department of Justice raised the stakes in early February with a memo that directed attorneys to use 'all available criminal statutes' to enforce immigration laws. 'If you know you have undocumented workers, and you're not severing ties with them at this stage, you're in a position where they're coming pretty soon,' Thomas said. 'If you wait until they arrive on the scene, it's probably too late.' Greg Casten, who co-owns several restaurants, a fish wholesaler and a few other hospitality businesses in Washington, D.C., has watched the government's shifting approach for more than 40 years. Many of his 600 employees are immigrants. He has found Salvadorans in particular to be skilled at cutting fish. Advertisement Every year, he gets a list from the IRS of Social Security numbers on his payroll that don't match official records, and every year, he goes through to try to address any gaps. Still, it's not perfect. 'I do have some people who work for me who can barely speak English, and I find it hard to believe sometimes when they're giving me paperwork,' Casten said. But since he puts in the necessary effort, he doesn't worry much about punishment. In early May, the Department of Homeland Security served inspection notices to 187 businesses in Washington, though none of Casten's. 'Right now, as fragile as this industry is, if they came in and took 20% or 10% of someone's work staff, they would be out of business,' he said. This article originally appeared in .

Los Angeles Times
20 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge in Britain warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court
LONDON — Lawyers have cited fake cases generated by artificial intelligence in court proceedings in England, a judge has said — warning that attorneys could be prosecuted if they don't check the accuracy of their research. High Court justice Victoria Sharp said the misuse of AI has 'serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system.' In the latest example of how judicial systems around the world are grappling with how to handle the increasing presence of artificial intelligence in court, Sharp and fellow judge Jeremy Johnson chastised lawyers in two recent cases in a ruling on Friday. They were asked to rule after lower court judges raised concerns about 'suspected use by lawyers of generative artificial intelligence tools to produce written legal arguments or witness statements which are not then checked,' leading to false information being put before the court. In a ruling written by Sharp, the judges said that in a $120-million lawsuit over an alleged breach of a financing agreement involving the Qatar National Bank, a lawyer cited 18 cases that did not exist. The client in the case, Hamad Al-Haroun, apologized for unintentionally misleading the court with false information produced by publicly available AI tools, and said he was responsible, rather than his solicitor Abid Hussain. But Sharp said it was 'extraordinary that the lawyer was relying on the client for the accuracy of their legal research, rather than the other way around.' In the other incident, a lawyer cited five fake cases in a tenant's housing claim against the London Borough of Haringey. Barrister Sarah Forey denied using AI, but Sharp said she had 'not provided to the court a coherent explanation for what happened.' The judges referred the lawyers in both cases to their professional regulators, but did not take more serious action. Sharp said providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the 'most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. She said in the judgment that AI is a 'powerful technology' and a 'useful tool' for the law. 'Artificial intelligence is a tool that carries with it risks as well as opportunities,' the judge said. 'Its use must take place therefore with an appropriate degree of oversight, and within a regulatory framework that ensures compliance with well-established professional and ethical standards if public confidence in the administration of justice is to be maintained.' Lawless writes for the Associated Press.