Texas bill for hospital safety barriers clears critical vote
The Brief
Legislation was passed requiring the installation of safety barriers at the entrances to most hospitals in Texas
This comes after a car crashed into a North Austin hospital, killing the driver and injuring several others
If the legislation clears the House, and is later signed by the Governor, hospitals without the safety systems need to have them in place by January 2026
AUSTIN, Texas - A deadly crash into an Austin hospital in 2024 brought about action at the Texas Capitol.
Legislation was passed requiring the installation of safety barriers at the entrances to most hospitals in Texas.
The backstory
At the entrance of St. Davids North Medical Center security barriers known as bollards are in place. They were not there back in February 2024.
A car smashed through the entrance, killing the driver and injuring several people at St. David's.
The night of the incident, FOX 7 spoke to witnesses who saw the sedan break through the glass doors at high speed.
"It was such an intense experience, and it'll take a while to get the sounds of everyone's screams off my head," said Michelle Cruz when interviewed in 2024.
What they're saying
On Tuesday in the Texas Senate, Dallas Democrat Royce West spoke about the Austin crash and others like it.
"There have been over 400 crashes into medical facilities within the last decade. And 22 of those have resulted in fatalities," said Senator West during the Floor Discussion.
SB 660 filed by West requires hospitals to install bollards or other similar safety barriers. They are to be located at emergency room entrances that are close to vehicle traffic.
"I was shocked that we didn't have [barriers] at hospitals. To the hospital's credit, some of them already have safety mechanisms in place," said Sen. West.
West put in an exemption to address cost concerns. The opt-out is for hospitals in rural counties with populations of less than 68,000 people, and for hospitals designated as critical Medicare Medicaid access facilities.
West said the barriers should be a consideration, beyond hospitals.
"I think it is a wake-up call to make certain that all the businesses that we have, that they kind of look at the safety of the security of their particular buildings. And if you have some areas that are unsafe, where we have a lot of customers and patients come in, that you need to kind of look at it to make sure that those people are secure," said Sen. West.
What's next
Back in June, the Austin City Council passed a hospital safety barrier ordinance. It requires crash-tested bollards at all new hospitals that are built in Austin.
The bill passed its second reading vote 21 to 9. If the legislation clears the House, and is later signed by the Governor, hospitals without the safety systems need to have them in place by January 2026.
The Source
Information from a Texas legislative session hearing
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Johnson to Senate fiscal hawks: Will take ‘more than a flip of a switch' to fix US finance
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) defended the House-passed spending package in an interview that aired Sunday while lauding the bill's unprecedented cuts. President Trump has endorsed the legislation, which would add $4 trillion to the national debt. 'We have $36 trillion in federal debt. But it's important to remember that we did not get into that financial situation overnight. It took many decades … It's going to take more than a flip of a switch to turn it around,' Johnson said during an appearance on John Catsimatidis's radio show, 'Cats Roundtable' on WABC 770 AM. Critics, including Elon Musk, have slammed the bill for the debt ceiling increase, alleging it 'undermines' federal spending reductions made by the Department of Government Efficiency. However, Johnson remains confident that the legislation will help the country shift away from past transgressions. 'This is a dramatic shift in the right direction. And it's just the beginning,' Johnson said. 'We're going to have more of this in the Republican Congress under President Trump's leadership to get us out of the debt mess that we're in.' Republicans are pushing to have the text approved in the Senate prior to the Fourth of July, although they have received pushback from Democrats over Medicaid reforms set to leave millions without access to healthcare. 'Everybody, take a deep breath. Look at the legislation. You're going to find that you're very much in favor of what we're doing here,' Johnson told Catsimatidis. 'If we do not clean the system up, if we do not eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse, these programs will become insolvent, and they will not be there for the people who desperately need and deserve it. We're doing the right thing here,' he added.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Education advocates press Senate for changes to Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
House Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill' doubles down on President Trump's education agenda, including raising taxes on university endowments and overhauling the student loan program, even as colleges are already feeling a funding pinch and borrower defaults are on the rise. Advocates are hoping to seize on the opportunity to have the legislation reformed in the Senate, where GOP moderates and conservatives are calling for significant — and sometimes contradictory — changes. Education experts warn that in its current form the package, which also boosts student vouchers and gives a tax break to religious colleges, will financially cripple student loan borrowers and universities alike. 'The major takeaway is that this bill is going to make paying for college and paying off student loans more expensive and more risky for millions of students and working families with student debt,' said Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director for Student Borrower Protection Center. Student loan borrowers have faced a whirlwind in policy shifts between former President Biden and President Trump, but the current budget reconciliation bill would be an earthquake to the 45 million Americans with student debt. It would reshape repayment options, only offering one income-driven repayment plan or a standard repayment plan; all other options would be terminated. Advocates fear significant increases in monthly payment as more generous repayment plans disappear at a time when default rates are already going up. 'It's very bad for borrowers. I don't want to sugar coat it, you know, it's not looking good,' said Natalia Abrams at the Student Debt Crisis Center. 'It will lengthen the time for undergrads from 20 years to 30 years' to receive debt forgiveness after consistent payments, she added. 'For grad students, from 25 to 30 years. It's really unfortunate that this bill passed, especially by one vote' in the House. The package also intends to end Parent PLUS loans, limit how much federal student loan debt an individual can take out and changes eligibility to Pell Grants. The maximum an undergraduate student could take out is $50,000, with parents able to match the amount. For Pell Grants, the number of credits needed to qualify will increase. Other changes include eliminating subsidized loans. 'One of our big worries is that there will be borrower confusion amidst this return to repayment and with servicers potentially needing to implement, if this reconciliation bill goes through, a new income driven repayment plan that departs significantly from any IDR plan that has come before. And so, I think that borrower confusion is a big problem for policymakers,' said Sameer Gadkaree, president and CEO of the Institute for College Access & Success. Republicans and conservatives have cheered the legislation as a way to simplify student loan repayments and ensure those who did not go to college do not pay off others' debt through their taxes. 'It's time we stopped asking taxpayers to foot the bill for our broken student loan system that has left borrowers in trillions of dollars of debt and has caused college costs to balloon,' said Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. 'It's time we stopped asking a factory worker in Michigan or a rancher in Texas to subsidize the student debt of a lawyer in Manhattan. I urge my colleagues in the Senate to end the status quo and get this bill to the president's desk,' he added. Colleges, already beset by the Trump administration, face a financial hit too: tax increases on their endowments ranging from 1 percent to 21 percent, with major universities such as Harvard and Yale at the top end. Those are an addition to the taxes on endowments passed in 2017 during Trump's first administration back. Before then, endowments were never taxed. 'We know that almost 50 percent of endowment spending goes to financial aid. If you add financial aid and academic programs, that's two-thirds of endowment spending, and so, if you take money away from the school, from its endowment resources, it's going to undermine their ability to provide robust financial aid. That's why we call it a scholarship tax, because that's what it is,' said Steven Bloom, assistant vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education. Despite Trump calling for Republicans to unite around the bill, some in the Senate are demanding changes before they'll give it their support. 'I've told them if they'll take the debt ceiling off of it, I'll consider voting for it,' said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). The infighting has led to some optimism that there is still time to get some changes. 'It seems like folks in the Senate have a bit of heartburn about the level of cuts to the Pell program, and that there might be a discomfort in adopting what the House has put together on that front,' Canchola Bañez said. 'I would hope that senators would look at the ways in which the House proposal will make it significantly harder for folks to afford to repay their loans. And in a world where these policymakers want to ensure that student loan borrowers can repay their debts, we need to make sure that there are actual safeguards in place,' she added.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
House GOP passed trillions in tax cuts. How Trump's 'big bill' could change in the Senate
House Republicans passed a multi-trillion-dollar tax and spending package after months of debate, which included many of President Donald Trump's priorities. Now, policy experts are bracing for Senate changes as GOP lawmakers aim to finalize the "big bill" by the Fourth of July. If enacted as currently drafted, the House's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" would make permanent Trump's 2017 tax cuts, while adding new tax breaks for tip income, overtime pay and older Americans, among other provisions. More from Personal Finance:What the House GOP budget bill means for your moneyHouse bill calls for bigger 'pass-through' business tax breakWhat Medicaid and SNAP cuts in House bill mean for benefits The House bill also approved historic spending cuts to programs for low-income families, including Medicaid health coverage and SNAP, formerly known as food stamps. "Overall, the [Senate] bill is not going to be that much different," said Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. But there will be "a lot of debate" about the Medicaid provision, as well as other changes, he said. Here are some other issues to watch during negotiations, policy experts say. With control of Congress, Republicans are using a process called "budget reconciliation," which bypasses the Senate filibuster and only needs a simple majority vote to clear the upper chamber. But some GOP senators have cost concerns about the House-approved bill. "We have enough to stop the process until the president gets serious about spending reduction and reducing the deficit," Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said last week on CNN's 'State of the Union.' An earlier version of the House package could raise the deficit by an estimated $3.8 trillion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. However, the agency hasn't released an updated score to reflect the bill's last-minute changes. Other cost estimates for the House-passed reconciliation bill have ranged between $2 to $3 trillion over 10 years. Under reconciliation, the Senate bill also must follow the "Byrd Rule," which bans anything unrelated to federal revenue or spending. After the Senate vote, House lawmakers must approve changes to the bill, which could be tricky with a slim Republican majority. "That's where the fight is really going to happen," Gleckman said. One sticking point during the House debate was the current $10,000 limit on the federal deduction for state and local taxes, known as "SALT," which is scheduled to sunset after 2025. Enacted by Trump via the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, of 2017, the $10,000 cap has been a key issue for certain lawmakers in high-tax states like New York, New Jersey and California. Before TCJA, filers who itemized tax breaks could claim an unlimited deduction on state and local income taxes, along with property taxes. But the so-called alternative minimum tax reduced the benefit for some higher earners. After lengthy debate, House Republicans approved a $40,000 SALT limit. If enacted, the higher cap would apply to 2025 and phase out for incomes over $500,000. But the SALT limit is likely to be lower than $40,000 after Senate negotiations, experts say. Staying closer to the current $10,000 cap "seems like a very natural place to start," but the final number could be higher, said Alex Muresianu, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation. The Senate could also expand the child tax credit further, policy experts say. If enacted in its current form, the House bill would make permanent the maximum $2,000 credit passed via the TCJA, which will otherwise revert to $1,000 after 2025. The House measure would also make the highest child tax credit $2,500 from 2025 through 2028. After that, the credit's top value would revert to $2,000 and be indexed for inflation. But some senators, including Josh Hawley, R-Mo., have called for a bigger tax break. Vice President JD Vance also floated a higher child tax credit during the campaign in August. With the House-approved tax breaks favoring higher earners, "there's some recognition that they need to do a little more" for families, Gleckman said. "That's going to be a fun one to watch," he said of the upcoming Senate debate.
