
Can Democrats and big tech get back together?
Matthew Yglesias,
Tribune News Service
Despite the various frictions, America's technology sector did pretty well during Joe Biden's presidency — and despite the various warnings about his mercurial opponent, many tech executives supported Donald Trump in his 2024 campaign. After his victory, even more rushed to Trump's side, with Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg going on Joe Rogan's podcast to talk about his admiration for the president-elect and the need for more 'masculine energy' in U.S. corporate culture. Then came the Liberation Day tariffs, and then Obliteration Day in markets, and finally the Equivocation Day partial tariff rollback. Meanwhile Meta shares are trading below their price on the day of Zuckerberg's appearance on Rogan. It turns out that whatever the merits of masculine energy, a global trade war is not good for the tech industry. The whole episode ought to be an opportunity for a mutual reconsideration from both Democrats and the technology world: How did they come to be so alienated from each other, and isn't it past time for a rapprochement?
It's not just that tech benefits, probably more than any other sector, from the globally integrated cooperative economy that Trump disdains. It's that the underlying motives for Trump's trade policies are rooted in nostalgia economics, which is antithetical to any vision of progress.
For starters, even though Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff strategy has now been withdrawn, it's notable that his formula simply ignored the existence of services exports. From Hollywood to Silicon Valley to Wall Street, many of America's most successful companies are service exporters. It should be concerning to everyone — especially executives and investors in the service sector — that the US has a president who believes that these industries somehow don't count.
Consider that amid the tariff chaos, Trump took the time last week to sign some executive orders that he claims will promote a revival of the coal industry. He rightly pointed out that Democrat-supported initiatives to help retrain miners did not resonate in coal country, where voters preferred his pitch that he would keep the mines open. 'You could give 'em a penthouse on Fifth Avenue and a different kind of job and they'd be unhappy,' Trump said, surrounded by miners. 'They want to mine coal. That's what they love to do.'
As an observation about voter psychology, it may well be true — and it may even have implications for trade policy. Communities that have lost factories to China or Mexico don't want to hear that openness to trade makes Americans better off on average. And they don't want sophisticated plans for retraining or economic revival. They just want their jobs back. But as the basis for economic policy, it's a dead end. An approach designed to stop anything from ever changing is irreconcilable with economic growth — and toxic to the spirit of innovation and disruption that is at the core of Silicon Valley.
Trump is of course not entirely consistent in his application of these anti-progress views. When it comes to classes of people that he disdains — government workers, academics, researchers — he is happy to see them lose their jobs. But if it's people he has cultural affection for, he is eager to stand athwart history shouting 'no' — supporting dockworkers in their opposition to port automation, for example.
A 2017 paper from Stanford Business School found that technology entrepreneurs had broadly liberal views on cultural issues, favored globalization, were open to redistributive taxation, and were extremely hostile to regulation. This worldview is in many ways the opposite of Trump's sentiment-driven, nostalgia-soaked outlook. It broadly favors a competitive economy open to technological change and foreign competition, but with progressive taxation that finances a generous social safety net. That generally tracks the approach to economic policy taken by Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, and — along with Silicon Valley's location in Democratic California — it helped create the tech sector's alignment with the party.
During the Biden years, with several notable exceptions, much of the tech world seems to have forgotten exactly how crazy and backward-looking Trump is. Biden, meanwhile, won a Democratic Party primary by promising wealthy donors that he would make them pay higher taxes but would not 'demonize' the rich and that 'nothing would fundamentally change' for them. Leftists weren't happy, but it was a perfectly reasonable pitch.
Once in office, however, Biden appointed regulators who weren't just interested in tax progressivity but wanted to rein in the power of large US. businesses. This did not amount to very much in practice, but many tech entrepreneurs and investors found it threatening, insulting or both. Paired with the backlash to the excesses of left-wing cultural politics and Biden's personal lack of interest in technology, the stage was set for a rightward turn.
But Trump himself has not changed his spots. He remains hostile to scientific research as well as trade. He's made it harder to hire skilled immigrants while turning America into a markedly less desirable place for foreigners to study.
Business leaders did eventually denounce Trump's tariffs, which may have played a role in his announcement of a 90-day suspension. But their initial reluctance to vocally criticize a decision that was catastrophic for their own share prices reveals a deeper concern.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Dubai Eye
34 minutes ago
- Dubai Eye
Pentagon defends troop deployments to Los Angeles to protect ICE agents
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday defended a $134-million deployment of Marines and National Guard to Los Angeles, saying they would safeguard officers from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, whose roundups of alleged immigration offenders have triggered days of clashes. "We believe ICE agents should be allowed to be safe in doing their operations, and we have deployed National Guard and the Marines to protect them in the execution of their duties," Hegseth told a hearing in Congress. "Because we ought to be able to enforce immigration law in this country." Some 700 Marines have arrived in the Los Angeles area under orders from President Donald Trump, who has also activated 4,000 National Guard troops to quell protests despite objections from California Governor Gavin Newsom and other local leaders. Some 2,100 of those troops are operating in Los Angeles, a US official said. Bryn MacDonnell, who is performing comptroller duties at the Pentagon, told lawmakers the deployment's cost was about $134 million and included travel, housing and food for troops. Democratic lawmakers sought answers from Hegseth about the deployments, and raised concerns about sending active-duty US troops to a mission that they said would be better performed by law enforcement officers. "This is a deeply unfair position to put our Marines in. Their service should be honoured. It should not be exploited," said Representative Betty McCollum, a Democrat from Minnesota, on a House Appropriations subcommittee. McCollum said the Los Angeles protests did not mirror the 1992 Los Angeles riots, which was the last time the Insurrection Act was invoked to allow the US military to directly participate in civilian law enforcement. Then-President George H.W. Bush deployed US forces to Los Angeles after California's governor requested military aid to suppress unrest following the trial of Los Angeles police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King. However, Trump has not invoked the Insurrection Act, and the US military has said the Marines would only be deployed to "support the protection of federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area." At a different hearing, Marine Corps Commandant General Eric Smith said the Marines being deployed were trained in crowd control, and have shields and batons. "They do not have arrest authority," Smith told the Senate Armed Services Committee, adding they were in a support role. The US military has a long history of deployments within the United States. National Guard and active-duty troops are deployed for natural disasters and other events, including helping set up temporary hospitals during the pandemic. During the 2020 wave of nationwide protests over racial injustice, more than 17,000 National Guard troops were activated by 23 states. What is rare, however, is sending active-duty troops during times of civil disturbance. US Marines are trained for conflicts around the world - from the Middle East to Africa - and are also used for rapid deployments in case of emergencies, such as threats to US embassies. Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, said the operation risked the United States' traditionally strong support for its military. "This escalatory and inflammatory use of military men and women against their fellow citizens threatens to be a stain on their honor and a blow to their support and credibility among Americans," Blumenthal said.


Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US Secretary of State Rubio terminates all USAID positions abroad: Report
By the end of September, there will be no such thing as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), The Guardian reported on Monday, because all of its overseas staff will be terminated. Many, if not most, are local hires who have depended on a USAID salary for years and sometimes decades to support their families. The Guardian attributed the revelation to a State Department cable that it had obtained. It said the chiefs of mission at embassies in more than 100 countries have been notified that a significant overhaul is coming. 'The Department of State is streamlining procedures under National Security Decision Directive 38 to abolish all USAID overseas positions,' the cable said. The State Department and Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'will assume responsibility for foreign assistance programming previously undertaken by USAID' from 15 June, it added. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In early March, Rubio said that US President Donald Trump's purge of the six-decade-old USAID was complete and that 5,200 of its 6,200 programmes had been eliminated. The remaining programmes, he said, would now be administered 'more effectively' under the State Department and in consultation with Congress. The axing of the aid agency was an initiative from the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, which aimed to save Washington billions in what it believed was unnecessary spending. Among its earliest finds was what the administration described as $50worth of condoms sent by the US "to Hamas". It was then revealed that it was a programme to prevent sexually transmitted diseases in the rural province of Gaza, Mozambique. Musk departed the administration two weeks ago. Since the Trump administration announced an immediate suspension of all foreign assistance, blocking ongoing aid programmes and freezing new funding, humanitarian workers around the world have been trying to work out exactly what this means for the millions of vulnerable people they are trying to keep alive. Middle East Eye reported on the impact of the initial USAID cuts on 1.8 million Sudanese experiencing famine. Food boxes sent by the US were rotting in warehouses because the agency no longer provided the money needed for the actual distribution. Since 1946, the Middle East and North Africa have been the biggest recipients of US financial assistance. Between April 2023 and April 2024, Congress appropriated around $9bn for the region. While most of the aid went towards military assistance, a fraction was funnelled into democracy programmes via USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy, a quasi-autonomous agency funded largely by the US Congress. MEE reported in May of this year that the Trump cuts to USAID have already impacted human rights defenders in the region who were reliant on the small grants to relocate and resettle abroad. Although modest in scope, the money provided a lifeline for exiled human rights activists.


Al Etihad
7 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Meta creating new AI lab to pursue ‘superintelligence'
10 June 2025 23:12 SAN FRANCISCO (THE NEW YORK TIMES NEW SERVICE)Meta is preparing to unveil a new artificial intelligence research lab dedicated to pursuing "superintelligence,' a hypothetical AI system that exceeds the powers of the human brain, as the tech giant jockeys to stay competitive in the technology has tapped Alexandr Wang, 28, the founder and CEO of AI startup Scale AI, to join the new lab, sources said, and has been in talks to invest billions of dollars in his company as part of a deal that would also bring other Scale AI employees to the has reportedly offered seven- to nine-figure compensation packages to dozens of researchers from leading AI companies such as OpenAI and Google, with some agreeing to join, sources new lab is part of a larger reorganisation of Meta's AI Zuckerberg, Meta's CEO, has invested billions of dollars into turning his company, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, into an AI OpenAI released the ChatGPT chatbot in 2022, the tech industry has raced to build increasingly powerful AI. Zuckerberg has pushed his company to incorporate AI across its products, including in its smart glasses and a recently released app, Meta in the race is crucial for Meta, Google, Amazon and Microsoft, with the technology likely to be the future for the industry. The giants have pumped money into startups and their own AI has invested more than $13 billion in OpenAI, while Amazon has plowed $8 billion into AI startup behemoths have also spent billions to hire employees from high-profile startups and license their technology. Last year, Google agreed to pay $3 billion to license technology and hire technologists and executives from a startup that builds chatbots for personal February, Zuckerberg, 41, called AI "potentially one of the most important innovations in history.' He added, "This year is going to set the course for the future.'Meta and Scale AI declined to comment. Bloomberg earlier reported that Wang was joining the new Meta is regarded by leading researchers to be a futuristic goal of AI Google and others have said their immediate aim is to build "artificial general intelligence,' or AGI, shorthand for a machine that can do anything the human brain can do, which is an ambition with no clear path to success. Superintelligence, if it can be developed, would go beyond AGI in its has invested in AI for more than a decade. Zuckerberg created the company's first dedicated AI lab in 2013, after losing out to Google in trying to acquire a seminal startup called DeepMind. DeepMind is now the core of Google's AI then, Meta's research efforts have been overseen by its chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun, who is also a New York University professor. LeCun is a pioneer of neural networks, the technology that drives ChatGPT and similar ChatGPT caused an explosion of interest in AI, Meta deployed additional resources to pursue the technology. One of Meta's strategies for gaining ground in AI has been to "open source' its software, essentially giving away its AI code freely so that developers and others adopt its tools. The company released an open-source AI model, Llama, and its chatbot product, Meta AI was incorporated across Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, as well as in its Ray-Ban smart glasses. In May, Zuckerberg said more than 1 billion people used Meta AI every month.