logo
Can Democrats and big tech get back together?

Can Democrats and big tech get back together?

Gulf Today18-04-2025

Matthew Yglesias,
Tribune News Service
Despite the various frictions, America's technology sector did pretty well during Joe Biden's presidency — and despite the various warnings about his mercurial opponent, many tech executives supported Donald Trump in his 2024 campaign. After his victory, even more rushed to Trump's side, with Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg going on Joe Rogan's podcast to talk about his admiration for the president-elect and the need for more 'masculine energy' in U.S. corporate culture. Then came the Liberation Day tariffs, and then Obliteration Day in markets, and finally the Equivocation Day partial tariff rollback. Meanwhile Meta shares are trading below their price on the day of Zuckerberg's appearance on Rogan. It turns out that whatever the merits of masculine energy, a global trade war is not good for the tech industry. The whole episode ought to be an opportunity for a mutual reconsideration from both Democrats and the technology world: How did they come to be so alienated from each other, and isn't it past time for a rapprochement?
It's not just that tech benefits, probably more than any other sector, from the globally integrated cooperative economy that Trump disdains. It's that the underlying motives for Trump's trade policies are rooted in nostalgia economics, which is antithetical to any vision of progress.
For starters, even though Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff strategy has now been withdrawn, it's notable that his formula simply ignored the existence of services exports. From Hollywood to Silicon Valley to Wall Street, many of America's most successful companies are service exporters. It should be concerning to everyone — especially executives and investors in the service sector — that the US has a president who believes that these industries somehow don't count.
Consider that amid the tariff chaos, Trump took the time last week to sign some executive orders that he claims will promote a revival of the coal industry. He rightly pointed out that Democrat-supported initiatives to help retrain miners did not resonate in coal country, where voters preferred his pitch that he would keep the mines open. 'You could give 'em a penthouse on Fifth Avenue and a different kind of job and they'd be unhappy,' Trump said, surrounded by miners. 'They want to mine coal. That's what they love to do.'
As an observation about voter psychology, it may well be true — and it may even have implications for trade policy. Communities that have lost factories to China or Mexico don't want to hear that openness to trade makes Americans better off on average. And they don't want sophisticated plans for retraining or economic revival. They just want their jobs back. But as the basis for economic policy, it's a dead end. An approach designed to stop anything from ever changing is irreconcilable with economic growth — and toxic to the spirit of innovation and disruption that is at the core of Silicon Valley.
Trump is of course not entirely consistent in his application of these anti-progress views. When it comes to classes of people that he disdains — government workers, academics, researchers — he is happy to see them lose their jobs. But if it's people he has cultural affection for, he is eager to stand athwart history shouting 'no' — supporting dockworkers in their opposition to port automation, for example.
A 2017 paper from Stanford Business School found that technology entrepreneurs had broadly liberal views on cultural issues, favored globalization, were open to redistributive taxation, and were extremely hostile to regulation. This worldview is in many ways the opposite of Trump's sentiment-driven, nostalgia-soaked outlook. It broadly favors a competitive economy open to technological change and foreign competition, but with progressive taxation that finances a generous social safety net. That generally tracks the approach to economic policy taken by Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, and — along with Silicon Valley's location in Democratic California — it helped create the tech sector's alignment with the party.
During the Biden years, with several notable exceptions, much of the tech world seems to have forgotten exactly how crazy and backward-looking Trump is. Biden, meanwhile, won a Democratic Party primary by promising wealthy donors that he would make them pay higher taxes but would not 'demonize' the rich and that 'nothing would fundamentally change' for them. Leftists weren't happy, but it was a perfectly reasonable pitch.
Once in office, however, Biden appointed regulators who weren't just interested in tax progressivity but wanted to rein in the power of large US. businesses. This did not amount to very much in practice, but many tech entrepreneurs and investors found it threatening, insulting or both. Paired with the backlash to the excesses of left-wing cultural politics and Biden's personal lack of interest in technology, the stage was set for a rightward turn.
But Trump himself has not changed his spots. He remains hostile to scientific research as well as trade. He's made it harder to hire skilled immigrants while turning America into a markedly less desirable place for foreigners to study.
Business leaders did eventually denounce Trump's tariffs, which may have played a role in his announcement of a 90-day suspension. But their initial reluctance to vocally criticize a decision that was catastrophic for their own share prices reveals a deeper concern.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IAEA board declares Iran in breach of non-proliferation obligations
IAEA board declares Iran in breach of non-proliferation obligations

Zawya

time6 hours ago

  • Zawya

IAEA board declares Iran in breach of non-proliferation obligations

VIENNA: The U.N. nuclear watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors declared Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations on Thursday for the first time in almost 20 years, raising the prospect of reporting it to the U.N. Security Council. The major step is the culmination of several festering stand-offs between the International Atomic Energy Agency and Iran that have arisen since President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out of a nuclear deal between Tehran and major powers in 2018 during his first term, after which that deal unravelled. Since Iran bristles at resolutions against it and this is the most significant one in years, it is likely to respond with a nuclear escalation, as it has said it will. That could complicate the current talks between Iran and the U.S. aimed at imposing new curbs on Iran's accelerating atomic activities. The resolution also comes at a time of particularly heightened tension, with the U.S. pulling staff out of the Middle East, and Trump warning the region could become dangerous and saying Washington would not let Iran have nuclear weapons. Diplomats at the closed-door meeting said the board passed the resolution submitted by the United States, Britain, France and Germany with 19 countries in favour, 11 abstentions and three states - Russia, China and Burkina Faso - against. DAMNING REPORT The text, seen by Reuters, declares Iran in breach of its obligations given a damning report the IAEA sent to member states on May 31. "The Board of Governors... finds that Iran's many failures to uphold its obligations since 2019 to provide the Agency with full and timely cooperation regarding undeclared nuclear material and activities at multiple undeclared locations in Iran ... constitutes non-compliance with its obligations under its Safeguards Agreement with the Agency," the text said. A central issue is Iran's failure to provide the IAEA with credible explanations of how uranium traces detected at undeclared sites in Iran came to be there despite the agency having investigated the issue for years. The May 31 IAEA report, a board-mandated "comprehensive" account of developments, found three of the four locations "were part of an undeclared structured nuclear programme carried out by Iran until the early 2000s and that some activities used undeclared nuclear material". U.S. intelligence services and the IAEA have long believed Iran had a secret, coordinated nuclear weapons programme it halted in 2003, though isolated experiments continued for several years. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said this week the findings were broadly consistent with that. Iran denies ever having pursued nuclear weapons. While the resolution alluded to reporting Iran to the U.N. Security Council, diplomats said it would take a second resolution to send it there, as happened the last time it was declared in non-compliance in September 2005, followed by referral in February 2006. (Reporting by Francois Murphy; Editing by Ed Osmond)

Troops in LA can detain individuals, military official says, as protests spread
Troops in LA can detain individuals, military official says, as protests spread

Dubai Eye

time6 hours ago

  • Dubai Eye

Troops in LA can detain individuals, military official says, as protests spread

US troops in Los Angeles are authorised to detain people until police can arrest them, their commanding officer said on Wednesday, as hundreds of Marines prepared to move into a city rocked by protests over President Donald Trump's immigration raids. On Wednesday, Los Angeles endured a sixth day of protests that have been largely peaceful but occasionally punctuated by violence. The protests have spread to other US cities and hundreds of nationwide demonstrations are planned for Saturday. Trump's decision to dispatch troops to Los Angeles over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom has sparked a national debate about the use of the military on US soil. Newsom's administration has sued the US government to stop the deployment. The Marines and National Guard could be deployed to protect federal personnel and property during immigration raids or related protests, officials have said. Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Democrats condemn these tactics as authoritarian, arguing they undermine democratic traditions. "If I didn't act quickly on that, Los Angeles would be burning to the ground right now," said Trump at an event at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. US Army Major General Scott Sherman, who commands the deployed troops, told reporters that the 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops cannot make arrests but could briefly detain people. "They do not do any arrests. They're strictly there to detain to wait for law enforcement to come and handle those demonstrators," Sherman said. Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna said he was asking military leaders for clarification on the matter. "My understanding at this point is that they do not have the powers to arrest or detain," Luna told a press conference. The use of military forces is at the heart of California's lawsuit. The state maintains that none of the conditions were met to justify military deployment - such as a rebellion or danger thereof. It is also seeking a temporary restraining order to immediately stop the National Guard and Marines from participating in civilian law enforcement. A hearing on that restraining order is scheduled for Thursday in San Francisco federal court. The Trump administration argued in a court filing ahead of the hearing that the president has the discretion to determine whether a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" requires a military response. The Marines, who have been training at Seal Beach just south of Los Angeles County, will move to the city soon, but not on Wednesday, Sherman said. They will not carry live ammunition in their rifles, he added. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, joined at a press conference by about 30 other California mayors, said the White House has overstepped its authority and has provoked the unrest. Bass also imposed a curfew over 2.5 square kmof the city's downtown starting on Tuesday night following numerous incidents of looting and property damage. The Los Angeles Police Department said it arrested 225 people on Tuesday, including 203 for failing to disperse and 17 for violating the curfew. In all, police have arrested more than 400 people since Friday. "President Trump promised to carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in American history and left-wing riots will not deter him in that effort," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. Elsewhere, protesters marched in New York, Atlanta and Chicago on Tuesday night, chanting anti-ICE slogans and at times clashing with law enforcement. The protests are set to expand on Saturday, when several activist groups have planned more than 1,800 anti-Trump demonstrations across the country. That day, tanks and other armored vehicles will rumble down the streets of Washington DC, in a military parade marking the US Army's 250th anniversary and coinciding with Trump's 79th birthday.

Dollar slides on Fed expectations, murky trade picture
Dollar slides on Fed expectations, murky trade picture

Khaleej Times

time7 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Dollar slides on Fed expectations, murky trade picture

The dollar slid on Thursday on heightened expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts this year and lingering uncertainty over tariff battles. Trump said on Wednesday he would be willing to extend a July 8 deadline for completing trade talks with countries, but added the U.S. would send out letters in coming weeks specifying the terms of trade deals to dozens of other countries, which they could then embrace or reject. His comments followed earlier remarks from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that the Trump administration may offer extensions from a July trade deal deadline for countries negotiating in good faith. Uncertainty over what comes next for global trade, alongside scant details of a framework agreement reached between the U.S. and China this week, dampened the overall mood in markets and gave investors more reasons to sell the dollar. The broad fall in the greenback on Thursday pushed the euro to a seven-week high early in the session, before the common currency pared some gains to last trade at $1.1515. Sterling rose 0.34% to $1.3583, while the yen climbed 0.4% to 143.95 per dollar. Against a basket of currencies, the dollar fell to its weakest since April 22 at 98.284. "It's hard to tell whether there is a masterplan behind this, but common sense would suggest that President Trump is trying to create a level of urgency in terms of trade negotiations," said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank. "I think the market, in terms of the size of the moves, is becoming a little bit more sanguine about what this all means... the market is also very wary that the picture could change quite dramatically in a week's time or two weeks' time." Elsewhere, the dollar slid 0.44% against the Swiss franc to 0.8169. The Australian dollar fell 0.12% to $0.6496 as risk sentiment soured, while the New Zealand dollar ticked up 0.1% to $0.6033. Also keeping pressure on the greenback was data from Wednesday which showed U.S. consumer prices rose less than expected in May, leading traders to ramp up bets of a Fed cut as early as September. Thursday's producer price index data will be the next test for markets. The onshore yuan rose 0.2% to 7.1810 per dollar, though gains were capped by the still-fragile truce in the U.S.-China trade war. "Full details have not been published, and it remains unclear if the talks brought the two largest economies closer to productive cooperation," said Mantas Vanagas, senior economist at Westpac. Euro strength The euro was clinging to strong gains on Thursday, having jumped against most other currencies in the previous session. Against the yen, the common currency last stood at 165.77 having risen to its strongest since October at 166.42 yen on Thursday. It was up 0.33% against the Aussie, extending a 0.9% gain from Wednesday, and had also touched a one-month high of 84.88 pence overnight. While there was no immediate trigger behind the moves, analysts say the euro has over the past week drawn support from hawkish European Central Bank (ECB) rhetoric. Last week, the ECB cut interest rates as expected but hinted at a pause in its year-long easing cycle after inflation finally returned to its 2% target. "Expectations of fewer previously expected ECB rate cuts have lent some support to the euro," said Carol Kong, a currency strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. That contrasts with the likely resumption of a Fed easing cycle later this year, and as Trump has repeatedly called for U.S. rates to be lowered. Trump said last week that a decision on the next Fed chief will be coming soon, adding that a good Fed chair would lower interest rates. The euro has risen nearly 11% for the year thus far, helped in part by a weaker dollar and as investors pour money into European markets in a move away from the U.S.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store