logo
Couple steal back their own car after cops ‘refused to investigate theft'… despite AirTag pinpointing its exact location

Couple steal back their own car after cops ‘refused to investigate theft'… despite AirTag pinpointing its exact location

Scottish Suna day ago

The couple equipped their stolen vehicle with an essential gadget
GRAND THEFT AUTO Couple steal back their own car after cops 'refused to investigate theft'… despite AirTag pinpointing its exact location
A COUPLE whose Jaguar was swiped by thieves have stolen it back after cops failed to investigate the theft.
Mia Forbes Pirie and Mark Simpson discovered their motor was missing from its spot close to their home in Brook Green, West London on Wednesday morning.
However, the shrewd pair had installed an airtag locator in the vehicle which had been taken to Chiswick shortly after.
The couple called 999 but cops told them that they were unable to offer immediate assistance.
Unwilling to sit idly, Mia and Mark took matters into their own hands.
Mr Simpson, 62, reported being nervous as he made the four-mile journey with his wife to the car's new location.
The Jaguar E-Pace - a model that sold for about £46,000 new in 2024 - also had a 'ghost immobiliser' fitted which required the right buttons to be hit on the car's control unit before it could start.
The couple found the vehicle on a quiet back street with its carpets ripped apart after thugs attempted to access its wiring.
Forbes Pirie, a former solicitor and now an award-winning mediator, and Mr Simpson, a commercial barrister, had installed a series of additional security mechanisms on the car after previously experiencing the theft of a vehicle.
Neighbours later reported they had heard unusual noises at night.
Mia wrote in LinkedIn post: "[Is] it right that the police seem to have no interest in investigating what is likely to have been a reasonably sophisticated operation involving a flat bed truck… if there are no consequences, what is the incentive for people not to do more of this?"
However, she lamented the Met Police's lack of investment.
Three people arrested after teen boy dies near pub as cops launch murder probe
"The police are under-resourced and it's a shame," she told The Times.
"But if there aren't any consequences to people stealing cars or a lot of the other crimes where there aren't any consequences, then I don't really see what the deterrent is to stop people from doing it more."
In a statement, Met Police told The Sun: "On Tuesday, 3 June at 10.06am, police were alerted to the theft of a vehicle on Sterndale Road, W14.
"Officers spoke to the victim, who shared his intention to recover the vehicle himself.
"An Apple Airtag was inside, allowing the victim to view its location and trace it.
"The victim was reminded by officers to contact police again as needed or if police assistance was necessary at the vehicle's location.
"At 11.23am the victim confirmed with police that he had found the vehicle and that it was being recovered by a truck back to the victim's home address.
"This investigation is ongoing and police are working with the victim. No arrests have been made at this stage."
It comes after one man who has had his £114k Range Rover stolen four times revealed he always gets it back thanks to an essential gadget.
Tom Jaconelli, 39, was left infuriated after his posh 150mph SUV was taken from outside his house yet again.
Doorbell footage showed the director of car dealership Romans International, having his 2024 Range Rover Sport P550e snatched just metres from his front door.
But savvy Tom had fitted his motor with a tracking system which enabled him to get his vehicle back.
He said the car was retrieved when three police dog vans stopped the thief in his tracks.
Thankfully for Tom, the motor was found 15 minutes away from Tom's home in Cobham, Surrey.
Do you have a similar story? Email louis.regan@thesun.co.uk

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man, 72, ‘throttles neighbour, causes £1k of damage to his prized Jag & assaults daughter in row over shared driveway'
Man, 72, ‘throttles neighbour, causes £1k of damage to his prized Jag & assaults daughter in row over shared driveway'

Scottish Sun

timea day ago

  • Scottish Sun

Man, 72, ‘throttles neighbour, causes £1k of damage to his prized Jag & assaults daughter in row over shared driveway'

A court was told there was a 'very messy history' to the row over the driveway NEIGHBOUR ROW Man, 72, 'throttles neighbour, causes £1k of damage to his prized Jag & assaults daughter in row over shared driveway' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAN throttled his neighbour during a row over a shared driveway and caused damage to their luxury Jaguar, a court has heard. Trevor Hollisey, 72, is accused of grabbing neighbour Neil Ford by the throat for "ten to 15 seconds" and assaulting his wife, Michelle. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Trevor and Jennifer Hollisey pictured leaving Norwich Magistrates' Court Credit: SWNS 3 The couple share a driveway with at least three other properties in the village of Bressingham in Norfolk 3 Mr and Mrs Hollisey both face charges of assault Credit: Facebook Mr Hollisey, who runs a bathroom and kitchen installation firm, is also alleged to have caused £1,363 worth of damage to Mr Ford's Jaguar F-PACE during the incident last December. The company director faces two charges of assault and one of criminal damage. Wife Jennifer Hollisey, 79, also faces two charges of assault relating to the couple next door, as well as causing £3.99 of damage to her neighbour's phone in the incident. Both pleaded not guilty to the charges at Norwich Magistrates' Court last week. The court was told there was a "very messy history" to the row over the driveway, which the couple share with at least three other properties in the village of Bressingham in Norfolk. The court heard prosecutor Katherine Newson say that the alleged victims and the defendants had fallen out in a "dispute over access to their driveway". Declan Gallagher, defending the couple, said it was a "confrontation" as a result of a "long-term dispute" and that "there is a very messy history to this". When magistrates were seeking a date for the trial, Mr Hollisey interjected and told the court they "have several holidays booked this year and next". The case has been set for a two-day trial at Ipswich Magistrates' Court between March 10 and 11 next year. The couple, of High Road, Bressingham, were given conditional bail and told to have no contact with their neighbours.

Lord Brittan's widow blasts police watchdog for dropping probe into officer who pursued him over false VIP paedophile claims
Lord Brittan's widow blasts police watchdog for dropping probe into officer who pursued him over false VIP paedophile claims

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

Lord Brittan's widow blasts police watchdog for dropping probe into officer who pursued him over false VIP paedophile claims

The widow of Lord Brittan, whose husband was falsely accused of being part of a VIP paedophile ring in Westminster, said her trust in the Met and the police watchdog has been 'severely undermined'. An investigation into how former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse handled the claims has been dropped, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said last week. The probe was brought to an end by the watchdog after a 'large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed to the IOPC by the Metropolitan Police '. Mr Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary hearing for potentially breaching police professional standards of behaviour for honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. The allegations centred around comments made to the media in March 2016 concerning his beliefs about the honesty of two witnesses to Operation Midland - a Met investigation which he led into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse. They also involved remarks he is alleged to have subsequently made to former High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques, who had been commissioned to carry out an independent review of the handling of Operation Midland in August 2016. For nearly a decade, Operation Midland has been mired in allegations of criminality, misconduct and incompetence, yet not one officer involved in the fiasco has been held to account. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lady Diana Brittan, widow of the former home secretary, said she had hoped the investigation would bring a sense of 'closure'. She said: 'My husband was a high-profile individual, but at every level of society there are people who are falsely accused, and for them (also) it's the ruining of reputation, it's the anxiety that goes with it. 'I feel that it would have at least put a closure, to use that odd word, on the whole episode if somebody had been held to account, either for misconduct, or even for incompetence.' Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech, known as 'Nick' – real name – whose wild accusations of an Establishment paedophile ring were deemed 'credible and true' by the Met. The Metropolitan Police's 16-month investigation, led by Mr Roundhouse, into fake claims of a VIP paedophile ring saw raids on the homes of Lord Brittan, as well as D-Day veteran Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor. The £2.5 million inquiry closed in March 2016 without any arrests or charges and Beech was later jailed for 18 years for perverting the course of justice, fraud and child sexual offences. The force was heavily criticised for believing Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence, including naming witnesses who did not exist. The IOPC said there was 'no evidence' within the material provided from the Met that there was 'any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media' or which 'supports that he made those remarks during Sir Richard's review'. Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were 'ill-founded and incorrect'. Mr Proctor said he was 'appalled' by the 'disgraceful decision' not to proceed, adding he would be writing to Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to 'demand a meeting and an explanation'. Lady Brittan said she felt her husband's legacy had been permanently tarnished by the episode, telling the BBC: 'What I really feel very sorry about is the fact that my husband was a great public servant. 'When he died, his obituaries referred to all of this.' In response to Lady Brittan's comments, an IOPC spokesperson said: 'Our recent decision does not change our finding that - by failing to follow Sir Richard Henrique's recommendation to investigate the witnesses in his independent review of the Met's handling of Op Midland - the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed. 'During our investigation we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force.' A Met Police spokesperson said: 'We recognise the impact that this lengthy investigation and the prospect of a hearing will inevitably have had on former DAC Rodhouse. We are pleased the matter is now concluded. 'An assessment of the Met's email retention policy led to the assumption that emails sent and received before a certain date would no longer be on our systems. 'As soon as we became aware that some older material was still held, we informed the IOPC and arranged for it to be shared. Any impact this had on the investigation or proceedings was entirely unintentional.'

Lord Brittan's widow slams closure of police probe after fake abuse claims against husband
Lord Brittan's widow slams closure of police probe after fake abuse claims against husband

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

Lord Brittan's widow slams closure of police probe after fake abuse claims against husband

The widow of former home secretary Lord Brittan, who was falsely accused of being part of a paedophile ring in Westminster, said her trust in the Met and the police watchdog has been "severely undermined" after an investigation into an officer over his handling of the claims was dropped. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said last week it had stopped the investigation into former Met deputy assistant commissioner Steve Rodhouse after a "large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed to the IOPC by the Metropolitan Police". Mr Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary hearing for potentially breaching police professional standards of behaviour for honesty and integrity and discreditable conduct. The allegations centred around comments made to the media in March 2016 concerning his beliefs about the honesty of two witnesses to Operation Midland - a Met investigation into allegations of non-recent sexual abuse. They also involved remarks he is alleged to have subsequently made to former High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques, who had been commissioned to carry out an independent review of the handling of Operation Midland in August 2016. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Lady Diana Brittan said she had hoped the investigation would bring a sense of "closure". She said: "My husband was a high-profile individual, but at every level of society there are people who are falsely accused, and for them (also) it's the ruining of reputation, it's the anxiety that goes with it. "I feel that it would have at least put a closure, to use that odd word, on the whole episode if somebody had been held to account, either for misconduct, or even for incompetence." Operation Midland was launched off the back of lurid and false allegations made by fantasist Carl Beech - later jailed for 18 years for what a judge called "cruel and callous" lies. The Metropolitan Police's 16-month investigation into fake claims of a VIP paedophile ring saw raids on the homes of Lord Brittan, as well as D-Day veteran Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor. The probe ended in 2016 without a single arrest after Beech made a series of baseless allegations, including of three murders. The force was heavily criticised for believing Beech too readily despite inconsistencies in his evidence, including naming witnesses who did not exist. The IOPC said there was "no evidence" within the material provided from the Met that there was "any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media" or which "supports that he made those remarks during Sir Richard's review". Mr Rodhouse said the allegations made against him were "ill-founded and incorrect". Mr Proctor said he was "appalled" by the "disgraceful decision" not to proceed, adding he would be writing to Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to "demand a meeting and an explanation". Lady Brittan said she felt her husband's legacy had been permanently tarnished by the episode, telling the BBC: "What I really feel very sorry about is the fact that my husband was a great public servant. "When he died, his obituaries referred to all of this." In response to Lady Brittan's comments, an IOPC spokesperson said: "Our recent decision does not change our finding that - by failing to follow Sir Richard Henrique 's recommendation to investigate the witnesses in his independent review of the Met's handling of Op Midland - the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed. "During our investigation we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store