logo
What to know about travelling to the US and your rights at the border

What to know about travelling to the US and your rights at the border

Professor Donald Rothwell says he's no longer accepting invitations to speak in the United States anymore.
"I do a lot of commentary that's critical of the US — on Guantánamo Bay, on foreign policy, on war powers. I just don't want to take the risk," the international law expert told the ABC.
The Australian National University academic says he fears being detained, searched or denied entry under the same visa waiver rules that many Australians use to enter the US.
The recent case of Australian writer Alistair Kitchen — who was sent back to Melbourne from Los Angeles International Airport after being questioned about his views on the Israel-Gaza conflict — has highlighted a serious reality for travellers under the US Visa Waiver Program (VWP).
The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) again updated its travel advice for the US last week, warning Australians to avoid areas where demonstrations and protests are occurring due to the potential for unrest and violence.
Here's what Australians need to know about travelling to the US and what to do if you're stopped at the border.
Most Australians visiting the US do so using the VWP — a fast-track system that lets you apply online for a pass known as an "Electronic System for Travel Authorization", or ESTA.
It allows Australians to stay in the US for up to 90 days without applying for a visa — but the convenience comes at a cost.
You surrender many legal rights at the border, leaving you with no guaranteed right to entry, no access to legal advice, and little protection over digital devices.
"By agreeing to the VWP and by acquiring an ESTA, you actually waive some of your rights to contest the way in which you may be treated at the border," Professor Rothwell says.
Yes and no.
A B-1 (for business purposes) or B-2 (for recreation) does require a more rigorous vetting process before travelling, including an interview at the US consulate in Australia, so if you're going to be denied, you'll likely know before boarding a plane.
However, even with a visa, entry is never guaranteed — US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) still has the final say at the border.
Professor Rothwell says the risk of being stopped at the border has surged post-9/11, particularly for Australians whose political views or public profiles attract scrutiny.
"US border officials have complete discretion under US immigration law to refuse someone entry, even if they hold a valid ESTA or visa," he says.
"They don't have to give a reason, and there is very little ability for an Australian traveller to challenge that."
Professor Rothwell says Alistair Kitchen's case "highlights the full range of discretionary powers that US border officials have".
Professor Rothwell says many Australians incorrectly think they have an unconditional right to enter the US.
Australians have a right to request consular assistance anywhere in the world, but access is ultimately controlled by the host country.
If you're detained under US immigration powers, authorities aren't required to give immediate access to a phone or lawyer.
CBP has sweeping powers at ports of entry, including detaining travellers for hours, searching phones and luggage, and personal searches.
If you're deemed inadmissible, you may be held in a detention room until the next available return flight.
Since you're not formally "under arrest", many standard legal protections, such as the right to a lawyer immediately, don't apply.
Australia's Smartraveller website advises travellers detained at the US border to ask to call a lawyer or the Australian consulate.
In Alistair Kitchen's case, his phone and passport were reportedly held by Qantas staff until his plane landed back in Australia.
Professor Crock says airlines can be prosecuted if they bring somebody into a country they have no right to enter.
"Generally, the airlines sign an undertaking that they will remove a person from point A to point B," she says.
Professor Rothwell says airlines usually follow the instructions of border authorities.
"If Qantas agreed to transport someone under a US deportation order, then US authorities would have set the conditions," he says.
"That could include retaining their documents until they're off the aircraft at the other end."
Being turned around at the US border can have ongoing effects.
"Once you've been refused entry to the US, that will go on your immigration record — and you'll likely be ineligible for the VWP in future," Professor Rothwell says.
"It can also affect your ability to travel to other countries. You may be asked on future visa applications whether you've ever been deported or refused entry — and you'll have to answer 'yes'."
Professor Crock echoed that warning.
"Once you've been excluded like that, it makes your life difficult. You're never going to be eligible to go for one of these quick electronic visas again, probably in any country," she says.
If you're detained or questioned by US border officials, experts say it's vital to stay calm and know your limited rights.
"You certainly have rights to consular support … detained persons have the right to make a phone call, to family, a friend, or the consulate," Professor Rothwell says.
"But the ability of the consulate to intervene and assist on your behalf is going to be quite limited."
He also warns about potential delays and difficulties.
"You could find yourself waiting a very significant period of time before there would be a legal resolution of your case … putting yourself into purgatory for days, weeks, if not a number of months."
Professor Rothwell says Australians are unlikely to face the same level of scrutiny when travelling to most other popular destinations such as New Zealand, the UK, Canada, European nations, and many parts of Asia.
While most countries will ask about criminal history or past visa issues, Professor Rothwell says few, if any, investigate a traveller's social media presence or political activity.
"I have no knowledge of any of those countries regularly visited by Australians seeking to investigate a person's social media history or low levels of political activism such as attending rallies and marches," he says.
He says he found border processes in a recent trip to Europe to be seamless and contactless.
Professor Rothwell is not alone in deciding not to travel to the US.
He and Professor Crock say growing numbers of scholars, progressive academics and journalists, are refusing to travel there or are nervous to do so.
"There are a lot of people I know who've made the same decision as me," Professor Rothwell says.
"When you're not guaranteed entry, when you have no access to a lawyer, when your digital devices can be searched, it's just not worth it."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia's commitment to recognise Palestine met with 'disappointment and disgust' by Trump administration
Australia's commitment to recognise Palestine met with 'disappointment and disgust' by Trump administration

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

Australia's commitment to recognise Palestine met with 'disappointment and disgust' by Trump administration

The US ambassador to Israel says the Australian government's decision to recognise Palestine was met with disgust by senior members of the Trump administration. Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee told 7.30 he discussed Australia's decision with US President Donald Trump. "There's an enormous level of disappointment and some disgust," Ambassador Huckabee said. "I don't know that the president used that word, [but] I would say that is a characterisation of a sentiment. Ambassador Huckabee also said Australia's timing was "terrible". "I think the timing has been very hurtful to any prospects of negotiating some settlement in Gaza with Hamas … this is a gift to them, and it's unfortunate," he said. The ambassador continued his critique of the Albanese government's decision, saying it would have a direct impact on the remaining hostages of Hamas. "For this to come at a time like this, further endangering them and endangering any hopes of some peaceful resolution of dealing with Hamas and getting them to lay down their arms," he said. Australia followed similar commitments to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September, that were made by France, Canada and the UK. "As Israel's closest partner, we would have expected that there would have been some heads up," he said. On 7.30 this week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said she had spoken to the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio about the government's intentions. "As a matter of courtesy, I did want to give him advance notice of our announcement," Ms Wong said. Earlier in the week, Minister Wong warned there would be "no Palestine left" to recognise if the world did not act. Asked about Senator Wong's comments, Mr Huckabee claimed Australia's decision could inadvertently push Israel towards annexation of the West Bank. However, in July, the Israeli Knesset passed a non-binding motion calling for the annexation of the West Bank. On Thursday, multiple outlets reported that Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich threatened an expansion of settlements outside Jerusalem. "Those who try to recognise a Palestinian state will receive from us an answer on the ground … and ensure that by September the hypocritical leaders in Europe will have nothing to recognise," he said. Pressed on whether the Trump administration should have sought to influence Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's conduct of the war in Gaza, the ambassador said: "I guess if we wanted to tell them what to do we would, but we respect the fact they were attacked on October 7." On Wednesday, the total number of hunger-related deaths since the war began in October 2023 rose to 235, among them 106 children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Asked about Mr Trump's recent comments expressing discomfort at images of malnourished children, Mr Huckabee said Mr Trump had done "more than anyone else" to stop starvation. "He was the one who authorised us to create the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) to start feeding people … get food to people who are hungry to give it to them in a way where Hamas cannot steal it," he said Since the GHF has been operating in Gaza, more than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed while seeking aid, according to the UN. The UN also says 500,000 people are facing famine and every child under five is at risk of acute malnutrition. Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.

What is the US response to Australia committing to recognition of a Palestinian state?
What is the US response to Australia committing to recognition of a Palestinian state?

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

What is the US response to Australia committing to recognition of a Palestinian state?

SARAH FERGUSON, PRESENTER: Mike Huckabee was appointed by President Donald Trump as the US ambassador to Israel earlier this year. He joins me now from Jerusalem. Ambassador Huckabee, welcome. MIKE HUCKABEE, US AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL: Thank you, Sarah, an honour to be with you. SARAH FERGUSON: What is the US response to Australia joining other key allies in committing to recognition of a Palestinian state? MIKE HUCKABEE: Well, the US is disappointed that nations like Australia, UK and others, have decided to pick this particular time to unilaterally recognise a second state. I think that the timing has been very hurtful to any prospects of negotiating some settlement in Gaza with Hamas. They basically walked away. This is a gift to them and it's unfortunate. And also, it is a violation of the agreement that was done in Oslo that any type of recognition of a Palestinian state would involve the Israelis. This clearly does not, and I would say that it is unfortunate, but it's also very disappointing to the United States. SARAH FERGUSON: I think it's worth pointing out that Prime Minister Netanyahu has said in the past that he was proud to have put the brakes on Oslo. But let me ask you a specific question, have you discussed this issue with Donald Trump, President Trump? MIKE HUCKABEE: Absolutely and we discussed it at State Department level with the Secretary. There is an enormous level of disappointment, and some disgust. You perhaps heard the Secretary Rubio's interview this past weekend and he made it very clear that the result of this has been to completely halt any type of thoughtful negotiations going forward, and it's just very terrible timing for this to come about. SARAH FERGUSON: Can you be precise? We have heard what Secretary Rubio said. What did President Trump specifically say about this decision? MIKE HUCKABEE: Well, I don't want to disclose personal conversations with the President, that wouldn't be appropriate for me to do. SARAH FERGUSON: Perhaps, ambassador, you could characterise them for us? MIKE HUCKABEE: I can characterise them as sharing what I just shared. That is disappointing and frustrating. Frustrating that there was no communication with the United States. As Israel's closest partner, we would have expected that there would have been some heads up. There wasn't. This was done unilaterally. That was a disappointment. In the case of the UK, the President had had an extensive visit with the Prime Minister in the UK and about an hour after the President left to go back to Washington, that's when this decision was announced. One would think that it would have been an appropriate topic of conversation while the two were sitting there together. SARAH FERGUSON: And just if I could come back, you used the word "disgust", that's a very strong term. Who expressed disgust? Was that the President? MIKE HUCKABEE: I don't know that the President used that word. I would say that it is a characterisation of the sentiment - whether or not that word was employed by anybody in particular other than me. I think that it does express, though, the emotional sentiment, a sense of, you've got to be kidding! Why would they be doing this? And why would they be doing it now? And why wouldn't they not be telling the United States, or telling Israel, for that matter. But to go out and make a public announcement like this - it was unseemly. SARAH FERGUSON: Let me just put to you some of the arguments that were made by the Australian Government in making this decision. They felt, for example, that they had no option than to recognise a Palestinian state before Israel annexed the West Bank and to use their words, there was no state left to recognise. What do you say to the Australian Government in relation to that? MIKE HUCKABEE: I would say what Australia and the other countries may have done inadvertently is to push Israel towards doing exactly what they're afraid of. SARAH FERGUSON: But just talk to me about the US. This is really a question as to whether or not the US is becoming isolated? Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said that they had to do this because shortly, given what we've heard from the Israelis in relation to annexing the West Bank, there would be no state left to recognise. So how do you respond to that? MIKE HUCKABEE: Well, I would be very quick to tell you, I don't think that the United States feels isolated at all. You asked do we feel isolated? No, we don't. We're a sovereign country, so is Israel. So is Australia. Australia can do what it wants to do but we certainly don't have to agree with it. We don't have to like it. We don't have to pretend that it's okay, because in our view, it's not okay. And it was ill-timed, and I think, when hostages are being held, and tortured, not just held. They're not being fed. They're being forced to dig their own graves. We have seen the videos. And for this to come at a time like this, further endangering them, and endangering any hopes of some peaceful resolution of dealing with Hamas and getting them to lay down their arms. And Sarah, something that I think is very important to note, in the very week that the Australian Government, along with many others, were declaring publicly for a Palestinian state, you know who wasn't declaring for a Palestinian state? The Arab League. What they were calling for, that very week, was for Hamas to disarm and to let all of the hostages go. SARAH FERGUSON: I think that I just have to interrupt you there, ambassador, because it is clear that the Arab League has welcomed this recognition of a Palestinian state. But let's move on. Let me ask you a different question. MIKE HUCKABEE: They weren't calling for it last week, Sarah. They weren't calling for it last week. They were calling for Hamas to lay down their arms and surrender the hostages, and I think that it is an issue of timing. So I want to be very clear that, of course, they probably all support a second state, that they knew that there was a time and a place. Last week wasn't the time or the place. SARAH FERGUSON: Let me ask you this question. Do you take it as a starting point for any discussion on this conflict that the idea of a two-state solution is dead? MIKE HUCKABEE: The idea of a two-state solution is only alive if Israel and the Palestinian Authority can figure out a way to make it work. But as long as you have people chanting "From the river to the sea", as long as the Palestinian Authority continues to pay terrorists stipends for murdering Jews ... SARAH FERGUSON: I think to be clear, that Mahmoud Abbas, the head of the Palestinian Authority, has committed to stop doing that. But please continue. MIKE HUCKABEE: No, actually, he hasn't, Sarah. He said in Arabic, that if there is only one penny left in the Treasury, that penny will go to the martyrs. So whatever he may say in one language to sound as if he's appeasing, the truth is that he has not given up on that policy. It is still going on today. SARAH FERGUSON: Let me ask you another question. This is really looking at the situation in Gaza, which was along with the question over the annexation of the West Bank was the other set of circumstances that the Australian Government described as motivating them in this decision. Why is the Trump administration apparently powerless in its ability to impact on the way Benjamin Netanyahu has conducted this war? MIKE HUCKABEE: Well, I don't know that it is the role of the United States to tell Israel how to prosecute a war. I want to remind you that there were 100 Americans who were held hostage, too. Two of them, who are deceased, their remains are still being held hostage. Some of them are out. Others have been killed, and we have their remains back. SARAH FERGUSON: Does not the United States' very large military aid, billions and billions of dollars to Israel, give you some leverage over how the war is conducted? MIKE HUCKABEE: I guess if we wanted to tell them what to do, we would but they're our partner. We respect the fact that they were attacked on October 7. They're not the attacking country. They were attacked country and there were 1,200 people... SARAH FERGUSON: Sure but the question here... MIKE HUCKABEE: No, Sarah, I'm going to stop you there. SARAH FERGUSON: Go ahead. MIKE HUCKABEE: Because I'm so tired of people blaming Israel for the fact that it is defending themselves against the monsters who raped women in front of their families, who mutilated their bodies, who burnt babies, who beheaded people, who burned elderly people in their wheelchairs, who took 250 people hostage - continued to torture them - many of them Holocaust survivors, many of them children and infants and somehow, we're supposed to blame Israel because it's trying to defend its country. No, I'm sorry, we're not going to tell them how to defend themselves. SARAH FERGUSON: As I have said many times on this program, the actions of Hamas are repulsive to all right-thinking people. This is a question however about the extended coverage of the war, not Israel's right to defend itself. Israel has dropped 100,000 tonnes of explosives on Gaza, a very small territory. That is more than the combined ordinance dropped on Hamburg, Dresden and the United Kingdom in the Second World War. That is the question. You cannot do that over a tiny space without mass casualty. So why doesn't the US have anything to say about the huge extent of civilian casualties in Gaza? MIKE HUCKABEE: We do. We have a lot to say about it. The first thing that we say is that Hamas should have surrendered on October the 8th. That would have ended the war and there wouldn't have been civilian casualties. The second thing that we say is that Hamas shouldn't do what it does routinely, which is put its civilians in front of targets that the Israelis announce in advance they're going to hit. I've got to be very clear to you. Not even the US military, and I think that we have one of the best and most ethical that have ever existed, but we don't announce in advance when we're going to hit a target, where we're going to hit and tell people to get out of it. Israel does that. They get no credit for that but Hamas on the other hand, they move their civilians right towards the target that Israel has announced, and then they threaten to shoot anyone who gets away from the target. So do they have a lot of civilian casualties? Yes, they do and a lot of the reason that they do is because Hamas makes sure that they have civilian casualties, because then, everybody can blame Israel for it. SARAH FERGUSON: I just note that you're not answering the question about Israel's conduct of the war. But let me ask you a different question about the war. MIKE HUCKABEE: No, I just did. I told you that Israel, I did announce that. I told you very clearly. SARAH FERGUSON: A partial answer, if I may, ambassador. A partial answer about warnings that are not universal. Let me ask you a different question. We all pay a lot of attention to your President. You are aware of that. We watched him express some disquiet, some upset over pictures of starving children in Gaza. When understand he doesn't like it. Why doesn't he make it stop? MIKE HUCKABEE: I think that the President has done more than anyone else I know to stop it. He was the one who authorised us to create the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, to start feeding people. He gave us two directives, Sarah. He gave us one, get food to people who are hungry. Two, give it to them in a way where Hamas cannot steal it or loot it and turn it into a commodity that they can sell, which they have been doing, to the tune of $500 million last year. So the President has been very clear what he wants to see done. I just wish people would recognise that the real reason for any deprivation in Gaza and starvation that may be happening is because Hamas has taken control of the food. This morning, I got the reports that of the UN food that goes in, as of this week, 91.5 per cent of food was stolen or looted. SARAH FERGUSON: We are running out of time but I am going to jump in there because I need to say something to the audience which is that since that organisation took over there, there has been a fundamental change in the way that aid is distributed inside Gaza. There are now only four centres. There were 400. There is only one crossing, one road in and more than 1,000 people have been killed while seeking that aid. But the issue here, I'm afraid here, is that we're running out of time. Ambassador Huckabee, I'm very grateful for the time that you've given us. Thank you for joining us. MIKE HUCKABEE: Thank you, Sarah. SARAH FERGUSON: Thank you.

Some Russians are signalling a claim to Alaska ahead of Trump and Putin's visit
Some Russians are signalling a claim to Alaska ahead of Trump and Putin's visit

SBS Australia

time5 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

Some Russians are signalling a claim to Alaska ahead of Trump and Putin's visit

As United States President Donald Trump prepares to hold a meeting on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin, old historical ties are re-emerging. Trump has previously said both Russia and Ukraine will have to swap land to end the fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. While the US bought the state from the Russians over 150 years ago, some are hailing the choice of venue as a victory for Russia, and perhaps a step towards it reclaiming Alaska. 'Alaska is ours' Alaska, which was once a Russian colony, was bought by the US in 1867 for US$7.2 million ($11 million), or roughly 2 US cents per acre. It's of strategic importance to the US, as it provides a large coastline across the Pacific and Arctic oceans with several military bases and commercial harbours. "I'm going to see Putin. I'm going to Russia, on Friday," the US president said mistakenly, ahead of the much-anticipated summit. On the streets and airwaves of Russia, the idea that Alaska rightfully belongs to Russia remains alive, often in satirical or provocative forms. A billboard proclaiming "Alaska is ours" briefly appeared in a Siberian region in 2022, stirring political concern before being revealed as a commercial advertisement. Now, as this territory becomes the backdrop for a high-stakes diplomatic meeting, it's a strong reminder of Alaska's Russian roots. Russia's special envoy on international economic cooperation, Kirill Dmitriev, said the decision to hold the summit in Alaska was symbolically important for the US-Russian partnership. "Born as Russian America — Orthodox roots, forts, fur trade — Alaska echoes those ties and makes the US an Arctic nation," Dmitriev wrote on X. Last year, Russian state TV presenter Olga Skabeyeva referred to the US territory as "our Alaska". Kremlin-aligned media outlets are reportedly gushing over their country's links to the region. A Russian billboard that appeared in Siberia in 2022, which read "Alaska nasha", which translates to "Alaska is ours", sparked concern among some US politicians. Credit: Michael McFaul, a former US ambassador to Russia during the Obama administration, said the meeting venue is a reminder to Russian nationalists of a "raw deal". "Trump has chosen to host Putin in a part of the former Russian empire," he wrote on X. "Wonder if he knows that Russian nationalists claim that losing Alaska, like Ukraine, was a raw deal for Moscow that needs to be corrected." Following the 2022 billboard incident, Alaska's governor, Mike Dunleavy, weighed in with a "good luck" post on social media. "To the Russian politicians who believe they can take back Alaska: Good luck," he wrote on X. 'Alaska is the most strategic location in the world' In his latest tweet, Dunleavy described the state as a "bridge between nations", welcoming the upcoming meeting between the two leaders. "Alaska is the most strategic location in the world, sitting at the crossroads of North America and Asia, with the Arctic to our north and the Pacific to our south," he wrote on X last week. "With a mere two miles separating Russia from Alaska, no other place plays a more vital role in our national defence, energy security, and Arctic leadership. He said what happens in the Arctic and the Pacific impacts Alaska before the rest of the country, "so it's fitting that discussions of global importance take place there". "For centuries, Alaska has been a bridge between nations, and today, we remain a gateway for diplomacy, commerce, and security in one of the most critical regions on earth. The world will be watching, and Alaska stands ready to host this historic meeting."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store